{
  "schema_version": "hkb-evidence-chain-1.0",
  "version": "v0.5-candidate",
  "as_of": "2026-10-04",
  "title": "人类知识边界：既有40题的资料缺口与版本核查增量",
  "semantics": {
    "node_types": {
      "source": "有版本和检视范围的作品文本；不是独立证据数量。",
      "evidence": "来源中的可定位观测、结果或文本依据。",
      "claim": "带类型、前提、范围与限制的最小命题。",
      "question": "本项目明确标记的开放问题；不自动代表全领域议程。",
      "premise": "命题解释或行动所依赖的条件。",
      "limitation": "限制推断、适用范围或核验层级。"
    },
    "claim_classes": {
      "measured": "作者报告的观测估计或实施事实；会显式注明模型处理，并非本项目重新测量。",
      "derived": "作者统计/模型推断、算术推导或规范/制度文本归纳；看claim_class_detail区分。",
      "editorial": "本图谱提出的综合判断或评价路线。"
    },
    "edge_types": {
      "supports": "原文证据支持目标的限定表述；若目标为编辑判断，只表示所用依据，不是实验证明。",
      "qualifies": "约束适用范围或解释；不等于反驳。",
      "does_not_establish": "不足以确立目标问题的肯定答案；不等于证明其否定答案。",
      "depends_on": "源节点依赖目标前提、结果或版本；evidence→source表示出处依赖。"
    },
    "confidence_score": null,
    "edge_direction": "source → target"
  },
  "cases": [
    {
      "id": "P06",
      "card_id": "P06",
      "title": "P是否等于NP：形式定义与证明边界",
      "summary": "正式定义、归约和可行性分开；官方页面仍标为未解。",
      "epistemic_mode": "formal_open_proof",
      "question_id": "P06-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "P06-S1",
        "P06-S2",
        "P06-E1",
        "P06-P1",
        "P06-L1",
        "P06-C1",
        "P06-E2",
        "P06-P2",
        "P06-L2",
        "P06-C2",
        "P06-E3",
        "P06-P3",
        "P06-L3",
        "P06-C3",
        "P06-E4",
        "P06-P4",
        "P06-L4",
        "P06-C4",
        "P06-E5",
        "P06-P5",
        "P06-L5",
        "P06-C5",
        "P06-Q1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "P06-R01",
        "P06-R02",
        "P06-R03",
        "P06-R04",
        "P06-R05",
        "P06-R06",
        "P06-R07",
        "P06-R08",
        "P06-R09",
        "P06-R10",
        "P06-R11",
        "P06-R12",
        "P06-R13",
        "P06-R14",
        "P06-R15",
        "P06-R16",
        "P06-R17",
        "P06-R18",
        "P06-R19",
        "P06-R20",
        "P06-R21",
        "P06-R22",
        "P06-R23",
        "P06-R24",
        "P06-R25"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_original_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "selection_change": null,
      "not_yet_established": "P=NP或P≠NP的一般证明；实际可用算法速度。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "P06-E1",
        "P06-C1",
        "P06-L1",
        "P06-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "P06-R02",
        "P06-R04",
        "P06-R21"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P07",
      "card_id": "P07",
      "title": "黎曼猜想：全称命题、有限认证与比例下界",
      "summary": "数值认证和2026年比例下界各有明确量词，均未构成黎曼猜想全证。",
      "epistemic_mode": "formal_open_proof_with_computational_and_asymptotic_partial_results",
      "question_id": "P07-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "P07-S1",
        "P07-S2",
        "P07-S3",
        "P07-S4",
        "P07-E1",
        "P07-P1",
        "P07-L1",
        "P07-C1",
        "P07-E2",
        "P07-P2",
        "P07-L2",
        "P07-C2",
        "P07-E3",
        "P07-P3",
        "P07-L3",
        "P07-C3",
        "P07-E4",
        "P07-P4",
        "P07-L4",
        "P07-C4",
        "P07-E5",
        "P07-P5",
        "P07-L5",
        "P07-C5",
        "P07-Q1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "P07-R01",
        "P07-R02",
        "P07-R03",
        "P07-R04",
        "P07-R05",
        "P07-R06",
        "P07-R07",
        "P07-R08",
        "P07-R09",
        "P07-R10",
        "P07-R11",
        "P07-R12",
        "P07-R13",
        "P07-R14",
        "P07-R15",
        "P07-R16",
        "P07-R17",
        "P07-R18",
        "P07-R19",
        "P07-R20",
        "P07-R21",
        "P07-R22",
        "P07-R23",
        "P07-R24",
        "P07-R25",
        "P07-R26",
        "P07-R27",
        "P07-R28"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_original_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "selection_change": null,
      "not_yet_established": "全部非平凡零点在线上的一般证明；或严格认证的线外反例。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "P07-E1",
        "P07-C1",
        "P07-L1",
        "P07-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "P07-R02",
        "P07-R04",
        "P07-R24"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P08",
      "card_id": "P08",
      "title": "Navier–Stokes：有外力分支与验证状态",
      "summary": "2026稿把突破明确落在C/D有外力反例；零外力A/B不由此判定。",
      "epistemic_mode": "announced_formal_breakthrough_scoped_validation_pending",
      "question_id": "P08-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "P08-S1",
        "P08-S2",
        "P08-S3",
        "P08-S4",
        "P08-E1",
        "P08-P1",
        "P08-L1",
        "P08-C1",
        "P08-E2",
        "P08-P2",
        "P08-L2",
        "P08-C2",
        "P08-E3",
        "P08-P3",
        "P08-L3",
        "P08-C3",
        "P08-E4",
        "P08-P4",
        "P08-L4",
        "P08-C4",
        "P08-E5",
        "P08-P5",
        "P08-L5",
        "P08-C5",
        "P08-Q1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "P08-R01",
        "P08-R02",
        "P08-R03",
        "P08-R04",
        "P08-R05",
        "P08-R06",
        "P08-R07",
        "P08-R08",
        "P08-R09",
        "P08-R10",
        "P08-R11",
        "P08-R12",
        "P08-R13",
        "P08-R14",
        "P08-R15",
        "P08-R16",
        "P08-R17",
        "P08-R18",
        "P08-R19",
        "P08-R20",
        "P08-R21",
        "P08-R22",
        "P08-R23",
        "P08-R24",
        "P08-R25",
        "P08-R26",
        "P08-R27"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_original_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "selection_change": null,
      "not_yet_established": "本项目未确证整份证明与Lean实现无误，未确认正式授奖，也未判定零外力A/B。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "P08-E1",
        "P08-C1",
        "P08-L1",
        "P08-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "P08-R02",
        "P08-R04",
        "P08-R23"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P09",
      "card_id": "P09",
      "title": "新任务泛化：冻结协议、算力与评测器",
      "summary": "补入2026年ARC-AGI-3接近饱和结果；仍区分受限游戏效率与开放世界泛化。",
      "epistemic_mode": "benchmark_measurement_with_protocol_and_generalization_limits",
      "question_id": "P09-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "P09-S1",
        "P09-S2",
        "P09-S3",
        "P09-E1",
        "P09-P1",
        "P09-L1",
        "P09-C1",
        "P09-E2",
        "P09-P2",
        "P09-L2",
        "P09-C2",
        "P09-E3",
        "P09-P3",
        "P09-L3",
        "P09-C3",
        "P09-E4",
        "P09-P4",
        "P09-L4",
        "P09-C4",
        "P09-E5",
        "P09-P5",
        "P09-L5",
        "P09-C5",
        "P09-Q1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "P09-R01",
        "P09-R02",
        "P09-R03",
        "P09-R04",
        "P09-R05",
        "P09-R06",
        "P09-R07",
        "P09-R08",
        "P09-R09",
        "P09-R10",
        "P09-R11",
        "P09-R12",
        "P09-R13",
        "P09-R14",
        "P09-R15",
        "P09-R16",
        "P09-R17",
        "P09-R18",
        "P09-R19",
        "P09-R20",
        "P09-R21",
        "P09-R22",
        "P09-R23",
        "P09-R24",
        "P09-R25",
        "P09-R26"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_original_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "selection_change": null,
      "not_yet_established": "在任意未见任务、开放环境和可承受总成本下的普适高效泛化。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "P09-E1",
        "P09-C1",
        "P09-L1",
        "P09-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "P09-R02",
        "P09-R04",
        "P09-R22"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P10",
      "card_id": "P10",
      "title": "从评测通过到部署保证：威胁模型必须对齐",
      "summary": "两项2026原始评测提供失败证据，同时暴露无状态设定、过度防御及现实外推限制。",
      "epistemic_mode": "original_adversarial_benchmarks_with_threat_model_limits",
      "question_id": "P10-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "P10-S1",
        "P10-S2",
        "P10-E1",
        "P10-P1",
        "P10-L1",
        "P10-C1",
        "P10-E2",
        "P10-P2",
        "P10-L2",
        "P10-C2",
        "P10-E3",
        "P10-P3",
        "P10-L3",
        "P10-C3",
        "P10-E4",
        "P10-P4",
        "P10-L4",
        "P10-C4",
        "P10-E5",
        "P10-P5",
        "P10-L5",
        "P10-C5",
        "P10-Q1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "P10-R01",
        "P10-R02",
        "P10-R03",
        "P10-R04",
        "P10-R05",
        "P10-R06",
        "P10-R07",
        "P10-R08",
        "P10-R09",
        "P10-R10",
        "P10-R11",
        "P10-R12",
        "P10-R13",
        "P10-R14",
        "P10-R15",
        "P10-R16",
        "P10-R17",
        "P10-R18",
        "P10-R19",
        "P10-R20",
        "P10-R21",
        "P10-R22",
        "P10-R23",
        "P10-R24",
        "P10-R25",
        "P10-R26"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_original_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "selection_change": null,
      "not_yet_established": "长期开放世界行为的普适可维护安全保证。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "P10-E1",
        "P10-C1",
        "P10-L1",
        "P10-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "P10-R02",
        "P10-R04",
        "P10-R22"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P11",
      "card_id": "P11",
      "title": "容错量子系统：存储、漂移控制与连续运行",
      "summary": "存储纠错与漂移控制有实验支持；实时长算法中的探索噪声仍仅在限定模拟下检验。",
      "epistemic_mode": "experimental_components_plus_simulation_engineering_gap",
      "question_id": "P11-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "P11-S1",
        "P11-S2",
        "P11-S3",
        "P11-E1",
        "P11-P1",
        "P11-L1",
        "P11-C1",
        "P11-E2",
        "P11-P2",
        "P11-L2",
        "P11-C2",
        "P11-E3",
        "P11-P3",
        "P11-L3",
        "P11-C3",
        "P11-E4",
        "P11-P4",
        "P11-L4",
        "P11-C4",
        "P11-E5",
        "P11-P5",
        "P11-L5",
        "P11-C5",
        "P11-Q1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "P11-R01",
        "P11-R02",
        "P11-R03",
        "P11-R04",
        "P11-R05",
        "P11-R06",
        "P11-R07",
        "P11-R08",
        "P11-R09",
        "P11-R10",
        "P11-R11",
        "P11-R12",
        "P11-R13",
        "P11-R14",
        "P11-R15",
        "P11-R16",
        "P11-R17",
        "P11-R18",
        "P11-R19",
        "P11-R20",
        "P11-R21",
        "P11-R22",
        "P11-R23",
        "P11-R24",
        "P11-R25",
        "P11-R26"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_original_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "selection_change": null,
      "not_yet_established": "可持续、资源可承受且应用级有优势的通用容错端到端系统。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "P11-E1",
        "P11-C1",
        "P11-L1",
        "P11-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "P11-R02",
        "P11-R04",
        "P11-R22"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P01",
      "card_id": "P01",
      "title": "暗物质身份：引力证据、阴性搜索与新候选",
      "summary": "保留轻暗物质阴性结果，新增2026高能反冲候选；不同能窗与统计问题不能混写。",
      "epistemic_mode": "astrophysical_inference_and_direct_detection_candidates",
      "question_id": "P01-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "P01-S1",
        "P01-S2",
        "P01-S3",
        "P01-E1",
        "P01-P1",
        "P01-L1",
        "P01-C1",
        "P01-E2",
        "P01-P2",
        "P01-L2",
        "P01-C2",
        "P01-E3",
        "P01-P3",
        "P01-L3",
        "P01-C3",
        "P01-E4",
        "P01-P4",
        "P01-L4",
        "P01-C4",
        "P01-E5",
        "P01-P5",
        "P01-L5",
        "P01-C5",
        "P01-E6",
        "P01-P6",
        "P01-L6",
        "P01-C6",
        "P01-Q1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "P01-R01",
        "P01-R02",
        "P01-R03",
        "P01-R04",
        "P01-R05",
        "P01-R06",
        "P01-R07",
        "P01-R08",
        "P01-R09",
        "P01-R10",
        "P01-R11",
        "P01-R12",
        "P01-R13",
        "P01-R14",
        "P01-R15",
        "P01-R16",
        "P01-R17",
        "P01-R18",
        "P01-R19",
        "P01-R20",
        "P01-R21",
        "P01-R22",
        "P01-R23",
        "P01-R24",
        "P01-R25",
        "P01-R26",
        "P01-R27",
        "P01-R28",
        "P01-R29",
        "P01-R30",
        "P01-R31",
        "P01-R32"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_original_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "selection_change": null,
      "not_yet_established": "具体暗物质粒子／机制身份；单一高能候选的暗物质归因。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "P01-E1",
        "P01-C1",
        "P01-L1",
        "P01-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "P01-R02",
        "P01-R04",
        "P01-R27"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P02",
      "card_id": "P02",
      "title": "DESI暗能量：测量不等于模型确证",
      "summary": "1%级AP约束与2.7/3.2σ条件性偏好并存；新增高红移点更接近ΛCDM。",
      "epistemic_mode": "empirical_model_dependent",
      "question_id": "P02-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "P02-S1",
        "P02-E1",
        "P02-E2",
        "P02-E3",
        "P02-E4",
        "P02-E5",
        "P02-P1",
        "P02-P2",
        "P02-L1",
        "P02-L2",
        "P02-L3",
        "P02-C1",
        "P02-C2",
        "P02-C3",
        "P02-C4",
        "P02-C5",
        "P02-Q1",
        "P02-E6",
        "P02-L4",
        "P02-V05-S1",
        "P02-V05-E1",
        "P02-V05-L1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "P02-R01",
        "P02-R02",
        "P02-R03",
        "P02-R04",
        "P02-R05",
        "P02-R06",
        "P02-R07",
        "P02-R08",
        "P02-R09",
        "P02-R10",
        "P02-R11",
        "P02-R12",
        "P02-R13",
        "P02-R14",
        "P02-R15",
        "P02-R16",
        "P02-R17",
        "P02-R18",
        "P02-R19",
        "P02-R20",
        "P02-R21",
        "P02-R22",
        "P02-R23",
        "P02-R24",
        "P02-R25",
        "P02-R26",
        "P02-R27",
        "P02-R28",
        "P02-R29",
        "P02-R30",
        "P02-R31",
        "P02-R32",
        "P02-R33",
        "P02-R34",
        "P02-R35",
        "P02-R36",
        "P02-R37",
        "P02-R38",
        "P02-R39",
        "P02-R40",
        "P02-R41",
        "P02-V05-R01",
        "P02-V05-R02",
        "P02-V05-R03"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "display_node_order": [
        "P02-S1",
        "P02-E1",
        "P02-E2",
        "P02-E3",
        "P02-E4",
        "P02-E5",
        "P02-P1",
        "P02-P2",
        "P02-L1",
        "P02-L2",
        "P02-L3",
        "P02-C1",
        "P02-C2",
        "P02-C3",
        "P02-C4",
        "P02-C5",
        "P02-Q1",
        "P02-E6",
        "P02-L4"
      ],
      "selection_change": null,
      "not_yet_established": "未独立复算似然、未证明暗能量演化；3.2σ/3.1σ报告语境待核。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "P02-E2",
        "P02-C3",
        "P02-L4",
        "P02-Q1",
        "P02-C5"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "P02-R16",
        "P02-R27",
        "P02-R38",
        "P02-R39",
        "P02-R41"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04",
      "v05_coverage_note": "本轮仅完成research_results中声明的指定资料核对；部分主文、校正文件与独立复现仍缺。",
      "v05_update": {
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "patch_sha256": "575d02a2ef1e985dd418a1c76920cfb0a56942cce4621f098e2439751e507d37",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03",
      "card_id": "P03",
      "title": "哈勃张力：相关距离网络与模型依赖",
      "summary": "公开网络给73.50±0.81；删法测试和明确协方差取舍支持稳健性，但不唯一定位原因。",
      "epistemic_mode": "correlated_measurement_network_and_model_tension",
      "question_id": "P03-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "P03-S1",
        "P03-E1",
        "P03-P1",
        "P03-L1",
        "P03-C1",
        "P03-E2",
        "P03-P2",
        "P03-L2",
        "P03-C2",
        "P03-E3",
        "P03-P3",
        "P03-L3",
        "P03-C3",
        "P03-E4",
        "P03-P4",
        "P03-L4",
        "P03-C4",
        "P03-E5",
        "P03-P5",
        "P03-L5",
        "P03-C5",
        "P03-Q1",
        "P03-V05-S1",
        "P03-V05-E1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "P03-R01",
        "P03-R02",
        "P03-R03",
        "P03-R04",
        "P03-R05",
        "P03-R06",
        "P03-R07",
        "P03-R08",
        "P03-R09",
        "P03-R10",
        "P03-R11",
        "P03-R12",
        "P03-R13",
        "P03-R14",
        "P03-R15",
        "P03-R16",
        "P03-R17",
        "P03-R18",
        "P03-R19",
        "P03-R20",
        "P03-R21",
        "P03-R22",
        "P03-R23",
        "P03-R24",
        "P03-R25",
        "P03-V05-R01",
        "P03-V05-R02",
        "P03-V05-R03",
        "P03-V05-R04",
        "P03-V05-R05",
        "P03-V05-R06"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_original_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "selection_change": null,
      "not_yet_established": "张力的唯一物理或系统误差原因。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "P03-E1",
        "P03-C1",
        "P03-L1",
        "P03-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "P03-R02",
        "P03-R04",
        "P03-R21"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope",
      "v05_coverage_note": "本轮仅完成research_results中声明的指定资料核对；部分主文、校正文件与独立复现仍缺。",
      "v05_update": {
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "patch_sha256": "355a2a5de83f649d3ebf0023511cfc6d9572e0dc67c9549ff9dba82ff04246f1",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04",
      "card_id": "P04",
      "title": "量子引力见证：必须审计介导机制",
      "summary": "原始判据的局域性与唯一介导前提明确；2025–2026理论反例及批评须归属作者，不能当实验结论。",
      "epistemic_mode": "conditional_theoretical_witness_with_live_model_dispute",
      "question_id": "P04-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "P04-S1",
        "P04-S2",
        "P04-S3",
        "P04-S4",
        "P04-E1",
        "P04-P1",
        "P04-L1",
        "P04-C1",
        "P04-E2",
        "P04-P2",
        "P04-L2",
        "P04-C2",
        "P04-E3",
        "P04-P3",
        "P04-L3",
        "P04-C3",
        "P04-E4",
        "P04-P4",
        "P04-L4",
        "P04-C4",
        "P04-E5",
        "P04-P5",
        "P04-L5",
        "P04-C5",
        "P04-Q1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "P04-R01",
        "P04-R02",
        "P04-R03",
        "P04-R04",
        "P04-R05",
        "P04-R06",
        "P04-R07",
        "P04-R08",
        "P04-R09",
        "P04-R10",
        "P04-R11",
        "P04-R12",
        "P04-R13",
        "P04-R14",
        "P04-R15",
        "P04-R16",
        "P04-R17",
        "P04-R18",
        "P04-R19",
        "P04-R20",
        "P04-R21",
        "P04-R22",
        "P04-R23",
        "P04-R24",
        "P04-R25",
        "P04-R26",
        "P04-R27",
        "P04-R28"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_original_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "selection_change": null,
      "not_yet_established": "已完成量子引力实验确认；理论争议最终裁决；特定完整量子引力理论获唯一支持。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "P04-E1",
        "P04-C1",
        "P04-L1",
        "P04-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "P04-R02",
        "P04-R04",
        "P04-R24"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P05",
      "card_id": "P05",
      "title": "中微子质量：端点上限与新的联合排序指示",
      "summary": "保留有效质量上限，并加入2026-09 JUNO联合分析的2.1σ正常排序偏好。",
      "epistemic_mode": "parameter_bounds_and_conditional_ordering_evidence",
      "question_id": "P05-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "P05-S1",
        "P05-S2",
        "P05-E1",
        "P05-P1",
        "P05-L1",
        "P05-C1",
        "P05-E2",
        "P05-P2",
        "P05-L2",
        "P05-C2",
        "P05-E3",
        "P05-P3",
        "P05-L3",
        "P05-C3",
        "P05-E4",
        "P05-P4",
        "P05-L4",
        "P05-C4",
        "P05-E5",
        "P05-P5",
        "P05-L5",
        "P05-C5",
        "P05-Q1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "P05-R01",
        "P05-R02",
        "P05-R03",
        "P05-R04",
        "P05-R05",
        "P05-R06",
        "P05-R07",
        "P05-R08",
        "P05-R09",
        "P05-R10",
        "P05-R11",
        "P05-R12",
        "P05-R13",
        "P05-R14",
        "P05-R15",
        "P05-R16",
        "P05-R17",
        "P05-R18",
        "P05-R19",
        "P05-R20",
        "P05-R21",
        "P05-R22",
        "P05-R23",
        "P05-R24",
        "P05-R25",
        "P05-R26"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_original_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "selection_change": null,
      "not_yet_established": "非零绝对质量尺度的精确测量；高显著性质量排序定论；狄拉克或马约拉纳属性。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "P05-E1",
        "P05-C1",
        "P05-L1",
        "P05-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "P05-R02",
        "P05-R04",
        "P05-R22"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P12",
      "card_id": "P12",
      "title": "镍酸盐超导：转变定义与机制证据",
      "summary": "已补读合法高压接受稿正文和方法，区分96 K起始转变与另一成分的零阻/抗磁证据；保留最终VoR及arXiv版本边界，提交独立审计。",
      "epistemic_mode": "materials_measurements_with_pairing_mechanism_frontier",
      "question_id": "P12-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "P12-S1",
        "P12-S2",
        "P12-S3",
        "P12-S4",
        "P12-E1",
        "P12-P1",
        "P12-L1",
        "P12-C1",
        "P12-E2",
        "P12-P2",
        "P12-L2",
        "P12-C2",
        "P12-E3",
        "P12-P3",
        "P12-L3",
        "P12-C3",
        "P12-E4",
        "P12-P4",
        "P12-L4",
        "P12-C4",
        "P12-E5",
        "P12-P5",
        "P12-L5",
        "P12-C5",
        "P12-E6",
        "P12-P6",
        "P12-L6",
        "P12-C6",
        "P12-Q1",
        "P12-V05-S1",
        "P12-V05-E1",
        "P12-V05-L1",
        "P12-V05-S2",
        "P12-V05-S3",
        "P12-V05-E2",
        "P12-V05-E3",
        "P12-V05-P2",
        "P12-V05-L2",
        "P12-V05-C2",
        "P12-V05-P3",
        "P12-V05-L3",
        "P12-V05-C3",
        "P12-V05-L4",
        "P12-V05-S4",
        "P12-V05-E4",
        "P12-V05-L5"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "P12-R01",
        "P12-R02",
        "P12-R03",
        "P12-R04",
        "P12-R05",
        "P12-R06",
        "P12-R07",
        "P12-R08",
        "P12-R09",
        "P12-R10",
        "P12-R11",
        "P12-R12",
        "P12-R13",
        "P12-R14",
        "P12-R15",
        "P12-R16",
        "P12-R17",
        "P12-R18",
        "P12-R19",
        "P12-R20",
        "P12-R21",
        "P12-R22",
        "P12-R23",
        "P12-R24",
        "P12-R25",
        "P12-R26",
        "P12-R27",
        "P12-R28",
        "P12-R29",
        "P12-R30",
        "P12-R31",
        "P12-R32",
        "P12-R33",
        "P12-R34",
        "P12-V05-R01",
        "P12-V05-R02",
        "P12-V05-R03",
        "P12-V05-R04",
        "P12-V05-R05",
        "P12-V05-R06",
        "P12-V05-R07",
        "P12-V05-R08",
        "P12-V05-R09",
        "P12-V05-R10",
        "P12-V05-R11",
        "P12-V05-R12",
        "P12-V05-R13",
        "P12-V05-R14",
        "P12-V05-R15",
        "P12-V05-R16",
        "P12-V05-R17"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_original_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "selection_change": null,
      "not_yet_established": "配对相位符号、主导相互作用与跨材料预测模型；接受稿与最终VoR主文的逐字版本核对。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "P12-E1",
        "P12-C1",
        "P12-L1",
        "P12-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "P12-R02",
        "P12-R04",
        "P12-R27"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope",
      "v05_coverage_note": "本轮仅完成research_results中声明的指定资料核对；部分主文、校正文件与独立复现仍缺。",
      "v05_update": {
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "patch_sha256": "4e9a9b1686e7d9f087045d7a8d97c07ae05c629ec1a50bc04b7a203d42d40e43",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13",
      "card_id": "P13",
      "title": "CO₂电催化从选择性到工业闭环",
      "summary": "高温选择性有原始结果；1 cm²、48小时与阴极能效均须保留边界。",
      "epistemic_mode": "lab_to_system_gap",
      "question_id": "P13-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "P13-S1",
        "P13-E1",
        "P13-P1",
        "P13-L1",
        "P13-C1",
        "P13-E2",
        "P13-P2",
        "P13-L2",
        "P13-C2",
        "P13-E3",
        "P13-P3",
        "P13-L3",
        "P13-C3",
        "P13-E4",
        "P13-P4",
        "P13-L4",
        "P13-C4",
        "P13-E5",
        "P13-P5",
        "P13-L5",
        "P13-C5",
        "P13-Q1",
        "P13-V05-S1",
        "P13-V05-E1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "P13-R01",
        "P13-R02",
        "P13-R03",
        "P13-R04",
        "P13-R05",
        "P13-R06",
        "P13-R07",
        "P13-R08",
        "P13-R09",
        "P13-R10",
        "P13-R11",
        "P13-R12",
        "P13-R13",
        "P13-R14",
        "P13-R15",
        "P13-R16",
        "P13-R17",
        "P13-R18",
        "P13-R19",
        "P13-R20",
        "P13-R21",
        "P13-R22",
        "P13-R23",
        "P13-R24",
        "P13-R25",
        "P13-V05-R01",
        "P13-V05-R02",
        "P13-V05-R03"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending; independent_audit_pending",
      "scope": "Hu等2026单项原始实验；保持P13工业闭环问题，未系统评审全领域。",
      "not_yet_established": "大面积真实进料与波动电力下的长期全流程净能量、碳利用和经济性。",
      "selection_change": "用可读原始流动池实验深化原卡两篇观点文章，不把观点文章当独立实验。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "P13-E1",
        "P13-C1",
        "P13-L1",
        "P13-Q1",
        "P13-C5"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "P13-R02",
        "P13-R04",
        "P13-R05"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope",
      "v05_update": {
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "patch_sha256": "6d246207d058996dcd3c0185e23e269325fda63679f62eb3497d7c0492c648dd",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14",
      "card_id": "P14",
      "title": "实用固态金属电池的界面稳定性",
      "summary": "新增软包原文证据；核对出60°C、20 MPa接触恢复和比能质量边界。",
      "epistemic_mode": "materials_progress_system_gap",
      "question_id": "P14-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "P14-S1",
        "P14-S2",
        "P14-E1",
        "P14-P1",
        "P14-L1",
        "P14-C1",
        "P14-E2",
        "P14-P2",
        "P14-L2",
        "P14-C2",
        "P14-E3",
        "P14-P3",
        "P14-L3",
        "P14-C3",
        "P14-E4",
        "P14-P4",
        "P14-L4",
        "P14-C4",
        "P14-E5",
        "P14-P5",
        "P14-L5",
        "P14-C5",
        "P14-Q1",
        "P14-V05-S1",
        "P14-V05-E1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "P14-R01",
        "P14-R02",
        "P14-R03",
        "P14-R04",
        "P14-R05",
        "P14-R06",
        "P14-R07",
        "P14-R08",
        "P14-R09",
        "P14-R10",
        "P14-R11",
        "P14-R12",
        "P14-R13",
        "P14-R14",
        "P14-R15",
        "P14-R16",
        "P14-R17",
        "P14-R18",
        "P14-R19",
        "P14-R20",
        "P14-R21",
        "P14-R22",
        "P14-R23",
        "P14-R24",
        "P14-R25",
        "P14-R26",
        "P14-V05-R01",
        "P14-V05-R02",
        "P14-V05-R03"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending; independent_audit_pending",
      "scope": "固态锂金属电池工程问题；Sang2026软包全文与Mi2026更正，不替代全部原卡文献审查。",
      "not_yet_established": "在现实工况下同时达到量产电芯寿命、安全、快充和完整系统比能。",
      "selection_change": "保持原问题；补充2026可读原始软包研究，不重新声称已核验Mi原研究全部性能。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "P14-E1",
        "P14-C1",
        "P14-L1",
        "P14-Q1",
        "P14-C5"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "P14-R02",
        "P14-R04",
        "P14-R05"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope",
      "v05_coverage_note": "本轮仅完成research_results中声明的指定资料核对；部分主文、校正文件与独立复现仍缺。",
      "v05_update": {
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "patch_sha256": "ce6bbb2edc5ae692b9c5c87a5faf94ccbe720dcd795a32ba72db086bbdf6b6df",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15",
      "card_id": "P15",
      "title": "聚变点火到可用净电力",
      "summary": "靶增益有机构原始报告；DOE正式路线图仍列氚自持、包层集成和材料资格缺口。",
      "epistemic_mode": "physics_milestone_engineering_frontier",
      "question_id": "P15-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "P15-S1",
        "P15-S2",
        "P15-E1",
        "P15-P1",
        "P15-L1",
        "P15-C1",
        "P15-E2",
        "P15-P2",
        "P15-L2",
        "P15-C2",
        "P15-E3",
        "P15-P3",
        "P15-L3",
        "P15-C3",
        "P15-E4",
        "P15-P4",
        "P15-L4",
        "P15-C4",
        "P15-E5",
        "P15-P5",
        "P15-L5",
        "P15-C5",
        "P15-Q1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "P15-R01",
        "P15-R02",
        "P15-R03",
        "P15-R04",
        "P15-R05",
        "P15-R06",
        "P15-R07",
        "P15-R08",
        "P15-R09",
        "P15-R10",
        "P15-R11",
        "P15-R12",
        "P15-R13",
        "P15-R14",
        "P15-R15",
        "P15-R16",
        "P15-R17",
        "P15-R18",
        "P15-R19",
        "P15-R20",
        "P15-R21",
        "P15-R22",
        "P15-R23",
        "P15-R24",
        "P15-R25",
        "P15-R26"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending; independent_audit_pending",
      "scope": "NIF特定实验与美国DOE2026正式路线图；不混同比较惯性与磁约束性能。",
      "not_yet_established": "持续、可维护、经济可用的整站净电力。",
      "selection_change": null,
      "display_node_ids": [
        "P15-E1",
        "P15-C1",
        "P15-L1",
        "P15-Q1",
        "P15-C5"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "P15-R02",
        "P15-R04",
        "P15-R05"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P16",
      "card_id": "P16",
      "title": "叠层光伏的真实寿命与规模制造",
      "summary": "区分短时认证、封装叠层1135小时T90与单结3200小时T80，并保留原卡更正记录。",
      "epistemic_mode": "performance_known_durability_gap",
      "question_id": "P16-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "P16-S1",
        "P16-S2",
        "P16-E1",
        "P16-P1",
        "P16-L1",
        "P16-C1",
        "P16-E2",
        "P16-P2",
        "P16-L2",
        "P16-C2",
        "P16-E3",
        "P16-P3",
        "P16-L3",
        "P16-C3",
        "P16-E4",
        "P16-P4",
        "P16-L4",
        "P16-C4",
        "P16-E5",
        "P16-P5",
        "P16-L5",
        "P16-C5",
        "P16-Q1",
        "P16-V05-S1",
        "P16-V05-E1",
        "P16-V05-L1",
        "P16-V05-S2",
        "P16-V05-E2",
        "P16-V05-P2",
        "P16-V05-L2",
        "P16-V05-C2"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "P16-R01",
        "P16-R02",
        "P16-R03",
        "P16-R04",
        "P16-R05",
        "P16-R06",
        "P16-R07",
        "P16-R08",
        "P16-R09",
        "P16-R10",
        "P16-R11",
        "P16-R12",
        "P16-R13",
        "P16-R14",
        "P16-R15",
        "P16-R16",
        "P16-R17",
        "P16-R18",
        "P16-R19",
        "P16-R20",
        "P16-R21",
        "P16-R22",
        "P16-R23",
        "P16-R24",
        "P16-R25",
        "P16-R26",
        "P16-V05-R01",
        "P16-V05-R02",
        "P16-V05-R03",
        "P16-V05-R04",
        "P16-V05-R05",
        "P16-V05-R06",
        "P16-V05-R07",
        "P16-V05-R08"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending; independent_audit_pending",
      "scope": "Han2025可读原始叠层研究加Wang2026公开更新记录；原P16问题不变。",
      "not_yet_established": "大面积批产、多年真实气候、安全回收与成本的同时实现。",
      "selection_change": "以另一可读原始叠层实验补强同一问题，不替换问题；原两篇受限证据保持缺口。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "P16-E1",
        "P16-C1",
        "P16-L1",
        "P16-Q1",
        "P16-C5"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "P16-R02",
        "P16-R04",
        "P16-R05"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope",
      "v05_coverage_note": "本轮仅完成research_results中声明的指定资料核对；部分主文、校正文件与独立复现仍缺。",
      "v05_update": {
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "patch_sha256": "efe72aacae03bed9785b901df45f0efea89b94684d415ca3598ff80adb8fc4e4",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01",
      "card_id": "LS01",
      "title": "从 DNA 到细胞与疾病",
      "summary": "正式版是25/26分子变异基准；Systema需保留其不同任务与简单基线。",
      "epistemic_mode": "经验研究：局部可预测，跨尺度机制未闭合",
      "question_id": "LS01-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "LS01-S1",
        "LS01-S2",
        "LS01-E1",
        "LS01-P1",
        "LS01-L1",
        "LS01-C1",
        "LS01-E2",
        "LS01-P2",
        "LS01-L2",
        "LS01-C2",
        "LS01-E3",
        "LS01-P3",
        "LS01-L3",
        "LS01-C3",
        "LS01-E4",
        "LS01-P4",
        "LS01-L4",
        "LS01-C4",
        "LS01-E5",
        "LS01-P5",
        "LS01-L5",
        "LS01-C5",
        "LS01-Q1",
        "LS01-V05-S1",
        "LS01-V05-L1",
        "LS01-V05-S2",
        "LS01-V05-E1",
        "LS01-V05-P1",
        "LS01-V05-L2",
        "LS01-V05-C1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "LS01-R01",
        "LS01-R02",
        "LS01-R03",
        "LS01-R04",
        "LS01-R05",
        "LS01-R06",
        "LS01-R07",
        "LS01-R08",
        "LS01-R09",
        "LS01-R10",
        "LS01-R11",
        "LS01-R12",
        "LS01-R13",
        "LS01-R14",
        "LS01-R15",
        "LS01-R16",
        "LS01-R17",
        "LS01-R18",
        "LS01-R19",
        "LS01-R20",
        "LS01-R21",
        "LS01-R22",
        "LS01-R23",
        "LS01-R24",
        "LS01-R25",
        "LS01-R26",
        "LS01-V05-R1",
        "LS01-V05-R2",
        "LS01-V05-R3",
        "LS01-V05-R4",
        "LS01-V05-R5",
        "LS01-V05-R6",
        "LS01-V05-R7"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending; independent_audit_pending",
      "scope": "AlphaGenome正式论文和Systema原始基准；无个体医疗建议。",
      "not_yet_established": "由新变异、多基因与环境可靠预测人体疾病结局。",
      "selection_change": null,
      "display_node_ids": [
        "LS01-E1",
        "LS01-C1",
        "LS01-L1",
        "LS01-Q1",
        "LS01-C5"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "LS01-R02",
        "LS01-R04",
        "LS01-R05"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope",
      "v05_update": {
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "patch_sha256": "9392e02fef317dacf44f1c0c41e2c5c0b5223ebf0aae9e200719da1ba5b9535e",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02",
      "card_id": "LS02",
      "title": "安全延缓人的衰老",
      "summary": "随机试验显示一种甲基化指标小幅改变；两年、事后与替代终点的限制明确。",
      "epistemic_mode": "经验研究：可干预线索，长期结局未定",
      "question_id": "LS02-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "LS02-S1",
        "LS02-E1",
        "LS02-P1",
        "LS02-L1",
        "LS02-C1",
        "LS02-E2",
        "LS02-P2",
        "LS02-L2",
        "LS02-C2",
        "LS02-E3",
        "LS02-P3",
        "LS02-L3",
        "LS02-C3",
        "LS02-E4",
        "LS02-P4",
        "LS02-L4",
        "LS02-C4",
        "LS02-E5",
        "LS02-P5",
        "LS02-L5",
        "LS02-C5",
        "LS02-Q1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "LS02-R01",
        "LS02-R02",
        "LS02-R03",
        "LS02-R04",
        "LS02-R05",
        "LS02-R06",
        "LS02-R07",
        "LS02-R08",
        "LS02-R09",
        "LS02-R10",
        "LS02-R11",
        "LS02-R12",
        "LS02-R13",
        "LS02-R14",
        "LS02-R15",
        "LS02-R16",
        "LS02-R17",
        "LS02-R18",
        "LS02-R19",
        "LS02-R20",
        "LS02-R21",
        "LS02-R22",
        "LS02-R23",
        "LS02-R24",
        "LS02-R25"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending; independent_audit_pending",
      "scope": "CALERIE Phase2的DNAm事后分析；不综述所有抗衰老干预。",
      "not_yet_established": "安全延长人的长期健康寿命和临床净收益。",
      "selection_change": null,
      "display_node_ids": [
        "LS02-E1",
        "LS02-C1",
        "LS02-L1",
        "LS02-Q1",
        "LS02-C5"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "LS02-R02",
        "LS02-R04",
        "LS02-R05"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03",
      "card_id": "LS03",
      "title": "癌症的持久控制",
      "summary": "十年RCT支持限定癌种长期获益；胰腺癌疫苗仍是小样本关联与模型性免疫寿命。",
      "epistemic_mode": "经验研究：局部强疗效与新机制前沿并存",
      "question_id": "LS03-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "LS03-S1",
        "LS03-S2",
        "LS03-E1",
        "LS03-P1",
        "LS03-L1",
        "LS03-C1",
        "LS03-E2",
        "LS03-P2",
        "LS03-L2",
        "LS03-C2",
        "LS03-E3",
        "LS03-P3",
        "LS03-L3",
        "LS03-C3",
        "LS03-E4",
        "LS03-P4",
        "LS03-L4",
        "LS03-C4",
        "LS03-E5",
        "LS03-P5",
        "LS03-L5",
        "LS03-C5",
        "LS03-E6",
        "LS03-P6",
        "LS03-L6",
        "LS03-C6",
        "LS03-Q1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "LS03-R01",
        "LS03-R02",
        "LS03-R03",
        "LS03-R04",
        "LS03-R05",
        "LS03-R06",
        "LS03-R07",
        "LS03-R08",
        "LS03-R09",
        "LS03-R10",
        "LS03-R11",
        "LS03-R12",
        "LS03-R13",
        "LS03-R14",
        "LS03-R15",
        "LS03-R16",
        "LS03-R17",
        "LS03-R18",
        "LS03-R19",
        "LS03-R20",
        "LS03-R21",
        "LS03-R22",
        "LS03-R23",
        "LS03-R24",
        "LS03-R25",
        "LS03-R26",
        "LS03-R27",
        "LS03-R28",
        "LS03-R29",
        "LS03-R30",
        "LS03-R31"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending; independent_audit_pending",
      "scope": "CheckMate067三期十年随访与切除后PDAC一期疫苗随访；两者不是相互复制。",
      "not_yet_established": "跨癌种可预测阻断耐药、转移和复发。",
      "selection_change": null,
      "display_node_ids": [
        "LS03-E1",
        "LS03-C1",
        "LS03-L1",
        "LS03-Q1",
        "LS03-C6"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "LS03-R02",
        "LS03-R04",
        "LS03-R05"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04",
      "card_id": "LS04",
      "title": "神经退行的根本干预",
      "summary": "随机76周量表效应与ARIA风险并列；三年延长观察没有内部未治疗对照。",
      "epistemic_mode": "经验研究：部分病程修饰，完整机制与持久保护未定",
      "question_id": "LS04-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "LS04-S1",
        "LS04-S2",
        "LS04-E1",
        "LS04-P1",
        "LS04-L1",
        "LS04-C1",
        "LS04-E2",
        "LS04-P2",
        "LS04-L2",
        "LS04-C2",
        "LS04-E3",
        "LS04-P3",
        "LS04-L3",
        "LS04-C3",
        "LS04-E4",
        "LS04-P4",
        "LS04-L4",
        "LS04-C4",
        "LS04-E5",
        "LS04-P5",
        "LS04-L5",
        "LS04-C5",
        "LS04-Q1",
        "LS04-V05-S1",
        "LS04-V05-L1",
        "LS04-V05-S2",
        "LS04-V05-E1",
        "LS04-V05-P1",
        "LS04-V05-L2",
        "LS04-V05-C1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "LS04-R01",
        "LS04-R02",
        "LS04-R03",
        "LS04-R04",
        "LS04-R05",
        "LS04-R06",
        "LS04-R07",
        "LS04-R08",
        "LS04-R09",
        "LS04-R10",
        "LS04-R11",
        "LS04-R12",
        "LS04-R13",
        "LS04-R14",
        "LS04-R15",
        "LS04-R16",
        "LS04-R17",
        "LS04-R18",
        "LS04-R19",
        "LS04-R20",
        "LS04-R21",
        "LS04-R22",
        "LS04-R23",
        "LS04-R24",
        "LS04-R25",
        "LS04-R26",
        "LS04-V05-R1",
        "LS04-V05-R2",
        "LS04-V05-R3",
        "LS04-V05-R4",
        "LS04-V05-R5",
        "LS04-V05-R6",
        "LS04-V05-R7",
        "LS04-V05-R8",
        "LS04-V05-R9"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending; independent_audit_pending",
      "scope": "Donanemab原RCT与同队列延长观察，保持LS04问题；非全部神经退行病综述。",
      "not_yet_established": "症状前识别并长期保护认知功能，兼顾风险与实际生活获益。",
      "selection_change": "先完整深化可读donanemab两版本；不以另一药物研究假作lecanemab复核。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "LS04-E1",
        "LS04-C1",
        "LS04-L1",
        "LS04-Q1",
        "LS04-C5"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "LS04-R02",
        "LS04-R04",
        "LS04-R05"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope",
      "v05_update": {
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "patch_sha256": "4418c9a97286ccc3af910dda6515a1ee436dd9cd13fd661a8876e9d7d07f7596",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05",
      "card_id": "LS05",
      "title": "从化学到可进化生命",
      "summary": "核对出0.24%/0.17%产率、一次链分离辅助和全长正确率；RNA选择实验仍有轮间蛋白质酶步骤。",
      "epistemic_mode": "经验研究与历史重建交界",
      "question_id": "LS05-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "LS05-S1",
        "LS05-S2",
        "LS05-E1",
        "LS05-P1",
        "LS05-L1",
        "LS05-C1",
        "LS05-E2",
        "LS05-P2",
        "LS05-L2",
        "LS05-C2",
        "LS05-E3",
        "LS05-P3",
        "LS05-L3",
        "LS05-C3",
        "LS05-E4",
        "LS05-P4",
        "LS05-L4",
        "LS05-C4",
        "LS05-E5",
        "LS05-P5",
        "LS05-L5",
        "LS05-C5",
        "LS05-Q1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "LS05-R01",
        "LS05-R02",
        "LS05-R03",
        "LS05-R04",
        "LS05-R05",
        "LS05-R06",
        "LS05-R07",
        "LS05-R08",
        "LS05-R09",
        "LS05-R10",
        "LS05-R11",
        "LS05-R12",
        "LS05-R13",
        "LS05-R14",
        "LS05-R15",
        "LS05-R16",
        "LS05-R17",
        "LS05-R18",
        "LS05-R19",
        "LS05-R20",
        "LS05-R21",
        "LS05-R22",
        "LS05-R23",
        "LS05-R24",
        "LS05-R25",
        "LS05-R26"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending; independent_audit_pending",
      "scope": "QT45原始实验与2024锤头核酶选择实验；合法EuropePMCXML读取。",
      "not_yet_established": "持续自主复制、遗传进化、能量与区室整合，以及实际生命起源历史。",
      "selection_change": null,
      "display_node_ids": [
        "LS05-E1",
        "LS05-C1",
        "LS05-L1",
        "LS05-Q1",
        "LS05-C5"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "LS05-R02",
        "LS05-R04",
        "LS05-R05"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01",
      "card_id": "NS01",
      "title": "意识的可检验理论",
      "summary": "三模态检验具体预测；类别、维持、同步结果各有边界，不能给整个理论一个胜负标签。",
      "epistemic_mode": "经验机制问题与概念问题并列",
      "question_id": "NS01-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "NS01-S1",
        "NS01-E1",
        "NS01-P1",
        "NS01-L1",
        "NS01-C1",
        "NS01-E2",
        "NS01-P2",
        "NS01-L2",
        "NS01-C2",
        "NS01-E3",
        "NS01-P3",
        "NS01-L3",
        "NS01-C3",
        "NS01-E4",
        "NS01-P4",
        "NS01-L4",
        "NS01-C4",
        "NS01-E5",
        "NS01-P5",
        "NS01-L5",
        "NS01-C5",
        "NS01-Q1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "NS01-R01",
        "NS01-R02",
        "NS01-R03",
        "NS01-R04",
        "NS01-R05",
        "NS01-R06",
        "NS01-R07",
        "NS01-R08",
        "NS01-R09",
        "NS01-R10",
        "NS01-R11",
        "NS01-R12",
        "NS01-R13",
        "NS01-R14",
        "NS01-R15",
        "NS01-R16",
        "NS01-R17",
        "NS01-R18",
        "NS01-R19",
        "NS01-R20",
        "NS01-R21",
        "NS01-R22",
        "NS01-R23",
        "NS01-R24",
        "NS01-R25"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending; independent_audit_pending",
      "scope": "COGITATE EXP1阈上视觉内容研究；只核查正文、方法和图注相关段落，SI未逐项复核。",
      "not_yet_established": "哪些神经机制必要或充分，以及可泛化、可区分的意识理论。",
      "selection_change": null,
      "display_node_ids": [
        "NS01-E1",
        "NS01-C1",
        "NS01-L1",
        "NS01-Q1",
        "NS01-C5"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "NS01-R02",
        "NS01-R04",
        "NS01-R05"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02",
      "card_id": "NS02",
      "title": "连接图怎样产生认知",
      "summary": "全脑标注、局部功能配准与训练模拟分别建链；图规模不是完整认知模型。",
      "epistemic_mode": "经验研究：结构地图快速扩张，功能机制仍需干预",
      "question_id": "NS02-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "NS02-S1",
        "NS02-S2",
        "NS02-S3",
        "NS02-E1",
        "NS02-P1",
        "NS02-L1",
        "NS02-C1",
        "NS02-E2",
        "NS02-P2",
        "NS02-L2",
        "NS02-C2",
        "NS02-E3",
        "NS02-P3",
        "NS02-L3",
        "NS02-C3",
        "NS02-E4",
        "NS02-P4",
        "NS02-L4",
        "NS02-C4",
        "NS02-E5",
        "NS02-P5",
        "NS02-L5",
        "NS02-C5",
        "NS02-Q1",
        "NS02-V05-S1",
        "NS02-V05-E1",
        "NS02-V05-P1",
        "NS02-V05-L1",
        "NS02-V05-C1",
        "NS02-V05-S2",
        "NS02-V05-L2"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "NS02-R01",
        "NS02-R02",
        "NS02-R03",
        "NS02-R04",
        "NS02-R05",
        "NS02-R06",
        "NS02-R07",
        "NS02-R08",
        "NS02-R09",
        "NS02-R10",
        "NS02-R11",
        "NS02-R12",
        "NS02-R13",
        "NS02-R14",
        "NS02-R15",
        "NS02-R16",
        "NS02-R17",
        "NS02-R18",
        "NS02-R19",
        "NS02-R20",
        "NS02-R21",
        "NS02-R22",
        "NS02-R23",
        "NS02-R24",
        "NS02-R25",
        "NS02-R26",
        "NS02-R27",
        "NS02-V05-R1",
        "NS02-V05-R2",
        "NS02-V05-R3",
        "NS02-V05-R4",
        "NS02-V05-R5",
        "NS02-V05-R6",
        "NS02-V05-R7"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending; independent_audit_pending",
      "scope": "2024雌蝇脑标注、2025单鼠视觉皮层与2026 FlyGM v3；保持原NS02问题。",
      "not_yet_established": "连接结构在何种细节/时间尺度上足以预测学习、计算和行为。",
      "selection_change": null,
      "display_node_ids": [
        "NS02-E1",
        "NS02-C1",
        "NS02-L1",
        "NS02-Q1",
        "NS02-C5"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "NS02-R02",
        "NS02-R04",
        "NS02-R05"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope",
      "v05_update": {
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "patch_sha256": "61f378193ada9b78b2e982749765b796ccad6fbe7896eca9170d3cf8f73f8cab",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01",
      "card_id": "ES01",
      "title": "气候反馈：平衡敏感度与历史云变化",
      "summary": "正式评估与两项2026原始研究并列，区分历史有效反馈、强迫响应和区域预测。",
      "epistemic_mode": "official_assessment_plus_original_conditional_feedback_estimates",
      "question_id": "ES01-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "ES01-S1",
        "ES01-S2",
        "ES01-S3",
        "ES01-E1",
        "ES01-P1",
        "ES01-L1",
        "ES01-C1",
        "ES01-E2",
        "ES01-P2",
        "ES01-L2",
        "ES01-C2",
        "ES01-E3",
        "ES01-P3",
        "ES01-L3",
        "ES01-C3",
        "ES01-E4",
        "ES01-P4",
        "ES01-L4",
        "ES01-C4",
        "ES01-E5",
        "ES01-P5",
        "ES01-L5",
        "ES01-C5",
        "ES01-E6",
        "ES01-P6",
        "ES01-L6",
        "ES01-C6",
        "ES01-Q1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "ES01-R01",
        "ES01-R02",
        "ES01-R03",
        "ES01-R04",
        "ES01-R05",
        "ES01-R06",
        "ES01-R07",
        "ES01-R08",
        "ES01-R09",
        "ES01-R10",
        "ES01-R11",
        "ES01-R12",
        "ES01-R13",
        "ES01-R14",
        "ES01-R15",
        "ES01-R16",
        "ES01-R17",
        "ES01-R18",
        "ES01-R19",
        "ES01-R20",
        "ES01-R21",
        "ES01-R22",
        "ES01-R23",
        "ES01-R24",
        "ES01-R25",
        "ES01-R26",
        "ES01-R27",
        "ES01-R28",
        "ES01-R29",
        "ES01-R30",
        "ES01-R31",
        "ES01-R32"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_original_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "selection_change": null,
      "not_yet_established": "所有区域未来降水/极端事件的确定预测；海温格局持久性及全部云反馈幅度。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "ES01-E1",
        "ES01-C1",
        "ES01-L1",
        "ES01-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "ES01-R02",
        "ES01-R04",
        "ES01-R27"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02",
      "card_id": "ES02",
      "title": "AMOC 与气候临界点",
      "summary": "纳入2026速率依赖原文；34/7模型区别和2025更正后的6 Sv定义均明确。",
      "epistemic_mode": "经验研究：高后果风险，门槛仍有争议",
      "question_id": "ES02-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "ES02-S1",
        "ES02-S2",
        "ES02-S3",
        "ES02-S4",
        "ES02-E1",
        "ES02-P1",
        "ES02-L1",
        "ES02-C1",
        "ES02-E2",
        "ES02-P2",
        "ES02-L2",
        "ES02-C2",
        "ES02-E3",
        "ES02-P3",
        "ES02-L3",
        "ES02-C3",
        "ES02-E4",
        "ES02-P4",
        "ES02-L4",
        "ES02-C4",
        "ES02-E5",
        "ES02-P5",
        "ES02-L5",
        "ES02-C5",
        "ES02-E6",
        "ES02-P6",
        "ES02-L6",
        "ES02-C6",
        "ES02-Q1",
        "ES02-V05-S1",
        "ES02-V05-E1",
        "ES02-V05-P1",
        "ES02-V05-L1",
        "ES02-V05-C1",
        "ES02-V05-E2",
        "ES02-V05-L2"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "ES02-R01",
        "ES02-R02",
        "ES02-R03",
        "ES02-R04",
        "ES02-R05",
        "ES02-R06",
        "ES02-R07",
        "ES02-R08",
        "ES02-R09",
        "ES02-R10",
        "ES02-R11",
        "ES02-R12",
        "ES02-R13",
        "ES02-R14",
        "ES02-R15",
        "ES02-R16",
        "ES02-R17",
        "ES02-R18",
        "ES02-R19",
        "ES02-R20",
        "ES02-R21",
        "ES02-R22",
        "ES02-R23",
        "ES02-R24",
        "ES02-R25",
        "ES02-R26",
        "ES02-R27",
        "ES02-R28",
        "ES02-R29",
        "ES02-R30",
        "ES02-R31",
        "ES02-R32",
        "ES02-R33",
        "ES02-R34",
        "ES02-V05-R01",
        "ES02-V05-R02",
        "ES02-V05-R03",
        "ES02-V05-R04",
        "ES02-V05-R05",
        "ES02-V05-R06",
        "ES02-V05-R07",
        "ES02-V05-R08",
        "ES02-V05-R09"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending; independent_audit_pending",
      "scope": "2024 CESM、2025 CMIP6极端试验及2026 CESM速率研究；原ES02问题不变。",
      "not_yet_established": "经观测约束、稳健跨模型的真实AMOC失稳条件与可用预警。",
      "selection_change": null,
      "display_node_ids": [
        "ES02-E1",
        "ES02-C1",
        "ES02-L1",
        "ES02-Q1",
        "ES02-C6"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "ES02-R02",
        "ES02-R04",
        "ES02-R05"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope",
      "v05_coverage_note": "本轮仅完成research_results中声明的指定资料核对；部分主文、校正文件与独立复现仍缺。",
      "v05_update": {
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "patch_sha256": "f023b00ddcda246bf19e545cfc76f92bdb1fc586ddd4d24a79d60ee873ab2713",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03",
      "card_id": "ES03",
      "title": "生态系统的恢复与耦合",
      "summary": "恢复要同时检验功能、福利和分配；IPBES章节把多目标潜力与长期、跨部门结果缺口并列。",
      "epistemic_mode": "primary_assessment_with_empirical_and_normative_layers",
      "question_id": "ES03-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "ES03-S1",
        "ES03-E1",
        "ES03-P1",
        "ES03-L1",
        "ES03-C1",
        "ES03-E2",
        "ES03-P2",
        "ES03-L2",
        "ES03-C2",
        "ES03-E3",
        "ES03-P3",
        "ES03-L3",
        "ES03-C3",
        "ES03-E4",
        "ES03-P4",
        "ES03-L4",
        "ES03-C4",
        "ES03-E5",
        "ES03-P5",
        "ES03-L5",
        "ES03-C5",
        "ES03-Q1",
        "ES03-V05-S1",
        "ES03-V05-E1",
        "ES03-V05-P1",
        "ES03-V05-L1",
        "ES03-V05-C1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "ES03-R01",
        "ES03-R02",
        "ES03-R03",
        "ES03-R04",
        "ES03-R05",
        "ES03-R06",
        "ES03-R07",
        "ES03-R08",
        "ES03-R09",
        "ES03-R10",
        "ES03-R11",
        "ES03-R12",
        "ES03-R13",
        "ES03-R14",
        "ES03-R15",
        "ES03-R16",
        "ES03-R17",
        "ES03-R18",
        "ES03-R19",
        "ES03-R20",
        "ES03-R21",
        "ES03-R22",
        "ES03-R23",
        "ES03-R24",
        "ES03-R25",
        "ES03-V05-R01",
        "ES03-V05-R02",
        "ES03-V05-R03",
        "ES03-V05-R04",
        "ES03-V05-R05"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "not_yet_established": "哪些地区的恢复组合真正改善生态功能和居民福利，代价如何分配，是否把损失转移到区域外？",
      "scope": "深化恢复与耦合子问题；读到原始评估完整指定节，未逐页读整卷，未把机构评估当独立实验。",
      "selection_change": "旧快照保留；本轮按已读正文缩窄并深化证据链。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "ES03-S1",
        "ES03-E1",
        "ES03-C1",
        "ES03-P1",
        "ES03-L1",
        "ES03-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "ES03-R01",
        "ES03-R02",
        "ES03-R03",
        "ES03-R04",
        "ES03-R21"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope",
      "v05_material_gap_status": [
        {
          "gap_id": "ES03-G01",
          "status": "resolved_for_scoped_target"
        }
      ],
      "v05_update": {
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "patch_sha256": "c2fb446dedacbf1373e000da0e85e5a7f80499e9747e168380be364f5d4cabb3",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01",
      "card_id": "AG01",
      "title": "多样化农业如何兼顾生态与吃得起",
      "summary": "2024农场汇合资料明确是观察关联；2026长期综合提供新线索，但不证明消费者膳食可负担性。",
      "epistemic_mode": "observational_farm_synthesis_and_meta_regression",
      "question_id": "AG01-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "AG01-S1",
        "AG01-S2",
        "AG01-E1",
        "AG01-P1",
        "AG01-L1",
        "AG01-C1",
        "AG01-E2",
        "AG01-P2",
        "AG01-L2",
        "AG01-C2",
        "AG01-E3",
        "AG01-P3",
        "AG01-L3",
        "AG01-C3",
        "AG01-E4",
        "AG01-P4",
        "AG01-L4",
        "AG01-C4",
        "AG01-E5",
        "AG01-P5",
        "AG01-L5",
        "AG01-C5",
        "AG01-Q1",
        "AG01-V05-S1",
        "AG01-V05-E1",
        "AG01-V05-P1",
        "AG01-V05-L1",
        "AG01-V05-C1",
        "AG01-V05-S2",
        "AG01-V05-E2",
        "AG01-V05-P2",
        "AG01-V05-L2",
        "AG01-V05-C2"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "AG01-R01",
        "AG01-R02",
        "AG01-R03",
        "AG01-R04",
        "AG01-R05",
        "AG01-R06",
        "AG01-R07",
        "AG01-R08",
        "AG01-R09",
        "AG01-R10",
        "AG01-R11",
        "AG01-R12",
        "AG01-R13",
        "AG01-R14",
        "AG01-R15",
        "AG01-R16",
        "AG01-R17",
        "AG01-R18",
        "AG01-R19",
        "AG01-R20",
        "AG01-R21",
        "AG01-R22",
        "AG01-R23",
        "AG01-R24",
        "AG01-R25",
        "AG01-V05-R1",
        "AG01-V05-R2",
        "AG01-V05-R3",
        "AG01-V05-R4",
        "AG01-V05-R5",
        "AG01-V05-R6",
        "AG01-V05-R7",
        "AG01-V05-R8",
        "AG01-V05-R9",
        "AG01-V05-R10",
        "AG01-V05-R11",
        "AG01-V05-R12"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "not_yet_established": "哪些组合在具体土壤、气候、劳动力与市场条件下带来持续收益，收益是否传给消费者，成本由谁承担？",
      "scope": "本卡只核查下列来源的指定正文；不宣称领域全面检索。",
      "selection_change": "旧快照保留；本轮按已读正文缩窄并深化证据链。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "AG01-S1",
        "AG01-E1",
        "AG01-C1",
        "AG01-P1",
        "AG01-L1",
        "AG01-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "AG01-R01",
        "AG01-R02",
        "AG01-R03",
        "AG01-R04",
        "AG01-R21"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope",
      "v05_update": {
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "patch_sha256": "75b233d4f11e9bb06dea061acf95815be1dc31133b7dc360fbe4176c01cbde35",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01",
      "card_id": "VH01",
      "title": "跨人群与动物的防控怎样落地",
      "summary": "联合咬伤监测改善报告和调查；2026政策模型把观察资料推进为条件预测，尚未证实全国死亡减少。",
      "epistemic_mode": "before_after_surveillance_and_conditional_policy_model",
      "question_id": "VH01-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "VH01-S1",
        "VH01-S2",
        "VH01-E1",
        "VH01-P1",
        "VH01-L1",
        "VH01-C1",
        "VH01-E2",
        "VH01-P2",
        "VH01-L2",
        "VH01-C2",
        "VH01-E3",
        "VH01-P3",
        "VH01-L3",
        "VH01-C3",
        "VH01-E4",
        "VH01-P4",
        "VH01-L4",
        "VH01-C4",
        "VH01-E5",
        "VH01-P5",
        "VH01-L5",
        "VH01-C5",
        "VH01-Q1",
        "VH01-V05-S1",
        "VH01-V05-E1",
        "VH01-V05-P1",
        "VH01-V05-L1",
        "VH01-V05-C1",
        "VH01-V05-S2",
        "VH01-V05-E2",
        "VH01-V05-P2",
        "VH01-V05-L2",
        "VH01-V05-C2"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "VH01-R01",
        "VH01-R02",
        "VH01-R03",
        "VH01-R04",
        "VH01-R05",
        "VH01-R06",
        "VH01-R07",
        "VH01-R08",
        "VH01-R09",
        "VH01-R10",
        "VH01-R11",
        "VH01-R12",
        "VH01-R13",
        "VH01-R14",
        "VH01-R15",
        "VH01-R16",
        "VH01-R17",
        "VH01-R18",
        "VH01-R19",
        "VH01-R20",
        "VH01-R21",
        "VH01-R22",
        "VH01-R23",
        "VH01-R24",
        "VH01-R25",
        "VH01-V05-R1",
        "VH01-V05-R2",
        "VH01-V05-R3",
        "VH01-V05-R4",
        "VH01-V05-R5",
        "VH01-V05-R6",
        "VH01-V05-R7",
        "VH01-V05-R8",
        "VH01-V05-R9",
        "VH01-V05-R10",
        "VH01-V05-R11",
        "VH01-V05-R12",
        "VH01-V05-R13",
        "VH01-V05-R14"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "not_yet_established": "如何把更敏感的监测转为持续降低人和动物疾病负担的服务，同时验证全部成本、可及性、动物福利和跨部门分配？",
      "scope": "本卡只核查下列来源的指定正文；不宣称领域全面检索。",
      "selection_change": "旧快照保留；本轮按已读正文缩窄并深化证据链。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "VH01-S1",
        "VH01-E1",
        "VH01-C1",
        "VH01-P1",
        "VH01-L1",
        "VH01-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "VH01-R01",
        "VH01-R02",
        "VH01-R03",
        "VH01-R04",
        "VH01-R21"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope",
      "v05_update": {
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "patch_sha256": "5c7799a9af04122f0373896b2bc4ac35959776e7077893c4db628af302440277",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01",
      "card_id": "SS01",
      "title": "制度与长期繁荣",
      "summary": "原研究、最终数据批评与作者答复均有一手全文；争议同时涉及史料编码、弱工具推断和模型选择。",
      "epistemic_mode": "historical_instrumental_variables_with_contested_measurement",
      "question_id": "SS01-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "SS01-S1",
        "SS01-S2",
        "SS01-S3",
        "SS01-E1",
        "SS01-P1",
        "SS01-L1",
        "SS01-C1",
        "SS01-E2",
        "SS01-P2",
        "SS01-L2",
        "SS01-C2",
        "SS01-E3",
        "SS01-P3",
        "SS01-L3",
        "SS01-C3",
        "SS01-E4",
        "SS01-P4",
        "SS01-L4",
        "SS01-C4",
        "SS01-E5",
        "SS01-P5",
        "SS01-L5",
        "SS01-C5",
        "SS01-Q1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "SS01-R01",
        "SS01-R02",
        "SS01-R03",
        "SS01-R04",
        "SS01-R05",
        "SS01-R06",
        "SS01-R07",
        "SS01-R08",
        "SS01-R09",
        "SS01-R10",
        "SS01-R11",
        "SS01-R12",
        "SS01-R13",
        "SS01-R14",
        "SS01-R15",
        "SS01-R16",
        "SS01-R17",
        "SS01-R18",
        "SS01-R19",
        "SS01-R20",
        "SS01-R21",
        "SS01-R22",
        "SS01-R23",
        "SS01-R24",
        "SS01-R25"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "not_yet_established": "哪些具体制度及历史过程造成发展差异，怎样用可核查史料与独立识别区分制度、疾病和其他持久路径？",
      "scope": "本卡只核查下列来源的指定正文；不宣称领域全面检索。",
      "selection_change": "旧快照保留；本轮按已读正文缩窄并深化证据链。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "SS01-S1",
        "SS01-E1",
        "SS01-C1",
        "SS01-P1",
        "SS01-L1",
        "SS01-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "SS01-R01",
        "SS01-R02",
        "SS01-R03",
        "SS01-R04",
        "SS01-R21"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02",
      "card_id": "SS02",
      "title": "有效政策能否跨情境推广",
      "summary": "乡村随机现金转移识别了当地外溢；乘数有较大不确定度，且外部融资和地方经济是关键边界。",
      "epistemic_mode": "cluster_randomized_spatial_spillovers_with_transportability_limits",
      "question_id": "SS02-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "SS02-S1",
        "SS02-E1",
        "SS02-P1",
        "SS02-L1",
        "SS02-C1",
        "SS02-E2",
        "SS02-P2",
        "SS02-L2",
        "SS02-C2",
        "SS02-E3",
        "SS02-P3",
        "SS02-L3",
        "SS02-C3",
        "SS02-E4",
        "SS02-P4",
        "SS02-L4",
        "SS02-C4",
        "SS02-Q1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "SS02-R01",
        "SS02-R02",
        "SS02-R03",
        "SS02-R04",
        "SS02-R05",
        "SS02-R06",
        "SS02-R07",
        "SS02-R08",
        "SS02-R09",
        "SS02-R10",
        "SS02-R11",
        "SS02-R12",
        "SS02-R13",
        "SS02-R14",
        "SS02-R15",
        "SS02-R16",
        "SS02-R17",
        "SS02-R18",
        "SS02-R19",
        "SS02-R20"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "not_yet_established": "同类现金转移在别国、全国、长期和不同融资约束下会有什么净收益、价格和分配后果？",
      "scope": "本卡只核查下列来源的指定正文；不宣称领域全面检索。",
      "selection_change": "旧快照保留；本轮按已读正文缩窄并深化证据链。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "SS02-S1",
        "SS02-E1",
        "SS02-C1",
        "SS02-P1",
        "SS02-L1",
        "SS02-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "SS02-R01",
        "SS02-R02",
        "SS02-R03",
        "SS02-R04",
        "SS02-R17"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03",
      "card_id": "SS03",
      "title": "个人与社会的可预测性",
      "summary": "盲测给特定任务的预测上限线索；2021代码更正和2024访谈研究使误差来源与一般化边界更清楚。",
      "epistemic_mode": "holdout_prediction_and_mixed_methods_not_fundamental_impossibility",
      "question_id": "SS03-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "SS03-S1",
        "SS03-S2",
        "SS03-S3",
        "SS03-E1",
        "SS03-P1",
        "SS03-L1",
        "SS03-C1",
        "SS03-E2",
        "SS03-P2",
        "SS03-L2",
        "SS03-C2",
        "SS03-E3",
        "SS03-P3",
        "SS03-L3",
        "SS03-C3",
        "SS03-E4",
        "SS03-P4",
        "SS03-L4",
        "SS03-C4",
        "SS03-E5",
        "SS03-P5",
        "SS03-L5",
        "SS03-C5",
        "SS03-Q1",
        "SS03-V05-S1",
        "SS03-V05-E1",
        "SS03-V05-P1",
        "SS03-V05-L1",
        "SS03-V05-C1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "SS03-R01",
        "SS03-R02",
        "SS03-R03",
        "SS03-R04",
        "SS03-R05",
        "SS03-R06",
        "SS03-R07",
        "SS03-R08",
        "SS03-R09",
        "SS03-R10",
        "SS03-R11",
        "SS03-R12",
        "SS03-R13",
        "SS03-R14",
        "SS03-R15",
        "SS03-R16",
        "SS03-R17",
        "SS03-R18",
        "SS03-R19",
        "SS03-R20",
        "SS03-R21",
        "SS03-R22",
        "SS03-R23",
        "SS03-R24",
        "SS03-R25",
        "SS03-V05-R01",
        "SS03-V05-R02",
        "SS03-V05-R03",
        "SS03-V05-R04",
        "SS03-V05-R05",
        "SS03-V05-R06",
        "SS03-V05-R07"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "not_yet_established": "哪些误差可由新测量、样本和短窗口改善，哪些在明确任务下持续存在，怎样测量而不把预测变成人的命运判断？",
      "scope": "本卡只核查下列来源的指定正文；不宣称领域全面检索。",
      "selection_change": "旧快照保留；本轮按已读正文缩窄并深化证据链。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "SS03-S1",
        "SS03-E1",
        "SS03-C1",
        "SS03-P1",
        "SS03-L1",
        "SS03-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "SS03-R01",
        "SS03-R02",
        "SS03-R03",
        "SS03-R04",
        "SS03-R21"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope",
      "v05_material_gap_status": [
        {
          "gap_id": "SS03-G01",
          "status": "partial",
          "needed_source": {
            "description": "Corrected2021 SI associated with10.1073/pnas.1915006117, whose S15/S18 read three times/95%, with corrected FigsS6–S9,S17–S18.",
            "legitimate_next_route": "Publisher supplied updated public SI or clearly dated/correction-marker-matched author/repository deposit; no payment/account/outreach performed."
          }
        }
      ],
      "v05_update": {
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "patch_sha256": "ee3924086a308d6debfd9271d3c60c51f1c1e45ab543d39428a03e9af824dc65",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04",
      "card_id": "SS04",
      "title": "发现何时可重复、可推广",
      "summary": "约55%是按主张计数的特定判据；按论文加权约49%，其他判据和效应量比较给不同信息。",
      "epistemic_mode": "metascientific_replication_with_measurement_and_selection_limits",
      "question_id": "SS04-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "SS04-S1",
        "SS04-E1",
        "SS04-P1",
        "SS04-L1",
        "SS04-C1",
        "SS04-E2",
        "SS04-P2",
        "SS04-L2",
        "SS04-C2",
        "SS04-E3",
        "SS04-P3",
        "SS04-L3",
        "SS04-C3",
        "SS04-E4",
        "SS04-P4",
        "SS04-L4",
        "SS04-C4",
        "SS04-E5",
        "SS04-P5",
        "SS04-L5",
        "SS04-C5",
        "SS04-Q1",
        "SS04-V05-S1",
        "SS04-V05-S2",
        "SS04-V05-E1",
        "SS04-V05-P1",
        "SS04-V05-L1",
        "SS04-V05-C1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "SS04-R01",
        "SS04-R02",
        "SS04-R03",
        "SS04-R04",
        "SS04-R05",
        "SS04-R06",
        "SS04-R07",
        "SS04-R08",
        "SS04-R09",
        "SS04-R10",
        "SS04-R11",
        "SS04-R12",
        "SS04-R13",
        "SS04-R14",
        "SS04-R15",
        "SS04-R16",
        "SS04-R17",
        "SS04-R18",
        "SS04-R19",
        "SS04-R20",
        "SS04-R21",
        "SS04-R22",
        "SS04-R23",
        "SS04-R24",
        "SS04-R25",
        "SS04-V05-R01",
        "SS04-V05-R02",
        "SS04-V05-R03",
        "SS04-V05-R04",
        "SS04-V05-R05",
        "SS04-V05-R06",
        "SS04-V05-R07"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "not_yet_established": "如何区分不可靠发现、较小真实效应和情境调节，并建立适合研究目的的重复及推广标准？",
      "scope": "本卡只核查下列来源的指定正文；不宣称领域全面检索。",
      "selection_change": "旧快照保留；本轮按已读正文缩窄并深化证据链。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "SS04-S1",
        "SS04-E1",
        "SS04-C1",
        "SS04-P1",
        "SS04-L1",
        "SS04-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "SS04-R01",
        "SS04-R02",
        "SS04-R03",
        "SS04-R04",
        "SS04-R21"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope",
      "v05_material_gap_status": [
        {
          "gap_id": "SS04-G01",
          "status": "resolved_for_scoped_target"
        }
      ],
      "v05_update": {
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "patch_sha256": "07d664acdf01adedc59860307ce9426b8d21ab0ae4a7ba5c684e1d41e386a7ed",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01",
      "card_id": "ED01",
      "title": "AI辅助与独立学习：短期因果结果",
      "summary": "练习表现提高，Base组随后无辅助考试下降；Tutor组未显示显著无辅助提升。",
      "not_yet_established": "长期保持、远迁移、普适AI导师利弊与Tutor等效/无害均未确立；正式SI未读。",
      "epistemic_mode": "causal_experiment_with_external_validity_limits",
      "question_id": "ED01-Q01",
      "node_ids": [
        "ED01-S01",
        "ED01-S02",
        "ED01-S03",
        "ED01-V01",
        "ED01-P01",
        "ED01-L01",
        "ED01-C01",
        "ED01-V02",
        "ED01-P02",
        "ED01-L02",
        "ED01-C02",
        "ED01-V03",
        "ED01-P03",
        "ED01-L03",
        "ED01-C03",
        "ED01-V04",
        "ED01-P04",
        "ED01-L04",
        "ED01-C04",
        "ED01-V05",
        "ED01-P05",
        "ED01-L05",
        "ED01-C05",
        "ED01-V06",
        "ED01-P06",
        "ED01-L06",
        "ED01-C06",
        "ED01-Q01",
        "ED01-V05-S1",
        "ED01-V05-E1",
        "ED01-V05-P1",
        "ED01-V05-L1",
        "ED01-V05-C1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "ED01-R01",
        "ED01-R02",
        "ED01-R03",
        "ED01-R04",
        "ED01-R05",
        "ED01-R06",
        "ED01-R07",
        "ED01-R08",
        "ED01-R09",
        "ED01-R10",
        "ED01-R11",
        "ED01-R12",
        "ED01-R13",
        "ED01-R14",
        "ED01-R15",
        "ED01-R16",
        "ED01-R17",
        "ED01-R18",
        "ED01-R19",
        "ED01-R20",
        "ED01-R21",
        "ED01-R22",
        "ED01-R23",
        "ED01-R24",
        "ED01-R25",
        "ED01-R26",
        "ED01-R27",
        "ED01-R28",
        "ED01-R29",
        "ED01-R30",
        "ED01-R31",
        "ED01-R32",
        "ED01-R33",
        "ED01-R34",
        "ED01-V05-R01",
        "ED01-V05-R02",
        "ED01-V05-R03",
        "ED01-V05-R04",
        "ED01-V05-R05",
        "ED01-V05-R06"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "selection_change": null,
      "display_node_ids": [
        "ED01-V02",
        "ED01-C02",
        "ED01-V04",
        "ED01-C04",
        "ED01-L04",
        "ED01-Q01"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "ED01-R06",
        "ED01-R14",
        "ED01-R16",
        "ED01-R29",
        "ED01-R30"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04",
      "v05_material_gap_status": [
        {
          "gap_id": "ED01-G01",
          "status": "resolved_for_scoped_target"
        }
      ],
      "v05_update": {
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "patch_sha256": "9905b1798d6f809aace9a99a69ed60642626817f1587dd75dc83d108fe9e8ebd",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01",
      "card_id": "LW01",
      "title": "法律如何被解释与正当化",
      "summary": "判决、解释理由和规范立场须分开；2026法哲学原文进一步区分规则归属、内容与理由。",
      "epistemic_mode": "formal_legal_record_and_original_conceptual_argument",
      "question_id": "LW01-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "LW01-S1",
        "LW01-S2",
        "LW01-E1",
        "LW01-P1",
        "LW01-L1",
        "LW01-C1",
        "LW01-E2",
        "LW01-P2",
        "LW01-L2",
        "LW01-C2",
        "LW01-E3",
        "LW01-P3",
        "LW01-L3",
        "LW01-C3",
        "LW01-E4",
        "LW01-P4",
        "LW01-L4",
        "LW01-C4",
        "LW01-E5",
        "LW01-P5",
        "LW01-L5",
        "LW01-C5",
        "LW01-Q1",
        "LW01-V05-S1",
        "LW01-V05-E1",
        "LW01-V05-P1",
        "LW01-V05-L1",
        "LW01-V05-C1",
        "LW01-V05-S2",
        "LW01-V05-E2",
        "LW01-V05-P2",
        "LW01-V05-L2",
        "LW01-V05-C2"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "LW01-R01",
        "LW01-R02",
        "LW01-R03",
        "LW01-R04",
        "LW01-R05",
        "LW01-R06",
        "LW01-R07",
        "LW01-R08",
        "LW01-R09",
        "LW01-R10",
        "LW01-R11",
        "LW01-R12",
        "LW01-R13",
        "LW01-R14",
        "LW01-R15",
        "LW01-R16",
        "LW01-R17",
        "LW01-R18",
        "LW01-R19",
        "LW01-R20",
        "LW01-R21",
        "LW01-R22",
        "LW01-R23",
        "LW01-R24",
        "LW01-R25",
        "LW01-V05-R01",
        "LW01-V05-R02",
        "LW01-V05-R03",
        "LW01-V05-R04",
        "LW01-V05-R05",
        "LW01-V05-R06",
        "LW01-V05-R07",
        "LW01-V05-R08",
        "LW01-V05-R09",
        "LW01-V05-R10",
        "LW01-V05-R11",
        "LW01-V05-R12"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "not_yet_established": "怎样分别论证法律的制度成立、具体内容、裁判效果及正当性，并检验文本、先例和价值理由在其中的作用？",
      "scope": "本卡只核查下列来源的指定正文；不宣称领域全面检索。",
      "selection_change": "旧快照保留；本轮按已读正文缩窄并深化证据链。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "LW01-S1",
        "LW01-E1",
        "LW01-C1",
        "LW01-P1",
        "LW01-L1",
        "LW01-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "LW01-R01",
        "LW01-R02",
        "LW01-R03",
        "LW01-R04",
        "LW01-R21"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope",
      "v05_material_gap_status": [
        {
          "gap_id": "LW01-G01",
          "status": "resolved_for_scoped_target"
        },
        {
          "gap_id": "LW01-G02",
          "status": "resolved_for_scoped_target"
        }
      ],
      "v05_update": {
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "patch_sha256": "5600205e1848d4b2f6368c77f41951852931c1636ec9932bea0896ccee65bc3d",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01",
      "card_id": "IK01",
      "title": "原住民族数据治理：提案不等于效果",
      "summary": "CARE与五阶段框架提供规范和制度设计；VCSF段落是建议，尚未在此建立运行或效果证据。",
      "not_yet_established": "没有社群授权的本地评价、治理实况核查或效果验证；不重核Two-Eyed Seeing部分。",
      "epistemic_mode": "normative_institutional_framework_not_empirical_effect",
      "question_id": "IK01-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "IK01-S1",
        "IK01-S2",
        "IK01-V11",
        "IK01-P1",
        "IK01-L1",
        "IK01-C1",
        "IK01-V21",
        "IK01-P2",
        "IK01-L2",
        "IK01-C2",
        "IK01-V31",
        "IK01-P3",
        "IK01-L3",
        "IK01-C3",
        "IK01-V41",
        "IK01-P4",
        "IK01-L4",
        "IK01-C4",
        "IK01-V51",
        "IK01-V52",
        "IK01-P5",
        "IK01-L5",
        "IK01-C5",
        "IK01-V61",
        "IK01-V62",
        "IK01-P6",
        "IK01-L6",
        "IK01-C6",
        "IK01-Q1",
        "IK01-V05-S1",
        "IK01-V05-E1",
        "IK01-V05-P1",
        "IK01-V05-L1",
        "IK01-V05-C1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "IK01-R01",
        "IK01-R02",
        "IK01-R03",
        "IK01-R04",
        "IK01-R05",
        "IK01-R06",
        "IK01-R07",
        "IK01-R08",
        "IK01-R09",
        "IK01-R10",
        "IK01-R11",
        "IK01-R12",
        "IK01-R13",
        "IK01-R14",
        "IK01-R15",
        "IK01-R16",
        "IK01-R17",
        "IK01-R18",
        "IK01-R19",
        "IK01-R20",
        "IK01-R21",
        "IK01-R22",
        "IK01-R23",
        "IK01-R24",
        "IK01-R25",
        "IK01-R26",
        "IK01-R27",
        "IK01-R28",
        "IK01-R29",
        "IK01-R30",
        "IK01-R31",
        "IK01-R32",
        "IK01-R33",
        "IK01-R34",
        "IK01-R35",
        "IK01-V05-R01",
        "IK01-V05-R02",
        "IK01-V05-R03",
        "IK01-V05-R04",
        "IK01-V05-R05"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; community_authorized_and_expert_review_pending",
      "selection_change": null,
      "scope": "只追踪 CARE 与澳大利亚五阶段数据治理框架；不重新核验原卡的 Two-Eyed Seeing／Mi’kmaw 共同学习部分。",
      "classification_correction": "原卡 normative=false 不能概括本组件：其中含权利主张、规范原则和制度设计。建议区分规范正当性、正式制度安排、实际运行和经验效果，避免压成同一真伪或成熟度刻度。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "IK01-S1",
        "IK01-V41",
        "IK01-C4",
        "IK01-C5",
        "IK01-C6",
        "IK01-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "IK01-R13",
        "IK01-R14",
        "IK01-R30",
        "IK01-R31",
        "IK01-R35"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04",
      "v05_material_gap_status": [
        {
          "gap_id": "IK01-G01",
          "status": "resolved_for_scoped_target"
        }
      ],
      "v05_update": {
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "patch_sha256": "37a4dce4d4ede83ea50ca3ee8e6215457a20869206334eb5d3d1dcd67d073e7c",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01",
      "card_id": "HU01",
      "title": "人类起源的网络历史",
      "summary": "基因资料支持更复杂祖先结构，但2023持续迁移模型与2025脉冲模型仍给不同时间与过程。",
      "epistemic_mode": "historical_genetic_model_comparison_with_identifiability_limits",
      "question_id": "HU01-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "HU01-S1",
        "HU01-S2",
        "HU01-E1",
        "HU01-P1",
        "HU01-L1",
        "HU01-C1",
        "HU01-E2",
        "HU01-P2",
        "HU01-L2",
        "HU01-C2",
        "HU01-E3",
        "HU01-P3",
        "HU01-L3",
        "HU01-C3",
        "HU01-E4",
        "HU01-P4",
        "HU01-L4",
        "HU01-C4",
        "HU01-E5",
        "HU01-P5",
        "HU01-L5",
        "HU01-C5",
        "HU01-Q1",
        "HU01-V05-S1",
        "HU01-V05-E1",
        "HU01-V05-P1",
        "HU01-V05-L1",
        "HU01-V05-C1",
        "HU01-V05-S2",
        "HU01-V05-E2",
        "HU01-V05-P2",
        "HU01-V05-L2",
        "HU01-V05-C2",
        "HU01-V05-S3",
        "HU01-V05-S4",
        "HU01-V05-E3",
        "HU01-V05-P3",
        "HU01-V05-L3",
        "HU01-V05-C3"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "HU01-R01",
        "HU01-R02",
        "HU01-R03",
        "HU01-R04",
        "HU01-R05",
        "HU01-R06",
        "HU01-R07",
        "HU01-R08",
        "HU01-R09",
        "HU01-R10",
        "HU01-R11",
        "HU01-R12",
        "HU01-R13",
        "HU01-R14",
        "HU01-R15",
        "HU01-R16",
        "HU01-R17",
        "HU01-R18",
        "HU01-R19",
        "HU01-R20",
        "HU01-R21",
        "HU01-R22",
        "HU01-R23",
        "HU01-R24",
        "HU01-R25",
        "HU01-V05-R1",
        "HU01-V05-R2",
        "HU01-V05-R3",
        "HU01-V05-R4",
        "HU01-V05-R5",
        "HU01-V05-R6",
        "HU01-V05-R7",
        "HU01-V05-R8",
        "HU01-V05-R9",
        "HU01-V05-R10",
        "HU01-V05-R11",
        "HU01-V05-R12",
        "HU01-V05-R13",
        "HU01-V05-R14",
        "HU01-V05-R15",
        "HU01-V05-R16",
        "HU01-V05-R17",
        "HU01-V05-R18",
        "HU01-V05-R19",
        "HU01-V05-R20",
        "HU01-V05-R21",
        "HU01-V05-R22",
        "HU01-V05-R23",
        "HU01-V05-R24"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "not_yet_established": "非洲祖先群体如何分合并交流，哪些模型能被独立遗传、化石和定年证据区分，形态及文化事件又如何对应？",
      "scope": "本卡只核查下列来源的指定正文；不宣称领域全面检索。",
      "selection_change": "旧快照保留；本轮按已读正文缩窄并深化证据链。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "HU01-S1",
        "HU01-E1",
        "HU01-C1",
        "HU01-P1",
        "HU01-L1",
        "HU01-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "HU01-R01",
        "HU01-R02",
        "HU01-R03",
        "HU01-R04",
        "HU01-R21"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope",
      "v05_update": {
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "patch_sha256": "c846d135fa14cd45e96ac8818a23218a8efa8d48011e52b74682cbae5de1336b",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02",
      "card_id": "HU02",
      "title": "语言、迁徙与文化传播",
      "summary": "语言词表、古基因与考古各自约束传播历史；2025年的编码批评与新古DNA结果仍不把人口移动直接等同于语言转变。",
      "epistemic_mode": "historical_reconstruction_with_distinct_linguistic_and_genetic_measurements",
      "question_id": "HU02-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "HU02-S1",
        "HU02-S2",
        "HU02-S3",
        "HU02-E1",
        "HU02-P1",
        "HU02-L1",
        "HU02-C1",
        "HU02-E2",
        "HU02-P2",
        "HU02-L2",
        "HU02-C2",
        "HU02-E3",
        "HU02-P3",
        "HU02-L3",
        "HU02-C3",
        "HU02-E4",
        "HU02-P4",
        "HU02-L4",
        "HU02-C4",
        "HU02-E5",
        "HU02-P5",
        "HU02-L5",
        "HU02-C5",
        "HU02-Q1",
        "HU02-V05-S1",
        "HU02-V05-E1",
        "HU02-V05-P1",
        "HU02-V05-L1",
        "HU02-V05-C1",
        "HU02-V05-S2",
        "HU02-V05-S3",
        "HU02-V05-E2",
        "HU02-V05-P2",
        "HU02-V05-L2",
        "HU02-V05-C2"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "HU02-R01",
        "HU02-R02",
        "HU02-R03",
        "HU02-R04",
        "HU02-R05",
        "HU02-R06",
        "HU02-R07",
        "HU02-R08",
        "HU02-R09",
        "HU02-R10",
        "HU02-R11",
        "HU02-R12",
        "HU02-R13",
        "HU02-R14",
        "HU02-R15",
        "HU02-R16",
        "HU02-R17",
        "HU02-R18",
        "HU02-R19",
        "HU02-R20",
        "HU02-R21",
        "HU02-R22",
        "HU02-R23",
        "HU02-R24",
        "HU02-R25",
        "HU02-V05-R1",
        "HU02-V05-R2",
        "HU02-V05-R3",
        "HU02-V05-R4",
        "HU02-V05-R5",
        "HU02-V05-R6",
        "HU02-V05-R7",
        "HU02-V05-R8",
        "HU02-V05-R9",
        "HU02-V05-R10",
        "HU02-V05-R11",
        "HU02-V05-R12",
        "HU02-V05-R13",
        "HU02-V05-R14",
        "HU02-V05-R15",
        "HU02-V05-R16",
        "HU02-V05-R17"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "not_yet_established": "哪些语言变化确与人口移动相连，哪些由接触、借词或转语造成；不同证据怎样在不混同祖源、语言与文化身份的前提下相互约束？",
      "scope": "已补读2023原始数据/结果Guide和2025批评的方法/结论；2023完整正文及百页SI仍缺。古DNA原文、单位更正及作者稿版本差异分开，未由遗传祖源直接赋予语言或民族身份。",
      "selection_change": "旧快照保留；本轮按已读正文缩窄并深化证据链。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "HU02-S1",
        "HU02-E1",
        "HU02-C1",
        "HU02-P1",
        "HU02-L1",
        "HU02-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "HU02-R01",
        "HU02-R02",
        "HU02-R03",
        "HU02-R04",
        "HU02-R21"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope",
      "v05_update": {
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "patch_sha256": "853a335f84cb69529bbd0fed21ee2455e3117aa3984df5c8a19474a842c3979f",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03",
      "card_id": "HU03",
      "title": "证据怎样改变历史叙事",
      "summary": "斯瓦希里古DNA改变了特定墓葬人群的祖源重建；关于社会过程、口述传统和当代身份的解释仍需独立材料。",
      "epistemic_mode": "historical_measurement_and_interpretation_with_sampling_and_identity_boundaries",
      "question_id": "HU03-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "HU03-S1",
        "HU03-E1",
        "HU03-P1",
        "HU03-L1",
        "HU03-C1",
        "HU03-E2",
        "HU03-P2",
        "HU03-L2",
        "HU03-C2",
        "HU03-E3",
        "HU03-P3",
        "HU03-L3",
        "HU03-C3",
        "HU03-E4",
        "HU03-P4",
        "HU03-L4",
        "HU03-C4",
        "HU03-E5",
        "HU03-P5",
        "HU03-L5",
        "HU03-C5",
        "HU03-Q1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "HU03-R01",
        "HU03-R02",
        "HU03-R03",
        "HU03-R04",
        "HU03-R05",
        "HU03-R06",
        "HU03-R07",
        "HU03-R08",
        "HU03-R09",
        "HU03-R10",
        "HU03-R11",
        "HU03-R12",
        "HU03-R13",
        "HU03-R14",
        "HU03-R15",
        "HU03-R16",
        "HU03-R17",
        "HU03-R18",
        "HU03-R19",
        "HU03-R20",
        "HU03-R21",
        "HU03-R22",
        "HU03-R23",
        "HU03-R24",
        "HU03-R25"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "not_yet_established": "新遗传证据能改变哪些可检验的历史事件主张；哪些社会过程、文化意义与当代身份问题仍要由文本、考古、社区知识和明确解释理由共同约束？",
      "scope": "本卡只核查下列来源的指定正文；不宣称领域全面检索。",
      "selection_change": "旧快照保留；本轮按已读正文缩窄并深化证据链。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "HU03-S1",
        "HU03-E1",
        "HU03-C1",
        "HU03-P1",
        "HU03-L1",
        "HU03-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "HU03-R01",
        "HU03-R02",
        "HU03-R03",
        "HU03-R04",
        "HU03-R21"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01",
      "card_id": "AR01",
      "title": "扩大阅读范围会改变什么",
      "summary": "远读是带有取舍的研究方案；2026正式TLDM论文只测试一组英语小说与2025模型的任务稳定性，不能替代文学解释或人类真值。",
      "epistemic_mode": "literary_method_argument_distinguished_from_computational_benchmark",
      "question_id": "AR01-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "AR01-S1",
        "AR01-S2",
        "AR01-E1",
        "AR01-P1",
        "AR01-L1",
        "AR01-C1",
        "AR01-E2",
        "AR01-P2",
        "AR01-L2",
        "AR01-C2",
        "AR01-E3",
        "AR01-P3",
        "AR01-L3",
        "AR01-C3",
        "AR01-E4",
        "AR01-P4",
        "AR01-L4",
        "AR01-C4",
        "AR01-E5",
        "AR01-P5",
        "AR01-L5",
        "AR01-C5",
        "AR01-Q1",
        "AR01-V05-S1",
        "AR01-V05-E1",
        "AR01-V05-P1",
        "AR01-V05-L1",
        "AR01-V05-C1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "AR01-R01",
        "AR01-R02",
        "AR01-R03",
        "AR01-R04",
        "AR01-R05",
        "AR01-R06",
        "AR01-R07",
        "AR01-R08",
        "AR01-R09",
        "AR01-R10",
        "AR01-R11",
        "AR01-R12",
        "AR01-R13",
        "AR01-R14",
        "AR01-R15",
        "AR01-R16",
        "AR01-R17",
        "AR01-R18",
        "AR01-R19",
        "AR01-R20",
        "AR01-R21",
        "AR01-R22",
        "AR01-R23",
        "AR01-R24",
        "AR01-R25",
        "AR01-V05-R01",
        "AR01-V05-R02",
        "AR01-V05-R03",
        "AR01-V05-R04",
        "AR01-V05-R05"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "not_yet_established": "怎样根据研究目标扩大阅读范围，让语言细读、史料和可审查计算结果相互检验，同时保留解释理由与价值判断的责任？",
      "scope": "本卡只核查下列来源的指定正文；不宣称领域全面检索。",
      "selection_change": "旧快照保留；本轮按已读正文缩窄并深化证据链。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "AR01-S1",
        "AR01-E1",
        "AR01-C1",
        "AR01-P1",
        "AR01-L1",
        "AR01-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "AR01-R01",
        "AR01-R02",
        "AR01-R03",
        "AR01-R04",
        "AR01-R21"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope",
      "v05_material_gap_status": [
        {
          "gap_id": "AR01-G02",
          "status": "resolved_for_scoped_target"
        },
        {
          "gap_id": "AR01-G01",
          "status": "unresolved_after_bounded_search",
          "needed_source": {
            "description": "Lawfully accessible original NLR16(2002)pp.35–45 full article, or authorized author/institution deposit with source identity and continuous text.",
            "legitimate_next_route": "A public publisher or author/institution copy if available later; no account, purchase, author request, or unauthorized mirror used."
          }
        }
      ],
      "v05_update": {
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "patch_sha256": "0d624f1032a517dd0a03146900ae1bda69c62ef2f6c038409355b9ce917f5829",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04",
      "card_id": "HU04",
      "title": "何谓公平与值得追求的生活",
      "summary": "Sen的效用、资源与能力之辨提出可检验的规范理由；IPBES价值分类进一步说明多种价值的关系，但都不能在没有价值前提时唯一决定公平。",
      "epistemic_mode": "normative_argument_and_conceptual_assessment_not_unresolved_empirical_measurement",
      "question_id": "HU04-Q1",
      "node_ids": [
        "HU04-S1",
        "HU04-S2",
        "HU04-E1",
        "HU04-P1",
        "HU04-L1",
        "HU04-C1",
        "HU04-E2",
        "HU04-P2",
        "HU04-L2",
        "HU04-C2",
        "HU04-E3",
        "HU04-P3",
        "HU04-L3",
        "HU04-C3",
        "HU04-E4",
        "HU04-P4",
        "HU04-L4",
        "HU04-C4",
        "HU04-E5",
        "HU04-P5",
        "HU04-L5",
        "HU04-C5",
        "HU04-Q1"
      ],
      "edge_ids": [
        "HU04-R01",
        "HU04-R02",
        "HU04-R03",
        "HU04-R04",
        "HU04-R05",
        "HU04-R06",
        "HU04-R07",
        "HU04-R08",
        "HU04-R09",
        "HU04-R10",
        "HU04-R11",
        "HU04-R12",
        "HU04-R13",
        "HU04-R14",
        "HU04-R15",
        "HU04-R16",
        "HU04-R17",
        "HU04-R18",
        "HU04-R19",
        "HU04-R20",
        "HU04-R21",
        "HU04-R22",
        "HU04-R23",
        "HU04-R24",
        "HU04-R25"
      ],
      "review_status": "relevant_primary_fulltext_sections_checked; expert_review_pending",
      "not_yet_established": "在效用、资源、能力与多种关系价值冲突时，应保护什么，由谁以何种理由和程序作出选择；哪些新事实会改变后果判断，哪些分歧仍需要规范论证？",
      "scope": "本卡只核查下列来源的指定正文；不宣称领域全面检索。",
      "selection_change": "旧快照保留；本轮按已读正文缩窄并深化证据链。",
      "display_node_ids": [
        "HU04-S1",
        "HU04-E1",
        "HU04-C1",
        "HU04-P1",
        "HU04-L1",
        "HU04-Q1"
      ],
      "display_edge_ids": [
        "HU04-R01",
        "HU04-R02",
        "HU04-R03",
        "HU04-R04",
        "HU04-R21"
      ],
      "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
    }
  ],
  "nodes": [
    {
      "id": "P02-S1",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "DESI DR2 IV · v3",
      "text": "DESI Collaboration，Lyα全形状/AP测量及联合宇宙学分析。",
      "title": "DESI DR2 Results IV: Alcock–Paczyński Measurements from the Lyman Alpha Forest and Cosmological Constraints",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2607.27410v3",
      "metadataUrl": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27410",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2607.27410v3",
      "first_posted": "2026-07-29",
      "version_date": "2026-08-04",
      "publication_status": "preprint; no journal reference shown on inspected arXiv record",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext_html",
      "license": "CC BY 4.0 as shown on arXiv HTML",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "IV.3 Discussion",
        "V.1 Alcock–Paczyński measurements",
        "V.3 Cosmological distances, equations 24–26",
        "VI.1 Other data sets",
        "VI.4.1 Dark energy, equations 30–32 and Figure 10",
        "VI.5 Summary and discussion, Figure 13 and Table 4",
        "VII Conclusions",
        "Appendix B, Table 5",
        "Appendix C, Figure 16",
        "VI.1/VI.4.1/VI.5/VII/AppendixC and Fig10/Fig16 visually inspected"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "all cited companion papers",
        "all figures visually at original resolution",
        "code, chains and raw spectra"
      ],
      "independence_group": "DESI_DR2_LYA_AND_SHARED_JOINT_DATA",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against only the newly named v0.5 passages; historical v0.3 scope preserved in prior_review",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent likelihood rerun",
          "raw-data reanalysis",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "v05_only_new_named_scope_reviewed_on_2026_10_04; full prior source scope not re-reviewed"
      },
      "v05_review_date": "2026-10-04",
      "v05_update": {
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      },
      "prior_review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent likelihood rerun",
          "raw-data reanalysis",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      },
      "prior_retrieval": {
        "retrieved_on": "2026-10-03",
        "retrieved_scope": [
          "IV.3 Discussion",
          "V.1 Alcock–Paczyński measurements",
          "V.3 Cosmological distances, equations 24–26",
          "VI.1 Other data sets",
          "VI.4.1 Dark energy, equations 30–32 and Figure 10",
          "VI.5 Summary and discussion, Figure 13 and Table 4",
          "VII Conclusions",
          "Appendix B, Table 5",
          "Appendix C, Figure 16"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-E1",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "AP观测约束",
      "text": "在指定相关函数模型下，全文给出 z_eff=2.33 的距离比约束。",
      "source_id": "P02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P02-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2607.27410v3",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2607.27410v3",
      "preciseLocator": "V.3 Cosmological distances, equation (25); nearby equations (24) and (26) define component and joint results.",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent likelihood rerun",
          "raw-data reanalysis",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      },
      "reported_values": {
        "D_M_over_D_H": 4.572,
        "plus_minus": 0.046,
        "z_eff": 2.33,
        "relative_precision": "1.0%",
        "unit": "dimensionless"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-E2",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "联合模型比较",
      "text": "Table 4列出各数据组合相对平直ΛCDM的MAP拟合差和频率学显著性。",
      "source_id": "P02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P02-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2607.27410v3",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2607.27410v3",
      "preciseLocator": "VI.5 Summary and discussion, Table 4, w0waCDM block, rows DESI, DESI+CMB, DESI+CMB+DES-Dovekie; VI.4.1 paragraph immediately before equation (31) and after it.",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent likelihood rerun",
          "raw-data reanalysis",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      },
      "reported_values": {
        "DESI": {
          "delta_chi2_MAP": -5.6,
          "sigma": 1.9
        },
        "DESI_CMB": {
          "delta_chi2_MAP": -9.8,
          "sigma": 2.7
        },
        "DESI_CMB_DES_Dovekie": {
          "delta_chi2_MAP": -12.9,
          "sigma": 3.2
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-E3",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "超新星组合与参数",
      "text": "正文给出DES-Dovekie联合结果及替代超新星样本的显著性。",
      "source_id": "P02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P02-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2607.27410v3",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2607.27410v3",
      "preciseLocator": "VI.4.1 Dark energy, equation (32) and its immediately following paragraph; Figure 10 caption.",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent likelihood rerun",
          "raw-data reanalysis",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      },
      "reported_values": {
        "w0": -0.821,
        "w0_plus_minus": 0.054,
        "wa": -0.65,
        "wa_plus_minus": 0.2,
        "DES_Dovekie_sigma": 3.2,
        "updated_Pantheon_plus_sigma": 3.0,
        "Union3_1_sigma": 3.5
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-E4",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "高红移分量并不单向支持",
      "text": "作者比较新AP点与不同模型的预测；这一分量更接近Planck ΛCDM。",
      "source_id": "P02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P02-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2607.27410v3",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2607.27410v3",
      "preciseLocator": "VI.5 Summary and discussion, Figure 13 and first prose paragraph following the figure; V.3 final comparison paragraph associated with Figure 7.",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent likelihood rerun",
          "raw-data reanalysis",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      },
      "reported_values": {
        "distance_from_Planck_LCDM_sigma": "within 0.5",
        "distance_from_best_fit_DESI_CMB_w0wa_sigma": "about 2"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-E5",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "分析条件与验证范围",
      "text": "模型、数据组合、盲化测试和系统误差处理限定了推断的含义。",
      "source_id": "P02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P02-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2607.27410v3",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2607.27410v3",
      "preciseLocator": "IV.3 Discussion, final paragraph before V Results; V.1 final paragraph; VI.1 data-combination and likelihood paragraphs; VI.4.1 first paragraph; Appendix B, Table 5 and final paragraph.",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent likelihood rerun",
          "raw-data reanalysis",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      },
      "evidence_kind": "methods_and_limits"
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-P1",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "相关函数模型适用",
      "text": "AP距离比是模板拟合后的观测估计；须依赖相关函数模型、污染物处理、尺度截断、协方差与先验。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P02-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "V.1; IV.3; Appendix B, Table 5"
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-P2",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "指定模型与数据版本",
      "text": "演化模型采用CPL参数化 w(a)=w0+(1−a)wa；DESI含DR2 BAO与新Lyα全形状，CMB按VI.1的Planck/ACT/SPT组合。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P02-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "VI.1 Other data sets; VI.4.1 first paragraph"
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-L1",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "没有独立复算",
      "text": "本轮核对论文全文中的测量和推导，不验证全部模拟、原始光谱、后验采样或显著性换算。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P02-E5"
      ],
      "origin": "project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-L2",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "系统误差处理有条件",
      "text": "作者依盲化数据与模拟测试，未给宽带AP参数额外系统误差；这是分析决定，不是证明未知系统误差不存在。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P02-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "IV.3 final paragraph; V.1 final paragraph",
      "origin": "source_method_plus_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-L3",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "组合非独立投票",
      "text": "2.7σ与3.2σ使用重叠的DESI/CMB资料；不能相加或当作两个独立重复。高红移分量本身也更接近ΛCDM。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P02-E2",
        "P02-E4"
      ],
      "origin": "editorial_inference_from_data_overlap"
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-C1",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "测量：高红移距离比",
      "text": "指定全形状AP分析在 z_eff=2.33 得到 D_M/D_H=4.572±0.046（约1.0%精度）。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "processed observational estimate, not an unmodeled raw reading",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P02-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P02-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P02-L1",
        "P02-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "DESI DR2 Lyα full-shape paper v3 and its explicitly defined joint datasets",
      "status": "source_reported_measurement",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立管线与新光谱资料验证或移动该距离比；系统误差重估可能扩大不确定度。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent likelihood rerun",
          "raw-data reanalysis",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-C2",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "推导：DESI+CMB的2.7σ偏好",
      "text": "在CPL模型比较中，DESI+CMB相对ΛCDM给出 Δχ²_MAP=−9.8，对应作者报告的2.7σ偏好。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "author statistical/model-derived inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P02-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P02-P1",
        "P02-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P02-L1",
        "P02-L2",
        "P02-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "DESI DR2 Lyα full-shape paper v3 and its explicitly defined joint datasets",
      "status": "conditional_model_preference",
      "what_would_change_status": "在同一联合似然下复算参数化、先验与系统误差；独立观测应给出可比较的预测检验。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent likelihood rerun",
          "raw-data reanalysis",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-C3",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "推导：加入超新星的3.2σ",
      "text": "同一模型下再加入DES-Dovekie得到3.2σ；替换为更新的Pantheon+或Union3.1，正文分别报告3.0σ或3.5σ。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "author statistical/model-derived inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P02-S1",
        "P02-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P02-E2",
        "P02-E3",
        "P02-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P02-P1",
        "P02-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P02-L1",
        "P02-L3",
        "P02-L4",
        "P02-V05-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "DESI DR2 Lyα full-shape paper v3 and its explicitly defined joint datasets",
      "status": "conditional_model_preference_with_reporting_discrepancy_pending",
      "what_would_change_status": "超新星校准、样本选择、联合协方差或新数据改变时，应重估而非沿用旧显著性。 另需澄清结论段3.1σ与指定表格3.2σ的组合/版本差别。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against only the newly named v0.5 passages; historical v0.3 scope preserved in prior_review",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent likelihood rerun",
          "raw-data reanalysis",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "v05_only_new_named_scope_reviewed_on_2026_10_04; full prior source scope not re-reviewed"
      },
      "v05_update": {
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      },
      "prior_review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent likelihood rerun",
          "raw-data reanalysis",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-C4",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "推导：新增AP点更近ΛCDM",
      "text": "新高红移AP点距Planck ΛCDM预测在0.5σ内，距DESI+CMB最佳拟合演化模型约2σ。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "author statistical/model-derived inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P02-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P02-P1",
        "P02-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P02-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "DESI DR2 Lyα full-shape paper v3 and its explicitly defined joint datasets",
      "status": "subset_qualifies_joint_preference",
      "what_would_change_status": "更精确独立高红移距离测量可判别该局部分歧是否持续。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent likelihood rerun",
          "raw-data reanalysis",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-C5",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "编辑判断：尚未确证",
      "text": "上述测量与条件性模型偏好尚不足以确立“暗能量真实随时间演化”。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "project assessment, not an additional empirical result",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P02-E1",
        "P02-E2",
        "P02-E3",
        "P02-E4",
        "P02-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P02-P1",
        "P02-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P02-L1",
        "P02-L2",
        "P02-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "DESI DR2 Lyα full-shape paper v3 and its explicitly defined joint datasets",
      "status": "open_conditional_assessment",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立、可重复且跨参数化与校准的预测检验可提高支持；偏好消退或新系统误差可降低支持。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent likelihood rerun",
          "raw-data reanalysis",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-Q1",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题：演化还是模型/系统效应？",
      "text": "在独立数据、校准与更灵活参数化下，偏离 w=−1 的信号是否持续，并产生能区分系统误差与真实演化的新预测？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "暗能量确实随时间演化",
      "source_ids": [
        "P02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P02-E2",
        "P02-E3",
        "P02-E4",
        "P02-E5"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": "获得可复核的跨观测一致性与预测检验；或发现消除信号的系统误差。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent likelihood rerun",
          "raw-data reanalysis",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-E6",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "数值表述待核对",
      "text": "详细结果的命名组合与结论段的泛称组合给出不同末位显著性，不能由本轮自行断定是同一组合的勘误。",
      "source_id": "P02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P02-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2607.27410v3",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2607.27410v3",
      "preciseLocator": "VI.4.1, paragraph immediately after equation (32); VI.5, Table 4 last w0waCDM row; VII Conclusions, paragraph following the summary of VI.4 extended-model results.",
      "reported_values": {
        "detailed_results": {
          "dataset_label": "DESI+CMB+DES-Dovekie",
          "sigma": 3.2
        },
        "conclusion": {
          "dataset_label": "DESI+CMB+SNe",
          "sigma": 3.1
        }
      },
      "extraction": "paraphrase; data labels retained for disambiguation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent likelihood rerun",
          "raw-data reanalysis",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-L4",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "3.2σ与3.1σ的语境待核",
      "text": "式(32)后及Table 4对DESI+CMB+DES-Dovekie列3.2σ；VII结论以DESI+CMB+SNe泛称列3.1σ。VI.1以DES-Dovekie为默认，但本轮未证实差异原因；主命题按命名表格限定，待核对组合或文本版本。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P02-E6"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "VI.1 supernova sample paragraphs; VI.4.1 after equation (32); Table 4; VII Conclusions extended-model summary",
      "origin": "source_reporting_discrepancy_pending_disambiguation"
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-S01",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "PNAS正式正文",
      "text": "Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics",
      "title": "Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2422633122",
      "sourceVersion": "期刊正式发表、在线已更正版本；更正公告日期2025-08-20",
      "version_date": "2025-06-25",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "已读官方HTML正文：研究设计、式1、表1、机制分析及表2/图3说明、Discussion、Notes和数据可用性；未重跑代码，未核验原始学生记录；该基线轮次的期刊 SI 链接未能读取；v0.5 经 Europe PMC 另行取得 SI 并读取指定段落，见 ED01-V05-S1，未据此宣称 SI 全部复审。"
      ],
      "publication_status": "PNAS 122(26), e2422633122 (2025)",
      "access": "open_fulltext_relevant_sections_read",
      "license": "not independently audited; only metadata and paraphrase retained",
      "source_limits": "一项试验；正式发表不等于独立复现。表1的2848是学生×场次观测数，不能称为2848名学生。",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "independence_group": "ED01_SINGLE_TURKEY_SCHOOL_TRIAL",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "2026-10-04 read-status metadata updated after separate official SI review; prior main-text passage review remains historical",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "expertise_needed": "教育试验、统计和学习测量",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "v05_SI_linkage_and_scope_metadata_only; no whole original article re-review"
      },
      "v05_update": {
        "gap_ids": [
          "ED01-G01"
        ],
        "new_source_ids": [
          "ED01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "new_evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "scope": "Only the explicitly changed reading/version boundary is updated; baseline substantive claims and prior review are preserved."
      },
      "prior_review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": "教育试验、统计和学习测量",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      },
      "prior_retrieval": {
        "retrieved_on": "2026-10-03",
        "retrieved_scope": [
          "已读官方HTML正文：研究设计、式1、表1、机制分析及表2/图3说明、Discussion、Notes和数据可用性；未重跑代码，未核验原始学生记录；期刊SI链接本次未能读取。"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-S02",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "机构更正公告",
      "text": "Correction for Bastani et al., Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics",
      "title": "Correction for Bastani et al., Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2518204122",
      "sourceVersion": "官方更正公告",
      "version_date": "2025-08-20",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-03",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "已读更正全文及日期；更正对象仅为Osbert Bastani的作者机构，公告未更改研究结果。"
      ],
      "publication_status": "PNAS 122(34), e2518204122 (2025)",
      "access": "open_fulltext_relevant_sections_read",
      "license": "not independently audited; only metadata and paraphrase retained",
      "source_limits": "用于版本核对，不是新的效果研究。",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "independence_group": "ED01_SINGLE_TURKEY_SCHOOL_TRIAL",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": "教育试验、统计和学习测量",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-S03",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "作者稿附录（版本分离）",
      "text": "Generative AI Without Guardrails Can Harm Learning: Evidence from High School Mathematics (author-hosted manuscript)",
      "title": "Generative AI Without Guardrails Can Harm Learning: Evidence from High School Mathematics (author-hosted manuscript)",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://hamsabastani.github.io/education_llm.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "68页作者网站稿件；文件内本次未定位版本日期，不与期刊版页码混用",
      "version_date": null,
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-03",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "选择性读取正文相关结果与附录A.1、A.4、A.5、A.6及表3–5；未逐页通读68页。附录A.1标明GPT-4-0613；期刊主结果以S01为准。"
      ],
      "publication_status": "author manuscript; publication version not confirmed",
      "access": "open_fulltext_relevant_sections_read",
      "license": "not independently audited; only metadata and paraphrase retained",
      "source_limits": "作者稿与期刊HTML在主样本排除条件措辞上有差异；其附录不能自动视作已核验的正式SI。表3的839为该稿非honors问卷样本；未将其写成期刊表1唯一学生人数。",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "independence_group": "ED01_SINGLE_TURKEY_SCHOOL_TRIAL",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": "教育试验、统计和学习测量",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-V01",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "原文定位：实施与测量",
      "text": "2023年秋，土耳其一所高中9–11年级开展四次90分钟数学复习；干预发生于练习阶段，随后同场次闭卷闭电脑考试。",
      "source_id": "ED01-S01",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2422633122",
      "sourceVersion": "期刊正式发表、在线已更正版本；更正公告日期2025-08-20",
      "preciseLocator": "Experimental Design：场次描述段及编号步骤1–3；班级分配段；Notes #。",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "reported_values": {},
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": "教育现场试验方法专家核对分配算法、样本流及聚类推断。",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-P01",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "前提：实施与测量",
      "text": "近1000名参与者、约50个班是正文的近似规模。；普通班学生原本随机编班；治疗臂按班分配，整数规划兼顾可观测特征及排课约束。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V01"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Experimental Design：场次描述段及编号步骤1–3；班级分配段；Notes #。"
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-L01",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "限制：实施与测量",
      "text": "不应简写成每名学生独立随机抽签使用工具。；考试题与刚练过的题概念相近；不是远迁移测试。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V01"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Experimental Design：场次描述段及编号步骤1–3；班级分配段；Notes #。",
      "origin": "source limits plus explicitly scoped editorial interpretation"
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-C01",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "实施与测量",
      "text": "2023年秋，土耳其一所高中9–11年级开展四次90分钟数学复习；干预发生于练习阶段，随后同场次闭卷闭电脑考试。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "作者报告的实施与测量事实；本项目没有亲自观测课堂。",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V01"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ED01-P01"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ED01-L01"
      ],
      "scope": "2023年秋土耳其单校、9–11年级、四次数学复习中的指定GPT-4工具设计；主结果采用PNAS正式表1。",
      "status": "source_reported_conditionally_supported",
      "what_would_change_status": "若分配记录、出勤或评分审计揭示与处理臂相关的选择或测量偏差，需重估因果可信度。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": "教育现场试验方法专家核对分配算法、样本流及聚类推断。",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-V02",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "原文定位：辅助练习增益",
      "text": "相对对照组，辅助练习分数的意向治疗估计：GPT Base +0.137，GPT Tutor +0.361；均P<0.01。",
      "source_id": "ED01-S01",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2422633122",
      "sourceVersion": "期刊正式发表、在线已更正版本；更正公告日期2025-08-20",
      "preciseLocator": "Main Results，Eq. 1；Table 1，Practice perf列、GPT base/GPT tutor行及表注。",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "reported_values": {
        "outcome_scale": [
          0,
          1
        ],
        "base_coefficient": 0.137,
        "base_class_clustered_se": 0.031,
        "tutor_coefficient": 0.361,
        "tutor_class_clustered_se": 0.032,
        "control_mean": 0.284,
        "student_session_observations": 2848
      },
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": "统计复核与数据代码复现。",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-P02",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "前提：辅助练习增益",
      "text": "系数调整既往GPA、场次、评分者、年级和教师；标准误按班聚类。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V02"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Main Results，Eq. 1；Table 1，Practice perf列、GPT base/GPT tutor行及表注。"
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-L02",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "限制：辅助练习增益",
      "text": "工具可用时的表现，不直接测量离开工具后学会多少。；主回归与预注册的两两t检验不同；不能将表1称为原封不动的预注册模型。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V02"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Main Results，Eq. 1；Table 1，Practice perf列、GPT base/GPT tutor行及表注。",
      "origin": "source limits plus explicitly scoped editorial interpretation"
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-C02",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "辅助练习增益",
      "text": "相对对照组，辅助练习分数的意向治疗估计：GPT Base +0.137，GPT Tutor +0.361；均P<0.01。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "从观测评分经协变量调整和班级聚类得到的作者因果/ITT估计，非原始均分。",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V02"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ED01-P02"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ED01-L02"
      ],
      "scope": "2023年秋土耳其单校、9–11年级、四次数学复习中的指定GPT-4工具设计；主结果采用PNAS正式表1。",
      "status": "source_reported_conditionally_supported",
      "what_would_change_status": "重分析若显示缺失、评分或规格敏感性足以消除效果，应下调结论。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": "统计复核与数据代码复现。",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      },
      "values": {
        "outcome_scale": [
          0,
          1
        ],
        "base_coefficient": 0.137,
        "base_class_clustered_se": 0.031,
        "tutor_coefficient": 0.361,
        "tutor_class_clustered_se": 0.032,
        "control_mean": 0.284,
        "student_session_observations": 2848
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-V03",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "原文定位：Base无辅助考试",
      "text": "随后无辅助考试中，GPT Base相对对照的估计为−0.054（SE 0.022，P<0.05）。",
      "source_id": "ED01-S01",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2422633122",
      "sourceVersion": "期刊正式发表、在线已更正版本；更正公告日期2025-08-20",
      "preciseLocator": "Table 1，Exam perf列、GPT base行；Main Results中表1之后讨论无辅助考试的首段。",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "reported_values": {
        "outcome_scale": [
          0,
          1
        ],
        "base_coefficient": -0.054,
        "base_class_clustered_se": 0.022,
        "control_mean": 0.321
      },
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": "因果估计复现及学习测量专家复核。",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-P03",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "前提：Base无辅助考试",
      "text": "沿用C01的设计及C02的估计方法。；处理是练习阶段获得Base访问权限，而非强制每个人使用。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V03"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Table 1，Exam perf列、GPT base行；Main Results中表1之后讨论无辅助考试的首段。"
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-L03",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "限制：Base无辅助考试",
      "text": "短期平均成绩下降不能诊断某个学生，不能直接推出永久能力损伤。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V03"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Table 1，Exam perf列、GPT base行；Main Results中表1之后讨论无辅助考试的首段。",
      "origin": "source limits plus explicitly scoped editorial interpretation"
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-C03",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "Base无辅助考试",
      "text": "随后无辅助考试中，GPT Base相对对照的估计为−0.054（SE 0.022，P<0.05）。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "作者回归估计，非原始评分或个体效应。",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V03"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ED01-P03"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ED01-L03"
      ],
      "scope": "2023年秋土耳其单校、9–11年级、四次数学复习中的指定GPT-4工具设计；主结果采用PNAS正式表1。",
      "status": "source_reported_conditionally_supported",
      "what_would_change_status": "可信的分配/缺失审计或按班聚类复现若改变方向或不确定性，需修订；延迟考试可改变长期解释。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": "因果估计复现及学习测量专家复核。",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      },
      "values": {
        "outcome_scale": [
          0,
          1
        ],
        "base_coefficient": -0.054,
        "base_class_clustered_se": 0.022,
        "control_mean": 0.321
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-V04",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "原文定位：Tutor无辅助考试",
      "text": "GPT Tutor的无辅助考试估计为−0.004（SE 0.013），与对照差异不显著；未显示统计显著的无辅助成绩提升。",
      "source_id": "ED01-S01",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2422633122",
      "sourceVersion": "期刊正式发表、在线已更正版本；更正公告日期2025-08-20",
      "preciseLocator": "Table 1，Exam perf列、GPT tutor行；Main Results紧接表1的无辅助考试讨论段；Experimental Design开头两种工具说明段。",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "reported_values": {
        "outcome_scale": [
          0,
          1
        ],
        "tutor_coefficient": -0.004,
        "tutor_class_clustered_se": 0.013,
        "statistically_significant": false
      },
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": "试验统计与教学设计专家核对无效结果及组件解释。",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-P04",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "前提：Tutor无辅助考试",
      "text": "Tutor捆绑提示策略、教师提供的正确解答和常见错误反馈。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V04"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Table 1，Exam perf列、GPT tutor行；Main Results紧接表1的无辅助考试讨论段；Experimental Design开头两种工具说明段。"
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-L04",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "限制：Tutor无辅助考试",
      "text": "不显著不是等效或无害的证明。；不能仅由一组显著、另一组不显著证明组间差异；表1未给此直接对比。；不能将整套Tutor与Base的差别归因于单一提示特征。 v0.5 补读的官方 SI 表 A.2 另有 Tutor−Base 的直接两两组间 t 检验：归一化成绩差 0.028（95% CI 0.005–0.052，p=0.019）。该结果不是 28% 提升、配对样本检验或主表1的班级聚类回归；也未证明长期收益、对照等效或单一护栏机制。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01",
        "ED01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V04",
        "ED01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Table 1，Exam perf列、GPT tutor行；Main Results紧接表1的无辅助考试讨论段；Experimental Design开头两种工具说明段。 | Official SI A.6 p.8, Table A.2 p.10",
      "origin": "source limits plus explicitly scoped editorial interpretation",
      "v05_update": {
        "gap_ids": [
          "ED01-G01"
        ],
        "new_source_ids": [
          "ED01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "new_evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "scope": "Only the explicitly changed reading/version boundary is updated; baseline substantive claims and prior review are preserved."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-C04",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "Tutor无辅助考试",
      "text": "GPT Tutor的无辅助考试估计为−0.004（SE 0.013），与对照差异不显著；未显示统计显著的无辅助成绩提升。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "作者回归估计；不显著不等于等效。",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V04"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ED01-P04"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ED01-L04"
      ],
      "scope": "2023年秋土耳其单校、9–11年级、四次数学复习中的指定GPT-4工具设计；主结果采用PNAS正式表1。",
      "status": "source_reported_conditionally_supported",
      "what_would_change_status": "足够精度的等效/非劣检验、直接组间对比及拆解组件的随机试验可改变判断。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": "试验统计与教学设计专家核对无效结果及组件解释。",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      },
      "values": {
        "outcome_scale": [
          0,
          1
        ],
        "tutor_coefficient": -0.004,
        "tutor_class_clustered_se": 0.013,
        "statistically_significant": false
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-V05",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "原文定位：百分比的分母",
      "text": "常见的48%、127%和17%是系数除以对应对照均值后的相对变化，不是百分点。",
      "source_id": "ED01-S01",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2422633122",
      "sourceVersion": "期刊正式发表、在线已更正版本；更正公告日期2025-08-20",
      "preciseLocator": "Table 1，两项处理系数与Control arm mean行；Main Results表1前后效果解释段。",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "reported_values": {},
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": "算术已按刊载数值核对；来源数据仍待独立复现。",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-P05",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "前提：百分比的分母",
      "text": "采用论文显示的已四舍五入系数与对照均值。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V05"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Table 1，两项处理系数与Control arm mean行；Main Results表1前后效果解释段。"
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-L05",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "限制：百分比的分母",
      "text": "换用另一基线均值或指标，百分比也会变化；不等于掌握知识量的比例。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V05"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Table 1，两项处理系数与Control arm mean行；Main Results表1前后效果解释段。",
      "origin": "source limits plus explicitly scoped editorial interpretation"
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-C05",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "百分比的分母",
      "text": "常见的48%、127%和17%是系数除以对应对照均值后的相对变化，不是百分点。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "按论文已四舍五入的系数/均值复算的相对百分比。",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V05"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ED01-P05"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ED01-L05"
      ],
      "scope": "2023年秋土耳其单校、9–11年级、四次数学复习中的指定GPT-4工具设计；主结果采用PNAS正式表1。",
      "status": "source_reported_conditionally_supported",
      "what_would_change_status": "修订后的系数、基线或评分尺度会改变这些比值。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": "算术已按刊载数值核对；来源数据仍待独立复现。",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      },
      "derivation": [
        {
          "expression": "0.137 / 0.284 * 100",
          "result_percent": 48.2394,
          "reported_rounded_percent": 48
        },
        {
          "expression": "0.361 / 0.284 * 100",
          "result_percent": 127.1127,
          "reported_rounded_percent": 127
        },
        {
          "expression": "-0.054 / 0.321 * 100",
          "result_percent": -16.8224,
          "reported_rounded_percent": -17
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-V06",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "原文定位：外推边界",
      "text": "此证据支持把辅助表现与无辅助学习分开评价；尚不能裁决长期保持、远迁移或所有AI导师的整体利弊。",
      "source_id": "ED01-S01",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2422633122",
      "sourceVersion": "期刊正式发表、在线已更正版本；更正公告日期2025-08-20",
      "preciseLocator": "Experimental Design编号步骤3；Discussion最后一段（单校、数学、Fall 2023、短期结局及机制限制）；Notes ‡。",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "reported_values": {},
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": "学习科学、教育测量及具体课堂领域专家审核。",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-P06",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "前提：外推边界",
      "text": "接受C02–C04的特定试验估计；教育目标不被一次考试穷尽。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V06"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Experimental Design编号步骤3；Discussion最后一段（单校、数学、Fall 2023、短期结局及机制限制）；Notes ‡。"
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-L06",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "限制：外推边界",
      "text": "这是编辑性的适用范围判断，不是论文测得的另一项结局。；聊天行为分析可支持机制假设，尚非独立随机操纵该机制的证明。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V06"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Experimental Design编号步骤3；Discussion最后一段（单校、数学、Fall 2023、短期结局及机制限制）；Notes ‡。",
      "origin": "source limits plus explicitly scoped editorial interpretation"
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-C06",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "外推边界",
      "text": "此证据支持把辅助表现与无辅助学习分开评价；尚不能裁决长期保持、远迁移或所有AI导师的整体利弊。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "项目编辑的适用范围评估。",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V06"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ED01-P06"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ED01-L06"
      ],
      "scope": "2023年秋土耳其单校、9–11年级、四次数学复习中的指定GPT-4工具设计；主结果采用PNAS正式表1。",
      "status": "editorial_scope_assessment",
      "what_would_change_status": "跨学校/语言复现，预注册延迟无辅助与新题迁移测验，加上教学实施记录，可扩大或缩小适用边界。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": "学习科学、教育测量及具体课堂领域专家审核。",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-Q01",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题：延迟的独立迁移",
      "text": "在多所学校复现时，教师参与设计的AI提示能否在工具撤除数周后，提高新题迁移成绩，而非只提高当场练习分数？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "教师参与设计的AI辅助在多校条件下可靠改善延迟的无辅助新题迁移",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V02",
        "ED01-V03",
        "ED01-V04",
        "ED01-V06"
      ],
      "unresolved_reason": "当前试验没有测量这一延迟迁移结局；单校平均效果不足以识别哪些设计在其他情境可靠。",
      "decisive_evidence": "预注册多校比较常规教学、Base式辅助与分解组件的Tutor式辅助；主要结局为延迟无辅助新题测试，报告基线、缺失、班级聚类、实施强度与教师劳动投入。",
      "what_would_change_status": "可复现且有精确区间的延迟迁移收益将支持能力形成；收益消失或异质性强则缩小推广范围。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": "学习科学、统计和跨情境实施研究",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-S1",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "澳大利亚五阶段框架",
      "text": "Implementing Indigenous Data Sovereignty in Australia: A Five-Phase Framework for Indigenous Data Governance",
      "title": "Implementing Indigenous Data Sovereignty in Australia: A Five-Phase Framework for Indigenous Data Governance",
      "authors": "Jacob Prehn; Michael A. Guerzoni; Maggie Walter; Gawaian Bodkin-Andrews; Bobby Maher",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.70086",
      "pdfUrl": "https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ajs4.70086",
      "sourceVersion": "出版商 Early View／Online Version of Record；PDF 为 Australian Journal of Social Issues, 2025, 0:1–13。",
      "version_date": "2025-12-21",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-03",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "HTML：摘要、§§1–6、Tables 1–3、Appendix A、作者贡献、致谢、Data Availability Statement。",
        "PDF：pp.1–10 的正文、表格文字及数据可用性声明；校对出版版页码。",
        "图像未作独立视觉核验；本组件不从图的布局或箭头推导额外结论。"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "没有取得或核查 VCSF 内部合同、委员会纪要、实施记录或个体健康资料。",
        "没有逐一核验参考文献的经验性主张，也未进行后续实施成果的系统检索。"
      ],
      "source_type": "原住民族研究者主导的规范性／制度性框架论文，含特定合作情境；不是效果试验。",
      "publication_status": "publisher version of record",
      "access": "官方开放获取 HTML 与 13 页 PDF 均成功读取。",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "independence_group": "IK01-S1_NORMATIVE_FRAMEWORK_NOT_EFFECT_STUDY",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": "相关原住民族数据治理与获授权的社群审阅",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-S2",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "CARE原始原则论文",
      "text": "The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance",
      "title": "The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance",
      "authors": "Stephanie Russo Carroll et al.",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://datascience.codata.org/articles/10.5334/dsj-2020-043",
      "pdfUrl": null,
      "sourceVersion": "Data Science Journal 19, article 43；出版商正式 HTML，Practice Papers，同行评审。",
      "version_date": "2020-11-04",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-03",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "摘要、Rationale、Development、Exposition、The CARE Principles and Their Supporting Concepts、The CARE Principles in Action、Conclusion、Acknowledgements。"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "未核查各早期采纳机构在 2020 年之后的执行和效果。",
        "未将文章概述的国际规范直接当作某司法辖区已生效的具体法律意见。"
      ],
      "source_type": "原住民族主导的数据治理规范与实践论证。",
      "publication_status": "publisher version of record",
      "access": "官方 HTML 经重试后成功；PDF/XML 下载尝试未成功，未依赖其内容。",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "independence_group": "IK01-S2_NORMATIVE_FRAMEWORK_NOT_EFFECT_STUDY",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": "相关原住民族数据治理与获授权的社群审阅",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-V11",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "原文定位：CARE的规范内容",
      "text": "CARE 将集体受益、控制权、责任与伦理并列，并将治理规则及利害评价交由相关原住民族决定。",
      "source_id": "IK01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://datascience.codata.org/articles/10.5334/dsj-2020-043",
      "sourceVersion": "Data Science Journal 19, article 43；出版商正式 HTML，Practice Papers，同行评审。",
      "preciseLocator": "HTML：The CARE Principles and Their Supporting Concepts，五个正文段落，尤其第 2–5 段；Exposition 最后一段。",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "evidence_kind": "normative_or_institutional_text",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": [
          "相关原住民族数据治理专家与获授权的知识／权利主体；尚未取得其对本地图表述的审阅。"
        ],
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-P1",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "前提：CARE的规范内容",
      "text": "这里的判断对象是 CARE 的规范内容，而非任何具体机构已履行承诺。",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V11"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "HTML：The CARE Principles and Their Supporting Concepts，五个正文段落，尤其第 2–5 段；Exposition 最后一段。"
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-L1",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "限制：CARE的规范内容",
      "text": "权利和治理原则不是对某项经验性主张的真实性认证；具体适用性须由相应权利主体判断。",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V11"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "HTML：The CARE Principles and Their Supporting Concepts，五个正文段落，尤其第 2–5 段；Exposition 最后一段。",
      "origin": "source scope plus editorial boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-C1",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "CARE的规范内容",
      "text": "CARE 将集体受益、控制权、责任与伦理并列，并将治理规则及利害评价交由相关原住民族决定。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "文献中的规范/制度内容之可追溯归纳，不是效果估计。",
      "nature": "normative_principles",
      "normative": true,
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V11"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "IK01-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "IK01-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "CARE原则及澳大利亚框架论文中的VCSF应用建议；未核查现行VCSF实施状态。",
      "status": "已核实为来源的规范框架；并非已测得的因果效果。",
      "what_would_change_status": "正式修订原则或相关权利主体对适用范围提出校正，可能改变文本归纳；单一效果研究不能独自决定规范正当性。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": [
          "相关原住民族数据治理专家与获授权的知识／权利主体；尚未取得其对本地图表述的审阅。"
        ],
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-V21",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "原文定位：五阶段是制度提案",
      "text": "2025 年论文提出五类制度安排，从缺少原住民族治理到完全掌握治理权；这是澳大利亚情境中的实施提案。",
      "source_id": "IK01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.70086",
      "sourceVersion": "出版商 Early View／Online Version of Record；PDF 为 Australian Journal of Social Issues, 2025, 0:1–13。",
      "preciseLocator": "PDF pp.4–6，§§4.1–4.6；p.10，§6 第 3 段。HTML §§4.2–4.6。",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "evidence_kind": "normative_or_institutional_text",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": [
          "澳大利亚原住民族数据治理研究者、相关社群获授权代表与机构治理专家；尚未审阅。"
        ],
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-P2",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "前提：五阶段是制度提案",
      "text": "阶段描述的是数据相关机构的权限安排，不能被移作民族、文化或知识体系的等级。",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V21"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "PDF pp.4–6，§§4.1–4.6；p.10，§6 第 3 段。HTML §§4.2–4.6。"
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-L2",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "限制：五阶段是制度提案",
      "text": "不能由提案推出所有组织必须沿同一路径前进，或完成某阶段就已实现社群所重视的结果。",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V21"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "PDF pp.4–6，§§4.1–4.6；p.10，§6 第 3 段。HTML §§4.2–4.6。",
      "origin": "source scope plus editorial boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-C2",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "五阶段是制度提案",
      "text": "2025 年论文提出五类制度安排，从缺少原住民族治理到完全掌握治理权；这是澳大利亚情境中的实施提案。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "文献中的规范/制度内容之可追溯归纳，不是效果估计。",
      "nature": "institutional_framework_proposal",
      "normative": true,
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V21"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "IK01-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "IK01-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "CARE原则及澳大利亚框架论文中的VCSF应用建议；未核查现行VCSF实施状态。",
      "status": "已核实框架文本；阶段顺序及跨情境效果未在本文获得经验验证。",
      "what_would_change_status": "社区授权的跨期实施研究，可改变对本地可行性的判断；跨地区比较仍须分别说明权限、资源和文化情境，不能自动升级为普遍规律。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": [
          "澳大利亚原住民族数据治理研究者、相关社群获授权代表与机构治理专家；尚未审阅。"
        ],
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-V31",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "原文定位：席位不等于治理权",
      "text": "框架区分咨询、席位与治理权：多数席位本身不足，正式授权及可执行制度也是关键条件。",
      "source_id": "IK01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.70086",
      "sourceVersion": "出版商 Early View／Online Version of Record；PDF 为 Australian Journal of Social Issues, 2025, 0:1–13。",
      "preciseLocator": "PDF p.5，§4.2 第 1 段；p.6，§4.5 第 2 段和 §4.6；p.7，Table 3 左列第 2 项。",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "evidence_kind": "normative_or_institutional_text",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": [
          "相关社群治理代表、原住民族数据治理专家，以及熟悉该合作安排的制度／法律实务人员；尚未审阅。"
        ],
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-P3",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "前提：席位不等于治理权",
      "text": "文件授权与实际可行使的权力须分开审查。",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V31"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "PDF p.5，§4.2 第 1 段；p.6，§4.5 第 2 段和 §4.6；p.7，Table 3 左列第 2 项。"
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-L3",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "限制：席位不等于治理权",
      "text": "席位、投票、资源、申诉、外部机构否决权和日常执行可能并不一致；此处未对任何合作方进行审计。",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V31"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "PDF p.5，§4.2 第 1 段；p.6，§4.5 第 2 段和 §4.6；p.7，Table 3 左列第 2 项。",
      "origin": "source scope plus editorial boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-C3",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "席位不等于治理权",
      "text": "框架区分咨询、席位与治理权：多数席位本身不足，正式授权及可执行制度也是关键条件。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "文献中的规范/制度内容之可追溯归纳，不是效果估计。",
      "nature": "institutional_criterion",
      "normative": true,
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V31"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "IK01-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "IK01-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "CARE原则及澳大利亚框架论文中的VCSF应用建议；未核查现行VCSF实施状态。",
      "status": "来源提出的制度判据；没有据此判定任何具体委员会的真实权力。",
      "what_would_change_status": "经授权查验合同／授权文件、实际决定及执行追踪后，才能将具体组织从自述安排提升为有实施依据的判断。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": [
          "相关社群治理代表、原住民族数据治理专家，以及熟悉该合作安排的制度／法律实务人员；尚未审阅。"
        ],
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-V41",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "原文定位：VCSF是应用建议",
      "text": "VCSF 应用段建议从第三阶段共同治理起步，以有条件的两至三年目标走向第五阶段；这是建议。",
      "source_id": "IK01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.70086",
      "sourceVersion": "出版商 Early View／Online Version of Record；PDF 为 Australian Journal of Social Issues, 2025, 0:1–13。",
      "preciseLocator": "PDF p.7，§5 合作方列表后的段落；pp.8–9，§5.5，尤其 p.9 最后一段。",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "evidence_kind": "normative_or_institutional_text",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": [
          "VACCHO／相关维多利亚 First Peoples 获授权治理人员及癌症筛查合作实务专家；尚未取得审阅或代表性背书。"
        ],
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-P4",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "前提：VCSF是应用建议",
      "text": "论文的发布时间与建议目标须同实际执行时间、实际权限变更日期分开。",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V41"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "PDF p.7，§5 合作方列表后的段落；pp.8–9，§5.5，尤其 p.9 最后一段。"
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-L4",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "限制：VCSF是应用建议",
      "text": "没有核验 2026-10-03 的 VCSF 状态；本文建议既不证明已经落实，也不证明后来没有进展。",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V41"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "PDF p.7，§5 合作方列表后的段落；pp.8–9，§5.5，尤其 p.9 最后一段。",
      "origin": "source scope plus editorial boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-C4",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "VCSF是应用建议",
      "text": "VCSF 应用段建议从第三阶段共同治理起步，以有条件的两至三年目标走向第五阶段；这是建议。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "文献中的规范/制度内容之可追溯归纳，不是效果估计。",
      "nature": "prospective_application_recommendation",
      "normative": true,
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V41"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "IK01-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "IK01-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "CARE原则及澳大利亚框架论文中的VCSF应用建议；未核查现行VCSF实施状态。",
      "status": "已核实前瞻性建议；不能标记为已完成转型或当前实施现状。",
      "what_would_change_status": "VCSF 或相关原住民族治理机构公开且允许使用的实施文件、版本日期与评估，可支持新的现状主张；需逐项核验而非倒推。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": [
          "VACCHO／相关维多利亚 First Peoples 获授权治理人员及癌症筛查合作实务专家；尚未取得审阅或代表性背书。"
        ],
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-V51",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "原文定位：未建立经验效果",
      "text": "该来源的研究形态与实施证据范围，限制效果推断。",
      "source_id": "IK01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.70086",
      "sourceVersion": "出版商 Early View／Online Version of Record；PDF 为 Australian Journal of Social Issues, 2025, 0:1–13。",
      "preciseLocator": "PDF p.10，Data Availability Statement；pp.7–9，§§5、5.4–5.5；对照 p.10，§6 第 3 段。",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "evidence_kind": "normative_or_institutional_text",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": [
          "原住民族主导的评价方法专家、相关社群治理代表及公共卫生方法专家；尚未审阅。"
        ],
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-V52",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "原文定位：未建立经验效果",
      "text": "该来源的研究形态与实施证据范围，限制效果推断。",
      "source_id": "IK01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://datascience.codata.org/articles/10.5334/dsj-2020-043",
      "sourceVersion": "Data Science Journal 19, article 43；出版商正式 HTML，Practice Papers，同行评审。",
      "preciseLocator": "HTML：The CARE Principles in Action，Figure 3 之后、Conclusion 之前的最后一段。",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "evidence_kind": "normative_or_institutional_text",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": [
          "原住民族主导的评价方法专家、相关社群治理代表及公共卫生方法专家；尚未审阅。"
        ],
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-P5",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "前提：未建立经验效果",
      "text": "本结论只限制这两篇已读来源能支持什么，不等于断言整个领域不存在相关研究。",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S1",
        "IK01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V51",
        "IK01-V52"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "PDF p.10，Data Availability Statement；pp.7–9，§§5、5.4–5.5；对照 p.10，§6 第 3 段。 | HTML：The CARE Principles in Action，Figure 3 之后、Conclusion 之前的最后一段。"
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-L5",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "限制：未建立经验效果",
      "text": "没有进行全领域系统综述或后续效果评估检索；文章参考文献中的独立经验依据须另行逐条查验。",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S1",
        "IK01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V51",
        "IK01-V52"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "PDF p.10，Data Availability Statement；pp.7–9，§§5、5.4–5.5；对照 p.10，§6 第 3 段。 | HTML：The CARE Principles in Action，Figure 3 之后、Conclusion 之前的最后一段。",
      "origin": "source scope plus editorial boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-C5",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "未建立经验效果",
      "text": "论文声明未生成或分析数据集；该应用叙述不能单独证明治理安排改善了筛查、健康或集体受益。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "文献中的规范/制度内容之可追溯归纳，不是效果估计。",
      "nature": "limit_of_inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S1",
        "IK01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V51",
        "IK01-V52"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "IK01-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "IK01-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "CARE原则及澳大利亚框架论文中的VCSF应用建议；未核查现行VCSF实施状态。",
      "status": "由研究形态与所报告证据范围得出的限制判断；不是认定治理无效。",
      "what_would_change_status": "新增经相关社群授权的实施／效果研究，可建立新的限定性效果主张；即使有相关性，也须检验时间顺序、替代解释与评价标准。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": [
          "原住民族主导的评价方法专家、相关社群治理代表及公共卫生方法专家；尚未审阅。"
        ],
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-V61",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "原文定位：编辑的评价路线",
      "text": "文本依据，不能单独解释为效果验证。",
      "source_id": "IK01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.70086",
      "sourceVersion": "出版商 Early View／Online Version of Record；PDF 为 Australian Journal of Social Issues, 2025, 0:1–13。",
      "preciseLocator": "作为启发而非验证：PDF p.5，§4.4 第 2 段；p.6，§§4.5–4.7；p.7，Table 3；HTML Appendix A，题 1.1、1.2、3.2、3.3、5.2。",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "evidence_kind": "normative_or_institutional_text",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": [
          "应由相关原住民族治理／知识持有者与方法专家共同审查，且审阅不能代替机构或社群授权。"
        ],
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-V62",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "原文定位：编辑的评价路线",
      "text": "文本依据，不能单独解释为效果验证。",
      "source_id": "IK01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://datascience.codata.org/articles/10.5334/dsj-2020-043",
      "sourceVersion": "Data Science Journal 19, article 43；出版商正式 HTML，Practice Papers，同行评审。",
      "preciseLocator": "作为规范前提：HTML，The CARE Principles and Their Supporting Concepts 第 2–5 段；The CARE Principles in Action 最后一段。",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "evidence_kind": "normative_or_institutional_text",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": [
          "应由相关原住民族治理／知识持有者与方法专家共同审查，且审阅不能代替机构或社群授权。"
        ],
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-P6",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "前提：编辑的评价路线",
      "text": "相关权利主体确定是否评价、评价者、问题、可用资料与公开边界；不能用公开论文替代这些授权。；应区分治理运行、可归因效果与价值判断；过程证据可以有价值，不必全部改造成实验命题。",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S1",
        "IK01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V61",
        "IK01-V62"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "作为启发而非验证：PDF p.5，§4.4 第 2 段；p.6，§§4.5–4.7；p.7，Table 3；HTML Appendix A，题 1.1、1.2、3.2、3.3、5.2。 | 作为规范前提：HTML，The CARE Principles and Their Supporting Concepts 第 2–5 段；The CARE Principles in Action 最后一段。"
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-L6",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "限制：编辑的评价路线",
      "text": "本路线不是通用合规认证，也不能要求社群为外部可验证性公开受限制的知识或个人健康数据。",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S1",
        "IK01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V61",
        "IK01-V62"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "作为启发而非验证：PDF p.5，§4.4 第 2 段；p.6，§§4.5–4.7；p.7，Table 3；HTML Appendix A，题 1.1、1.2、3.2、3.3、5.2。 | 作为规范前提：HTML，The CARE Principles and Their Supporting Concepts 第 2–5 段；The CARE Principles in Action 最后一段。",
      "origin": "source scope plus editorial boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-C6",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "编辑的评价路线",
      "text": "本地图建议将下一条证据链设为：社群授权的评价规则 → 正式权限 → 实际决定与执行 → 社群认可的结果。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "项目编辑提出的待社群授权路线。",
      "nature": "proposed_evaluation_design",
      "normative": true,
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S1",
        "IK01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V61",
        "IK01-V62"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "IK01-P6"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "IK01-L6"
      ],
      "scope": "CARE原则及澳大利亚框架论文中的VCSF应用建议；未核查现行VCSF实施状态。",
      "status": "编者提出的研究与核查路线，尚未由相关社群批准或实际执行。",
      "what_would_change_status": "经相关治理主体共同修订并授权后，才成为可执行的本地方案；完成预定核查后仍须由其认可的评价机制解释结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": [
          "应由相关原住民族治理／知识持有者与方法专家共同审查，且审阅不能代替机构或社群授权。"
        ],
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-Q1",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题：正式权力是否实际运行？",
      "text": "经相关主体授权开展评价时，VCSF有哪些治理权限已经正式移交、在日常决定中如何行使，并能否带来当地社群认可的受益？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "VCSF治理权限已实际行使并带来社群认可的受益",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-S1",
        "IK01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V51",
        "IK01-V52",
        "IK01-V61",
        "IK01-V62"
      ],
      "decisive_evidence": [
        "由相关治理主体批准的评价问题、标准、方法及资料权限。",
        "有版本日期的授权与合同；有权限访问的决定、异议、执行及资源记录。",
        "以社群认可的方式跟踪受益、负担及持续性，并检查替代解释。"
      ],
      "boundary": "不以健康或文化知识的公开作为开展评价的当然条件；可使用经授权的限制访问或聚合证据。",
      "what_would_change_status": "相关治理主体授权评价后，版本明确的制度与实施资料及社群认可的解释可形成新的限定主张。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "expertise_needed": "相关原住民族数据治理／知识持有者与评价方法专家；审阅不替代授权",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent reproduction of raw-data analyses",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "preserved_v03_not_reread_on_2026_10_04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-S1",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Stephen Cook: The P Versus NP Problem",
      "label": "Stephen Cook: The P Versus NP Problem",
      "text": "Stephen Cook: The P Versus NP Problem",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/pvsnp.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/pvsnp.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "CMI official problem description; 12-page PDF, no version/date printed in inspected text",
      "version_date": null,
      "publication_status": "primary formal problem description; historical text, not current hardware survey",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "§1 pp.1–2",
        "§2 pp.3–5, Definitions 3–4 and Proposition 1"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "COOK_CMI_P_VS_NP",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-S2",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "CMI P vs NP problem status",
      "label": "CMI P vs NP problem status",
      "text": "CMI P vs NP problem status",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/millennium/p-vs-np/",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/millennium/p-vs-np/",
      "sourceVersion": "Live official page observed 2026-10-04",
      "version_date": null,
      "publication_status": "official status page",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "status heading; overview and advanced text"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_official_full_page",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "CMI_P_VS_NP_STATUS",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-E1",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "P的量词：原文依据",
      "text": "定义对所有输入长度和同长输入取最坏情形。",
      "source_id": "P06-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P06-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/pvsnp.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "CMI official problem description; 12-page PDF, no version/date printed in inspected text",
      "preciseLocator": "§1 p.1, definition of T_M(n) and polynomial time; p.2 definition of P",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-P1",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "P的量词：前提",
      "text": "固定有限字母表、标准图灵机模型及输入编码。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P06-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P06-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§1 p.1, definition of T_M(n) and polynomial time; p.2 definition of P",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-L1",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "P的量词：边界",
      "text": "在某一测试集很快，不能替代最坏情形的全称证明。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P06-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P06-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§1 p.1, definition of T_M(n) and polynomial time; p.2 definition of P",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-C1",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "P的量词",
      "text": "P要求一个确定性算法，在所有长度为n的输入上，其最坏运行步数受固定多项式约束。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P06-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P06-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P06-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P06-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "固定有限字母表、标准图灵机模型及输入编码。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-E2",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "NP的证书：原文依据",
      "text": "正文给出证书长度界、存在量词与P⊆NP的构造。",
      "source_id": "P06-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P06-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/pvsnp.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "CMI official problem description; 12-page PDF, no version/date printed in inspected text",
      "preciseLocator": "§1 p.2, checking-relation definition and paragraph following Problem Statement",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-P2",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "NP的证书：前提",
      "text": "判定语言、YES实例的证书；不是任意长度证明。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P06-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P06-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§1 p.2, checking-relation definition and paragraph following Problem Statement",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-L2",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "NP的证书：边界",
      "text": "可检验证书并不自行给出高效寻找证书的算法。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P06-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P06-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§1 p.2, checking-relation definition and paragraph following Problem Statement",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-C2",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "NP的证书",
      "text": "NP的定义要求长度为输入长度多项式的证书，且存在确定性多项式时间检查关系；P包含于NP。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P06-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P06-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P06-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P06-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "判定语言、YES实例的证书；不是任意长度证明。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-E3",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "完整性的证明杠杆：原文依据",
      "text": "正式描述将NP完全性与P=NP连接为命题。",
      "source_id": "P06-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P06-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/pvsnp.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "CMI official problem description; 12-page PDF, no version/date printed in inspected text",
      "preciseLocator": "§2 pp.4–5, Definitions 3–4 and Proposition 1(c)",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-P3",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "完整性的证明杠杆：前提",
      "text": "必须证明目标语言完整且算法对全部合法输入正确、最坏时间多项式。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P06-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P06-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§2 pp.4–5, Definitions 3–4 and Proposition 1(c)",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-L3",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "完整性的证明杠杆：边界",
      "text": "受限实例族、启发式或平均案例表现不能代替这些前提。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P06-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P06-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§2 pp.4–5, Definitions 3–4 and Proposition 1(c)",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-C3",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "完整性的证明杠杆",
      "text": "若某个NP完全语言属于P，依据多项式归约的传递性即可推出P=NP。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P06-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P06-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P06-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P06-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "必须证明目标语言完整且算法对全部合法输入正确、最坏时间多项式。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-E4",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "多项式并非即刻实用：原文依据",
      "text": "Cook用巨大幂次与巨大常数说明可行性论题的限度。",
      "source_id": "P06-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P06-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/pvsnp.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "CMI official problem description; 12-page PDF, no version/date printed in inspected text",
      "preciseLocator": "§2 p.3, paragraph beginning It has now become standard; p.4 minor-closed-family discussion",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-P4",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "多项式并非即刻实用：前提",
      "text": "此处讨论复杂度定义与有限规模执行成本的差别。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P06-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P06-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§2 p.3, paragraph beginning It has now become standard; p.4 minor-closed-family discussion",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-L4",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "多项式并非即刻实用：边界",
      "text": "这是形式边界，不预测假想算法将有何具体耗时。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P06-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P06-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§2 p.3, paragraph beginning It has now become standard; p.4 minor-closed-family discussion",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-C4",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "多项式并非即刻实用",
      "text": "形式上的多项式时间可有巨大指数或常数，因此P=NP与实用速度是不同判断。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "explicit editorial evaluation, not a new experimental result",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P06-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P06-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P06-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P06-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "此处讨论复杂度定义与有限规模执行成本的差别。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment_pending_review",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-E5",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "当前状态有限核验：原文依据",
      "text": "官方状态标签及说明均未给出一般性解决。",
      "source_id": "P06-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P06-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/millennium/p-vs-np/",
      "sourceVersion": "Live official page observed 2026-10-04",
      "preciseLocator": "status heading immediately above P vs NP; Advanced paragraph on absence of a general lower-bound proof",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-P5",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "当前状态有限核验：前提",
      "text": "状态判断限于此官方页面与日志中的定向查询。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P06-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P06-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "status heading immediately above P vs NP; Advanced paragraph on absence of a general lower-bound proof",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-L5",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "当前状态有限核验：边界",
      "text": "没有穷尽所有声称证明；机构标签也不是证明本身。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P06-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P06-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "status heading immediately above P vs NP; Advanced paragraph on absence of a general lower-bound proof",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-C5",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "当前状态有限核验",
      "text": "2026-10-04所读Clay官方页面标为Unsolved；本轮未找到其宣布解决的更新。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "explicit editorial evaluation, not a new experimental result",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P06-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P06-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P06-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P06-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "状态判断限于此官方页面与日志中的定向查询。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment_pending_review",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-Q1",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题／待验证边界",
      "text": "每一个可多项式时间验证的问题，是否也可多项式时间求解？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "P=NP或P≠NP的一般证明；实际可用算法速度。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P06-S1",
        "P06-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P06-E1",
        "P06-E2",
        "P06-E3",
        "P06-E4",
        "P06-E5"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": "给出并审查一个NP完全问题的多项式时间算法，或证明任何此类算法不可能；形式化验证可辅助检查但必须核对定理与问题定义一致。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-S1",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "E. Bombieri: Problems of the Millennium: The Riemann Hypothesis",
      "label": "E. Bombieri: Problems of the Millennium: The Riemann Hypothesis",
      "text": "E. Bombieri: Problems of the Millennium: The Riemann Hypothesis",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/riemann.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/riemann.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "CMI official 11-page formal description; no version date verified",
      "version_date": null,
      "publication_status": "primary formal problem description",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "I. The problem p.1"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "BOMBIERI_CMI_RH",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-S2",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Platt and Trudgian: The Riemann hypothesis is true up to 3·10^12",
      "label": "Platt and Trudgian: The Riemann hypothesis is true up to 3·10^12",
      "text": "Platt and Trudgian: The Riemann hypothesis is true up to 3·10^12",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.09765",
      "metadataUrl": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.09765",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2004.09765v1",
      "version_date": "2020-04-21",
      "publication_status": "author preprint of work published in Bulletin LMS 53 (2021), DOI 10.1112/blms.12460",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "§1 pp.1–2 Theorem 1",
        "§2 pp.2–3 Theory and computation"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "PLATT_TRUDGIAN_2004_09765",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-S3",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Claude: More than two thirds of the zeros of the Riemann zeta function are simple and on the critical line",
      "label": "Claude: More than two thirds of the zeros of the Riemann zeta function are simple and on the critical line",
      "text": "Claude: More than two thirds of the zeros of the Riemann zeta function are simple and on the critical line",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/95c246936988e43127bc6b2ceb7077c1dad2d68e.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/95c246936988e43127bc6b2ceb7077c1dad2d68e.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "author PDF dated August 11, 2026; linked by release updated August 13",
      "version_date": "2026-08-11",
      "publication_status": "original author manuscript; journal peer review not verified",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "§1.1 pp.1–2 Theorem A",
        "§1.2 proof outline p.2",
        "§1.4–1.5 p.3"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "ANTHROPIC_ZETA_2026",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-S4",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "CMI Riemann Hypothesis status",
      "label": "CMI Riemann Hypothesis status",
      "text": "CMI Riemann Hypothesis status",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/millennium/riemann-hypothesis/",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/millennium/riemann-hypothesis/",
      "sourceVersion": "Live official page observed 2026-10-04",
      "version_date": null,
      "publication_status": "official status page",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "status heading and overview"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_official_full_page",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "CMI_RH_STATUS",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-E1",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "精确的全称问题：原文依据",
      "text": "正式文本以解析延拓定义ζ并区分平凡与非平凡零点。",
      "source_id": "P07-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P07-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/riemann.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "CMI official 11-page formal description; no version date verified",
      "preciseLocator": "I. The problem p.1, final two displayed/text statements before section II",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-P1",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "精确的全称问题：前提",
      "text": "通常的黎曼ζ函数，而非所有L函数的一揽子命题。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P07-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P07-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "I. The problem p.1, final two displayed/text statements before section II",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-L1",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "精确的全称问题：边界",
      "text": "函数方程的对称性本身不推出所有零点都位于中心线。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P07-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P07-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "I. The problem p.1, final two displayed/text statements before section II",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-C1",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "精确的全称问题",
      "text": "黎曼猜想断言ζ函数每个非平凡零点实部均为1/2；负偶整数的平凡零点不在此断言内。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P07-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P07-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P07-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P07-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "通常的黎曼ζ函数，而非所有L函数的一揽子命题。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-E2",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "有限高度认证：原文依据",
      "text": "定理给出有限高度及12,363,153,437,138个零点的计数。",
      "source_id": "P07-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P07-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.09765",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2004.09765v1",
      "preciseLocator": "§1 p.2 Theorem 1",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-P2",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "有限高度认证：前提",
      "text": "该论文的计算与严格误差界正确；高度界不是零点数。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P07-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P07-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§1 p.2 Theorem 1",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-L2",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "有限高度认证：边界",
      "text": "本轮未重跑计算；有限区间不能通过归纳外推到无限高度。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P07-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P07-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§1 p.2 Theorem 1",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-C2",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "有限高度认证",
      "text": "Platt–Trudgian定理1报告，将所有虚部在0与3,000,175,332,800之间的非平凡零点认证为临界线上。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P07-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P07-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P07-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P07-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "该论文的计算与严格误差界正确；高度界不是零点数。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-E3",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "认证依赖的计算结构：原文依据",
      "text": "算法说明同时包含定位和避免漏掉线外零点的计数环节。",
      "source_id": "P07-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P07-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.09765",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2004.09765v1",
      "preciseLocator": "§2 pp.2–3, first three paragraphs",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-P3",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "认证依赖的计算结构：前提",
      "text": "需要严格截断与舍入界和计数证明同时成立。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P07-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P07-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§2 pp.2–3, first three paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-L3",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "认证依赖的计算结构：边界",
      "text": "浮点近似吻合不等价于同等级认证；本文未重新审计软件。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P07-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P07-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§2 pp.2–3, first three paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-C3",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "认证依赖的计算结构",
      "text": "其计算用Arb区间／球算术控制误差，以变号寻找线上的零点，并以Turing方法变体核对完整计数。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P07-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P07-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P07-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P07-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "需要严格截断与舍入界和计数证明同时成立。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-E4",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "2026年比例进展：原文依据",
      "text": "分母按重数计数；结论为T趋于无穷时(T,2T)区间的比例下界。",
      "source_id": "P07-S3",
      "source_ids": [
        "P07-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/95c246936988e43127bc6b2ceb7077c1dad2d68e.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "author PDF dated August 11, 2026; linked by release updated August 13",
      "preciseLocator": "§1.1 pp.1–2, definitions N and N0^s, Theorem A; §1.4 p.3",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-P4",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "2026年比例进展：前提",
      "text": "接受其解析输入、秩—迹不等式与误差控制；这是来源报告的定理，待专家复核。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P07-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P07-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§1.1 pp.1–2, definitions N and N0^s, Theorem A; §1.4 p.3",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-L4",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "2026年比例进展：边界",
      "text": "未达到部分不被证明在线外；o(N)个线外零点亦可能逃过该类比例判据。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P07-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P07-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§1.1 pp.1–2, definitions N and N0^s, Theorem A; §1.4 p.3",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-C4",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "2026年比例进展",
      "text": "2026年作者稿定理A声称：渐近至少2/3的零点既单又在线上；指定窗口把下界提高至约0.67250。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P07-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P07-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P07-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P07-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "接受其解析输入、秩—迹不等式与误差控制；这是来源报告的定理，待专家复核。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-E5",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "边界仍是全称证明：原文依据",
      "text": "全称命题、有限高度和渐近比例对应三个不同逻辑对象。",
      "source_id": "P07-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P07-S1",
        "P07-S2",
        "P07-S3",
        "P07-S4"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/riemann.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "CMI official 11-page formal description; no version date verified",
      "preciseLocator": "CMI status heading; Bombieri I p.1; Platt–Trudgian Theorem 1; Claude §1.4 p.3",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-P5",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "边界仍是全称证明：前提",
      "text": "本判断区分量词，并未验证新稿全部证明或其Lean实现。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P07-S1",
        "P07-S2",
        "P07-S3",
        "P07-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P07-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "CMI status heading; Bombieri I p.1; Platt–Trudgian Theorem 1; Claude §1.4 p.3",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-L5",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "边界仍是全称证明：边界",
      "text": "若获得被严格认证的线外零点即反驳；比例提高本身不能给“剩余工作量”。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P07-S1",
        "P07-S2",
        "P07-S3",
        "P07-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P07-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "CMI status heading; Bombieri I p.1; Platt–Trudgian Theorem 1; Claude §1.4 p.3",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-C5",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "边界仍是全称证明",
      "text": "官方仍标未解；有限认证和比例下界均不能被解释为“黎曼猜想完成了某百分比”。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "explicit editorial evaluation, not a new experimental result",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P07-S1",
        "P07-S2",
        "P07-S3",
        "P07-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P07-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P07-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P07-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "本判断区分量词，并未验证新稿全部证明或其Lean实现。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment_pending_review",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-Q1",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题／待验证边界",
      "text": "ζ函数所有非平凡零点的实部是否都是1/2？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "全部非平凡零点在线上的一般证明；或严格认证的线外反例。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P07-S1",
        "P07-S2",
        "P07-S3",
        "P07-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P07-E1",
        "P07-E2",
        "P07-E3",
        "P07-E4",
        "P07-E5"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": "对所有非平凡零点成立的严密证明，或一个被严格认证的反例。仅逐项核验有限多个零点，不能由此证明所有非平凡零点都满足猜想；严格认证的一个反例则足以推翻。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-S1",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Charles L. Fefferman: Existence and smoothness of the Navier–Stokes equation",
      "label": "Charles L. Fefferman: Existence and smoothness of the Navier–Stokes equation",
      "text": "Charles L. Fefferman: Existence and smoothness of the Navier–Stokes equation",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/navierstokes.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/navierstokes.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "CMI official 6-page formal problem description; no version date verified",
      "version_date": null,
      "publication_status": "primary formal problem description",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "pp.1–2 equations (1)–(11) and alternatives A–D"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "FEFFERMAN_CMI_NS",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-S2",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "OpenAI: Finite Time Blowup for Navier–Stokes",
      "label": "OpenAI: Finite Time Blowup for Navier–Stokes",
      "text": "OpenAI: Finite Time Blowup for Navier–Stokes",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/32d9f210-8b73-45e0-91bc-82a30aef8a9a/navier-stokes.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/32d9f210-8b73-45e0-91bc-82a30aef8a9a/navier-stokes.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "166-page author PDF linked from 2026-09-08 release; immutable URL snapshot",
      "version_date": "2026-09-08",
      "publication_status": "original author proof manuscript; formalization claimed by authors, not independently checked here",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "p.1 §1 Theorem 1.1",
        "§10 pp.116–117 opening and construction scope",
        "p.125 Corollary 10.6"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "OPENAI_NS_2026",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-S3",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "CMI Navier-Stokes Announcement",
      "label": "CMI Navier-Stokes Announcement",
      "text": "CMI Navier-Stokes Announcement",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/news/navier-stokes-announcement/",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/news/navier-stokes-announcement/",
      "sourceVersion": "official statement dated 2026-09-11",
      "version_date": "2026-09-11",
      "publication_status": "official institutional status statement",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "substantive paragraphs 6–9; final evaluation-process paragraph"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_official_full_page",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "CMI_NS_STATUS_2026",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-S4",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "CMI Navier-Stokes Equation status",
      "label": "CMI Navier-Stokes Equation status",
      "text": "CMI Navier-Stokes Equation status",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/millennium/navier-stokes-equation/",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/millennium/navier-stokes-equation/",
      "sourceVersion": "Live official page observed 2026-10-04",
      "version_date": null,
      "publication_status": "official problem status page",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Active heading and official problem description link"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_official_full_page",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "CMI_NS_STATUS_2026",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-E1",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "四种可交付命题：原文依据",
      "text": "全空间与周期空间分别定义存在命题和崩溃命题。",
      "source_id": "P08-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P08-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/navierstokes.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "CMI official 6-page formal problem description; no version date verified",
      "preciseLocator": "p.2 alternatives A–D; pp.1–2 equations (4)–(11)",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-P1",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "四种可交付命题：前提",
      "text": "三维、正黏性、无散初值及相应衰减／周期条件。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P08-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P08-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "p.2 alternatives A–D; pp.1–2 equations (4)–(11)",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-L1",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "四种可交付命题：边界",
      "text": "四者并非仅差措辞；特别是外力量词不能省略。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P08-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P08-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "p.2 alternatives A–D; pp.1–2 equations (4)–(11)",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-C1",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "四种可交付命题",
      "text": "正式悬赏接受A、B、C、D任一项：A/B为零外力全局光滑存在；C/D允许合条件的光滑外力造成不存在该类全局解。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P08-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P08-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P08-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P08-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "三维、正黏性、无散初值及相应衰减／周期条件。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-E2",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "全空间来源定理：原文依据",
      "text": "定理列出力、支撑、范数和无全局同初值同外力解的结论。",
      "source_id": "P08-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P08-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/32d9f210-8b73-45e0-91bc-82a30aef8a9a/navier-stokes.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "166-page author PDF linked from 2026-09-08 release; immutable URL snapshot",
      "preciseLocator": "§1 p.1, Theorem 1.1 and equation (1.1)",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-P2",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "全空间来源定理：前提",
      "text": "这是所读原稿报告的定理；未独立验证166页论证。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P08-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P08-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§1 p.1, Theorem 1.1 and equation (1.1)",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-L2",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "全空间来源定理：边界",
      "text": "并非现实流体被实验观察到无限速度，也不声称无外力反例。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P08-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P08-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§1 p.1, Theorem 1.1 and equation (1.1)",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-C2",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "全空间来源定理",
      "text": "2026稿定理1.1声称：任意正黏性下，可构造零初速、时空紧支撑光滑外力，使速度在t趋于1时无界而动能有界。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P08-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P08-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P08-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P08-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "这是所读原稿报告的定理；未独立验证166页论证。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-E3",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "周期分支来源结论：原文依据",
      "text": "该处对应正式问题的D分支，并保留外力。",
      "source_id": "P08-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P08-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/32d9f210-8b73-45e0-91bc-82a30aef8a9a/navier-stokes.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "166-page author PDF linked from 2026-09-08 release; immutable URL snapshot",
      "preciseLocator": "§10 p.125, Corollary 10.6 and preceding rescaling discussion",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-P3",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "周期分支来源结论：前提",
      "text": "需要局部化、光滑延拓与缩放论证完整成立。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P08-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P08-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§10 p.125, Corollary 10.6 and preceding rescaling discussion",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-L3",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "周期分支来源结论：边界",
      "text": "本轮只核对结论与正式问题的文字对应；未审计每条引理。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P08-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P08-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§10 p.125, Corollary 10.6 and preceding rescaling discussion",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-C3",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "周期分支来源结论",
      "text": "原稿推论10.6把构造缩放到三维环面，报告零初速且时间紧支撑外力的周期解在有限时间爆破。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P08-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P08-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P08-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P08-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "需要局部化、光滑延拓与缩放论证完整成立。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-E4",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "机构状态不是授奖：原文依据",
      "text": "公告使用审慎语言，并未在所读页面宣布奖金授予。",
      "source_id": "P08-S3",
      "source_ids": [
        "P08-S3",
        "P08-S4"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/news/navier-stokes-announcement/",
      "sourceVersion": "official statement dated 2026-09-11",
      "preciseLocator": "Announcement penultimate substantive paragraph and final process paragraph; problem page status heading",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-P4",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "机构状态不是授奖：前提",
      "text": "日期固定于2026-10-04所见正式网页。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P08-S3",
        "P08-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P08-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Announcement penultimate substantive paragraph and final process paragraph; problem page status heading",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-L4",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "机构状态不是授奖：边界",
      "text": "作者宣布、形式化提交、专家接受和机构正式决定是不同层级。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P08-S3",
        "P08-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P08-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Announcement penultimate substantive paragraph and final process paragraph; problem page status heading",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-C4",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "机构状态不是授奖",
      "text": "Clay于9月11日称问题似已解决，并表示评估和归功流程将继续；10月4日问题页显示Active。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "explicit editorial evaluation, not a new experimental result",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P08-S3",
        "P08-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P08-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P08-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P08-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "日期固定于2026-10-04所见正式网页。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment_pending_review",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-E5",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "不能移除外力条件：原文依据",
      "text": "正式问题和新稿对外力的条件明确不同。",
      "source_id": "P08-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P08-S1",
        "P08-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/navierstokes.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "CMI official 6-page formal problem description; no version date verified",
      "preciseLocator": "Fefferman p.2 A–D; OpenAI Theorem 1.1 p.1 and Corollary 10.6 p.125",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-P5",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "不能移除外力条件：前提",
      "text": "这是对逻辑蕴含范围的编辑核对。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P08-S1",
        "P08-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P08-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Fefferman p.2 A–D; OpenAI Theorem 1.1 p.1 and Corollary 10.6 p.125",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-L5",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "不能移除外力条件：边界",
      "text": "零外力结论需要额外证明；工程适用性需要另有尺度与工况证据。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P08-S1",
        "P08-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P08-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Fefferman p.2 A–D; OpenAI Theorem 1.1 p.1 and Corollary 10.6 p.125",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-C5",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "不能移除外力条件",
      "text": "即使C/D证明最终成立，也不能单凭这一有外力构造推出零外力A/B为假，或宣布一般工程模拟失效。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "explicit editorial evaluation, not a new experimental result",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P08-S1",
        "P08-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P08-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P08-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P08-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "这是对逻辑蕴含范围的编辑核对。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment_pending_review",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-Q1",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题／待验证边界",
      "text": "2026年宣布的突破究竟解决正式问题的哪一分支，其证明、假设与形式化实现能否通过独立核验？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "本项目未确证整份证明与Lean实现无误，未确认正式授奖，也未判定零外力A/B。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P08-S1",
        "P08-S2",
        "P08-S3",
        "P08-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P08-E1",
        "P08-E2",
        "P08-E3",
        "P08-E4",
        "P08-E5"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": "公开可审计证明、精确初边值/外力/定义条件对应、独立专家验证及正式机构后续状态。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-S1",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "ARC Prize 2025: Technical Report",
      "label": "ARC Prize 2025: Technical Report",
      "text": "ARC Prize 2025: Technical Report",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2601.10904v1",
      "metadataUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2601.10904v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2601.10904v1",
      "version_date": "2026-01-15",
      "publication_status": "organizer original benchmark report preprint",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "§1–1.1",
        "§2.1–2.2 Table 1",
        "§4.1–4.2"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "ARC_PRIZE_2025",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-S2",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "ARC Prize: OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra on ARC-AGI-3",
      "label": "ARC Prize: OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra on ARC-AGI-3",
      "text": "ARC Prize: OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra on ARC-AGI-3",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arcprize.org/blog/astra",
      "metadataUrl": "https://arcprize.org/blog/astra",
      "sourceVersion": "original evaluator report dated 2026-09-03; page observed 2026-10-04",
      "version_date": "2026-09-03",
      "publication_status": "original benchmark evaluator report; not a peer-reviewed journal paper",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Astra Results table",
        "Action Efficiency Compared to Humans",
        "Two Harnesses, Two Questions",
        "ARC-AGI Series final three paragraphs"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_primary_report",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "ARC_PRIZE_ASTRA_2026",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-S3",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "GPT-6 Astra verified ARC-AGI results",
      "label": "GPT-6 Astra verified ARC-AGI results",
      "text": "GPT-6 Astra verified ARC-AGI results",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arcprize.org/results/openai-gpt-6-astra",
      "metadataUrl": "https://arcprize.org/results/openai-gpt-6-astra",
      "sourceVersion": "live result page dated 2026-09-02; snapshot 2026-10-04",
      "version_date": "2026-09-02",
      "publication_status": "official evaluator data summary; same evaluation family as blog",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Verified scores table; High and Max rows"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_primary_results",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "ARC_PRIZE_ASTRA_2026",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-E1",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "2025协议与分母：原文依据",
      "text": "报告把公开训练、半私有和私有测试集分开。",
      "source_id": "P09-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P09-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2601.10904v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2601.10904v1",
      "preciseLocator": "§1 paragraphs describing test attempts; §1.1 Dataset Composition, three dataset bullets",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-P1",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "2025协议与分母：前提",
      "text": "结论限于该版本网格任务及评分规则。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P09-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P09-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§1 paragraphs describing test attempts; §1.1 Dataset Composition, three dataset bullets",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-L1",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "2025协议与分母：边界",
      "text": "私有是主办方的保管声明，不是本项目完成污染审计。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P09-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P09-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§1 paragraphs describing test attempts; §1.1 Dataset Composition, three dataset bullets",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-C1",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "2025协议与分母",
      "text": "ARC-AGI-2最终私有集含120个人工设计任务；每个测试输入允许两次尝试，半私有集有API暴露风险。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P09-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P09-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P09-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P09-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "结论限于该版本网格任务及评分规则。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-E2",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "历史得分与成本：原文依据",
      "text": "主办方同时报告名次、得分与成本。",
      "source_id": "P09-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P09-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2601.10904v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2601.10904v1",
      "preciseLocator": "§2.1 Competition Progress first paragraph; §2.2 Table 1 NVARC row",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-P2",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "历史得分与成本：前提",
      "text": "2025比赛计算约束；美元口径为报告所述计算成本。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P09-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P09-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§2.1 Competition Progress first paragraph; §2.2 Table 1 NVARC row",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-L2",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "历史得分与成本：边界",
      "text": "不是2026年能力上限，亦不包含全部研发、训练与人员成本。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P09-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P09-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§2.1 Competition Progress first paragraph; §2.2 Table 1 NVARC row",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-C2",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "历史得分与成本",
      "text": "2025竞赛第一名私有得分为24.03%；报告给出约每任务0.20美元的计算成本。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported measurement; not independently rerun",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P09-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P09-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P09-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P09-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "2025比赛计算约束；美元口径为报告所述计算成本。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-E3",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "污染推断的限度：原文依据",
      "text": "作者把行为线索解释为ARC相关知识已被学习。",
      "source_id": "P09-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P09-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2601.10904v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2601.10904v1",
      "preciseLocator": "§4.1 final example and explanatory paragraph; §4.2 first paragraph",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-P3",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "污染推断的限度：前提",
      "text": "这是主办方归因，不是已核对训练语料的直接测量。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P09-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P09-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§4.1 final example and explanatory paragraph; §4.2 first paragraph",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-L3",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "污染推断的限度：边界",
      "text": "不能单凭颜色映射认定私有题答案泄漏。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P09-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P09-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§4.1 final example and explanatory paragraph; §4.2 first paragraph",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-C3",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "污染推断的限度",
      "text": "报告观察到模型在未被提示的情况下使用ARC颜色映射，并据此提出领域知识过拟合；未量化该效应大小。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P09-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P09-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P09-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P09-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "这是主办方归因，不是已核对训练语料的直接测量。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-E4",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "2026结果依赖上下文接口：原文依据",
      "text": "两种接口分别保留可见笔记或提供商的不透明推理状态与压缩。",
      "source_id": "P09-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P09-S2",
        "P09-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arcprize.org/blog/astra",
      "sourceVersion": "original evaluator report dated 2026-09-03; page observed 2026-10-04",
      "preciseLocator": "Astra Results table, max and high rows; result page Verified scores table (62.71%,99.95%)",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-P4",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "2026结果依赖上下文接口：前提",
      "text": "这是不同推理档与接口的最佳观察结果，不能当单因素随机试验；显示精度按原报告。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P09-S2",
        "P09-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P09-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Astra Results table, max and high rows; result page Verified scores table (62.71%,99.95%)",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-L4",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "2026结果依赖上下文接口：边界",
      "text": "ARC-AGI-3分数包含动作效率，不是单纯答对率；金额是该次评测总成本，不含全部训练／研发。两种接口使用同模型和任务，非独立重复，不能代表所有新任务已解决。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P09-S2",
        "P09-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P09-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Astra Results table, max and high rows; result page Verified scores table (62.71%,99.95%)",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-C4",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "2026结果依赖上下文接口",
      "text": "9月评测报告Astra在半私有ARC-AGI-3上，标准接口max得62.7%，该次评测总成本26,098美元；保留推理状态的接口high得99.9%，该次总成本18,817美元。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported measurement; not independently rerun",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P09-S2",
        "P09-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P09-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P09-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P09-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "这是不同推理档与接口的最佳观察结果，不能当单因素随机试验；显示精度按原报告。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-E5",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "接近饱和不终结问题：原文依据",
      "text": "主办方限定结果的外推范围，同时承认互动学习的重要进步。",
      "source_id": "P09-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P09-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arcprize.org/blog/astra",
      "sourceVersion": "original evaluator report dated 2026-09-03; page observed 2026-10-04",
      "preciseLocator": "ARC-AGI Series, paragraphs beginning When we launched and At the same time; Two Harnesses, Two Questions",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-P5",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "接近饱和不终结问题：前提",
      "text": "将此作为评测效度边界，而不裁定唯一的智能定义。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P09-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P09-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "ARC-AGI Series, paragraphs beginning When we launched and At the same time; Two Harnesses, Two Questions",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-L5",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "接近饱和不终结问题：边界",
      "text": "开放任务、持续学习、成本和跨域迁移仍需新的直接证据。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P09-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P09-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "ARC-AGI Series, paragraphs beginning When we launched and At the same time; Two Harnesses, Two Questions",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-C5",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "接近饱和不终结问题",
      "text": "2026评测者明确指出ARC-AGI-3是确定性、封闭目标的有限格式；接近饱和不足以证明开放世界AGI。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "explicit editorial evaluation, not a new experimental result",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P09-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P09-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P09-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P09-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "将此作为评测效度边界，而不裁定唯一的智能定义。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment_pending_review",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-Q1",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题／待验证边界",
      "text": "系统能否在未污染、结构真正新颖的任务与环境中，保持可复现、资源可控的学习和规划能力？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "在任意未见任务、开放环境和可承受总成本下的普适高效泛化。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P09-S1",
        "P09-S2",
        "P09-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P09-E1",
        "P09-E2",
        "P09-E3",
        "P09-E4",
        "P09-E5"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": "事先隐藏的新任务族、时间切分/任务生成独立性、可复现成本账本、干预/组合变化和跨领域迁移测试共同显示稳健提升。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-S1",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Jain et al.: Adaptive Adversaries: A Multi-Turn, Multi-LLM Benchmark for LLM Agent Security",
      "label": "Jain et al.: Adaptive Adversaries: A Multi-Turn, Multi-LLM Benchmark for LLM Agent Security",
      "text": "Jain et al.: Adaptive Adversaries: A Multi-Turn, Multi-LLM Benchmark for LLM Agent Security",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2607.18063v1",
      "metadataUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2607.18063v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2607.18063v1",
      "version_date": "2026-07-20",
      "publication_status": "original research preprint; peer review not verified",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "§3 Design principles, memoryless defender and structured checks",
        "§4.3",
        "§5.3",
        "§5.5 Table 3",
        "§6 Limitations"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "ADAPTIVE_ADVERSARIES_2607_18063",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-S2",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Li et al.: AgentDyn",
      "label": "Li et al.: AgentDyn",
      "text": "Li et al.: AgentDyn",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2602.03117v1",
      "metadataUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2602.03117v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2602.03117v1",
      "version_date": "2026-02-03",
      "publication_status": "original research preprint; peer review not verified",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "§3.3 Table 2",
        "§4.1 setup and metrics",
        "§4.2 Table 3",
        "Appendix A Limitations"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "AGENTDYN_2602_03117",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-E1",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "多轮攻击增加测得失败：原文依据",
      "text": "同一矩阵仅改变计入的交互预算，暴露第一轮遗漏的失败。",
      "source_id": "P10-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P10-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2607.18063v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2607.18063v1",
      "preciseLocator": "§4.3 identifies Opus 4.6 / GPT-5.4 / Gemini 2.5 Pro; §5.3 first paragraph",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-P1",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "多轮攻击增加测得失败：前提",
      "text": "攻击者可见历史，而防守者每轮无状态；每格每场景N=5。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P10-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P10-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§4.3 identifies Opus 4.6 / GPT-5.4 / Gemini 2.5 Pro; §5.3 first paragraph",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-L1",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "多轮攻击增加测得失败：边界",
      "text": "不是真实长期有记忆代理的部署失效率；多轮预算与攻击适应共同影响结果。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P10-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P10-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§4.3 identifies Opus 4.6 / GPT-5.4 / Gemini 2.5 Pro; §5.3 first paragraph",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-C1",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "多轮攻击增加测得失败",
      "text": "固定21场景和945次对战时，第一轮评分的三模型ASR为0/0/1.0%；15轮评分为5.4/5.4/14.0%。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported measurement; not independently rerun",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P10-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P10-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P10-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P10-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "攻击者可见历史，而防守者每轮无状态；每格每场景N=5。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-E2",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "安全排名非单一维度：原文依据",
      "text": "14个有攻击成功的场景用于一致性指标，13个区分至少一对防守者。",
      "source_id": "P10-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P10-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2607.18063v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2607.18063v1",
      "preciseLocator": "§5.5 Table 3, Ours row; accompanying calibration caveat",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-P2",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "安全排名非单一维度：前提",
      "text": "场景为难度校准后的选择集，并非真实任务随机样本。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P10-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P10-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§5.5 Table 3, Ours row; accompanying calibration caveat",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-L2",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "安全排名非单一维度：边界",
      "text": "不能按此区间推出所有场景的统一“最安全模型”。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P10-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P10-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§5.5 Table 3, Ours row; accompanying calibration caveat",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-C2",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "安全排名非单一维度",
      "text": "同一论文在21场景中14个informative场景上计算的排名一致性Kendall W为0.19，95%区间0.02–0.58；汇总ASR会掩盖场景差异。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P10-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P10-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P10-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P10-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "场景为难度校准后的选择集，并非真实任务随机样本。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-E3",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "低ASR与低效用可并存：原文依据",
      "text": "攻击成功率和正常效用分列，防御可牺牲任务完成。",
      "source_id": "P10-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P10-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2602.03117v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2602.03117v1",
      "preciseLocator": "§4.2 Table 3 GPT-4o None and Tool Filter rows; §4.1 Evaluation Metrics",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-P3",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "低ASR与低效用可并存：前提",
      "text": "该实现、模型快照、560安全测试与60任务；默认固定类型攻击。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P10-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P10-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§4.2 Table 3 GPT-4o None and Tool Filter rows; §4.1 Evaluation Metrics",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-L3",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "低ASR与低效用可并存：边界",
      "text": "不是所有过滤方法必然如此；对不同威胁模型不能直接移植此比例。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P10-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P10-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§4.2 Table 3 GPT-4o None and Tool Filter rows; §4.1 Evaluation Metrics",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-C3",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "低ASR与低效用可并存",
      "text": "AgentDyn的GPT-4o加Tool Filter时ASR为4.22%，但无攻击任务成功率仅8.33%；未防御分别为37.80%和53.33%。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported measurement; not independently rerun",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P10-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P10-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P10-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P10-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "该实现、模型快照、560安全测试与60任务；默认固定类型攻击。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-E4",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "评测修改了确认行为：原文依据",
      "text": "方法正文明确记录此统一指令，作者也称场景仍远离现实。",
      "source_id": "P10-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P10-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2602.03117v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2602.03117v1",
      "preciseLocator": "§4.1 Defense Implementation final sentence; Appendix A",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-P4",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "评测修改了确认行为：前提",
      "text": "本命题只描述研究设定；不把论文指令当作对本项目的授权。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P10-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P10-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§4.1 Defense Implementation final sentence; Appendix A",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-L4",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "评测修改了确认行为：边界",
      "text": "取消确认会改变安全—效用边界，不能据此判定原产品实际风险。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P10-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P10-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§4.1 Defense Implementation final sentence; Appendix A",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-C4",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "评测修改了确认行为",
      "text": "AgentDyn为避免停机，给各实现加入自动完成且不向用户确认的指令；这会限制其对有人类确认部署的外推。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "explicit editorial evaluation, not a new experimental result",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P10-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P10-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P10-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P10-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "本命题只描述研究设定；不把论文指令当作对本项目的授权。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment_pending_review",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-E5",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "有限压力测试不是保证：原文依据",
      "text": "作者列出攻击空间、样本、API漂移与现实覆盖限制。",
      "source_id": "P10-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P10-S1",
        "P10-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2607.18063v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2607.18063v1",
      "preciseLocator": "Adaptive Adversaries §6 sample size, attacker capability, coverage, reproducibility and defender state; AgentDyn Appendix A",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-P5",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "有限压力测试不是保证：前提",
      "text": "保证须声明威胁、模型与工具版本、允许行为及部署监测条件。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P10-S1",
        "P10-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P10-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Adaptive Adversaries §6 sample size, attacker capability, coverage, reproducibility and defender state; AgentDyn Appendix A",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-L5",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "有限压力测试不是保证：边界",
      "text": "安全论证还需真实事故和恢复证据；本卡未审查价值对齐全部问题。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P10-S1",
        "P10-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P10-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Adaptive Adversaries §6 sample size, attacker capability, coverage, reproducibility and defender state; AgentDyn Appendix A",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-C5",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "有限压力测试不是保证",
      "text": "两研究支持持续、场景化的对抗测试；它们不证明开放世界绝对安全，也不量化所有未来失效。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "explicit editorial evaluation, not a new experimental result",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P10-S1",
        "P10-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P10-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P10-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P10-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "保证须声明威胁、模型与工具版本、允许行为及部署监测条件。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment_pending_review",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-Q1",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题／待验证边界",
      "text": "在长期自主行动、环境变化和对抗输入下，怎样给出可检验且可维护的行为保证？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "长期开放世界行为的普适可维护安全保证。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P10-S1",
        "P10-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P10-E1",
        "P10-E2",
        "P10-E3",
        "P10-E4",
        "P10-E5"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": "明确允许行为和威胁模型后，独立评测与部署事故数据相连；关键子系统有可验证约束、可恢复机制和持续监测，并量化残余失效率。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-S1",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Google Quantum AI: Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold",
      "label": "Google Quantum AI: Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold",
      "text": "Google Quantum AI: Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08449-y",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08449-y",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature 638, 920–926; VoR 2025-01-29, updated by 2026-04-28 correction",
      "version_date": "2026-04-28",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed original experimental research, corrected",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Fig.1c,d and associated fitting paragraph",
        "Outlook",
        "Change history",
        "Rights and permissions"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 as displayed; no figures/fulltext redistributed; original factual paraphrase only, third-party rights may differ",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 as displayed; no figures/fulltext redistributed; original factual paraphrase only, third-party rights may differ",
      "independence_group": "GOOGLE_WILLOW_THRESHOLD_2024",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-S2",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Author Correction: Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold",
      "label": "Author Correction: Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold",
      "text": "Author Correction: Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10559-8?error=cookies_not_supported",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10559-8?error=cookies_not_supported",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature 653 E5; VoR 2026-04-28",
      "version_date": "2026-04-28",
      "publication_status": "official author correction to same work",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "single substantive correction paragraph; rights section"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 as displayed; no figures/fulltext redistributed; original factual paraphrase only, third-party rights may differ",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 as displayed; no figures/fulltext redistributed; original factual paraphrase only, third-party rights may differ",
      "independence_group": "GOOGLE_WILLOW_THRESHOLD_2024",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-S3",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Sivak et al.: Reinforcement learning control of quantum error correction",
      "label": "Sivak et al.: Reinforcement learning control of quantum error correction",
      "text": "Sivak et al.: Reinforcement learning control of quantum error correction",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10759-2",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10759-2",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature 655, 879–884; VoR 2026-07-08",
      "version_date": "2026-07-08",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed original experimental and simulation study",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Main paragraphs describing memory experiment",
        "Fig.4 and following steering paragraphs",
        "Fig.5 and exploration-noise/real-time simulation paragraphs",
        "Rights and permissions"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 as displayed; no figures/fulltext redistributed; original factual paraphrase only, third-party rights may differ",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 as displayed; no figures/fulltext redistributed; original factual paraphrase only, third-party rights may differ",
      "independence_group": "GOOGLE_WILLOW_RL_2026",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-E1",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "有限码距的阈值下存储：原文依据",
      "text": "每种码与基分别拟合至250周期，再汇总；同一芯片子网并非独立平台重复。",
      "source_id": "P11-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P11-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08449-y",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature 638, 920–926; VoR 2025-01-29, updated by 2026-04-28 correction",
      "preciseLocator": "Fig.1c,d and paragraph beginning We characterize the logical performance",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-P1",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "有限码距的阈值下存储：前提",
      "text": "指定初始化、泄漏移除、解码器与物理噪声环境。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P11-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P11-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Fig.1c,d and paragraph beginning We characterize the logical performance",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-L1",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "有限码距的阈值下存储：边界",
      "text": "不是任意大码距的实验认证，也不是运行通用长算法。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P11-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P11-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Fig.1c,d and paragraph beginning We characterize the logical performance",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-C1",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "有限码距的阈值下存储",
      "text": "在d=3、5、7存储数据的拟合中，神经网络解码给Λ=2.14±0.02，d=7每周期逻辑错误为(1.43±0.03)×10⁻³。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported measurement; not independently rerun",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P11-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P11-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P11-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P11-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "指定初始化、泄漏移除、解码器与物理噪声环境。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-E2",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "更正范围已查清：原文依据",
      "text": "更正明确把横轴改为重复码距离并重标两组数据。",
      "source_id": "P11-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P11-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10559-8?error=cookies_not_supported",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature 653 E5; VoR 2026-04-28",
      "preciseLocator": "single substantive paragraph immediately after Correction to citation",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-P2",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "更正范围已查清：前提",
      "text": "对应同一原始作品，独立性组与原文相同。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P11-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P11-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "single substantive paragraph immediately after Correction to citation",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-L2",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "更正范围已查清：边界",
      "text": "本轮不凭更正的存在推断其他全部图或源数据已经复算。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P11-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P11-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "single substantive paragraph immediately after Correction to citation",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-C2",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "更正范围已查清",
      "text": "2026更正只列Fig.3a横轴与图例标签错误，并称HTML/PDF已修订；不能把该重复码图误当表面码距离图。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P11-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P11-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P11-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P11-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "对应同一原始作品，独立性组与原文相同。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-E3",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "注入漂移下的控制改进：原文依据",
      "text": "稳定性以逻辑错误率分布标准差定义，非新的通用可靠性指标。",
      "source_id": "P11-S3",
      "source_ids": [
        "P11-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10759-2",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature 655, 879–884; VoR 2026-07-08",
      "preciseLocator": "Fig.4c and paragraph beginning To confirm that suppression",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-P3",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "注入漂移下的控制改进：前提",
      "text": "人为步进、正弦、频闪漂移；与固定控制策略比较。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P11-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P11-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Fig.4c and paragraph beginning To confirm that suppression",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-L3",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "注入漂移下的控制改进：边界",
      "text": "该解码器调节依赖LER估计，作者指出不能直接扩展到实时场景。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P11-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P11-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Fig.4c and paragraph beginning To confirm that suppression",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-C3",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "注入漂移下的控制改进",
      "text": "d=5注入漂移实验中，RL控制平均降逻辑错误率24%，稳定性提高2.4倍；再调解码器后为31%及3.5倍。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported measurement; not independently rerun",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P11-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P11-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P11-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P11-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "人为步进、正弦、频闪漂移；与固定控制策略比较。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-E4",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "实时长运行尚有模拟条件：原文依据",
      "text": "模拟显示漂移慢于约1/150 epochs时，可平衡探索噪声与控制收益。",
      "source_id": "P11-S3",
      "source_ids": [
        "P11-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10759-2",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature 655, 879–884; VoR 2026-07-08",
      "preciseLocator": "paragraphs beginning This exploration noise and To study this trade-off; Fig.5a",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-P4",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "实时长运行尚有模拟条件：前提",
      "text": "此阈值是该模拟和RL配置的结果，不是普适物理常数。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P11-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P11-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "paragraphs beginning This exploration noise and To study this trade-off; Fig.5a",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-L4",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "实时长运行尚有模拟条件：边界",
      "text": "快速相关漂移在当前实现不能实时追踪；模拟不等于长算法实机演示。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P11-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P11-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "paragraphs beginning This exploration noise and To study this trade-off; Fig.5a",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-C4",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "实时长运行尚有模拟条件",
      "text": "实验依赖短存储电路反复重新制备；连续单次长算法中的探索噪声影响，另以d=3正弦漂移模拟评估。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P11-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P11-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P11-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P11-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "此阈值是该模拟和RL配置的结果，不是普适物理常数。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-E5",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "系统收益需独立验收：原文依据",
      "text": "原文区分存储、逻辑运算及未来实时校准的挑战。",
      "source_id": "P11-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P11-S1",
        "P11-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08449-y",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature 638, 920–926; VoR 2025-01-29, updated by 2026-04-28 correction",
      "preciseLocator": "threshold paper Outlook final two paragraphs; RL Main memory scope and Fig.5 discussion",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-P5",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "系统收益需独立验收：前提",
      "text": "本判断限于此两项工作，不否认其他架构的逻辑门进展。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P11-S1",
        "P11-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P11-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "threshold paper Outlook final two paragraphs; RL Main memory scope and Fig.5 discussion",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-L5",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "系统收益需独立验收：边界",
      "text": "不能把工程尚未集成解释为量子理论未成立，亦不能把部件指标当商业效益。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P11-S1",
        "P11-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P11-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "threshold paper Outlook final two paragraphs; RL Main memory scope and Fig.5 discussion",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-C5",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "系统收益需独立验收",
      "text": "这些工作支持纠错存储与校准部件；可扩展通用逻辑运算、总资源成本和应用优于经典仍须端到端证据。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "explicit editorial evaluation, not a new experimental result",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P11-S1",
        "P11-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P11-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P11-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P11-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "本判断限于此两项工作，不否认其他架构的逻辑门进展。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment_pending_review",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-Q1",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题／待验证边界",
      "text": "能否以可承受的物理资源、运行时间和能耗，持续执行足够长的通用逻辑计算并产生可验证的应用优势？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "可持续、资源可承受且应用级有优势的通用容错端到端系统。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P11-S1",
        "P11-S2",
        "P11-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P11-E1",
        "P11-E2",
        "P11-E3",
        "P11-E4",
        "P11-E5"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": "逻辑门、测量、解码和校准一起运行，随规模改善的错误预算支持长算法；与最佳经典方法在相同问题、精度和总成本下比较。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-S1",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Clowe et al.: A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter",
      "label": "Clowe et al.: A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter",
      "text": "Clowe et al.: A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0608407",
      "metadataUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0608407",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:astro-ph/0608407v1",
      "version_date": "2006-08-19",
      "publication_status": "author manuscript of ApJ Letters original observational study",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "§2 lensing reconstruction p.2",
        "§3 Analysis p.3, Fig.1 and Table 2 context"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "CLOWE_BULLET_CLUSTER_2006",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-S2",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "LZ: Searches for Light Dark Matter and Evidence of CEνNS of Solar Neutrinos",
      "label": "LZ: Searches for Light Dark Matter and Evidence of CEνNS of Solar Neutrinos",
      "text": "LZ: Searches for Light Dark Matter and Evidence of CEνNS of Solar Neutrinos",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2512.08065v3",
      "metadataUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2512.08065v3",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2512.08065v3",
      "version_date": "2026-07-17",
      "publication_status": "author manuscript accepted/published PRL 137,091806 (2026); DOI 10.1103/jvqf-njpj",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Response Modeling",
        "Dark Matter Search; Table 1, Figs.2–3",
        "Boron-8 CEνNS Measurement",
        "Appendix C"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "LZ_LIGHT_DM_2512_08065",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-S3",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "LZ: Search for dark matter particle interactions in an extended nuclear recoil energy window",
      "label": "LZ: Search for dark matter particle interactions in an extended nuclear recoil energy window",
      "text": "LZ: Search for dark matter particle interactions in an extended nuclear recoil energy window",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://lz.lbl.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2026/08/LZ_Preprint_260901_Dark_Matter_EFT_Nuclear_Recoil_Search_at_Higher_Energies.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://lz.lbl.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2026/08/LZ_Preprint_260901_Dark_Matter_EFT_Nuclear_Recoil_Search_at_Higher_Energies.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "LZ official 2026-09-01 release PDF, 25 pages; corresponding arXiv:2609.02823",
      "version_date": "2026-09-01",
      "publication_status": "original collaboration preprint; submitted to PRL, acceptance not verified",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "PDF p.5 event selection and non-blind qualification",
        "p.7 Results and Fig.5",
        "p.8 rare backgrounds paragraph",
        "p.9 Conclusion",
        "Supplement pp.14–15 Log-Likelihood Function and the Look Elsewhere Effect"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "LZ_HIGH_ENERGY_2609_02823",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-E1",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "引力图不等于粒子谱：原文依据",
      "text": "剪切重建与X射线气体图提供空间分离证据。",
      "source_id": "P01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0608407",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:astro-ph/0608407v1",
      "preciseLocator": "§3 Analysis p.3, first paragraph; §2 p.2 reconstruction caveats",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-P1",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "引力图不等于粒子谱：前提",
      "text": "特定并合星系团；依赖透镜重建、背景星系选择与气体模型。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P01-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§3 Analysis p.3, first paragraph; §2 p.2 reconstruction caveats",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-L1",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "引力图不等于粒子谱：边界",
      "text": "支持额外引力成分的空间分布，不测其微观质量、耦合或生成机制。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P01-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§3 Analysis p.3, first paragraph; §2 p.2 reconstruction caveats",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-C1",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "引力图不等于粒子谱",
      "text": "子弹星系团弱透镜重建的两个质量峰接近星系光度中心，却与各自主要气体重子峰约相差8σ。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported measurement; not independently rerun",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P01-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P01-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P01-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "特定并合星系团；依赖透镜重建、背景星系选择与气体模型。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-E2",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "轻质量搜索给出上限：原文依据",
      "text": "19事件与中微子、偶然符合及中子背景模型相容。",
      "source_id": "P01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2512.08065v3",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2512.08065v3",
      "preciseLocator": "Dark Matter Search, background-only goodness-of-fit paragraph and Fig.3 caption",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-P2",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "轻质量搜索给出上限：前提",
      "text": "5.7吨年、1–6 keV反冲窗口及指定散射谱模型。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P01-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Dark Matter Search, background-only goodness-of-fit paragraph and Fig.3 caption",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-L2",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "轻质量搜索给出上限：边界",
      "text": "不排除其他质量／相互作用；各能窗结果不可替代。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P01-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Dark Matter Search, background-only goodness-of-fit paragraph and Fig.3 caption",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-C2",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "轻质量搜索给出上限",
      "text": "LZ在3–9 GeV/c²候选搜索中未见显著暗物质超额，给自旋无关截面的90%置信上限而非发现值。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P01-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P01-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P01-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "5.7吨年、1–6 keV反冲窗口及指定散射谱模型。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-E3",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "低能响应是关键前提：原文依据",
      "text": "低于约2.5 keV的专门标定约束有限，使用其他测量驱动的NEST先验。",
      "source_id": "P01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2512.08065v3",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2512.08065v3",
      "preciseLocator": "Dark Matter Search paragraph defining sigma_eff; Response Modeling low-energy paragraph; Appendix C",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-P3",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "低能响应是关键前提：前提",
      "text": "数字是指定率模型的±1标准差扰动，非暗物质截面的置信区间。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P01-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Dark Matter Search paragraph defining sigma_eff; Response Modeling low-energy paragraph; Appendix C",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-L3",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "低能响应是关键前提：边界",
      "text": "本轮未重跑NEST或检验所有先验敏感性。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P01-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Dark Matter Search paragraph defining sigma_eff; Response Modeling low-energy paragraph; Appendix C",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-C3",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "低能响应是关键前提",
      "text": "轻暗物质率的不确定性强依赖质量：一个联合响应扰动在3 GeV/c²为+81%/−60%，9 GeV/c²为+21%/−20%。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P01-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P01-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P01-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "数字是指定率模型的±1标准差扰动，非暗物质截面的置信区间。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-E4",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "中微子信号条件不同：原文依据",
      "text": "同一事件集在无暗物质假设下拟合硼-8分量。",
      "source_id": "P01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2512.08065v3",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2512.08065v3",
      "preciseLocator": "Boron-8 CEνNS Measurement first paragraph; Table 1 final column",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-P4",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "中微子信号条件不同：前提",
      "text": "零暗物质及所列背景、反冲响应和中微子模型。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P01-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Boron-8 CEνNS Measurement first paragraph; Table 1 final column",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-L4",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "中微子信号条件不同：边界",
      "text": "4.5σ不是暗物质显著性，两种拟合也不是独立证据。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P01-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Boron-8 CEνNS Measurement first paragraph; Table 1 final column",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-C4",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "中微子信号条件不同",
      "text": "令暗物质事件数为零时，LZ以4.5σ拒绝零太阳硼-8相干散射信号；这是中微子测量。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P01-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P01-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P01-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "零暗物质及所列背景、反冲响应和中微子模型。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-E5",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "新增高能候选需保留谨慎：原文依据",
      "text": "作者把此研究列为非盲分析，并用背景模拟计算多模型搜索校正。",
      "source_id": "P01-S3",
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://lz.lbl.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2026/08/LZ_Preprint_260901_Dark_Matter_EFT_Nuclear_Recoil_Search_at_Higher_Energies.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "LZ official 2026-09-01 release PDF, 25 pages; corresponding arXiv:2609.02823",
      "preciseLocator": "PDF p.5 event paragraph; p.7 Results; p.9 Conclusion; Supplement pp.14–15 LEE",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-P5",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "新增高能候选需保留谨慎：前提",
      "text": "5.4–270 keV能窗、指定非相对论有效场论／非弹性模型和背景。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P01-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "PDF p.5 event paragraph; p.7 Results; p.9 Conclusion; Supplement pp.14–15 LEE",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-L5",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "新增高能候选需保留谨慎：边界",
      "text": "作者列为非盲分析；p.8指出某电子反冲尾部外推系统误差未纳入所报显著性推断；候选仍非身份鉴定。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P01-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "PDF p.5 event paragraph; p.7 Results; p.9 Conclusion; Supplement pp.14–15 LEE",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-C5",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "新增高能候选需保留谨慎",
      "text": "9月LZ稿在2.84吨年中报告一个248±23(stat)±23(sys) keV候选；模型扫描后全局2.6σ，局部最高3.4σ。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported measurement; not independently rerun",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P01-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P01-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P01-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "5.4–270 keV能窗、指定非相对论有效场论／非弹性模型和背景。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-E6",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "三层证据不可合并成发现：原文依据",
      "text": "微观身份尚缺跨探测器、相互作用和天文丰度的一致链条。",
      "source_id": "P01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S1",
        "P01-S2",
        "P01-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0608407",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:astro-ph/0608407v1",
      "preciseLocator": "Clowe §3 p.3; LZ light Fig.3 and CEνNS section; LZ high-energy pp.7–9",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-P6",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "三层证据不可合并成发现：前提",
      "text": "这是编辑证据分层；LZ两分析共享实验平台与部分时期，非独立重复。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S1",
        "P01-S2",
        "P01-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P01-E6"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Clowe §3 p.3; LZ light Fig.3 and CEνNS section; LZ high-energy pp.7–9",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-L6",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "三层证据不可合并成发现：边界",
      "text": "需要独立候选复现、背景检验和可区别模型的预测。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S1",
        "P01-S2",
        "P01-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P01-E6"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Clowe §3 p.3; LZ light Fig.3 and CEνNS section; LZ high-energy pp.7–9",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-C6",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "三层证据不可合并成发现",
      "text": "透镜质量分布、低能参数上限和高能单事件各回答不同问题；当前组合不能唯一识别暗物质。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "explicit editorial evaluation, not a new experimental result",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S1",
        "P01-S2",
        "P01-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P01-E6"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P01-P6"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P01-L6"
      ],
      "scope": "这是编辑证据分层；LZ两分析共享实验平台与部分时期，非独立重复。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment_pending_review",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-Q1",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题／待验证边界",
      "text": "造成这些引力现象的主要成分是什么，其质量、相互作用和生成历史如何？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "具体暗物质粒子／机制身份；单一高能候选的暗物质归因。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P01-S1",
        "P01-S2",
        "P01-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P01-E1",
        "P01-E2",
        "P01-E3",
        "P01-E4",
        "P01-E5",
        "P01-E6"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": "独立探测器/不同靶材重复一致信号，能同时解释粒子相互作用与宇宙丰度；或能跨尺度解释现有资料、给出新预测并获验证的替代理论。单一排除曲线不能穷尽候选空间。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-S1",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "H0DN Collaboration: The Local Distance Network",
      "label": "H0DN Collaboration: The Local Distance Network",
      "text": "H0DN Collaboration: The Local Distance Network",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2510.23823v1",
      "metadataUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2510.23823v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2510.23823v1; journal counterpart A&A 708 A166 (2026)",
      "version_date": "2025-10-27",
      "publication_status": "original analysis author manuscript of peer-reviewed A&A paper; journal fulltext DOI fetch failed",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "IV Baseline Results eq.(1)",
        "V variants and Table 4",
        "V orthogonal paths, Figs.12–13",
        "VI Conclusions and Discussion"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "H0DN_LOCAL_DISTANCE_NETWORK",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-E1",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "基线网络估计：原文依据",
      "text": "正文说明锚点、Pantheon+与2M++速度修正，Table 4给完整基线数值。",
      "source_id": "P03-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2510.23823v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2510.23823v1; journal counterpart A&A 708 A166 (2026)",
      "preciseLocator": "IV Baseline Results eq.(1) and following three paragraphs",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-P1",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "基线网络估计：前提",
      "text": "该选择集、校准与协方差模型，1σ误差；非无模型裸读数。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P03-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "IV Baseline Results eq.(1) and following three paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-L1",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "基线网络估计：边界",
      "text": "本轮未重运行公开网络；χ²说明也不包含所有哈勃流原始自由度。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P03-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "IV Baseline Results eq.(1) and following three paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-C1",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "基线网络估计",
      "text": "基线距离网络给H₀=73.50±0.81 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹，采用Ia超新星、表面亮度涨落及巨脉泽作为哈勃流示踪对象。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported measurement; not independently rerun",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-S1",
        "P03-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P03-E1",
        "P03-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P03-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P03-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "该选择集、校准与协方差模型，1σ误差；非无模型裸读数。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "v05_update": {
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-E2",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "删去一条路径的敏感性：原文依据",
      "text": "删法结果量化中心值及不确定度怎样变动。",
      "source_id": "P03-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2510.23823v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2510.23823v1; journal counterpart A&A 708 A166 (2026)",
      "preciseLocator": "V Table 4 rows V00,V08,V13",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-P2",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "删去一条路径的敏感性：前提",
      "text": "单位均km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹；剩余网络按各变体重新求解。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P03-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "V Table 4 rows V00,V08,V13",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-L2",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "删去一条路径的敏感性：边界",
      "text": "不能把变体当互相独立的测量；亦非穷尽所有共同系统误差。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P03-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "V Table 4 rows V00,V08,V13",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-C2",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "删去一条路径的敏感性",
      "text": "Table 4中删去造父变星得72.509±1.296；删去Ia超新星得73.434±1.795，与基线比较时精度明显降低。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported measurement; not independently rerun",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-S1",
        "P03-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P03-E2",
        "P03-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P03-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P03-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "单位均km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹；剩余网络按各变体重新求解。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "v05_update": {
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-E3",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "网络相关性不能投票消除：原文依据",
      "text": "正文区分正交路径与高度相关的普通路径。",
      "source_id": "P03-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2510.23823v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2510.23823v1; journal counterpart A&A 708 A166 (2026)",
      "preciseLocator": "V discussion immediately before VI; Fig.13 caption",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-P3",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "网络相关性不能投票消除：前提",
      "text": "仅真正不共享元素的指定正交路径可作独立比较。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P03-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "V discussion immediately before VI; Fig.13 caption",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-L3",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "网络相关性不能投票消除：边界",
      "text": "多团队、路径或校准指标数量不是独立重复次数。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P03-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "V discussion immediately before VI; Fig.13 caption",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-C3",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "网络相关性不能投票消除",
      "text": "作者指出19条最小路径并不全独立，可共享锚点或示踪对象；路径简单加权平均只用于视觉参照。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-S1",
        "P03-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P03-E3",
        "P03-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P03-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P03-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "仅真正不共享元素的指定正交路径可作独立比较。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "v05_update": {
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-E4",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "处理相关性仍有取舍：原文依据",
      "text": "这是原稿自己记录的方法简化。",
      "source_id": "P03-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2510.23823v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2510.23823v1; journal counterpart A&A 708 A166 (2026)",
      "preciseLocator": "VI paragraph beginning In constructing the distance network",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-P4",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "处理相关性仍有取舍：前提",
      "text": "此限制针对所读v1实现；不假定正式版或后续代码完全相同。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P03-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "VI paragraph beginning In constructing the distance network",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-L4",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "处理相关性仍有取舍：边界",
      "text": "不能把“协方差加权”理解为所有可能相关源已完整测知。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P03-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "VI paragraph beginning In constructing the distance network",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-C4",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "处理相关性仍有取舍",
      "text": "作者明确承认，使用超新星截距整合网络，未包含Pantheon+逐梯级的全部交叉协方差。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-S1",
        "P03-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P03-E4",
        "P03-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P03-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P03-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "此限制针对所读v1实现；不假定正式版或后续代码完全相同。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "v05_update": {
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-E5",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "张力尚不唯一选择原因：原文依据",
      "text": "同一H₀问题连接不同资料与背景模型。",
      "source_id": "P03-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2510.23823v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2510.23823v1; journal counterpart A&A 708 A166 (2026)",
      "preciseLocator": "IV paragraph reporting 67.24±0.35 and 7.1σ; VI methods and future independent-anchor paragraphs",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-P5",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "张力尚不唯一选择原因：前提",
      "text": "早期宇宙值在本卡仅作为作者所作比较的报告，不另宣称已复核CMB似然。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P03-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "IV paragraph reporting 67.24±0.35 and 7.1σ; VI methods and future independent-anchor paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-L5",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "张力尚不唯一选择原因：边界",
      "text": "“community consensus”描述该合作网络的选择协议，不代表整个天文学共同体对原因一致。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P03-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "IV paragraph reporting 67.24±0.35 and 7.1σ; VI methods and future independent-anchor paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-C5",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "张力尚不唯一选择原因",
      "text": "该稿的7.1σ比较依赖平直ΛCDM及特定CMB组合；显著不一致自身不能唯一判定哪种新物理或系统误差。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "explicit editorial evaluation, not a new experimental result",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-S1",
        "P03-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P03-E5",
        "P03-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P03-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P03-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "早期宇宙值在本卡仅作为作者所作比较的报告，不另宣称已复核CMB似然。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment_pending_review",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "v05_update": {
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-Q1",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题／待验证边界",
      "text": "本地与早期宇宙推断不一致来自未控制的系统误差，还是ΛCDM之外的物理？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "张力的唯一物理或系统误差原因。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P03-E1",
        "P03-E2",
        "P03-E3",
        "P03-E4",
        "P03-E5"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": "具有独立系统误差的距离方法、几何锚点和引力波标准汽笛形成可比精度的交叉验证；新模型同时拟合多组资料并产生被验证的新预测。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-S1",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Marletto and Vedral: Gravitationally-induced entanglement between two massive particles",
      "label": "Marletto and Vedral: Gravitationally-induced entanglement between two massive particles",
      "text": "Marletto and Vedral: Gravitationally-induced entanglement between two massive particles",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.06036",
      "metadataUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.06036",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:1707.06036v2",
      "version_date": "2017-12-09",
      "publication_status": "author manuscript of peer-reviewed PRL 119,240402 (2017)",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "pp.1–2 single-mass phase and two-system proof",
        "p.4 experimental caveats and model-selection limitation"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "MARLETTO_VEDRAL_GME_2017",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-S2",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Aziz and Howl: Classical theories of gravity produce entanglement",
      "label": "Aziz and Howl: Classical theories of gravity produce entanglement",
      "text": "Aziz and Howl: Classical theories of gravity produce entanglement",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09595-7",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09595-7",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature 646,813–817; 2025-10-22 version of record",
      "version_date": "2025-10-22",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed original theoretical study",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Perturbative classical gravity eq.(4)",
        "Feynman’s experiment, Classical gravity eqs.(9)–(10)",
        "Discussion"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "AZIZ_HOWL_CLASSICAL_2025",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-S3",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Marletto et al.: Classical gravity cannot mediate entanglement",
      "label": "Marletto et al.: Classical gravity cannot mediate entanglement",
      "text": "Marletto et al.: Classical gravity cannot mediate entanglement",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2511.07348v1",
      "metadataUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2511.07348v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2511.07348v1",
      "version_date": "2025-11-10",
      "publication_status": "original theoretical comment preprint; peer review not verified",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "main text paragraphs 1–9 beginning Two recent proposals; ultra-local/product-unitary and kinetic-term arguments"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "arXiv perpetual non-exclusive license displayed; factual paraphrase only",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "arXiv perpetual non-exclusive license displayed; factual paraphrase only",
      "independence_group": "MARLETTO_OPENHEIM_COMMENT_2025",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-S4",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Xue et al.: Aziz and Howl’s Gravity-Induced Entanglement Channel Is Essentially Classical Mechanics",
      "label": "Xue et al.: Aziz and Howl’s Gravity-Induced Entanglement Channel Is Essentially Classical Mechanics",
      "text": "Xue et al.: Aziz and Howl’s Gravity-Induced Entanglement Channel Is Essentially Classical Mechanics",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2604.16276v1",
      "metadataUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2604.16276v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2604.16276v1",
      "version_date": "2026-04-17",
      "publication_status": "original theoretical critique preprint; peer review not verified",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "§1",
        "§2.2–2.3 equations (3)–(10)",
        "§3 Conclusion"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "CC BY 4.0 displayed; original paraphrase only",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY 4.0 displayed; original paraphrase only",
      "independence_group": "XUE_CLASSICAL_COMMENT_2026",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-E1",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "介导判据有明确前提：原文依据",
      "text": "原文排除两探针直接互动，并以信息论定义“经典”。",
      "source_id": "P04-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P04-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.06036",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:1707.06036v2",
      "preciseLocator": "p.2 paragraphs beginning Consider now three physical systems and Now, consider an experiment; final locality paragraph",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-P1",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "介导判据有明确前提：前提",
      "text": "所列系统划分、局域作用、初态及经典性定义同时成立。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P04-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "p.2 paragraphs beginning Consider now three physical systems and Now, consider an experiment; final locality paragraph",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-L1",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "介导判据有明确前提：边界",
      "text": "不是对任意经典—量子混合模型不加前提的总判决。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P04-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "p.2 paragraphs beginning Consider now three physical systems and Now, consider an experiment; final locality paragraph",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-C1",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "介导判据有明确前提",
      "text": "2017论证中，初始不纠缠的两量子系统若只经局域第三系统互动而变纠缠，第三系统须有不对易可观测量。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P04-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P04-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P04-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "所列系统划分、局域作用、初态及经典性定义同时成立。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-E2",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "原反例依靠物质传播：原文依据",
      "text": "文中把不同分支的非因子化振幅归因于虚物质传播。",
      "source_id": "P04-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P04-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09595-7",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature 646,813–817; 2025-10-22 version of record",
      "preciseLocator": "Perturbative classical gravity eq.(4); Feynman’s experiment / Classical gravity eq.(9) and following paragraphs",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-P2",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "原反例依靠物质传播：前提",
      "text": "这是作者的理论主张；非引力子实验探测，也非本项目已确认的反例。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P04-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P04-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Perturbative classical gravity eq.(4); Feynman’s experiment / Classical gravity eq.(9) and following paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-L2",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "原反例依靠物质传播：边界",
      "text": "是否满足原判据的唯一介导前提及计算一致性受到公开批评。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P04-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P04-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Perturbative classical gravity eq.(4); Feynman’s experiment / Classical gravity eq.(9) and following paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-C2",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "原反例依靠物质传播",
      "text": "Aziz–Howl将引力场保持经典、物质作量子场处理，声称第四阶物质传播项可使两质量分支纠缠。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P04-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P04-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P04-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P04-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "这是作者的理论主张；非引力子实验探测，也非本项目已确认的反例。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-E3",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "批评指向因子化与归因：原文依据",
      "text": "评论给出超局域项与传播项处理不一致的理由。",
      "source_id": "P04-S3",
      "source_ids": [
        "P04-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2511.07348v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2511.07348v1",
      "preciseLocator": "main text paragraphs beginning The interaction Hamiltonian and However, either; following kinetic-term paragraph",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-P3",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "批评指向因子化与归因：前提",
      "text": "明确归属评论作者；本轮未独立审计其引用的全部补充公式。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P04-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P04-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "main text paragraphs beginning The interaction Hamiltonian and However, either; following kinetic-term paragraph",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-L3",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "批评指向因子化与归因：边界",
      "text": "不能仅因有批评就自动宣告原论文撤回或学界争议已裁决。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P04-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P04-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "main text paragraphs beginning The interaction Hamiltonian and However, either; following kinetic-term paragraph",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-C3",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "批评指向因子化与归因",
      "text": "2025评论认为该近似哈密顿量给乘积幺正，不能按所声称方式纠缠；若物质本身耦合探针，则归因不再是引力介导。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P04-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P04-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P04-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P04-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "明确归属评论作者；本轮未独立审计其引用的全部补充公式。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-E4",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "新批评细化初态问题：原文依据",
      "text": "作者展示初态尾部和波包宽度随时间变化的推导，并讨论屏障抑制。",
      "source_id": "P04-S4",
      "source_ids": [
        "P04-S4"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2604.16276v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2604.16276v1",
      "preciseLocator": "§2.3 eqs.(3)–(10); §3 Conclusion",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-P4",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "新批评细化初态问题：前提",
      "text": "此为该模型下理论修正主张，需专家核验；不外推所有可能模型。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P04-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P04-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§2.3 eqs.(3)–(10); §3 Conclusion",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-L4",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "新批评细化初态问题：边界",
      "text": "没有产生新的引力纠缠实验数据。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P04-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P04-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§2.3 eqs.(3)–(10); §3 Conclusion",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-C4",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "新批评细化初态问题",
      "text": "2026稿指出阶跃波函数具有发散动能、不能同时当静态；改用高斯波包并恢复动能项会压低所讨论传播效应。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P04-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P04-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P04-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P04-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "此为该模型下理论修正主张，需专家核验；不外推所有可能模型。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-E5",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "成功见证仍不选择完整理论：原文依据",
      "text": "原判据的结论是非经典特征，远少于完整统一理论。",
      "source_id": "P04-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P04-S1",
        "P04-S2",
        "P04-S3",
        "P04-S4"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.06036",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:1707.06036v2",
      "preciseLocator": "2017 p.4 paragraph beginning If the experiment succeeded; competing sources’ specified model and critique passages",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-P5",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "成功见证仍不选择完整理论：前提",
      "text": "实验需独立证明信号确由引力介导，并阐明模型排除范围。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P04-S1",
        "P04-S2",
        "P04-S3",
        "P04-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P04-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2017 p.4 paragraph beginning If the experiment succeeded; competing sources’ specified model and critique passages",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-L5",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "成功见证仍不选择完整理论：边界",
      "text": "未检出纠缠也未必否定引力量子性：退相干或不合适通道可抹去信号。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P04-S1",
        "P04-S2",
        "P04-S3",
        "P04-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P04-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2017 p.4 paragraph beginning If the experiment succeeded; competing sources’ specified model and critique passages",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-C5",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "成功见证仍不选择完整理论",
      "text": "即便排除其他耦合并可靠测到引力介导纠缠，原论文也指出它不能单独选择某一完整量子引力理论。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "explicit editorial evaluation, not a new experimental result",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P04-S1",
        "P04-S2",
        "P04-S3",
        "P04-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P04-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P04-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P04-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "实验需独立证明信号确由引力介导，并阐明模型排除范围。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment_pending_review",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-Q1",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题／待验证边界",
      "text": "能否观察到必须归因于引力非经典自由度的信号，并排除非引力耦合与经典—量子混合描述？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "已完成量子引力实验确认；理论争议最终裁决；特定完整量子引力理论获唯一支持。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P04-S1",
        "P04-S2",
        "P04-S3",
        "P04-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P04-E1",
        "P04-E2",
        "P04-E3",
        "P04-E4",
        "P04-E5"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": "受控质量叠加实验中可重复信号、非引力串扰上界和明确的理论排除域共同成立；随后仍需检验高能/强引力统一理论的额外预测。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-S1",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "KATRIN: Direct neutrino-mass measurement based on 259 days of data",
      "label": "KATRIN: Direct neutrino-mass measurement based on 259 days of data",
      "text": "KATRIN: Direct neutrino-mass measurement based on 259 days of data",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.13516",
      "metadataUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.13516",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2406.13516v1, 61-page manuscript including supplement",
      "version_date": "2024-06-19",
      "publication_status": "author manuscript of Science 388,180–185 (2025), DOI 10.1126/science.adq9592",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Introduction pp.4–5 effective mass definition",
        "Analysis pp.10–11 eq.(2) and blinding",
        "Results p.12",
        "Supplement §4 confidence construction pp.49–50"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "KATRIN_259_DAYS_2406_13516",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-S2",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "JUNO: Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters and Indication of the Neutrino Mass Ordering",
      "label": "JUNO: Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters and Indication of the Neutrino Mass Ordering",
      "text": "JUNO: Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters and Indication of the Neutrino Mass Ordering",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2609.37895v1",
      "metadataUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2609.37895v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2609.37895v1",
      "version_date": "2026-09-29",
      "publication_status": "original collaboration preprint; peer review not verified",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "joint spectrum fit eq.(1) and Table 3",
        "Figs.4–6 and parameter paragraphs",
        "Figs.7–8 and following frequentist/Bayesian inference paragraphs",
        "final summary"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "JUNO_207_DAYS_2609_37895",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-E1",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "直接质量的操作定义：原文依据",
      "text": "未分辨的各质量态按电子味权重贡献端点谱。",
      "source_id": "P05-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P05-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.13516",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2406.13516v1, 61-page manuscript including supplement",
      "preciseLocator": "Introduction pp.4–5, beta-decay kinematics paragraph and footnote defining mν/mβ",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-P1",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "直接质量的操作定义：前提",
      "text": "标准β衰变运动学；原文采用自然单位c=1。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Introduction pp.4–5, beta-decay kinematics paragraph and footnote defining mν/mβ",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-L1",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "直接质量的操作定义：边界",
      "text": "不依赖宇宙背景模型不等于没有分子末态、能损或仪器模型。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Introduction pp.4–5, beta-decay kinematics paragraph and footnote defining mν/mβ",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-C1",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "直接质量的操作定义",
      "text": "KATRIN端点谱探测mν²=Σ|Uei|²mi²，即有效电子反中微子质量的平方；它不同于质量和。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P05-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P05-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "标准β衰变运动学；原文采用自然单位c=1。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-E2",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "上限不是非零测量：原文依据",
      "text": "模型允许统计涨落产生负平方质量拟合值，结果与零相容。",
      "source_id": "P05-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P05-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.13516",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2406.13516v1, 61-page manuscript including supplement",
      "preciseLocator": "Results p.12; Supplement §4 pp.49–50 and Fig.18",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-P2",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "上限不是非零测量：前提",
      "text": "五次测量活动及所列系统误差；自然单位。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P05-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results p.12; Supplement §4 pp.49–50 and Fig.18",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-L2",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "上限不是非零测量：边界",
      "text": "不能把−0.14当真实负质量平方或把0.45当测得质量。换Feldman–Cousins构造上限为0.31 eV。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P05-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results p.12; Supplement §4 pp.49–50 and Fig.18",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-C2",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "上限不是非零测量",
      "text": "259天联合拟合得mν²=−0.14(+0.13/−0.15) eV²；默认Lokhov–Tkachov构造给mν<0.45 eV（90% CL）。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P05-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P05-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P05-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "五次测量活动及所列系统误差；自然单位。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-E3",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "运动学独立性仍需标定：原文依据",
      "text": "正文明确记录校正和系统误差增加，而非隐去分析迭代。",
      "source_id": "P05-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P05-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.13516",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2406.13516v1, 61-page manuscript including supplement",
      "preciseLocator": "Analysis pp.10–11 eq.(2), pull terms and post-unblinding modification paragraphs",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-P3",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "运动学独立性仍需标定：前提",
      "text": "依赖分子末态计算、磁场/势能、响应及标定。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P05-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Analysis pp.10–11 eq.(2), pull terms and post-unblinding modification paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-L3",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "运动学独立性仍需标定：边界",
      "text": "本轮未重算似然；两分析团队共享实验数据，不是独立新实验。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P05-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Analysis pp.10–11 eq.(2), pull terms and post-unblinding modification paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-C3",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "运动学独立性仍需标定",
      "text": "KATRIN的率模型卷积理论谱和仪器响应；揭盲后发现数据组合问题并调整背景、能损和柱密度处理。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P05-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P05-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P05-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "依赖分子末态计算、磁场/势能、响应及标定。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-E4",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "新增联合排序指示：原文依据",
      "text": "TAO/Daya Bay约束反应堆谱；Daya Bay选择质量差物理极小值，再引入NuFit长基线质量差约束。",
      "source_id": "P05-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P05-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2609.37895v1",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2609.37895v1",
      "preciseLocator": "joint fit eq.(1); Fig.7–8 captions and paragraphs immediately following",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-P4",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "新增联合排序指示：前提",
      "text": "标准三味模型；排序等先验，外部测量高斯先验；2.1σ为全CP相位范围最低单侧显著性。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P05-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "joint fit eq.(1); Fig.7–8 captions and paragraphs immediately following",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-L4",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "新增联合排序指示：边界",
      "text": "不是JUNO单独确定排序；Bayes因子不是p值，也非实验独立性数量。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P05-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "joint fit eq.(1); Fig.7–8 captions and paragraphs immediately following",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-C4",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "新增联合排序指示",
      "text": "JUNO的207.2天、8,294个IBD候选联合外部约束，给Δχ²=4.86、拒绝反转排序单侧2.1σ及偏好正常排序Bayes因子10.18。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P05-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P05-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P05-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "标准三味模型；排序等先验，外部测量高斯先验；2.1σ为全CP相位范围最低单侧显著性。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-E5",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "绝对尺度与排序各待推进：原文依据",
      "text": "两个实验约束不同函数与参数，不能互换。",
      "source_id": "P05-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P05-S1",
        "P05-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.13516",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2406.13516v1, 61-page manuscript including supplement",
      "preciseLocator": "KATRIN Introduction effective-mass definitions pp.4–5; JUNO final summary and NMO statistical paragraphs",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-P5",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "绝对尺度与排序各待推进：前提",
      "text": "这是编辑合成；未把宇宙学质量和上限混作端点结果。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P05-S1",
        "P05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P05-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "KATRIN Introduction effective-mass definitions pp.4–5; JUNO final summary and NMO statistical paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-L5",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "绝对尺度与排序各待推进：边界",
      "text": "新JUNO结果更新旧首批论文的状态；高显著性排序与非零绝对质量仍需进一步证据。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P05-S1",
        "P05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P05-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "KATRIN Introduction effective-mass definitions pp.4–5; JUNO final summary and NMO statistical paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-C5",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "绝对尺度与排序各待推进",
      "text": "端点上限和正常排序联合偏好可以共存，但两者不唯一给出三个质量本征值，也不决定狄拉克／马约拉纳性质。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "explicit editorial evaluation, not a new experimental result",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P05-S1",
        "P05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P05-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P05-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P05-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "这是编辑合成；未把宇宙学质量和上限混作端点结果。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment_pending_review",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-Q1",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题／待验证边界",
      "text": "绝对质量尺度是多少，质量本征态是正常排序还是反转排序？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "非零绝对质量尺度的精确测量；高显著性质量排序定论；狄拉克或马约拉纳属性。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P05-S1",
        "P05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P05-E1",
        "P05-E2",
        "P05-E3",
        "P05-E4",
        "P05-E5"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": "端点谱非零质量信号经系统误差验证；反应堆与加速器/大气振荡的质量排序判别相互支持。宇宙学质量和需单独标注背景模型。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-S1",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Li et al.: Bulk superconductivity up to 96 K in pressurized nickelate single crystals, Extended Data",
      "label": "Li et al.: Bulk superconductivity up to 96 K in pressurized nickelate single crystals, Extended Data",
      "text": "Li et al.: Bulk superconductivity up to 96 K in pressurized nickelate single crystals, Extended Data",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09954-4?error=cookies_not_supported",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09954-4?error=cookies_not_supported",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature 649,871–878, VoR 2026-01-14; publicly accessible Extended Data Fig.10 caption",
      "version_date": "2026-01-14",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed original study; only original extended-data caption accessible, main text subscription-restricted",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Extended Data Fig.10 caption panels a–i; particularly d,f,h,i; metadata"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "partial_original_fulltext_extended_data",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "LI_NICKELATE_HIGH_PRESSURE_2501_14584",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "not_reviewed": [
        "paywalled main Methods/Results",
        "complete 96K-version supplementary evidence"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-S2",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Zhou et al.: Ambient-pressure superconductivity onset above 40 K in bilayer nickelate ultrathin films",
      "label": "Zhou et al.: Ambient-pressure superconductivity onset above 40 K in bilayer nickelate ultrathin films",
      "text": "Zhou et al.: Ambient-pressure superconductivity onset above 40 K in bilayer nickelate ultrathin films",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.16622",
      "metadataUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.16622",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2412.16622v1; 2024-12-21 author manuscript",
      "version_date": "2024-12-21",
      "publication_status": "author manuscript of Nature 640,641–646 (2025); numerical details attributed to v1",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "PDF pp.4–5 transport and mutual-inductance result",
        "PDF pp.15–16 Figs.1–2 captions"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext_download_read_with_pdftotext",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "ZHOU_BILAYER_FILM_2412_16622",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-S3",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Shen et al.: Nodeless superconducting gap and electron-boson coupling in (La,Pr,Sm)3Ni2O7 films",
      "label": "Shen et al.: Nodeless superconducting gap and electron-boson coupling in (La,Pr,Sm)3Ni2O7 films",
      "text": "Shen et al.: Nodeless superconducting gap and electron-boson coupling in (La,Pr,Sm)3Ni2O7 films",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.17831",
      "metadataUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.17831",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2502.17831v2",
      "version_date": "2025-07-09",
      "publication_status": "author manuscript of Science 392,1396–1400 (2026); DOI 10.1126/science.adw8329",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "pp.2–3 Figs.1–3 related result paragraphs",
        "pp.3–4 Fig.4 and pairing-mechanism discussion"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "SHEN_NICKELATE_ARPES_2502_17831",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-S4",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Li et al.: Bulk superconductivity up to 96 K in pressurized nickelate single crystals, accepted Accelerated Article Preview",
      "label": "Li et al.: 96 K high-pressure study, accepted Accelerated Article Preview",
      "text": "Peer-reviewed accepted original paper; unedited preview, not the final Version of Record.",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://sharps.ac.cn/en/uploads/soft/20251204/2-251204105024242.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09954-4",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Accelerated Article Preview; accepted 2025-11-21; 35-page unedited accepted paper; cover publication date unresolved (xx xx xxxx)",
      "version_date": "2025-11-21",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed and accepted; Accelerated Article Preview, unedited preliminary typesetting; not final VoR",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "PDF p.1 cover: DOI, acceptance date, Accelerated Article Preview and unedited-version warning",
        "PDF pp.5–8: sample-composition context; Bulk superconductivity at 92 K; Tc increased to 96 K; Conclusion",
        "PDF pp.11–12: main figure legends, particularly Fig.3a–e",
        "PDF p.13 Methods, Single crystal growth; p.14 In-situ high-pressure resistivity and DC magnetic susceptibility measurements",
        "PDF p.15 Calculation of superconducting volume fraction and Data availability",
        "PDF p.18 Extended Data Fig.10 caption a–i, especially h–i and final no-zero-resistivity sentence",
        "PDF p.7 rendered and visually inspected to verify onset superscript, composition, pressure and helium-PTM statement"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "legitimate_author_institution_fulltext; supplied public-download cache read with pdftotext and PDF rendering",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license found in inspected paper; reprint-permission pointer present. Original paraphrase and source link only; cached fulltext is research material, not for redistribution.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license found in inspected paper; reprint-permission pointer present. Original paraphrase and source link only; cached fulltext is research material, not for redistribution.",
      "independence_group": "LI_NICKELATE_HIGH_PRESSURE_2501_14584",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "not_reviewed": [
        "final VoR full main text and complete line-by-line accepted-to-VoR reconciliation",
        "independent reanalysis of raw transport/magnetization data",
        "complete supplementary datasets"
      ],
      "file_sha256": "65da36ff3d70df39547761b178a80f42abe0d6cd021a6c800b1be537021e384e",
      "publication_date_note": "The cover says Published online xx xx xxxx. The accepted date is known; no publication day inferred from the filename, URL path or PDF metadata."
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-E1",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "96K是指定起始温度：原文依据",
      "text": "接受稿正文在21.6 GPa、氦传压介质下报告La1.57Sm1.43Ni2O7−δ的96 K电阻起始转变；扩展图10说明该成分尚未达到零阻。对照同文La2SmNi2O7：Crystal #6在21.6 GPa的onset/zero分别为92/73 K；另一Crystal #11在20.6 GPa、10 Oe下60 K以下出现抗磁信号，不能混作96 K样品的三重互证。",
      "source_id": "P12-S4",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S4",
        "P12-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://sharps.ac.cn/en/uploads/soft/20251204/2-251204105024242.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Accelerated Article Preview; accepted 2025-11-21; 35-page unedited accepted paper; cover publication date unresolved (xx xx xxxx)",
      "preciseLocator": "P12-S4 PDF p.7, section Tc increased to 96 K, final two sentences; p.18, Extended Data Fig.10 caption d,f,h,i and final sentence; p.6, Bulk superconductivity at 92 K, first and Meissner-effect paragraphs; p.11, Fig.3a–e caption; Methods p.14, transport and DC-magnetism sections. P12-S1 final published Extended Data Fig.10 caption d,f,h,i confirms the narrower 96 K onset/no-zero-resistivity statement.",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-P1",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "96K是指定起始温度：前提",
      "text": "成分、样品、压力与温标定义必须分别保留；96 K样品的氦介质由p.7正文明确给出。p.14四探针、室温红宝石压标和DC磁性方法主要以La2SmNi2O7叙述，不假定全部方法参数可无差别移用于96 K样品。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S4",
        "P12-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "P12-S4 PDF p.7, section Tc increased to 96 K, final two sentences; p.18, Extended Data Fig.10 caption d,f,h,i and final sentence; p.6, Bulk superconductivity at 92 K, first and Meissner-effect paragraphs; p.11, Fig.3a–e caption; Methods p.14, transport and DC-magnetism sections. P12-S1 final published Extended Data Fig.10 caption d,f,h,i confirms the narrower 96 K onset/no-zero-resistivity statement.",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-L1",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "96K是指定起始温度：边界",
      "text": "96 K不是零电阻温度，亦无此温度的体积抗磁确证；同文另一成分La2SmNi2O7的92 K onset、73 K零阻及60 K以下抗磁须保持样品/压力区别。已读的是未编辑接受稿；最终VoR主文尚未逐字比对。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S4",
        "P12-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "P12-S4 PDF p.7, section Tc increased to 96 K, final two sentences; p.18, Extended Data Fig.10 caption d,f,h,i and final sentence; p.6, Bulk superconductivity at 92 K, first and Meissner-effect paragraphs; p.11, Fig.3a–e caption; Methods p.14, transport and DC-magnetism sections. P12-S1 final published Extended Data Fig.10 caption d,f,h,i confirms the narrower 96 K onset/no-zero-resistivity statement.",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-C1",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "96K是指定起始温度",
      "text": "接受稿报告La1.57Sm1.43Ni2O7−δ在21.6 GPa、氦传压介质下出现96 K电阻转变onset；扩展图10明确该成分尚未达到零电阻。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported measurement; not independently rerun",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S4",
        "P12-S1",
        "P12-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-E1",
        "P12-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P12-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P12-L1",
        "P12-V05-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "成分、样品、压力与温标定义必须分别保留；96 K样品的氦介质由p.7正文明确给出。p.14四探针、室温红宝石压标和DC磁性方法主要以La2SmNi2O7叙述，不假定全部方法参数可无差别移用于96 K样品。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "v05_update": {
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-E2",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "常压起始与相干分开：原文依据",
      "text": "电阻先两步下降，接近零电阻段另作BKT型拟合。",
      "source_id": "P12-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.16622",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2412.16622v1; 2024-12-21 author manuscript",
      "preciseLocator": "PDF p.4 paragraphs corresponding to Fig.1b–f; Fig.1 caption p.15",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-P2",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "常压起始与相干分开：前提",
      "text": "SrLaAlO4衬底、特定生长/退火及二维薄膜；数值锚定预印本v1。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "PDF p.4 paragraphs corresponding to Fig.1b–f; Fig.1 caption p.15",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-L2",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "常压起始与相干分开：边界",
      "text": "45K并非整片已形成零阻相干态；BKT拟合亦不是无条件证明。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "PDF p.4 paragraphs corresponding to Fig.1b–f; Fig.1 caption p.15",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-C2",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "常压起始与相干分开",
      "text": "3单胞La2.85Pr0.15Ni2O7薄膜原稿以50–60 K线性背景偏离定义onset=45 K；BKT型拟合温度为9 K。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported measurement; not independently rerun",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P12-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P12-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "SrLaAlO4衬底、特定生长/退火及二维薄膜；数值锚定预印本v1。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-E3",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "磁性证据给低温互证：原文依据",
      "text": "原文以拾取线圈虚部相对10–15K背景的偏离确定磁性温标。",
      "source_id": "P12-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.16622",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2412.16622v1; 2024-12-21 author manuscript",
      "preciseLocator": "PDF p.5 paragraph beginning The Meissner diamagnetic effect; Fig.2a caption p.16",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-P3",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "磁性证据给低温互证：前提",
      "text": "同一样品体系，属于不同测量通道而非独立实验室重复。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "PDF p.5 paragraph beginning The Meissner diamagnetic effect; Fig.2a caption p.16",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-L3",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "磁性证据给低温互证：边界",
      "text": "与正式摘要8K的舍入口径不混用；互感并不识别微观配对胶水。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "PDF p.5 paragraph beginning The Meissner diamagnetic effect; Fig.2a caption p.16",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-C3",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "磁性证据给低温互证",
      "text": "同一薄膜v1中双线圈互感测量在8.5 K以下出现抗磁信号，与9 K的BKT型温标相近。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported measurement; not independently rerun",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P12-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P12-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "同一样品体系，属于不同测量通道而非独立实验室重复。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-E4",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "能隙观测约束候选对称性：原文依据",
      "text": "激光谱与同步辐射谱合用；β、γ费米面上无所测节点，α受矩阵元抑制。",
      "source_id": "P12-S3",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.17831",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2502.17831v2",
      "preciseLocator": "pp.2–3 result text for Figs.1F–H and 2C–F",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-P4",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "能隙观测约束候选对称性：前提",
      "text": "样品低温真空转移保氧；范围为可分辨的薄膜能带与动量区域。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "pp.2–3 result text for Figs.1F–H and 2C–F",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-L4",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "能隙观测约束候选对称性：边界",
      "text": "不是所有镍酸盐/所有费米面的全覆盖，也不测序参量的相位符号。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "pp.2–3 result text for Figs.1F–H and 2C–F",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-C4",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "能隙观测约束候选对称性",
      "text": "ARPES稿在所测(La,Pr,Sm)3Ni2O7薄膜的布里渊区对角和边界方向见有限能隙，对角拟合约18 meV。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported measurement; not independently rerun",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P12-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P12-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "样品低温真空转移保氧；范围为可分辨的薄膜能带与动量区域。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-E5",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "70meV拐点未锁定胶水：原文依据",
      "text": "正文提出耦合强度—能隙关联与同位素测量作为下一步。",
      "source_id": "P12-S3",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.17831",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2502.17831v2",
      "preciseLocator": "pp.3–4 Fig.4 result text and paragraph beginning Below we discuss",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-P5",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "70meV拐点未锁定胶水：前提",
      "text": "拐点的提取依赖裸带近似和谱分析；作者给不同裸带的稳健性检查。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "pp.3–4 Fig.4 result text and paragraph beginning Below we discuss",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-L5",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "70meV拐点未锁定胶水：边界",
      "text": "耦合存在不自动等于配对因果机制；尚未唯一识别玻色子种类。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "pp.3–4 Fig.4 result text and paragraph beginning Below we discuss",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-C5",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "70meV拐点未锁定胶水",
      "text": "ARPES稿报告约70 meV色散拐点及自能特征，并解释为电子—玻色子耦合；作者要求进一步实验判断它是否主导配对。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P12-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P12-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "拐点的提取依赖裸带近似和谱分析；作者给不同裸带的稳健性检查。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-E6",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "机制问题已收窄但未统一：原文依据",
      "text": "已读高压接受稿、常压薄膜及ARPES原稿：成分、压力、应变和测量量不能仅按一个Tc排序。接受稿La2SmNi2O7的体积分数估计使用40/60 K磁矩差、名义圆柱体尺寸和退磁修正；其ZFC/FC估计不同，也不能移植为96 K成分的体积证据。",
      "source_id": "P12-S4",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S4",
        "P12-S1",
        "P12-S2",
        "P12-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://sharps.ac.cn/en/uploads/soft/20251204/2-251204105024242.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Accelerated Article Preview; accepted 2025-11-21; 35-page unedited accepted paper; cover publication date unresolved (xx xx xxxx)",
      "preciseLocator": "P12-S4 PDF pp.6–8 (92 K result, 96 K result, Conclusion), p.14 (transport/DC susceptibility methods), p.15 (Calculation of superconducting volume fraction), p.18 (Extended Data Fig.10); P12-S1 Extended Data Fig.10 caption; P12-S2 PDF pp.4–5 and Figs.1–2 captions pp.15–16; P12-S3 pp.2–4 Figs.1–4 result and pairing discussion.",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-P6",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "机制问题已收窄但未统一：前提",
      "text": "本轮是有限样品的证据链，非全学科机制共识。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S4",
        "P12-S1",
        "P12-S2",
        "P12-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-E6"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "P12-S4 PDF pp.6–8 (92 K result, 96 K result, Conclusion), p.14 (transport/DC susceptibility methods), p.15 (Calculation of superconducting volume fraction), p.18 (Extended Data Fig.10); P12-S1 Extended Data Fig.10 caption; P12-S2 PDF pp.4–5 and Figs.1–2 captions pp.15–16; P12-S3 pp.2–4 Figs.1–4 result and pairing discussion.",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-L6",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "机制问题已收窄但未统一：边界",
      "text": "高压接受稿的原始正文和所列方法已核对，最终VoR主文及arXiv版本错配仍未解决；本轮没有复算原始数据，跨体系模型预测仍需独立未拟合样品检验。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S4",
        "P12-S1",
        "P12-S2",
        "P12-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-E6"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "P12-S4 PDF pp.6–8 (92 K result, 96 K result, Conclusion), p.14 (transport/DC susceptibility methods), p.15 (Calculation of superconducting volume fraction), p.18 (Extended Data Fig.10); P12-S1 Extended Data Fig.10 caption; P12-S2 PDF pp.4–5 and Figs.1–2 captions pp.15–16; P12-S3 pp.2–4 Figs.1–4 result and pairing discussion.",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-C6",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "机制问题已收窄但未统一",
      "text": "原始输运、抗磁和谱学把问题从“是否出现转变”推进到“何种配对及何种耦合”，仍不支持无条件统一模型。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "explicit editorial evaluation, not a new experimental result",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S4",
        "P12-S1",
        "P12-S2",
        "P12-S3",
        "P12-V05-S2",
        "P12-V05-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-E6",
        "P12-V05-E2",
        "P12-V05-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P12-P6"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P12-L6",
        "P12-V05-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "本轮是有限样品的证据链，非全学科机制共识。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment_pending_review",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "v05_update": {
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-Q1",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题／待验证边界",
      "text": "双层镍酸盐的配对对称性和主导相互作用是什么，模型能否预测不同压力、掺杂与应变下的可复现超导行为？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "配对相位符号、主导相互作用与跨材料预测模型；接受稿与最终VoR主文的逐字版本核对。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S1",
        "P12-S2",
        "P12-S3",
        "P12-S4",
        "P12-V05-S2",
        "P12-V05-S3",
        "P12-V05-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-E1",
        "P12-E2",
        "P12-E3",
        "P12-E4",
        "P12-E5",
        "P12-E6",
        "P12-V05-E2",
        "P12-V05-E3",
        "P12-V05-E4"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": "独立样品中电输运、磁性及热力学证据互证；谱学与相敏感测量区分配对模型；模型对未用于拟合的新材料给出准确预测。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "v05_update": {
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-S1",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Synergistic electrode design for efficient CO2 electrolysis to multicarbon products at elevated temperatures",
      "label": "Synergistic electrode design for efficient CO2 electrolysis to multicarbon products at elevated temperatures",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-69506-w",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-69506-w",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Communications 17,2684; version of record 2026-03-23",
      "version_date": "2026-03-23",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_research",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Results: The impact of temperature toward the catalyst structure; GDE; C2+ product; Mechanistic studies",
        "Methods: Product analysis and performance evaluation; equations 4–5",
        "Fig. 2–5 captions; Rights and permissions"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext_html",
      "license": "CC BY-NC-ND 4.0；不复制图表、不分发改编全文；仅原创事实性概述与链接，第三方材料另受限制。",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY-NC-ND 4.0；不复制图表、不分发改编全文；仅原创事实性概述与链接，第三方材料另受限制。",
      "independence_group": "HU2026_THERMAL_CO2_FLOWCELL",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "publication_date": "2026-02-12",
      "date_note": "出版社About this article同时列Published和Version of record两个日期；本节点版本日期取后者，不把卷期推算为发布日期。"
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-E1",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "选择性：受控高温流动池：原文依据",
      "text": "原文所列位置报告本命题的研究结果与条件。",
      "source_id": "P13-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-69506-w",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Communications 17,2684; version of record 2026-03-23",
      "preciseLocator": "Results, The impact of temperature toward the C2+ product, Fig. 4d–e; Methods, Product analysis and performance evaluation, paragraphs 1–3",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-P1",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "选择性：受控高温流动池：条件",
      "text": "1 M KOH、99.99% CO₂进料、三电极流动池。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P13-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results, The impact of temperature toward the C2+ product, Fig. 4d–e; Methods, Product analysis and performance evaluation, paragraphs 1–3"
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-L1",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "选择性：受控高温流动池：限制",
      "text": "工业相关电流密度不是工业面积或真实杂质进料验证。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P13-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results, The impact of temperature toward the C2+ product, Fig. 4d–e; Methods, Product analysis and performance evaluation, paragraphs 1–3",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-C1",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "选择性：受控高温流动池",
      "text": "1 cm²反应区、348 K下，优化电极在200–1000 mA/cm²保持多碳产物法拉第效率超过70%。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors reported observation; no independent remeasurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P13-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P13-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P13-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "Hu等2026单项原始实验；保持P13工业闭环问题，未系统评审全领域。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-E2",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "耐久：48小时窗口：原文依据",
      "text": "原文所列位置报告本命题的研究结果与条件。",
      "source_id": "P13-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-69506-w",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Communications 17,2684; version of record 2026-03-23",
      "preciseLocator": "Results, The impact of temperature toward the C2+ product, paragraph beginning Benefiting from robust interfacial water management (refers to Supplementary Fig.39)",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-P2",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "耐久：48小时窗口：条件",
      "text": "同一优化电极在−200mA/cm²、348K、1.0M KOH条件下测试，图中约28小时补加电解液。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-S1",
        "P13-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P13-E2",
        "P13-V05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Supplementary Fig.39,p.53;main Results48-hour paragraph",
      "v05_update": {
        "gap_id": "P13-G01",
        "new_source_ids": [
          "P13-V05-S1"
        ],
        "new_evidence_ids": [
          "P13-V05-E1"
        ],
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-L2",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "耐久：48小时窗口：限制",
      "text": "本轮已补读并目视核对补充图39；48小时记录含补加电解液，不确立免维护长期寿命，也未验证动态供电。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-S1",
        "P13-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P13-E2",
        "P13-V05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Supplementary Fig.39,p.53;editorial inference limited to stated scope",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit",
      "v05_update": {
        "gap_id": "P13-G01",
        "new_source_ids": [
          "P13-V05-S1"
        ],
        "new_evidence_ids": [
          "P13-V05-E1"
        ],
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-C2",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "48小时稳定性记录含补加电解液",
      "text": "作者报告优化电极在348K的48小时测试中稳定；补充图39显示−200mA/cm²恒电流条件，并在约28小时补加电解液。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors reported observation; no independent remeasurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-S1",
        "P13-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P13-E2",
        "P13-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P13-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P13-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "Hu等2026单项原始实验；保持P13工业闭环问题，未系统评审全领域。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "v05_update": {
        "gap_id": "P13-G01",
        "new_source_ids": [
          "P13-V05-S1"
        ],
        "new_evidence_ids": [
          "P13-V05-E1"
        ],
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-E3",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "能效：阴极边界：原文依据",
      "text": "原文所列位置报告本命题的研究结果与条件。",
      "source_id": "P13-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-69506-w",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Communications 17,2684; version of record 2026-03-23",
      "preciseLocator": "Results Fig.4f paragraph; Methods Performance evaluation, equation (5)",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-P3",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "能效：阴极边界：条件",
      "text": "按原文各产物热力学电位、法拉第效率和实测阴极电位计算。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P13-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results Fig.4f paragraph; Methods Performance evaluation, equation (5)"
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-L3",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "能效：阴极边界：限制",
      "text": "不是全槽或捕集、分离、泵送系统净能效。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P13-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results Fig.4f paragraph; Methods Performance evaluation, equation (5)",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-C3",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "能效：阴极边界",
      "text": "−200 mA/cm²时阴极多碳能效为48.9%，常温对照37.7%；这是按阴极电位定义的指标。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P13-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P13-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P13-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "Hu等2026单项原始实验；保持P13工业闭环问题，未系统评审全领域。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-E4",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "机制：多因素约束：原文依据",
      "text": "原文所列位置报告本命题的研究结果与条件。",
      "source_id": "P13-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-69506-w",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Communications 17,2684; version of record 2026-03-23",
      "preciseLocator": "Results: The impact of temperature toward the catalyst structure, Fig.2; toward the GDE, Fig.3; Mechanistic studies, Fig.5",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-P4",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "机制：多因素约束：条件",
      "text": "需维持材料、温度与电化学测量条件；光谱试样不含Ag层。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P13-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results: The impact of temperature toward the catalyst structure, Fig.2; toward the GDE, Fig.3; Mechanistic studies, Fig.5"
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-L4",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "机制：多因素约束：限制",
      "text": "机制解释含模型和间接证据，不能把DFT势垒当实际全系统因果证明。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P13-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results: The impact of temperature toward the catalyst structure, Fig.2; toward the GDE, Fig.3; Mechanistic studies, Fig.5",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-C4",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "机制：多因素约束",
      "text": "原文把高温失效分为铜重构、气体扩散电极淹水与CO脱附；光谱与电极对照支持联合设计路线。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P13-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P13-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P13-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "Hu等2026单项原始实验；保持P13工业闭环问题，未系统评审全领域。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-E5",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "编辑结论：局部突破未闭环：原文依据",
      "text": "原文所列位置报告本命题的研究结果与条件。",
      "source_id": "P13-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-69506-w",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Communications 17,2684; version of record 2026-03-23",
      "preciseLocator": "Methods reaction area and feed paragraphs; equation (5); Results 48-h stability paragraph",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-P5",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "编辑结论：局部突破未闭环：条件",
      "text": "以原卡要求的面积、真实进料、能量和碳收支为系统验收边界。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P13-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Methods reaction area and feed paragraphs; equation (5); Results 48-h stability paragraph"
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-L5",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "编辑结论：局部突破未闭环：限制",
      "text": "这是本项目推断，不是作者或专家共识；未排除其他工程路线成功。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P13-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Methods reaction area and feed paragraphs; equation (5); Results 48-h stability paragraph",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-C5",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "编辑结论：局部突破未闭环",
      "text": "编辑判断：该研究深化热管理证据，却未独自回答工业闭环与净减排问题。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "project editorial synthesis; not expert consensus",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P13-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P13-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P13-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "Hu等2026单项原始实验；保持P13工业闭环问题，未系统评审全领域。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment",
      "what_would_change_status": "公开独立中试质量/能量/碳账本及动态运行、维护和多批次数据。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-Q1",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题（编辑性整合）",
      "text": "能否在实用电极面积、真实进料和波动电力下，同时维持产品选择性、能效、碳利用率与可维护寿命？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "大面积真实进料与波动电力下的长期全流程净能量、碳利用和经济性。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P13-E1",
        "P13-E2",
        "P13-E3",
        "P13-E4",
        "P13-E5"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": "可审计中试质量/能量平衡，覆盖启停、杂质、退化与维护；独立批次和大面积电极复现；生命周期核算明确电力与CO₂来源。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-S1",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Bulk-to-interface fluorination for stable and low-pressure all-solid-state lithium metal batteries",
      "label": "Bulk-to-interface fluorination for stable and low-pressure all-solid-state lithium metal batteries",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-73012-4",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-73012-4",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Communications 17,6441; version of record 2026-07-17",
      "version_date": "2026-07-17",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_research",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Results electrochemical performance paragraphs and Fig.5d–e",
        "Methods Electrochemical measurements: pouch-cell assembly; pressure and temperature",
        "Rights and permissions"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext_html",
      "license": "CC BY-NC-ND 4.0；不复制图表、不分发改编全文；仅原创事实性概述与链接，第三方材料另受限制。",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY-NC-ND 4.0；不复制图表、不分发改编全文；仅原创事实性概述与链接，第三方材料另受限制。",
      "independence_group": "SANG2026_FLUORINATION_ASSLMB",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "publication_date": "2026-05-14",
      "date_note": "出版社About this article同时列Published和Version of record两个日期；本节点版本日期取后者，不把卷期推算为发布日期。"
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-S2",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Author Correction: A ductile solid electrolyte interphase for solid-state batteries",
      "label": "Author Correction: A ductile solid electrolyte interphase for solid-state batteries",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10945-2",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10945-2",
      "sourceVersion": "Author Correction published 2026-07-29",
      "version_date": "2026-07-29",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_research_correction",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Correction substantive paragraphs 1–2"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "official_correction_substantive_text",
      "license": "出版社保留权利；只保存更正事实原创概述。",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "出版社保留权利；只保存更正事实原创概述。",
      "independence_group": "MI2025_DUCTILE_SEI",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-E1",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "软包：限定工况循环：原文依据",
      "text": "原文所列位置报告本命题的研究结果与条件。",
      "source_id": "P14-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-73012-4",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Communications 17,6441; version of record 2026-07-17",
      "preciseLocator": "Results paragraph beginning When paired with 3; Fig.5d caption; Methods pouch-cell paragraphs",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-P1",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "软包：限定工况循环：条件",
      "text": "2×3 cm电极、约40 μm电解质；不是室温量产大容量电芯。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P14-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results paragraph beginning When paired with 3; Fig.5d caption; Methods pouch-cell paragraphs"
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-L1",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "软包：限定工况循环：限制",
      "text": "温度、面积、堆压不能从结论中省略。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P14-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results paragraph beginning When paired with 3; Fig.5d caption; Methods pouch-cell paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-C1",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "软包：限定工况循环",
      "text": "氟化电解质单层软包在60°C、2.5 MPa、3 mAh/cm²和1C下循环350次，容量保留85%。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors reported observation; no independent remeasurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P14-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P14-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P14-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "固态锂金属电池工程问题；Sang2026软包全文与Mi2026更正，不替代全部原卡文献审查。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-E2",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "压力：存在恢复步骤：原文依据",
      "text": "原文所列位置报告本命题的研究结果与条件。",
      "source_id": "P14-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-73012-4",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Communications 17,6441; version of record 2026-07-17",
      "preciseLocator": "Results paragraph beginning When paired with 3 mAh cm−2, sentence beginning After reapplying 20 MPa",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-P2",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "压力：存在恢复步骤：条件",
      "text": "区分制造、接触恢复与运行堆压。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P14-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results paragraph beginning When paired with 3 mAh cm−2, sentence beginning After reapplying 20 MPa"
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-L2",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "压力：存在恢复步骤：限制",
      "text": "不能写成全寿命全过程只需2.5 MPa或完全无需机械维护。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P14-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results paragraph beginning When paired with 3 mAh cm−2, sentence beginning After reapplying 20 MPa",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-C2",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "压力：存在恢复步骤",
      "text": "最初三次活化后，研究重新施加20 MPa恢复接触，再在2.5 MPa循环。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors reported observation; no independent remeasurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P14-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P14-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P14-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "固态锂金属电池工程问题；Sang2026软包全文与Mi2026更正，不替代全部原卡文献审查。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-E3",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "比能：质量分母受限：原文依据",
      "text": "原文所列位置报告本命题的研究结果与条件。",
      "source_id": "P14-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-73012-4",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Communications 17,6441; version of record 2026-07-17",
      "preciseLocator": "Results paragraph beginning Increasing the positive electrode loading; Fig.5e caption",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-P3",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "比能：质量分母受限：条件",
      "text": "60°C、0.2C、2.8–4.6 V及2.5 MPa；与350次循环工况不同。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P14-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results paragraph beginning Increasing the positive electrode loading; Fig.5e caption"
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-L3",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "比能：质量分母受限：限制",
      "text": "不含完整包装、集流体和加压系统质量，不能直接当电池包比能；不能拼接成409 Wh/kg维持350次。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P14-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results paragraph beginning Increasing the positive electrode loading; Fig.5e caption",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-C3",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "比能：质量分母受限",
      "text": "高负载5.4 mAh/cm²软包报告409 Wh/kg；分母只计电解质、锂和正极材料。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P14-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P14-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P14-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "固态锂金属电池工程问题；Sang2026软包全文与Mi2026更正，不替代全部原卡文献审查。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-E4",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "版本：原卡SEI已更正：原文依据",
      "text": "原文所列位置报告本命题的研究结果与条件。",
      "source_id": "P14-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10945-2",
      "sourceVersion": "Author Correction published 2026-07-29",
      "preciseLocator": "Author Correction substantive paragraphs 1–2",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-P4",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "版本：原卡SEI已更正：条件",
      "text": "更正与2025原研究属于同一作品组。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P14-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Author Correction substantive paragraphs 1–2"
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-L4",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "版本：原卡SEI已更正：限制",
      "text": "读到更正不等于已重新核验该研究受限全文或原始曲线。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P14-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Author Correction substantive paragraphs 1–2",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-C4",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "版本：原卡SEI已更正",
      "text": "Mi等更正把PALA锂离子迁移数由0.57改为0.71，并修正误用的补充图11e,f电流曲线。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-S2",
        "P14-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P14-E4",
        "P14-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P14-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P14-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "固态锂金属电池工程问题；Sang2026软包全文与Mi2026更正，不替代全部原卡文献审查。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "v05_update": {
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-E5",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "编辑结论：工程验收仍分层：原文依据",
      "text": "原文所列位置报告本命题的研究结果与条件。",
      "source_id": "P14-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-S1",
        "P14-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-73012-4",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Communications 17,6441; version of record 2026-07-17",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Fig.5d–e and Methods pouch-cell paragraphs; S2 correction paragraphs 1–2",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-P5",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "编辑结论：工程验收仍分层：条件",
      "text": "保留测试类型、质量分母、恢复压力和版本差异。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-S1",
        "P14-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P14-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Fig.5d–e and Methods pouch-cell paragraphs; S2 correction paragraphs 1–2"
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-L5",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "编辑结论：工程验收仍分层：限制",
      "text": "不把不同器件或工况的最好指标拼成一枚已完成的商业电芯。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-S1",
        "P14-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P14-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Fig.5d–e and Methods pouch-cell paragraphs; S2 correction paragraphs 1–2",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-C5",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "编辑结论：工程验收仍分层",
      "text": "编辑判断：新软包结果加强实用化线索，但全温度、有限锂、多批次寿命与安全须分别验收。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "project editorial synthesis; not expert consensus",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-S1",
        "P14-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P14-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P14-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P14-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "固态锂金属电池工程问题；Sang2026软包全文与Mi2026更正，不替代全部原卡文献审查。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立批次全电芯、完整质量账本、现实压力温度及滥用安全和失效测试。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-Q1",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题（编辑性整合）",
      "text": "在低堆压、实用负载、有限金属储量和现实温度下，能否兼顾安全、能量密度、快充与长循环？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "在现实工况下同时达到量产电芯寿命、安全、快充和完整系统比能。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-S1",
        "P14-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P14-E1",
        "P14-E2",
        "P14-E3",
        "P14-E4",
        "P14-E5"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": "多批次大容量全电芯在透明工况下长期循环及滥用安全测试；包括电解质厚度、N/P比、压力、温度和失效分析；独立复现。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-S1",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "National Ignition Facility – 2025, LLNL Annual Report",
      "label": "National Ignition Facility – 2025, LLNL Annual Report",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://annual.llnl.gov/fy-2025/national-ignition-facility-2025",
      "metadataUrl": "https://annual.llnl.gov/fy-2025/national-ignition-facility-2025",
      "sourceVersion": "FY2025 official annual report; retrieved 2026-10-04",
      "version_date": null,
      "publication_status": "primary_institutional_report",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Record-Breaking Fusion Experiments paragraphs 1–2",
        "NIF Refurbishment paragraph 1"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "official_report_relevant_fulltext",
      "license": "网页未确认可再许可；只保存书目信息和原创概述，不转载图表或长摘录",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "网页未确认可再许可；只保存书目信息和原创概述，不转载图表或长摘录",
      "independence_group": "NIF_20250407_SHOT",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-S2",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Fusion Science and Technology Roadmap",
      "label": "Fusion Science and Technology Roadmap",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.energy.gov/documents/fusion-science-and-technology-roadmap",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.energy.gov/documents/fusion-science-and-technology-roadmap",
      "sourceVersion": "DOE finalized roadmap, June 2026, 122-page PDF",
      "version_date": "2026-06",
      "publication_status": "primary_formal_roadmap",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Part II: Core Challenge A Structural Materials, PDF page index42",
        "Core Challenge C, PDF index44; D Fuel Cycle, index45; E Blanket, index46",
        "Appendix3: D gaps, PDF index83; E gaps index87"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "official_fulltext_pdf_relevant_sections",
      "license": "网页未确认可再许可；只保存书目信息和原创概述，不转载图表或长摘录",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "网页未确认可再许可；只保存书目信息和原创概述，不转载图表或长摘录",
      "independence_group": "DOE2026_FUSION_ROADMAP",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-E1",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "实验：靶增益4.13：原文依据",
      "text": "原文所列位置报告本命题的研究结果与条件。",
      "source_id": "P15-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P15-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://annual.llnl.gov/fy-2025/national-ignition-facility-2025",
      "sourceVersion": "FY2025 official annual report; retrieved 2026-10-04",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Record-Breaking Fusion Experiments, paragraph 1",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-P1",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "实验：靶增益4.13：条件",
      "text": "机构报告的单次惯性约束实验；分母为入靶激光能。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P15-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P15-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Record-Breaking Fusion Experiments, paragraph 1"
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-L1",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "实验：靶增益4.13：限制",
      "text": "不是全设施耗电分母；本轮未独立复算诊断或查验原始实验数据。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P15-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P15-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Record-Breaking Fusion Experiments, paragraph 1",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-C1",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "实验：靶增益4.13",
      "text": "LLNL年报记录2025-04-07靶产生8.6 MJ聚变能，入靶激光2.08 MJ，靶增益4.13。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors reported observation; no independent remeasurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P15-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P15-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P15-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P15-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "NIF特定实验与美国DOE2026正式路线图；不混同比较惯性与磁约束性能。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-E2",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "燃料：自持尚需示范：原文依据",
      "text": "原文所列位置报告本命题的研究结果与条件。",
      "source_id": "P15-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P15-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.energy.gov/documents/fusion-science-and-technology-roadmap",
      "sourceVersion": "DOE finalized roadmap, June 2026, 122-page PDF",
      "preciseLocator": "S2 PartII Core Challenge D, PDF page index45 (46th PDF page), S&T Gaps D1–D2; Appendix3 PDF index83",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-P2",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "燃料：自持尚需示范：条件",
      "text": "针对需氚的DT电站及路线图范围。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P15-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P15-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 PartII Core Challenge D, PDF page index45 (46th PDF page), S&T Gaps D1–D2; Appendix3 PDF index83"
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-L2",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "燃料：自持尚需示范：限制",
      "text": "这是官方技术缺口描述，不是证明未来无法完成；不适用于所有燃料路线。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P15-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P15-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 PartII Core Challenge D, PDF page index45 (46th PDF page), S&T Gaps D1–D2; Appendix3 PDF index83",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-C2",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "燃料：自持尚需示范",
      "text": "DOE六月路线图把氚自持与核算、厂级燃料吞吐整合列为未解决缺口D1–D2。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P15-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P15-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P15-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P15-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "NIF特定实验与美国DOE2026正式路线图；不混同比较惯性与磁约束性能。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-E3",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "包层：同时验收供氚与取热：原文依据",
      "text": "原文所列位置报告本命题的研究结果与条件。",
      "source_id": "P15-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P15-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.energy.gov/documents/fusion-science-and-technology-roadmap",
      "sourceVersion": "DOE finalized roadmap, June 2026, 122-page PDF",
      "preciseLocator": "S2 PartII Core Challenge E, PDF page index46, S&T Gaps E6; Appendix3 PDF index87",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-P3",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "包层：同时验收供氚与取热：条件",
      "text": "“设计经验证”须包含集成运行条件。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P15-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P15-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 PartII Core Challenge E, PDF page index46, S&T Gaps E6; Appendix3 PDF index87"
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-L3",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "包层：同时验收供氚与取热：限制",
      "text": "部件或非核回路测试不能单独替代完整包层验证。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P15-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P15-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 PartII Core Challenge E, PDF page index46, S&T Gaps E6; Appendix3 PDF index87",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-C3",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "包层：同时验收供氚与取热",
      "text": "路线图E6指出尚无已验证、同时满足氚自持与热移除的集成包层设计。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P15-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P15-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P15-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P15-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "NIF特定实验与美国DOE2026正式路线图；不混同比较惯性与磁约束性能。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-E4",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "材料：寿命数据条件：原文依据",
      "text": "原文所列位置报告本命题的研究结果与条件。",
      "source_id": "P15-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P15-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.energy.gov/documents/fusion-science-and-technology-roadmap",
      "sourceVersion": "DOE finalized roadmap, June 2026, 122-page PDF",
      "preciseLocator": "S2 PartII Core Challenge A, PDF page index42, S&T Gaps A1; Appendix3 index69 A1",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-P4",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "材料：寿命数据条件：条件",
      "text": "真实中子谱与热/机械/化学联合作用影响材料资格。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P15-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P15-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 PartII Core Challenge A, PDF page index42, S&T Gaps A1; Appendix3 index69 A1"
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-L4",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "材料：寿命数据条件：限制",
      "text": "路线图要求是待完成指标，不能当作已建成设施或确定商用时间。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P15-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P15-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 PartII Core Challenge A, PDF page index42, S&T Gaps A1; Appendix3 index69 A1",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-C4",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "材料：寿命数据条件",
      "text": "DOE要求聚变相关辐照下的肿胀、脆化、接头、疲劳和氚输运等资格数据。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P15-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P15-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P15-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P15-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "NIF特定实验与美国DOE2026正式路线图；不混同比较惯性与磁约束性能。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-E5",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "编辑结论：净电力须整站测量：原文依据",
      "text": "原文所列位置报告本命题的研究结果与条件。",
      "source_id": "P15-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P15-S1",
        "P15-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://annual.llnl.gov/fy-2025/national-ignition-facility-2025",
      "sourceVersion": "FY2025 official annual report; retrieved 2026-10-04",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Record-Breaking Fusion Experiments paragraph1; S2 Core Challenges C–E, PDF indexes44–46",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-P5",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "编辑结论：净电力须整站测量：条件",
      "text": "验收边界纳入驱动、低温、燃料处理、维护和发电损失。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P15-S1",
        "P15-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P15-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Record-Breaking Fusion Experiments paragraph1; S2 Core Challenges C–E, PDF indexes44–46"
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-L5",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "编辑结论：净电力须整站测量：限制",
      "text": "仅说明这些证据尚不足；不是所有聚变路线的不可行性证明。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P15-S1",
        "P15-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P15-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Record-Breaking Fusion Experiments paragraph1; S2 Core Challenges C–E, PDF indexes44–46",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-C5",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "编辑结论：净电力须整站测量",
      "text": "编辑判断：靶能量突破与燃料、材料、包层缺口并存；本链没有整站持续净电力证据。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "project editorial synthesis; not expert consensus",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P15-S1",
        "P15-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P15-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P15-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P15-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "NIF特定实验与美国DOE2026正式路线图；不混同比较惯性与磁约束性能。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment",
      "what_would_change_status": "经审计的持续整站净电量、可用率、燃料收支、部件寿命与成本。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-Q1",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题（编辑性整合）",
      "text": "聚变系统能否在包含驱动、低温、燃料循环和维护的边界内，持续输出经济可用的净电力？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "持续、可维护、经济可用的整站净电力。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P15-S1",
        "P15-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P15-E1",
        "P15-E2",
        "P15-E3",
        "P15-E4",
        "P15-E5"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": "整站净电量审计、重复/持续运行、燃料收支与部件更换周期数据；在所选路线下实证可维护性和成本。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-S1",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Uniform phase distribution of wide bandgap perovskite for high-performance perovskite-silicon tandem solar cells",
      "label": "Uniform phase distribution of wide bandgap perovskite for high-performance perovskite-silicon tandem solar cells",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-66480-7",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-66480-7",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Communications16,11470; Published2025-12-12; VOR2025-12-29",
      "version_date": "2025-12-29",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_research",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Results Perovskite-silicon tandem device performance and analysis",
        "Single junction WBG efficiency and stability, Fig.3f caption",
        "Fig.4c–g captions; Rights and permissions; About this article"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext_html",
      "license": "CC BY-NC-ND 4.0；不转载改编全文或图表，仅原创事实性概述及链接。",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY-NC-ND 4.0；不转载改编全文或图表，仅原创事实性概述及链接。",
      "independence_group": "HAN2025_TANDEM_PHASE",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "publication_date": "2025-12-12",
      "date_note": "Published2025-12-12与Version of record2025-12-29均为官方页明示。"
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-S2",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Improving the stability of monolithic perovskite/silicon tandems against reverse-bias stress using graded dielectric layers: Change history",
      "label": "Improving the stability of monolithic perovskite/silicon tandems against reverse-bias stress using graded dielectric layers: Change history",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-026-02067-w",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-026-02067-w",
      "sourceVersion": "publisher change-history entries2026-06-25 and2026-08-12",
      "version_date": "2026-08-12",
      "publication_status": "primary_publisher_correction_record",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Change history: 25June2026 and12August2026 substantive entries"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "official_change_history_full_substantive_text",
      "license": "出版社独占许可；只概述公开更正事实。",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "出版社独占许可；只概述公开更正事实。",
      "independence_group": "WANG2026_GRADED_DIELECTRIC",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-E1",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "效率：独立测量与自测区分：原文依据",
      "text": "Fig.4d与4f分别为实验室稳定输出和NPVM稳定输出，后者跟踪300秒。",
      "source_id": "P16-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-66480-7",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Communications16,11470; Published2025-12-12; VOR2025-12-29",
      "preciseLocator": "Results Perovskite-silicon tandem device performance and analysis, paragraphs beginning A cross-sectional SEM and It showed a certified PCE; Fig.4d,f",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-P1",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "效率：独立测量与自测区分：条件",
      "text": "短时效率检测与扫描方向分开记录。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P16-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results Perovskite-silicon tandem device performance and analysis, paragraphs beginning A cross-sectional SEM and It showed a certified PCE; Fig.4d,f"
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-L1",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "效率：独立测量与自测区分：限制",
      "text": "300秒认证不验证多年寿命或量产模块良率。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P16-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results Perovskite-silicon tandem device performance and analysis, paragraphs beginning A cross-sectional SEM and It showed a certified PCE; Fig.4d,f",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-C1",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "效率：独立测量与自测区分",
      "text": "Han等叠层器件自测稳定效率33.5%；NPVM测得300秒MPP跟踪稳定效率32.85%。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors reported observation; no independent remeasurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P16-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P16-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P16-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "Han2025可读原始叠层研究加Wang2026公开更新记录；原P16问题不变。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-E2",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "寿命：封装器件1135小时：原文依据",
      "text": "Fig.4g正文给封装叠层T90与光热条件。",
      "source_id": "P16-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-66480-7",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Communications16,11470; Published2025-12-12; VOR2025-12-29",
      "preciseLocator": "Results same subsection paragraph beginning In addition; Fig.4g and caption",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-P2",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "寿命：封装器件1135小时：条件",
      "text": "T90是保留初始效率90%的时间；图注明空气中测试。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P16-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results same subsection paragraph beginning In addition; Fig.4g and caption"
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-L2",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "寿命：封装器件1135小时：限制",
      "text": "固定光热测试不覆盖户外湿热、遮阴反偏、季节循环或25年寿命。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P16-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results same subsection paragraph beginning In addition; Fig.4g and caption",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-C2",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "寿命：封装器件1135小时",
      "text": "封装叠层器件在1-sun、65°C的ISOS-L-2测试中达到T90=1135小时。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors reported observation; no independent remeasurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P16-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P16-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P16-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "Han2025可读原始叠层研究加Wang2026公开更新记录；原P16问题不变。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-E3",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "器件：单结与叠层不混同：原文依据",
      "text": "Fig.3f是六枚单结器件平均耐久，Fig.4g才是叠层。",
      "source_id": "P16-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-66480-7",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Communications16,11470; Published2025-12-12; VOR2025-12-29",
      "preciseLocator": "Introduction final paragraph; Results Fig.3 stability and Fig.4g",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-P3",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "器件：单结与叠层不混同：条件",
      "text": "比较必须一致：架构、初始效率、T80/T90与工况。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P16-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Introduction final paragraph; Results Fig.3 stability and Fig.4g"
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-L3",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "器件：单结与叠层不混同：限制",
      "text": "不能把单结最长时数套在最高效率叠层上。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P16-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Introduction final paragraph; Results Fig.3 stability and Fig.4g",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-C3",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "器件：单结与叠层不混同",
      "text": "该研究3200小时T80属于单结宽带隙器件；叠层对应另一组T90测试。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P16-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P16-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P16-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "Han2025可读原始叠层研究加Wang2026公开更新记录；原P16问题不变。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-E4",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "版本：原卡数据有更新：原文依据",
      "text": "出版社两条变更记录分别涉及图1d源数据与新Note10。",
      "source_id": "P16-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-026-02067-w",
      "sourceVersion": "publisher change-history entries2026-06-25 and2026-08-12",
      "preciseLocator": "S2 Change history entries dated25June2026 and12August2026",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-P4",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "版本：原卡数据有更新：条件",
      "text": "更新属于原作而非独立重复。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P16-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 Change history entries dated25June2026 and12August2026"
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-L4",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "版本：原卡数据有更新：限制",
      "text": "只核查公开更新记录；未读取受限原研究全文及新增Note10，不能声称已核实其全部性能。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P16-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 Change history entries dated25June2026 and12August2026",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-C4",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "版本：原卡数据有更新",
      "text": "Wang等页面记录6月25日改正图1d源数据；8月12日补充MPP跟踪与数据量化说明Note10。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-S2",
        "P16-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P16-E4",
        "P16-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P16-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P16-L4",
        "P16-V05-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "Han2025可读原始叠层研究加Wang2026公开更新记录；原P16问题不变。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "v05_update": {
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-E5",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "编辑结论：效率寿命须同设备验收：原文依据",
      "text": "可读实验覆盖短时效率和加速耐久，受限制造论文未被升级为已核读。",
      "source_id": "P16-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-S1",
        "P16-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-66480-7",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Communications16,11470; Published2025-12-12; VOR2025-12-29",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Results Fig.4d,f,g; S2 Change history",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-P5",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "编辑结论：效率寿命须同设备验收：条件",
      "text": "不同样品、测试终点和版本不能直接合并。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-S1",
        "P16-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P16-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Results Fig.4d,f,g; S2 Change history"
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-L5",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "编辑结论：效率寿命须同设备验收：限制",
      "text": "仅对所读证据作判断；不宣称整个产业没有新进展。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-S1",
        "P16-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P16-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Results Fig.4d,f,g; S2 Change history",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-C5",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "编辑结论：效率寿命须同设备验收",
      "text": "编辑判断：已有可定位的效率和加速耐久证据，但本链未确立大面积批量多年户外可靠性。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "project editorial synthesis; not expert consensus",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-S1",
        "P16-S2",
        "P16-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P16-E5",
        "P16-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P16-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P16-L5",
        "P16-V05-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "Han2025可读原始叠层研究加Wang2026公开更新记录；原P16问题不变。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment",
      "what_would_change_status": "同工艺跨批次模块的认证效率、良率、多地点户外时序和经验证寿命模型。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "v05_update": {
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-Q1",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题（编辑性整合）",
      "text": "实验室高效率能否在大面积、批量生产和多年户外工况中保持，并满足安全、回收与成本要求？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "大面积批产、多年真实气候、安全回收与成本的同时实现。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-S1",
        "P16-S2",
        "P16-V05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P16-E1",
        "P16-E2",
        "P16-E3",
        "P16-E4",
        "P16-E5",
        "P16-V05-E2"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": "独立认证效率、跨批次模块良率、多地点户外数据及与加速测试一致的失效模型；报告封装、遮阴和温湿循环条件。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "v05_update": {
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-S1",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Advancing regulatory variant effect prediction with AlphaGenome",
      "label": "Advancing regulatory variant effect prediction with AlphaGenome",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-10014-0",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-10014-0",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature649,1206–1218; VOR2026-01-28",
      "version_date": "2026-01-28",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_research",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Main evaluation paragraphs; Fig.1e",
        "Variant effect evaluation paragraphs near Fig.4; Discussion limitations",
        "Rights and permissions; publication metadata"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext_html",
      "license": "CC BY 4.0；保留出处与版本；本交付仅原创概述，不转载图表。",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY 4.0；保留出处与版本；本交付仅原创概述，不转载图表。",
      "independence_group": "ALPHAGENOME_AVSEC2026",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-S2",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Systema: a framework for evaluating genetic perturbation response prediction beyond systematic variation",
      "label": "Systema: a framework for evaluating genetic perturbation response prediction beyond systematic variation",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-025-02777-8",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-025-02777-8",
      "sourceVersion": "VOR2025-08-25; Nature Biotechnology44(2026),1050–1059",
      "version_date": "2025-08-25",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_research",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Results benchmark methods and baselines; Fig.1",
        "Discussion; Methods Reference-based metrics and Limitations of reference-sensitive metrics",
        "About this article"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext_html",
      "license": "CC BY4.0；只保存原创概述和链接，不转载图表。",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY4.0；只保存原创概述和链接，不转载图表。",
      "independence_group": "SYSTEMA2025_10_DATASETS",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-E1",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "序列模型：限定基准领先：原文依据",
      "text": "Fig.1e比较26项分子变异效应任务，正文说明使用蒸馏学生模型。",
      "source_id": "LS01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-10014-0",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature649,1206–1218; VOR2026-01-28",
      "preciseLocator": "Main benchmarking paragraphs191–193 in rendered HTML; Fig.1e; refers to Supplementary Table4",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-P1",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "序列模型：限定基准领先：条件",
      "text": "评价对象为分子调控读出；变异任务使用蒸馏模型。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS01-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Main benchmarking paragraphs191–193 in rendered HTML; Fig.1e; refers to Supplementary Table4"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-L1",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "序列模型：限定基准领先：限制",
      "text": "不是25/26种疾病能诊断，也不是所有变异预测正确；未复跑基准。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS01-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Main benchmarking paragraphs191–193 in rendered HTML; Fig.1e; refers to Supplementary Table4",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-C1",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "序列模型：限定基准领先",
      "text": "正式AlphaGenome论文在26项变异效应评估中25项达到或超过所比较外部模型。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS01-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS01-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS01-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "AlphaGenome正式论文和Systema原始基准；无个体医疗建议。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-E2",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "远端与跨环境：仍受限：原文依据",
      "text": "Discussion列远端、细胞情境与复杂性状三个外推限制。",
      "source_id": "LS01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-10014-0",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature649,1206–1218; VOR2026-01-28",
      "preciseLocator": "Discussion paragraphs beginning Despite its advances and Finally",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-P2",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "远端与跨环境：仍受限：条件",
      "text": "模型从序列预测分子后果，疾病还涉及发育、基因功能及环境。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS01-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Discussion paragraphs beginning Despite its advances and Finally"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-L2",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "远端与跨环境：仍受限：限制",
      "text": "作者局限说明不能量化每个疾病的误差，也不否定局部预测价值。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS01-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Discussion paragraphs beginning Despite its advances and Finally",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-C2",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "远端与跨环境：仍受限",
      "text": "作者明确指出>100 kb远端调控、跨细胞环境和条件特异变异效应仍难准确刻画。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS01-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS01-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS01-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "AlphaGenome正式论文和Systema原始基准；无个体医疗建议。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-E3",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "扰动模型：简单基线必要：原文依据",
      "text": "Fig.1c和正文比较10数据集、CPA/GEARS/scGPT与简单均值基线。",
      "source_id": "LS01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-025-02777-8",
      "sourceVersion": "VOR2025-08-25; Nature Biotechnology44(2026),1050–1059",
      "preciseLocator": "Results benchmarking and simple baselines, Fig.1c and paragraph beginning We found that the two simple baselines",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-P3",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "扰动模型：简单基线必要：条件",
      "text": "比较CPA、GEARS、scGPT；三次不同数据划分；不是AlphaGenome评测。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS01-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results benchmarking and simple baselines, Fig.1c and paragraph beginning We found that the two simple baselines"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-L3",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "扰动模型：简单基线必要：限制",
      "text": "仅在该指标与数据集成立，不推论所有深度模型普遍无用。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS01-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results benchmarking and simple baselines, Fig.1c and paragraph beginning We found that the two simple baselines",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-C3",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "扰动模型：简单基线必要",
      "text": "Systema的10个数据集测试中，未见单基因扰动的PearsonΔ指标上，扰动均值基线胜过所比较方法。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS01-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS01-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS01-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "AlphaGenome正式论文和Systema原始基准；无个体医疗建议。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-E4",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "评估框架：本身也有边界：原文依据",
      "text": "Methods明确相关/余弦类指标可忽略幅度且对参照敏感。",
      "source_id": "LS01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-025-02777-8",
      "sourceVersion": "VOR2025-08-25; Nature Biotechnology44(2026),1050–1059",
      "preciseLocator": "Methods Limitations of reference-sensitive metrics, paragraphs1–3; Discussion paragraph beginning While changing the reference",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-P4",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "评估框架：本身也有边界：条件",
      "text": "方向相关与效应大小属于不同评估问题。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS01-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Methods Limitations of reference-sensitive metrics, paragraphs1–3; Discussion paragraph beginning While changing the reference"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-L4",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "评估框架：本身也有边界：限制",
      "text": "更好的基准不是人体疾病预测机制已经闭合。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS01-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Methods Limitations of reference-sensitive metrics, paragraphs1–3; Discussion paragraph beginning While changing the reference",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-C4",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "评估框架：本身也有边界",
      "text": "Systema更换参照以凸显扰动特异效应，但参照敏感指标难评弱扰动且可忽略幅度。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS01-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS01-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS01-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "AlphaGenome正式论文和Systema原始基准；无个体医疗建议。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-E5",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "编辑结论：不同任务不可互相反证：原文依据",
      "text": "两原研究具有不同输入、任务、模型和终点，不能组成直接复制对。",
      "source_id": "LS01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-S1",
        "LS01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-10014-0",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature649,1206–1218; VOR2026-01-28",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Main and Discussion; S2 Results benchmark inclusion and Methods metrics",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-P5",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "编辑结论：不同任务不可互相反证：条件",
      "text": "先对齐输入、细胞体系、输出终点与测试集，才判断重复或冲突。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-S1",
        "LS01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS01-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Main and Discussion; S2 Results benchmark inclusion and Methods metrics"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-L5",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "编辑结论：不同任务不可互相反证：限制",
      "text": "尚无本链支持的个体疾病命运预测；9月新预印本已发现但全文访问受限。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-S1",
        "LS01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS01-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Main and Discussion; S2 Results benchmark inclusion and Methods metrics",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-C5",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "编辑结论：不同任务不可互相反证",
      "text": "编辑判断：序列调控预测与单细胞扰动预测分别推进局部可预测性；Systema不能直接反驳AlphaGenome。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "project editorial synthesis; not expert consensus",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-S1",
        "LS01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS01-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS01-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS01-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "AlphaGenome正式论文和Systema原始基准；无个体医疗建议。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment",
      "what_would_change_status": "跨遗传背景、细胞状态和环境的前瞻留出因果验证，并连到临床终点。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-Q1",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题（编辑性整合）",
      "text": "能否把新变异、多基因组合、细胞状态和环境连起来，可靠预测人体表型与疾病？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "由新变异、多基因与环境可靠预测人体疾病结局。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-S1",
        "LS01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS01-E1",
        "LS01-E2",
        "LS01-E3",
        "LS01-E4",
        "LS01-E5"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": [
        "跨细胞类型、遗传背景和环境的前瞻性留出验证",
        "在真实组织中进行因果扰动，并与简单基线比较",
        "从分子变化到器官及临床结局的多尺度校准"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-S1",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Effect of long-term caloric restriction on DNA methylation measures of biological aging in healthy adults from the CALERIE trial",
      "label": "Effect of long-term caloric restriction on DNA methylation measures of biological aging in healthy adults from the CALERIE trial",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-022-00357-y",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-022-00357-y",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Aging3,248–257; VOR2023-02-09",
      "version_date": "2023-02-09",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_research",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Main trial population, DNAm sample, Fig.2 and ITT results",
        "Main achieved calorie restriction; Discussion longitudinal follow-up limits",
        "Methods randomization, procedures and statistical models"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext_html",
      "license": "CC BY 4.0；保留出处与版本；本交付仅原创概述，不转载图表。",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY 4.0；保留出处与版本；本交付仅原创概述，不转载图表。",
      "independence_group": "CALERIE_PHASE2_DNAM",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-E1",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "人群：随机试验的事后分析：原文依据",
      "text": "Main随机人数、血样随访人数和入组范围给出分析总体。",
      "source_id": "LS02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-022-00357-y",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Aging3,248–257; VOR2023-02-09",
      "preciseLocator": "Main paragraphs beginning CALERIE Phase2, Of238 eligible and Blood DNAm data; Methods Study design",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-P1",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "人群：随机试验的事后分析：条件",
      "text": "男性21–50岁、绝经前女性21–47岁，BMI22.0–27.9；甲基化为事后分析。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS02-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Main paragraphs beginning CALERIE Phase2, Of238 eligible and Blood DNAm data; Methods Study design"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-L1",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "人群：随机试验的事后分析：限制",
      "text": "不直接外推高龄、慢病、儿童或全部人口；并非所有随机者均有甲基化随访。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS02-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Main paragraphs beginning CALERIE Phase2, Of238 eligible and Blood DNAm data; Methods Study design",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-C1",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "人群：随机试验的事后分析",
      "text": "220人随机试验中，197人具备基线及至少一次随访甲基化数据；研究对象为健康非肥胖成年人。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors reported observation; no independent remeasurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS02-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS02-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS02-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "CALERIE Phase2的DNAm事后分析；不综述所有抗衰老干预。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-E2",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "DunedinPACE：小平均效应：原文依据",
      "text": "Fig.2与ITT段落报告24月标准化差及置信区间。",
      "source_id": "LS02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-022-00357-y",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Aging3,248–257; VOR2023-02-09",
      "preciseLocator": "Main ITT paragraph beginning CR treatment reduced; Fig.2",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-P2",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "DunedinPACE：小平均效应：条件",
      "text": "意向治疗混合模型、基线与协变量调整；指标测血液DNA甲基化。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS02-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Main ITT paragraph beginning CR treatment reduced; Fig.2"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-L2",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "DunedinPACE：小平均效应：限制",
      "text": "作者换算2–3%指标速度下降，不是实测寿命延长百分比。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS02-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Main ITT paragraph beginning CR treatment reduced; Fig.2",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-C2",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "DunedinPACE：小平均效应",
      "text": "24个月DunedinPACE标准化组间效应d=−0.25，95%CI[−0.41,−0.09]。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS02-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS02-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS02-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "CALERIE Phase2的DNAm事后分析；不综述所有抗衰老干预。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-E3",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "其他时钟：未显著不等于零：原文依据",
      "text": "同一ITT段落给两个PC时钟跨零的区间。",
      "source_id": "LS02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-022-00357-y",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Aging3,248–257; VOR2023-02-09",
      "preciseLocator": "Main ITT paragraph beginning However, change in PhenoAge and GrimAge",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-P3",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "其他时钟：未显著不等于零：条件",
      "text": "同一试验，但各时钟构念和敏感度不同。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS02-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Main ITT paragraph beginning However, change in PhenoAge and GrimAge"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-L3",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "其他时钟：未显著不等于零：限制",
      "text": "置信区间跨零不确立无效或等效；也不能选一个指标代表整体逆龄。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS02-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Main ITT paragraph beginning However, change in PhenoAge and GrimAge",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-C3",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "其他时钟：未显著不等于零",
      "text": "24个月PC PhenoAge与PC GrimAge效应均为0.05；其95%CI分别[−0.11,0.20]、[−0.07,0.17]。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS02-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS02-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS02-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "CALERIE Phase2的DNAm事后分析；不综述所有抗衰老干预。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-E4",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "剂量：分配不等于达成：原文依据",
      "text": "依从性段落区分目标剂量与实际平均限制量。",
      "source_id": "LS02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-022-00357-y",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Aging3,248–257; VOR2023-02-09",
      "preciseLocator": "Main paragraph beginning In the CALERIE Trial, the %CR achieved; Methods Procedures",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-P4",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "剂量：分配不等于达成：条件",
      "text": "依从性依据双标水与身体成分变化估计；包括密集行为支持。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS02-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Main paragraph beginning In the CALERIE Trial, the %CR achieved; Methods Procedures"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-L4",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "剂量：分配不等于达成：限制",
      "text": "高依从者与低依从者比较不再只是随机分配对比；TOT另需工具变量假设。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS02-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Main paragraph beginning In the CALERIE Trial, the %CR achieved; Methods Procedures",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-C4",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "剂量：分配不等于达成",
      "text": "目标限热量25%，干预组实际平均达成11.9%（标准误0.7%）。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors reported observation; no independent remeasurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS02-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS02-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS02-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "CALERIE Phase2的DNAm事后分析；不综述所有抗衰老干预。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-E5",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "编辑结论：临床终点仍未确立：原文依据",
      "text": "Discussion明确试验没有干预后长期疾病/死亡随访。",
      "source_id": "LS02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-022-00357-y",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Aging3,248–257; VOR2023-02-09",
      "preciseLocator": "Discussion paragraph beginning Follow-up in the CALERIE Trial did not extend beyond the intervention",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-P5",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "编辑结论：临床终点仍未确立：条件",
      "text": "替代终点须证明干预引起的改变可靠预测临床获益。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS02-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Discussion paragraph beginning Follow-up in the CALERIE Trial did not extend beyond the intervention"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-L5",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "编辑结论：临床终点仍未确立：限制",
      "text": "文中10–15%死亡风险推算来自外部观察关联，不是此试验实测结局；不构成个人饮食建议。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS02-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Discussion paragraph beginning Follow-up in the CALERIE Trial did not extend beyond the intervention",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-C5",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "编辑结论：临床终点仍未确立",
      "text": "编辑判断：本研究确立限定生物标志物变化，不能据此宣布人类健康寿命延长或死亡风险已下降。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "project editorial synthesis; not expert consensus",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS02-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS02-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS02-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "CALERIE Phase2的DNAm事后分析；不综述所有抗衰老干预。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment",
      "what_would_change_status": "长期随机试验的疾病、功能、生活质量和死亡，以及副作用的净效益。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-Q1",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题（编辑性整合）",
      "text": "哪些干预真正延长人的健康寿命，且收益超过长期副作用？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "安全延长人的长期健康寿命和临床净收益。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS02-E1",
        "LS02-E2",
        "LS02-E3",
        "LS02-E4",
        "LS02-E5"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": [
        "长期随机试验，以疾病、功能、生活质量及死亡为临床终点",
        "验证生物标志物能否作为干预效果的可靠替代终点",
        "检验不同年龄、性别、健康状态和人群中的风险收益"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-S1",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Final, 10-Year Outcomes with Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma",
      "label": "Final, 10-Year Outcomes with Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12080919/fullTextXML",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12080919/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "PMC12080919 author accepted manuscript; final publication2024-09-15, issue2025-01-02",
      "version_date": "2024-09-15",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_research",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Methods Patients, Trial Design, Statistical Analysis",
        "Results Survival Outcomes, three-year progression-free subgroup",
        "Discussion adverse events and survival interpretation"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_author_manuscript_fulltext_xml",
      "license": "CC BY4.0，原稿权利声明；只保存出处及原创概述，不转载全文/图表。",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY4.0，原稿权利声明；只保存出处及原创概述，不转载全文/图表。",
      "independence_group": "CHECKMATE067",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-S2",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "RNA neoantigen vaccines prime long-lived CD8+ T cells in pancreatic cancer",
      "label": "RNA neoantigen vaccines prime long-lived CD8+ T cells in pancreatic cancer",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11946889/fullTextXML",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11946889/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "PMC11946889 publisher article; Nature639,1042–1051; published2025-02-19",
      "version_date": "2025-02-19",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_research",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Main Clinical outcome at extended follow-up, Fig.1",
        "Vaccines elicit long-lived T cell clones, Fig.2",
        "Discussion small sample/confounding; Methods Half-life and lifespan"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_primary_fulltext_xml",
      "license": "CC BY-NC-ND4.0；只保存原创事实性概述与出处，不分发改编全文/图表。",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY-NC-ND4.0；只保存原创事实性概述与出处，不分发改编全文/图表。",
      "independence_group": "AUTOGENE_CEVUMERAN_PHASE1",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-E1",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "黑色素瘤：十年总生存：原文依据",
      "text": "Survival Outcomes与Fig.1A给出随机组总生存及死亡HR。",
      "source_id": "LS03-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12080919/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "PMC12080919 author accepted manuscript; final publication2024-09-15, issue2025-01-02",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Results Survival Outcomes first paragraph and Fig.1A",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-P1",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "黑色素瘤：十年总生存：条件",
      "text": "945名既往未治不可切除III/IV期黑色素瘤随机三组；ECOG0–1。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS03-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Results Survival Outcomes first paragraph and Fig.1A"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-L1",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "黑色素瘤：十年总生存：限制",
      "text": "限定癌种与入组人群；联合治疗不良事件更频繁严重，不能只看生存不看风险。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS03-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Results Survival Outcomes first paragraph and Fig.1A",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-C1",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "黑色素瘤：十年总生存",
      "text": "CheckMate067中联合组10年总生存43%、ipilimumab组19%；死亡HR0.53，95%CI[0.44,0.65]。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS03-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS03-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS03-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "CheckMate067三期十年随访与切除后PDAC一期疫苗随访；两者不是相互复制。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-E2",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "比较：联合与单药属描述：原文依据",
      "text": "Statistical Analysis明确联合对nivolumab仅为描述性比较。",
      "source_id": "LS03-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12080919/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "PMC12080919 author accepted manuscript; final publication2024-09-15, issue2025-01-02",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Methods Statistical Analysis; Results Survival Outcomes first paragraph",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-P2",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "比较：联合与单药属描述：条件",
      "text": "主要比较是各含nivolumab组对ipilimumab。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS03-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Methods Statistical Analysis; Results Survival Outcomes first paragraph"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-L2",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "比较：联合与单药属描述：限制",
      "text": "不能据非显著结果宣称等效，也不能仅按中位数宣布联合显著优于nivolumab。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS03-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Methods Statistical Analysis; Results Survival Outcomes first paragraph",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-C2",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "比较：联合与单药属描述",
      "text": "联合与nivolumab组的死亡HR0.85，95%CI[0.69,1.05]，原试验不为两者正式比较设计或赋能。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS03-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS03-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS03-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "CheckMate067三期十年随访与切除后PDAC一期疫苗随访；两者不是相互复制。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-E3",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "长期存活：有条件的亚组：原文依据",
      "text": "Fig.3B以3年无进展为筛选条件，非所有随机者。",
      "source_id": "LS03-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12080919/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "PMC12080919 author accepted manuscript; final publication2024-09-15, issue2025-01-02",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Results post-hoc paragraph beginning In a post-hoc analysis, baseline characteristics; Fig.3B",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-P3",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "长期存活：有条件的亚组：条件",
      "text": "联合组这一条件亚组n=100；属于事后landmark描述。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS03-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Results post-hoc paragraph beginning In a post-hoc analysis, baseline characteristics; Fig.3B"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-L3",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "长期存活：有条件的亚组：限制",
      "text": "经过治疗后选择且不等于人人治愈；疾病特异生存亦非全因生存。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS03-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Results post-hoc paragraph beginning In a post-hoc analysis, baseline characteristics; Fig.3B",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-C3",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "长期存活：有条件的亚组",
      "text": "联合组中已在3年无进展者，10年黑色素瘤特异生存为96%；它不是全体随机者的生存率。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS03-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS03-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS03-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "CheckMate067三期十年随访与切除后PDAC一期疫苗随访；两者不是相互复制。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-E4",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "胰腺癌：免疫应答与复发关联：原文依据",
      "text": "Fig.1a为疫苗免疫应答分层的16人复发随访。",
      "source_id": "LS03-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11946889/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "PMC11946889 publisher article; Nature639,1042–1051; published2025-02-19",
      "preciseLocator": "S2 Clinical outcome at extended follow-up, paragraph1, Fig.1a",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-P4",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "胰腺癌：免疫应答与复发关联：条件",
      "text": "治疗包含手术、atezolizumab、个体疫苗及mFOLFIRINOX；按免疫应答分组。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS03-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 Clinical outcome at extended follow-up, paragraph1, Fig.1a"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-L4",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "胰腺癌：免疫应答与复发关联：限制",
      "text": "不是随机疫苗/无疫苗比较；小样本、未知宿主与治疗差异可混杂关联。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS03-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 Clinical outcome at extended follow-up, paragraph1, Fig.1a",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-C4",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "胰腺癌：免疫应答与复发关联",
      "text": "疫苗一期随访3.2年，8名应答者RFS中位数未达到，8名非应答者13.4个月。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS03-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS03-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS03-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "CheckMate067三期十年随访与切除后PDAC一期疫苗随访；两者不是相互复制。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-E5",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "免疫寿命：模型估计不是实测百年：原文依据",
      "text": "Methods定义克隆寿命为指数拟合至检测阈值的时间。",
      "source_id": "LS03-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11946889/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "PMC11946889 publisher article; Nature639,1042–1051; published2025-02-19",
      "preciseLocator": "S2 Vaccines elicit long-lived T cell clones, paragraphs beginning Next and After vaccine priming; Methods Half-life and lifespan",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-P5",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "免疫寿命：模型估计不是实测百年：条件",
      "text": "指数衰减模型与检测阈值定义；实际随访约三年。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS03-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 Vaccines elicit long-lived T cell clones, paragraphs beginning Next and After vaccine priming; Methods Half-life and lifespan"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-L5",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "免疫寿命：模型估计不是实测百年：限制",
      "text": "作者要求未来验证寿命外推；免疫持续不自动等于不复发。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS03-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 Vaccines elicit long-lived T cell clones, paragraphs beginning Next and After vaccine priming; Methods Half-life and lifespan",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-C5",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "免疫寿命：模型估计不是实测百年",
      "text": "报告的加强后克隆中位寿命7.7年来自频率衰减拟合至检测阈值；长期范围不是已观察到百年。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS03-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS03-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS03-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "CheckMate067三期十年随访与切除后PDAC一期疫苗随访；两者不是相互复制。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-E6",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "编辑结论：不能泛化为通用治愈：原文依据",
      "text": "RCT长期结局、一期关联及克隆寿命模型的证据类型不同。",
      "source_id": "LS03-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S1",
        "LS03-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12080919/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "PMC12080919 author accepted manuscript; final publication2024-09-15, issue2025-01-02",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Methods/Survival Outcomes; S2 Discussion small-sample confounding paragraph",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-P6",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "编辑结论：不能泛化为通用治愈：条件",
      "text": "保持癌种、终点、比较组、后续治疗和选择机制。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S1",
        "LS03-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS03-E6"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Methods/Survival Outcomes; S2 Discussion small-sample confounding paragraph"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-L6",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "编辑结论：不能泛化为通用治愈：限制",
      "text": "不能合成“癌症已治愈”或疫苗独立疗效结论；不作个人治疗建议。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S1",
        "LS03-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS03-E6"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Methods/Survival Outcomes; S2 Discussion small-sample confounding paragraph",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-C6",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "编辑结论：不能泛化为通用治愈",
      "text": "编辑判断：随机长期生存与小样本免疫机制证据属于不同层级，需逐癌种检验持久控制。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "project editorial synthesis; not expert consensus",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S1",
        "LS03-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS03-E6"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS03-P6"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS03-L6"
      ],
      "scope": "CheckMate067三期十年随访与切除后PDAC一期疫苗随访；两者不是相互复制。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment",
      "what_would_change_status": "疫苗随机试验及按亚型分层、长期耐药/复发追踪和外部重复。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-Q1",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题（编辑性整合）",
      "text": "如何预测并阻断耐药、转移和复发，使更多癌种获得可重复的持久控制？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "跨癌种可预测阻断耐药、转移和复发。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS03-S1",
        "LS03-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS03-E1",
        "LS03-E2",
        "LS03-E3",
        "LS03-E4",
        "LS03-E5",
        "LS03-E6"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": [
        "按癌种和分子亚型分层的随机对照试验与长期生存终点",
        "治疗前后纵向、多部位肿瘤和免疫微环境测量",
        "检验适应性联合方案及可预测的逃逸机制"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-S1",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Donanemab in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer Disease: The TRAILBLAZER-ALZ2 Randomized Clinical Trial",
      "label": "Donanemab in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer Disease: The TRAILBLAZER-ALZ2 Randomized Clinical Trial",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10352931/",
      "metadataUrl": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10352931/",
      "sourceVersion": "JAMA330,512–527; published2023-07-17",
      "version_date": "2023-07-17",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_research",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Methods Trial Design and Participants, Randomization, Statistical Analysis",
        "Results Table2 primary outcome; Table3 harms and footnotes",
        "Discussion Limitations"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext_html",
      "license": "Copyright2023 AMA All Rights Reserved；合法开放阅读不等于开放再许可；仅原创简述。",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "Copyright2023 AMA All Rights Reserved；合法开放阅读不等于开放再许可；仅原创简述。",
      "independence_group": "TRAILBLAZER_ALZ2",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-S2",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Donanemab in early symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease: results from the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ2 long-term extension",
      "label": "Donanemab in early symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease: results from the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ2 long-term extension",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12869028/",
      "metadataUrl": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12869028/",
      "sourceVersion": "Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer Disease13(2),100446; published2025-12-01",
      "version_date": "2025-12-01",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_research",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "2.1 Trial design; 2.3 External ADNI control cohort",
        "3.1 Participants; 4 Discussion final limitation paragraphs"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext_html",
      "license": "网页未确认可再许可；只保存书目信息和原创概述，不转载图表或长摘录",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "网页未确认可再许可；只保存书目信息和原创概述，不转载图表或长摘录",
      "independence_group": "TRAILBLAZER_ALZ2",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-E1",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "试验：选定早期AD人群：原文依据",
      "text": "入组方法同时限定年龄、临床阶段、PET和MRI标准。",
      "source_id": "LS04-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10352931/",
      "sourceVersion": "JAMA330,512–527; published2023-07-17",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Methods Trial Design and Participants, paragraphs1–3; Results participant flow",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-P1",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "试验：选定早期AD人群：条件",
      "text": "MMSE20–28，排除若干出血/水肿影像高风险表现。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS04-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Methods Trial Design and Participants, paragraphs1–3; Results participant flow"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-L1",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "试验：选定早期AD人群：限制",
      "text": "不能直接外推所有痴呆、晚期疾病、症状前人群；样本91.5%为白人。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS04-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Methods Trial Design and Participants, paragraphs1–3; Results participant flow",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-C1",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "试验：选定早期AD人群",
      "text": "1736人随机试验纳入60–85岁、MCI/轻度痴呆且PET有淀粉样蛋白和tau证据的人群。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors reported observation; no independent remeasurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS04-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS04-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS04-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "Donanemab原RCT与同队列延长观察，保持LS04问题；非全部神经退行病综述。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-E2",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "认知功能：平均恶化减慢：原文依据",
      "text": "Table2合并tau人群NCS2行列组均变化及组间差。",
      "source_id": "LS04-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10352931/",
      "sourceVersion": "JAMA330,512–527; published2023-07-17",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Results Primary Outcome, Table2 NCS2 combined population; Fig.2",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-P2",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "认知功能：平均恶化减慢：条件",
      "text": "iADRS低分更差，双方平均均恶化；模型调整后的组间估计。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS04-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Results Primary Outcome, Table2 NCS2 combined population; Fig.2"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-L2",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "认知功能：平均恶化减慢：限制",
      "text": "相对减慢22.3%不是记忆恢复率或每个患者受益幅度。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS04-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Results Primary Outcome, Table2 NCS2 combined population; Fig.2",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-C2",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "认知功能：平均恶化减慢",
      "text": "合并tau人群76周iADRS变化为−10.19对−13.11；组间差2.92，95%CI[1.51,4.33]。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS04-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS04-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS04-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "Donanemab原RCT与同队列延长观察，保持LS04问题；非全部神经退行病综述。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-E3",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "危害：ARIA须同列：原文依据",
      "text": "Table3的ARIA总览、治疗相关死亡行及脚注界定安全分母。",
      "source_id": "LS04-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10352931/",
      "sourceVersion": "JAMA330,512–527; published2023-07-17",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Table3 Overview of ARIA rows and Death considered related row; footnotes a,d,g,i",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-P3",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "危害：ARIA须同列：条件",
      "text": "采用MRI/事件簇定义，区别于治疗期AE编码行的17例。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS04-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Table3 Overview of ARIA rows and Death considered related row; footnotes a,d,g,i"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-L3",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "危害：ARIA须同列：限制",
      "text": "治疗相关归因为试验判断；总死亡与相关死亡不同；获益须与风险和监测负担权衡。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS04-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Table3 Overview of ARIA rows and Death considered related row; footnotes a,d,g,i",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-C3",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "危害：ARIA须同列",
      "text": "安全人群ARIA-E为205/853（24.0%）对18/874（2.1%）；研究判定治疗相关死亡3例对1例。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors reported observation; no independent remeasurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS04-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS04-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS04-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "Donanemab原RCT与同队列延长观察，保持LS04问题；非全部神经退行病综述。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-E4",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "延长观察：没有内部未治疗对照：原文依据",
      "text": "延长研究Methods2.3明示没有内部安慰剂比较。",
      "source_id": "LS04-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12869028/",
      "sourceVersion": "Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer Disease13(2),100446; published2025-12-01",
      "preciseLocator": "S2 2.1 Trial design; 2.3 External ADNI control cohort; 4 Discussion final3 paragraphs",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-P4",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "延长观察：没有内部未治疗对照：条件",
      "text": "延长阶段仍保留盲法；外部对照加权不能自动恢复随机化。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS04-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 2.1 Trial design; 2.3 External ADNI control cohort; 4 Discussion final3 paragraphs"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-L4",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "延长观察：没有内部未治疗对照：限制",
      "text": "存在存活者/选择偏差、未测混杂，分析为探索性且未控制多重性；与原试验同数据组。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS04-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 2.1 Trial design; 2.3 External ADNI control cohort; 4 Discussion final3 paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-C4",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "延长观察：没有内部未治疗对照",
      "text": "2025延长研究提供三年观察，但原安慰剂组开始用药，因此使用外部ADNI比较。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS04-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS04-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS04-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "Donanemab原RCT与同队列延长观察，保持LS04问题；非全部神经退行病综述。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-E5",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "编辑结论：长期保护须更强设计：原文依据",
      "text": "原RCT与延长研究分别约束短期随机效应和长期外推。",
      "source_id": "LS04-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-S1",
        "LS04-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10352931/",
      "sourceVersion": "JAMA330,512–527; published2023-07-17",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Table2–3 and Limitations; S2 2.3 and Discussion limitation paragraphs",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-P5",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "编辑结论：长期保护须更强设计：条件",
      "text": "量表效应、日常功能、治疗风险、病程阶段和随访设计分开。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-S1",
        "LS04-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS04-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Table2–3 and Limitations; S2 2.3 and Discussion limitation paragraphs"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-L5",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "编辑结论：长期保护须更强设计：限制",
      "text": "本链深入donanemab，未把打不开的lecanemab原文声称已读；不作个人用药建议。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-S1",
        "LS04-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS04-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Table2–3 and Limitations; S2 2.3 and Discussion limitation paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-C5",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "编辑结论：长期保护须更强设计",
      "text": "编辑判断：局部病程修饰有RCT支持，症状前、持久临床净收益和多机制解释仍需专门验证。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "project editorial synthesis; not expert consensus",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-S1",
        "LS04-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS04-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS04-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS04-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "Donanemab原RCT与同队列延长观察，保持LS04问题；非全部神经退行病综述。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment",
      "what_would_change_status": "有合适同期比较的长期认知功能和生活质量结局，预防试验及多样人群风险评估。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-Q1",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题（编辑性整合）",
      "text": "如何在症状前识别可干预机制，并实现持续的认知与功能保护？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "症状前识别并长期保护认知功能，兼顾风险与实际生活获益。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-S1",
        "LS04-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS04-E1",
        "LS04-E2",
        "LS04-E3",
        "LS04-E4",
        "LS04-E5"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": [
        "更长时间的预防和治疗随机试验",
        "同时跟踪淀粉样蛋白、tau、免疫、血管及神经损伤",
        "比较患者真正重视的功能获益、治疗负担与不良事件"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-S1",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "A small polymerase ribozyme that can synthesize itself and its complementary strand",
      "label": "A small polymerase ribozyme that can synthesize itself and its complementary strand",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC7618777/fullTextXML",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC7618777/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "PMC7618777 author manuscript of Science doi10.1126/science.adt2760; publication2026-02-12",
      "version_date": "2026-02-12",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_research",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "QT: a new small ribozyme class",
        "Ribozyme-catalyzed synthesis of its complementary strand and of itself",
        "Fig.4 caption; Discussion"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_author_manuscript_fulltext_xml",
      "license": "CC BY4.0，原稿权利声明；只保存出处及原创概述，不转载全文/图表。",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY4.0，原稿权利声明；只保存出处及原创概述，不转载全文/图表。",
      "independence_group": "QT45_GIANNI2026",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-S2",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "RNA-catalyzed evolution of catalytic RNA",
      "label": "RNA-catalyzed evolution of catalytic RNA",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC10945747/fullTextXML",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC10945747/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "PNAS121,e2321592121; publication2024-03-04; issue2024-03-12",
      "version_date": "2024-03-04",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_research",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Results RNA-Catalyzed Evolution of Hammerhead Ribozymes",
        "Sequence Changes Over the Course of Evolution; Fig.1D,Fig.2",
        "Biochemical Properties of the Evolved Hammerhead Ribozymes"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_primary_fulltext_xml",
      "license": "CC BY-NC-ND4.0；只保存原创事实性概述与出处，不分发改编全文/图表。",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY-NC-ND4.0；只保存原创事实性概述与出处，不分发改编全文/图表。",
      "independence_group": "PNAS2024_HAMMERHEAD_EVOLUTION",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-E1",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "QT45：两条链分别合成：原文依据",
      "text": "Fig.4C及正文分别给互补链与正链的低产率合成。",
      "source_id": "LS05-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS05-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC7618777/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "PMC7618777 author manuscript of Science doi10.1126/science.adt2760; publication2026-02-12",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Ribozyme-catalyzed synthesis of its complementary strand and of itself, paragraphs2 and5; Fig.4C",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-P1",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "QT45：两条链分别合成：条件",
      "text": "小型45nt RNA催化；受控冰相、活化底物和外加引物/模板。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Ribozyme-catalyzed synthesis of its complementary strand and of itself, paragraphs2 and5; Fig.4C"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-L1",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "QT45：两条链分别合成：限制",
      "text": "不是同一反应中自行闭合、多代自持复制。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Ribozyme-catalyzed synthesis of its complementary strand and of itself, paragraphs2 and5; Fig.4C",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-C1",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "QT45：两条链分别合成",
      "text": "QT45在分开的反应中合成自身互补链与正链；72天产率分别0.24%和0.17%。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors reported observation; no independent remeasurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS05-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS05-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "QT45原始实验与2024锤头核酶选择实验；合法EuropePMCXML读取。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-E2",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "条件：正链有外部辅助：原文依据",
      "text": "Fig.4图注记录正链反应的一次pH/热/冷冻步骤。",
      "source_id": "LS05-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS05-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC7618777/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "PMC7618777 author manuscript of Science doi10.1126/science.adt2760; publication2026-02-12",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 same subsection paragraph beginning We hypothesized that substrates; Fig.4C caption",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-P2",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "条件：正链有外部辅助：条件",
      "text": "Fig.4规定−7°C冰相72天；条件由实验者设置。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS05-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 same subsection paragraph beginning We hypothesized that substrates; Fig.4C caption"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-L2",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "条件：正链有外部辅助：限制",
      "text": "不应把受控补救与底物供给省去后称为自主生命。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS05-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 same subsection paragraph beginning We hypothesized that substrates; Fig.4C caption",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-C2",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "条件：正链有外部辅助",
      "text": "正链合成加入指定六核苷酸底物，并经历一次pH–加热–冷冻循环以促进链分离。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors reported observation; no independent remeasurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS05-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS05-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS05-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "QT45原始实验与2024锤头核酶选择实验；合法EuropePMCXML读取。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-E3",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "保真度：每位点与完整链不同：原文依据",
      "text": "Fig.4D旁正文区分每核苷酸保真度与全长正确读段比例。",
      "source_id": "LS05-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS05-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC7618777/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "PMC7618777 author manuscript of Science doi10.1126/science.adt2760; publication2026-02-12",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 same subsection paragraph beginning To test this, final sentences; Fig.4D",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-P3",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "保真度：每位点与完整链不同：条件",
      "text": "统计对象为测序获得的全长产物，并非所有反应物。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS05-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 same subsection paragraph beginning To test this, final sentences; Fig.4D"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-L3",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "保真度：每位点与完整链不同：限制",
      "text": "高每位点正确率不能直接替代全长正确率；作者仍要求提高效率/保真度以自持。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS05-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 same subsection paragraph beginning To test this, final sentences; Fig.4D",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-C3",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "保真度：每位点与完整链不同",
      "text": "随机三联体池复制互补链时，每核苷酸保真度94.1%，完全正确的全长读段只有10.9%。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS05-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS05-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS05-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "QT45原始实验与2024锤头核酶选择实验；合法EuropePMCXML读取。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-E4",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "选择：八轮仍有蛋白质酶辅助：原文依据",
      "text": "PNAS Fig.1D及Results记录轮间逆转录、PCR、转录与八轮选择。",
      "source_id": "LS05-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS05-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC10945747/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "PNAS121,e2321592121; publication2024-03-04; issue2024-03-12",
      "preciseLocator": "S2 Results RNA-Catalyzed Evolution of Hammerhead Ribozymes; Fig.1D; Sequence Changes Over the Course of Evolution",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-P4",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "选择：八轮仍有蛋白质酶辅助：条件",
      "text": "实验者选择切割活性并扩增；低保真对照逐渐失活。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS05-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 Results RNA-Catalyzed Evolution of Hammerhead Ribozymes; Fig.1D; Sequence Changes Over the Course of Evolution"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-L4",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "选择：八轮仍有蛋白质酶辅助：限制",
      "text": "展示RNA催化遗传选择，不是无蛋白、无干预的自主达尔文系统。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS05-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 Results RNA-Catalyzed Evolution of Hammerhead Ribozymes; Fig.1D; Sequence Changes Over the Course of Evolution",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-C4",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "选择：八轮仍有蛋白质酶辅助",
      "text": "2024研究的高保真RNA聚合酶能维持锤头核酶八轮选择，但轮间含逆转录、PCR和转录。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors reported observation; no independent remeasurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS05-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS05-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS05-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "QT45原始实验与2024锤头核酶选择实验；合法EuropePMCXML读取。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-E5",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "编辑结论：关键反应未等于生命起源：原文依据",
      "text": "QT45 Discussion提出仍需效率/保真度改进；PNAS流程保留外部辅助。",
      "source_id": "LS05-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS05-S1",
        "LS05-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC7618777/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "PMC7618777 author manuscript of Science doi10.1126/science.adt2760; publication2026-02-12",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Discussion first2 paragraphs; S2 Results/Fig.1D experimental cycle",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-P5",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "编辑结论：关键反应未等于生命起源：条件",
      "text": "原卡要求底物活化、复制、链分离、区室与能量持续耦合。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS05-S1",
        "LS05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS05-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Discussion first2 paragraphs; S2 Results/Fig.1D experimental cycle"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-L5",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "编辑结论：关键反应未等于生命起源：限制",
      "text": "实验可能性不证明早期地球实际历史；两个实验不是同一完整系统。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS05-S1",
        "LS05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS05-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Discussion first2 paragraphs; S2 Results/Fig.1D experimental cycle",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-C5",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "编辑结论：关键反应未等于生命起源",
      "text": "编辑判断：这些实验补足复制和选择的局部反应，仍未展示从前生命原料到自主可进化生命的连续闭环。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "project editorial synthesis; not expert consensus",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LS05-S1",
        "LS05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS05-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS05-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS05-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "QT45原始实验与2024锤头核酶选择实验；合法EuropePMCXML读取。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment",
      "what_would_change_status": "可信地球化学原料、能量与区室下无需反复补救的多代自持遗传和选择。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-Q1",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题（编辑性整合）",
      "text": "能否从可信的前生命原料与能量来源，连续产生可自主维持、复制并进化的系统？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "持续自主复制、遗传进化、能量与区室整合，以及实际生命起源历史。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS05-S1",
        "LS05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS05-E1",
        "LS05-E2",
        "LS05-E3",
        "LS05-E4",
        "LS05-E5"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": [
        "把底物活化、复制、链分离、区室化与能量供给接成持续循环",
        "在无需实验者反复补救的条件下展示多代遗传与选择",
        "用地质约束比较不同可行路径，而非只证明单一步骤可行"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-S1",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Adversarial testing of global neuronal workspace and integrated information theories of consciousness",
      "label": "Adversarial testing of global neuronal workspace and integrated information theories of consciousness",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12137136/fullTextXML",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12137136/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature642,133–142; published2025-04-30; PMC12137136 publisher fulltext",
      "version_date": "2025-04-30",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_research",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Main; Preregistered predictions and analyses",
        "Decoding of conscious content; Maintenance of conscious content; Interareal connectivity",
        "Discussion; Methods Participants and Analysis strategy"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_primary_fulltext_xml",
      "license": "CC BY4.0；只保存出处和原创概述，不转载全文或图表。",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY4.0；只保存出处和原创概述，不转载全文或图表。",
      "independence_group": "COGITATE_EXP1",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-E1",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "设计：不同模态与留出：原文依据",
      "text": "Methods区别总样本、最终留出样本与iEEG处理。",
      "source_id": "NS01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12137136/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature642,133–142; published2025-04-30; PMC12137136 publisher fulltext",
      "preciseLocator": "Preregistered predictions and analyses last paragraph; Methods Participants and Analysis strategy",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-P1",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "设计：不同模态与留出：条件",
      "text": "主要测试数据fMRI73、MEG65；iEEG不同分析人数不同，未采用相同拆分。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS01-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Preregistered predictions and analyses last paragraph; Methods Participants and Analysis strategy"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-L1",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "设计：不同模态与留出：限制",
      "text": "256不是每项分析样本数；三个模态不是三次完全独立理论研究。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS01-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Preregistered predictions and analyses last paragraph; Methods Participants and Analysis strategy",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-C1",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "设计：不同模态与留出",
      "text": "项目总计256人接受fMRI、MEG或iEEG测量；fMRI/MEG先用约1/3优化，再以约2/3预注册检验。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors reported observation; no independent remeasurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS01-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "NS01-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "NS01-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "COGITATE EXP1阈上视觉内容研究；只核查正文、方法和图注相关段落，SI未逐项复核。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-E2",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "内容：类别与方位不同：原文依据",
      "text": "Fig.2和正文分开报告类别、方位与跨模态解码。",
      "source_id": "NS01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12137136/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature642,133–142; published2025-04-30; PMC12137136 publisher fulltext",
      "preciseLocator": "Decoding of conscious content, Fig.2b–i and paragraph beginning Given the rich and multidimensional nature",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-P2",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "内容：类别与方位不同：条件",
      "text": "阈上视觉刺激、跨任务解码与指定ROI；方位为任务无关。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS01-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Decoding of conscious content, Fig.2b–i and paragraph beginning Given the rich and multidimensional nature"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-L2",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "内容：类别与方位不同：限制",
      "text": "MEG前额叶信号可能受后部泄漏；解码不证明因果必要性。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS01-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Decoding of conscious content, Fig.2b–i and paragraph beginning Given the rich and multidimensional nature",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-C2",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "内容：类别与方位不同",
      "text": "类别信息可在后部和部分前额叶解码；方位在后部较可靠，前额叶只在MEG出现较弱信号。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS01-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "NS01-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "NS01-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "COGITATE EXP1阈上视觉内容研究；只核查正文、方法和图注相关段落，SI未逐项复核。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-E3",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "维持：消失时点预测受挑战：原文依据",
      "text": "Fig.3及控制分析检验预先规定的起始/消失时间模式。",
      "source_id": "NS01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12137136/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature642,133–142; published2025-04-30; PMC12137136 publisher fulltext",
      "preciseLocator": "Maintenance of conscious content, paragraphs beginning In PFC ROIs and We used LMMs; Fig.3d",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-P3",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "维持：消失时点预测受挑战：条件",
      "text": "预先约定起始/消失反应与时间窗。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS01-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Maintenance of conscious content, paragraphs beginning In PFC ROIs and We used LMMs; Fig.3d"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-L3",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "维持：消失时点预测受挑战：限制",
      "text": "未检出不是断言任何尺度都绝无活动；不一次性证伪所有GNWT版本。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS01-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Maintenance of conscious content, paragraphs beginning In PFC ROIs and We used LMMs; Fig.3d",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-C3",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "维持：消失时点预测受挑战",
      "text": "前额叶出现起始类别表征，却未检出预期的刺激消失时点点火模式，挑战被测GNWT实现。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS01-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "NS01-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "NS01-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "COGITATE EXP1阈上视觉内容研究；只核查正文、方法和图注相关段落，SI未逐项复核。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-E4",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "连接：预注册PPC未支持任一预测：原文依据",
      "text": "Interareal connectivity区分预注册PPC与后续DFC指标。",
      "source_id": "NS01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12137136/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature642,133–142; published2025-04-30; PMC12137136 publisher fulltext",
      "preciseLocator": "Interareal connectivity, paragraphs beginning For iEEG, For MEG and The results of the preregistered PPC metric",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-P4",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "连接：预注册PPC未支持任一预测：条件",
      "text": "PPC衡量相位；指定电极、频段和任务无关试次。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS01-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Interareal connectivity, paragraphs beginning For iEEG, For MEG and The results of the preregistered PPC metric"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-L4",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "连接：预注册PPC未支持任一预测：限制",
      "text": "宏观相位噪声与V1/V2采样限制仍在；换用振幅连接DFC可见部分不同结果。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS01-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Interareal connectivity, paragraphs beginning For iEEG, For MEG and The results of the preregistered PPC metric",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-C4",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "连接：预注册PPC未支持任一预测",
      "text": "预注册相位一致性PPC未支持两理论的连接预测；后部同步短暂且偏低频，未呈IIT所需持续gamma模式。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS01-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "NS01-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "NS01-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "COGITATE EXP1阈上视觉内容研究；只核查正文、方法和图注相关段落，SI未逐项复核。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-E5",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "编辑结论：可检验的是指定实现：原文依据",
      "text": "Main区分数学核心和生物实现，Discussion保留不同理论解释。",
      "source_id": "NS01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12137136/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature642,133–142; published2025-04-30; PMC12137136 publisher fulltext",
      "preciseLocator": "Main paragraph beginning Both theories have a mathematical; Discussion opening and final paragraphs",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-P5",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "编辑结论：可检验的是指定实现：条件",
      "text": "把预注册预测、后续分析与理论修改分开记录。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS01-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Main paragraph beginning Both theories have a mathematical; Discussion opening and final paragraphs"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-L5",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "编辑结论：可检验的是指定实现：限制",
      "text": "不把神经相关、任务表现、因果机制和哲学解释合并；不外推机器意识。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS01-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Main paragraph beginning Both theories have a mathematical; Discussion opening and final paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-C5",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "编辑结论：可检验的是指定实现",
      "text": "编辑判断：研究细化了理论的失败点，未直接测定理论数学核心或解决主观体验全部问题。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "project editorial synthesis; not expert consensus",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS01-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "NS01-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "NS01-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "COGITATE EXP1阈上视觉内容研究；只核查正文、方法和图注相关段落，SI未逐项复核。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立预注册重复、可区分预测、因果干预及跨感官/状态验证。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-Q1",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题（编辑性整合）",
      "text": "哪些神经机制对特定意识内容必要或充分，哪些理论能给出互相区分的可靠预测？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "哪些神经机制必要或充分，以及可泛化、可区分的意识理论。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS01-E1",
        "NS01-E2",
        "NS01-E3",
        "NS01-E4",
        "NS01-E5"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": [
        "预先约定互斥预测和失败标准，再由独立团队重复",
        "结合因果干预、无报告范式和跨感官/状态测试",
        "澄清意识、报告、注意与任务表现的操作定义"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-S1",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Whole-brain annotation and multi-connectome cell typing of Drosophila",
      "label": "Whole-brain annotation and multi-connectome cell typing of Drosophila",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11446831/fullTextXML",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11446831/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature2024; published2024-10-02; PMC11446831 publisher fulltext",
      "version_date": "2024-10-02",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_research",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Main; Hierarchical annotation of a connectome",
        "Validating cell types across brains; Discussion headings and relevant scope"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_primary_fulltext_xml",
      "license": "CC BY4.0；只保存出处和原创概述，不转载全文或图表。",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY4.0；只保存出处和原创概述，不转载全文或图表。",
      "independence_group": "FLYWIRE_FAFB_ANNOTATION2024",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-S2",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Functional connectomics spanning multiple areas of mouse visual cortex",
      "label": "Functional connectomics spanning multiple areas of mouse visual cortex",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11981939/fullTextXML",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11981939/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature2025; published2025-04-09; PMC11981939 publisher fulltext",
      "version_date": "2025-04-09",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_research",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Overview; 2P calcium imaging; Automated reconstruction",
        "Functional–structural co-registration; Advances and limits in large-scale EM"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_primary_fulltext_xml",
      "license": "CC BY4.0；只保存出处和原创概述，不转载全文或图表。",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY4.0；只保存出处和原创概述，不转载全文或图表。",
      "independence_group": "MICRONS_SINGLE_MOUSE_VISUAL",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-S3",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Whole-Brain Connectomic Graph Model Enables Whole-Body Locomotion Control in Fruit Fly",
      "label": "Whole-Brain Connectomic Graph Model Enables Whole-Body Locomotion Control in Fruit Fly",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2602.17997v3",
      "metadataUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2602.17997v3",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv2602.17997v3; revised2026-06-14",
      "version_date": "2026-06-14",
      "publication_status": "preprint; arXiv record shows no journal reference",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "3.1 graph model; 3.2 training pipeline",
        "4.1 and Table1; 5 Conclusion and Discussion; AppendixA.2"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext_html",
      "license": "CC BY4.0；只保存出处和原创概述，不转载全文或图表。",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY4.0；只保存出处和原创概述，不转载全文或图表。",
      "independence_group": "FLYGM_2602_17997",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-E1",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "结构：可导航的细胞类型图：原文依据",
      "text": "Main说明单只雌蝇脑和版本化层级标注；跨脑检验修订原细胞类型。",
      "source_id": "NS02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11446831/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature2024; published2024-10-02; PMC11446831 publisher fulltext",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Abstract numeric inventory; Main paragraphs2–4; Hierarchical annotation of a connectome, Fig.1",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-P1",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "结构：可导航的细胞类型图：条件",
      "text": "FAFB/FlyWire单只成年雌蝇脑；分类利用跨脑比较。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS02-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Abstract numeric inventory; Main paragraphs2–4; Hierarchical annotation of a connectome, Fig.1"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-L1",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "结构：可导航的细胞类型图：限制",
      "text": "脑不等于整个身体神经系统；类型边界依赖定义和版本，不是认知功能已穷尽。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS02-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Abstract numeric inventory; Main paragraphs2–4; Hierarchical annotation of a connectome, Fig.1",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-C1",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "结构：可导航的细胞类型图",
      "text": "2024果蝇全脑研究为约14万神经元建立分层标注，报告8453类细胞。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors reported observation; no independent remeasurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS02-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "NS02-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "NS02-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "2024雌蝇脑标注、2025单鼠视觉皮层与2026 FlyGM v3；保持原NS02问题。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-E2",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "功能配准：单只小鼠局部：原文依据",
      "text": "Overview及2P imaging给同只小鼠、局部体积、细胞数和时段。",
      "source_id": "NS02-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11981939/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature2025; published2025-04-09; PMC11981939 publisher fulltext",
      "preciseLocator": "S2 Overview paragraph1; 2P calcium imaging paragraphs1 and final centroid paragraph; Fig.1b",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-P2",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "功能配准：单只小鼠局部：条件",
      "text": "四个视觉区、钙成像约P75–P81；电镜体积约1.3×0.87×0.82 mm³。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS02-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 Overview paragraph1; 2P calcium imaging paragraphs1 and final centroid paragraph; Fig.1b"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-L2",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "功能配准：单只小鼠局部：限制",
      "text": "不是整只小鼠脑、完整人脑或所有细胞类型的功能读出。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS02-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 Overview paragraph1; 2P calcium imaging paragraphs1 and final centroid paragraph; Fig.1b",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-C2",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "功能配准：单只小鼠局部",
      "text": "MICrONS记录约75909个兴奋性细胞视觉反应，并与同一只小鼠局部皮层电镜体积对齐。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors reported observation; no independent remeasurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS02-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "NS02-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "NS02-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "2024雌蝇脑标注、2025单鼠视觉皮层与2026 FlyGM v3；保持原NS02问题。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-E3",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "重建：精度与召回各有限：原文依据",
      "text": "Automated reconstruction给手标样本与检测精度/召回。",
      "source_id": "NS02-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11981939/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature2025; published2025-04-09; PMC11981939 publisher fulltext",
      "preciseLocator": "S2 Automated reconstruction paragraph beginning Synaptic contacts; Extended Data Fig.1 reference",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-P3",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "重建：精度与召回各有限：条件",
      "text": "基于70个小体积抽样；突触检出与伙伴指派是不同验证。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS02-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 Automated reconstruction paragraph beginning Synaptic contacts; Extended Data Fig.1 reference"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-L3",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "重建：精度与召回各有限：限制",
      "text": "不是每条连接均已人工正确；轴突、脱落棘与配准误差可能影响推断。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS02-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 Automated reconstruction paragraph beginning Synaptic contacts; Extended Data Fig.1 reference",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-C3",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "重建：精度与召回各有限",
      "text": "524百万突触自动检测在8611个手标突触验证集中估计精度96%、召回89%。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS02-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "NS02-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "NS02-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "2024雌蝇脑标注、2025单鼠视觉皮层与2026 FlyGM v3；保持原NS02问题。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-E4",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "2026模拟：训练过的控制器：原文依据",
      "text": "v3方法3.2和附录A.2明确模仿学习与PPO，而非无训练复现。",
      "source_id": "NS02-S3",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2602.17997v3",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv2602.17997v3; revised2026-06-14",
      "preciseLocator": "S3 sections3.1–3.2;4.1 Table1; AppendixA.2",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-P4",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "2026模拟：训练过的控制器：条件",
      "text": "含可训练细胞描述符和人工输入/输出映射；模拟身体与奖励任务。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS02-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S3 sections3.1–3.2;4.1 Table1; AppendixA.2"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-L4",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "2026模拟：训练过的控制器：限制",
      "text": "不是只输入静态接线就复现真实动物全部行为；预印本且未独立复跑。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS02-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S3 sections3.1–3.2;4.1 Table1; AppendixA.2",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-C4",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "2026模拟：训练过的控制器",
      "text": "FlyGM v3以连接图作结构约束，经专家轨迹模仿及PPO训练，在模拟果蝇运动任务取得控制结果。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS02-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "NS02-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "NS02-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "2024雌蝇脑标注、2025单鼠视觉皮层与2026 FlyGM v3；保持原NS02问题。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-E5",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "编辑结论：预测还须因果检验：原文依据",
      "text": "结构资源、自动配准与经训练模拟分别提供局部证据。",
      "source_id": "NS02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-S1",
        "NS02-S2",
        "NS02-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11446831/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature2024; published2024-10-02; PMC11446831 publisher fulltext",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Main scope; S2 Advances and limits; S3 section5",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-P5",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "编辑结论：预测还须因果检验：条件",
      "text": "核对同个体动态、神经调质、突触生理与干预外部预测。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-S1",
        "NS02-S2",
        "NS02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS02-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Main scope; S2 Advances and limits; S3 section5"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-L5",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "编辑结论：预测还须因果检验：限制",
      "text": "不能声称重建了意识、记忆或人格；2026雄性果蝇CNS新资料已发现但未读到正式全文。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-S1",
        "NS02-S2",
        "NS02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS02-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Main scope; S2 Advances and limits; S3 section5",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-C5",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "编辑结论：预测还须因果检验",
      "text": "编辑判断：结构、配准和训练模拟均有进展，但不能单凭接线图确立完整学习和自然行为机制。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "project editorial synthesis; not expert consensus",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-S1",
        "NS02-S2",
        "NS02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS02-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "NS02-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "NS02-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "2024雌蝇脑标注、2025单鼠视觉皮层与2026 FlyGM v3；保持原NS02问题。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment",
      "what_would_change_status": "同个体可复核干预预测、跨个体/性别/状态验证，以及无需事后调参的自然行为外推。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-Q1",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题（编辑性整合）",
      "text": "在何种生物细节和时间尺度上，连接结构足以预测学习、计算及行为？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "连接结构在何种细节/时间尺度上足以预测学习、计算和行为。",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-S1",
        "NS02-S2",
        "NS02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS02-E1",
        "NS02-E2",
        "NS02-E3",
        "NS02-E4",
        "NS02-E5"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": [
        "在同一个体中整合连接、细胞类型、神经调质与动态活动",
        "用选择性扰动检验网络模型的因果预测",
        "跨个体、发育阶段、物种和自然行为进行外推验证"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-S1",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "IPCC AR6 WGI Chapter 7: The Earth’s Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks and Climate Sensitivity",
      "label": "IPCC AR6 WGI Chapter 7: The Earth’s Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks and Climate Sensitivity",
      "text": "IPCC AR6 WGI Chapter 7: The Earth’s Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks and Climate Sensitivity",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://lib.icimod.org/records/npaw6-nkg09/files/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Chapter07.pdf?download=1",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/chapter/chapter-7/",
      "sourceVersion": "Final typeset Chapter 7, printed pp.923–1054; ICIMOD deposited copy, not FOD/SOD",
      "version_date": "2021-08-09",
      "publication_status": "primary official assessment text; not an independent observational experiment",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Box 7.1, printed p.932 (PDF p.10)",
        "§7.5.5, Table 7.13 printed p.1007 (PDF p.85)"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_original_report_via_institutional_repository",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "IPCC_AR6_WGI_CH07",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "not_reviewed": [
        "entire chapter",
        "all underlying original studies",
        "regional precipitation chapters"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-S2",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Zelinka et al.: Recent cloud trends and extremes reaffirm established bounds on cloud feedback and aerosol-cloud interactions",
      "label": "Zelinka et al.: Recent cloud trends and extremes reaffirm established bounds on cloud feedback and aerosol-cloud interactions",
      "text": "Zelinka et al.: Recent cloud trends and extremes reaffirm established bounds on cloud feedback and aerosol-cloud interactions",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-026-03461-8",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-026-03461-8",
      "sourceVersion": "Communications Earth & Environment 7,615, published 2026-03-31",
      "version_date": "2026-03-31",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed original observational/model-constraint research",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Results Figs.2–3 and reconstruction caveats",
        "Implications for aerosol forcing, cloud feedback, and climate sensitivity; Fig.4",
        "Conclusions"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "ZELINKA_CCF_CLOUD_2026",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-S3",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Cesana and Arouf: A Reconciled Satellite Record Reveals a Negative Low Cloud Feedback Over the Past 47 Years",
      "label": "Cesana and Arouf: A Reconciled Satellite Record Reveals a Negative Low Cloud Feedback Over the Past 47 Years",
      "text": "Cesana and Arouf: A Reconciled Satellite Record Reveals a Negative Low Cloud Feedback Over the Past 47 Years",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2026GL124158",
      "metadataUrl": "https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2026GL124158",
      "sourceVersion": "Geophysical Research Letters, first published 2026-07-09",
      "version_date": "2026-07-09",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed original reconstruction and model comparison",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "§2 definitions and historical/model-period construction",
        "§3.1 Fig.1 and Fig.2",
        "§3.2–3.3 pattern effect and conditional sensitivity test"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext",
      "license": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No explicit reuse license verified in inspected passages; links and original paraphrase only; do not redistribute fulltext",
      "independence_group": "CESANA_AROUF_HISTORICAL_CLOUD_2026",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-E1",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "ECS的量不是2100年温度：原文依据",
      "text": "表内把过程、现代记录、古气候和涌现约束与综合评估分列。",
      "source_id": "ES01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://lib.icimod.org/records/npaw6-nkg09/files/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Chapter07.pdf?download=1",
      "sourceVersion": "Final typeset Chapter 7, printed pp.923–1054; ICIMOD deposited copy, not FOD/SOD",
      "preciseLocator": "Box 7.1 Figure 1 and definitions printed p.932; §7.5.5 Table 7.13 printed p.1007",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-P1",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "ECS的量不是2100年温度：前提",
      "text": "2021正式评估，非新测量；温度增量与CO₂加倍的平衡定义。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES01-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Box 7.1 Figure 1 and definitions printed p.932; §7.5.5 Table 7.13 printed p.1007",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-L1",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "ECS的量不是2100年温度：边界",
      "text": "不是排放情景下2100年预言，亦非各地区各年份的预测精度。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES01-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Box 7.1 Figure 1 and definitions printed p.932; §7.5.5 Table 7.13 printed p.1007",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-C1",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "ECS的量不是2100年温度",
      "text": "AR6将CO₂加倍后趋于能量平衡的全球温度响应称ECS；正式综合最佳值3°C，likely范围2.5–4°C。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES01-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ES01-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ES01-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "2021正式评估，非新测量；温度增量与CO₂加倍的平衡定义。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-E2",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "2026约束仍给有限ECS区间：原文依据",
      "text": "保留原古气候证据，只替换指定历史/过程项。",
      "source_id": "ES01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-026-03461-8",
      "sourceVersion": "Communications Earth & Environment 7,615, published 2026-03-31",
      "preciseLocator": "Implications section, paragraph beginning Finally and following paragraph; Fig.4c",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-P2",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "2026约束仍给有限ECS区间：前提",
      "text": "贝叶斯综合及模型预测CCF变化；不是完全独立新气候敏感度实验。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES01-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Implications section, paragraph beginning Finally and following paragraph; Fig.4c",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-L2",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "2026约束仍给有限ECS区间：边界",
      "text": "对云滴数中介处理敏感；不能和AR6当独立投票简单平均。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES01-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Implications section, paragraph beginning Finally and following paragraph; Fig.4c",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-C2",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "2026约束仍给有限ECS区间",
      "text": "Zelinka等用新低云和气溶胶约束替换WCRP框架相应项，得到ECS中心3.3°C、66%区间2.7–4.1°C。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES01-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ES01-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ES01-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "贝叶斯综合及模型预测CCF变化；不是完全独立新气候敏感度实验。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-E3",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "反照率趋势包含气溶胶作用：原文依据",
      "text": "该区气象控制因子正负贡献大致相消。",
      "source_id": "ES01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-026-03461-8",
      "sourceVersion": "Communications Earth & Environment 7,615, published 2026-03-31",
      "preciseLocator": "Results Fig.3d and immediately following North Atlantic paragraph; Fig.2 reconstruction caveat",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-P3",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "反照率趋势包含气溶胶作用：前提",
      "text": "所选海域、云控制因子回归及观测/再分析产品。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES01-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results Fig.3d and immediately following North Atlantic paragraph; Fig.2 reconstruction caveat",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-L3",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "反照率趋势包含气溶胶作用：边界",
      "text": "2011、2022等年份重建欠佳；这是统计框架归因，不是操纵实验。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES01-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results Fig.3d and immediately following North Atlantic paragraph; Fig.2 reconstruction caveat",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-C3",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "反照率趋势包含气溶胶作用",
      "text": "该2026研究归因北大西洋2003–2024低云辐射趋势约+0.4 W m⁻²每十年，几乎全由硫酸盐气溶胶下降贡献。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES01-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ES01-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ES01-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "所选海域、云控制因子回归及观测/再分析产品。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-E4",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "历史低云反馈可异号：原文依据",
      "text": "用相同期间全球温度趋势归一化，并结合卫星与云控制因子重建。",
      "source_id": "ES01-S3",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2026GL124158",
      "sourceVersion": "Geophysical Research Letters, first published 2026-07-09",
      "preciseLocator": "§3.1 Fig.1 trend paragraph; Fig.2 discussion giving historical feedback; §2 definition paragraph",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-P4",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "历史低云反馈可异号：前提",
      "text": "35°S–35°N海洋及所列期间；这里的反馈不是平衡态反馈。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES01-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§3.1 Fig.1 trend paragraph; Fig.2 discussion giving historical feedback; §2 definition paragraph",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-L4",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "历史低云反馈可异号：边界",
      "text": "早期卫星记录更不确定；选2001以后窗口会明显改变幅度，不能直接替代长期ECS。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES01-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§3.1 Fig.1 trend paragraph; Fig.2 discussion giving historical feedback; §2 definition paragraph",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-C4",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "历史低云反馈可异号",
      "text": "Cesana–Arouf重建的热带低云覆盖在1979–2025增约0.18±0.07个百分点/十年，历史有效辐射响应为−0.79±0.30 W m⁻² K⁻¹。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-reported formal result or model inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES01-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ES01-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ES01-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "35°S–35°N海洋及所列期间；这里的反馈不是平衡态反馈。",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-E5",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "正负结果不先验互相否定：原文依据",
      "text": "东太平洋温度梯度及逆温强度变化在历史与强迫实验不同。",
      "source_id": "ES01-S3",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2026GL124158",
      "sourceVersion": "Geophysical Research Letters, first published 2026-07-09",
      "preciseLocator": "§2 historical/model definitions; §3.2 pattern-effect paragraphs; §3.3 paragraph beginning Given this model inability",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-P5",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "正负结果不先验互相否定：前提",
      "text": "只有未来持续类似历史海温格局，才能照搬该历史有效响应。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES01-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§2 historical/model definitions; §3.2 pattern-effect paragraphs; §3.3 paragraph beginning Given this model inability",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-L5",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "正负结果不先验互相否定：边界",
      "text": "不能由近期负低云项推翻温室气体增暖；也不能由正模型项否认历史观测差异。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES01-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§2 historical/model definitions; §3.2 pattern-effect paragraphs; §3.3 paragraph beginning Given this model inability",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-C5",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "正负结果不先验互相否定",
      "text": "历史负反馈与CO₂理想化实验中的正反馈对应不同海温空间格局；作者将历史格局延续的低敏感度推断明确设为条件测试。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "explicit editorial evaluation, not a new experimental result",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES01-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ES01-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ES01-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "只有未来持续类似历史海温格局，才能照搬该历史有效响应。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment_pending_review",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-E6",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "区域边界仍需独立证据：原文依据",
      "text": "全球平衡量、局地统计关系与区域未来状态是不同对象。",
      "source_id": "ES01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S1",
        "ES01-S2",
        "ES01-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://lib.icimod.org/records/npaw6-nkg09/files/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Chapter07.pdf?download=1",
      "sourceVersion": "Final typeset Chapter 7, printed pp.923–1054; ICIMOD deposited copy, not FOD/SOD",
      "preciseLocator": "IPCC Box7.1 definition; Zelinka Fig.3 regional contrasts; Cesana §3.2 pattern effect",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; zero verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-P6",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "区域边界仍需独立证据：前提",
      "text": "这是本卡的明确覆盖边界，不声称所有区域机制未知。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S1",
        "ES01-S2",
        "ES01-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES01-E6"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "IPCC Box7.1 definition; Zelinka Fig.3 regional contrasts; Cesana §3.2 pattern effect",
      "origin": "source_conditions_or_explicit_editorial_scope"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-L6",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "区域边界仍需独立证据：边界",
      "text": "需另接区域过程研究、内部变率及情景条件；本轮不把此缺口当作气候基本机制不成立。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S1",
        "ES01-S2",
        "ES01-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES01-E6"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "IPCC Box7.1 definition; Zelinka Fig.3 regional contrasts; Cesana §3.2 pattern effect",
      "origin": "source_limit_and_editorial_review_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-C6",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "区域边界仍需独立证据",
      "text": "本链收窄云与气溶胶反馈的条件，却没有建立地区降水、极端事件或海洋环流的统一高精度预测。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "explicit editorial evaluation, not a new experimental result",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S1",
        "ES01-S2",
        "ES01-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES01-E6"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ES01-P6"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ES01-L6"
      ],
      "scope": "这是本卡的明确覆盖边界，不声称所有区域机制未知。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment_pending_review",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文更正、独立复算或专家对所列前提与推断的审查。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-Q1",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题／待验证边界",
      "text": "云、气溶胶与海洋反馈怎样收窄长期增暖和地区降水/极端事件的预测范围？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "所有区域未来降水/极端事件的确定预测；海温格局持久性及全部云反馈幅度。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES01-S1",
        "ES01-S2",
        "ES01-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES01-E1",
        "ES01-E2",
        "ES01-E3",
        "ES01-E4",
        "ES01-E5",
        "ES01-E6"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": [
        "长期、可交叉校准的辐射、云和海洋观测",
        "把古气候、过程实验与现代观测联合约束模型",
        "在区域尺度检验极端事件机制并报告内部变率"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the specified original fulltext passages; editorial inferences labeled",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent experimental/computational replication",
          "complete proof verification",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-S1",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Physics-based early warning signal shows that AMOC is on tipping course",
      "label": "Physics-based early warning signal shows that AMOC is on tipping course",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC10857529/fullTextXML",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC10857529/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "Science Advances2024 doi10.1126/sciadv.adk1189; PMC current fulltext retrieved2026-10-04",
      "version_date": "2024-02-09",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_research",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Results AMOC collapse; Physics-based early warning indicator",
        "Discussion paragraphs3–5; Methods Climate model simulations"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_primary_fulltext_xml",
      "license": "CC BY4.0；只保存出处和原创概述，不转载全文或图表。",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY4.0；只保存出处和原创概述，不转载全文或图表。",
      "independence_group": "CESM_HOSING_VANWESTEN_LINEAGE",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-S2",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Continued Atlantic overturning circulation even under climate extremes",
      "label": "Continued Atlantic overturning circulation even under climate extremes",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11864975/fullTextXML",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11864975/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature638,987–994; published2025-02-26; corrected text includes2025-04-17 clarification",
      "version_date": "2025-04-17",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_research",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Experiments and AMOC upwelling pathways",
        "Future fate of the AMOC; Methods Models and experiments"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_corrected_primary_fulltext_xml",
      "license": "CC BY4.0；只保存出处和原创概述，不转载全文或图表。",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY4.0；只保存出处和原创概述，不转载全文或图表。",
      "independence_group": "BAKER_CMIP6_EXTREME34",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-S3",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Failure to track a stable AMOC state under rapid climate change",
      "label": "Failure to track a stable AMOC state under rapid climate change",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-026-02730-w",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-026-02730-w",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Climate Change VOR2026-08-13",
      "version_date": "2026-08-13",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_research",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Stable AMOC under extreme climate change; Fig.1",
        "Discussion; Methods Climate Model Simulations",
        "About this article; Rights and permissions"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_fulltext_html",
      "license": "CC BY4.0；只保存出处和原创概述，不转载全文或图表。",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY4.0；只保存出处和原创概述，不转载全文或图表。",
      "independence_group": "CESM_HOSING_VANWESTEN_LINEAGE",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-S4",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Author Correction: Continued Atlantic overturning circulation even under climate extremes",
      "label": "Author Correction: Continued Atlantic overturning circulation even under climate extremes",
      "text": "原始来源；仅核查所列相关段落，不代表独立复现。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12058520/fullTextXML",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08977-1",
      "sourceVersion": "Correction2025-04-17, updated2025-06-04",
      "version_date": "2025-06-04",
      "publication_status": "primary_correction",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "EuropePMC全文实质更正段落，包含6Sv、PMOC和颜色改正",
        "2025-06-04变更日期另在出版社完整索引文本核对"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "open_primary_correction_fulltext_xml",
      "license": "CC BY4.0；只保存出处和原创概述，不转载全文或图表。",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "CC BY4.0；只保存出处和原创概述，不转载全文或图表。",
      "independence_group": "BAKER_CMIP6_EXTREME34",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw data",
        "complete supplementary material"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-E1",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "2024：理想强迫可致突变：原文依据",
      "text": "Results AMOC collapse给准平衡淡水增加与固定辐射条件。",
      "source_id": "ES02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC10857529/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "Science Advances2024 doi10.1126/sciadv.adk1189; PMC current fulltext retrieved2026-10-04",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Results AMOC collapse paragraphs2–3; Fig.1A",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-P1",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "2024：理想强迫可致突变：条件",
      "text": "北大西洋20–50°N输入，以3×10⁻⁴ Sv/年递增，其他海面补偿盐度。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Results AMOC collapse paragraphs2–3; Fig.1A"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-L1",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "2024：理想强迫可致突变：限制",
      "text": "模型年不是日历预测；约0.6 Sv强迫与模式偏差必须保留。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Results AMOC collapse paragraphs2–3; Fig.1A",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-C1",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "2024：理想强迫可致突变",
      "text": "CESM固定工业前辐射强迫、逐年增加淡水输入时，AMOC在约1750模型年后迅速衰减。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ES02-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ES02-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "2024 CESM、2025 CMIP6极端试验及2026 CESM速率研究；原ES02问题不变。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-E2",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "2024：预警不等于倒计时：原文依据",
      "text": "Discussion明确再分析无法可靠估计距临界点距离。",
      "source_id": "ES02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC10857529/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "Science Advances2024 doi10.1126/sciadv.adk1189; PMC current fulltext retrieved2026-10-04",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Physics-based early warning indicator Fig.4; Discussion paragraph beginning In addition, with future observations",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-P2",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "2024：预警不等于倒计时：条件",
      "text": "预警行为先在特定准平衡强迫试验中建立。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Physics-based early warning indicator Fig.4; Discussion paragraph beginning In addition, with future observations"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-L2",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "2024：预警不等于倒计时：限制",
      "text": "不可把试验中提前约25年直接加到今天，或视为现实崩溃年份。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Physics-based early warning indicator Fig.4; Discussion paragraph beginning In addition, with future observations",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-C2",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "2024：预警不等于倒计时",
      "text": "作者把南边界淡水输运最小值作为预警，但明确现有再分析不能可靠估计距临界点多远。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S1",
        "ES02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-E2",
        "ES02-V05-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ES02-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ES02-L2",
        "ES02-V05-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "2024 CESM、2025 CMIP6极端试验及2026 CESM速率研究；原ES02问题不变。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "v05_update": {
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-E3",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "2025：34模型不是34种淡水实验：原文依据",
      "text": "Methods分开列34个四倍CO₂模型与7个淡水模型及时长。",
      "source_id": "ES02-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11864975/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature638,987–994; published2025-02-26; corrected text includes2025-04-17 clarification",
      "preciseLocator": "S2 Experiments and AMOC upwelling pathways paragraph1; Methods Models and experiments",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-P3",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "2025：34模型不是34种淡水实验：条件",
      "text": "四倍CO₂保持150年；淡水试验至少100年，施加强迫区域不同。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 Experiments and AMOC upwelling pathways paragraph1; Methods Models and experiments"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-L3",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "2025：34模型不是34种淡水实验：限制",
      "text": "多模型共享结构/偏差；不是独立同条件复制2024长时逐渐强迫。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S2 Experiments and AMOC upwelling pathways paragraph1; Methods Models and experiments",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-C3",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "2025：34模型不是34种淡水实验",
      "text": "研究分析34个四倍CO₂试验，淡水0.3 Sv试验只有7个模型；各取一名集合成员。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ES02-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ES02-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "2024 CESM、2025 CMIP6极端试验及2026 CESM速率研究；原ES02问题不变。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-E4",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "2025更正：崩溃定义有阈值：原文依据",
      "text": "正式更正加入6 Sv定义并修订PMOC措辞。",
      "source_id": "ES02-S4",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S4",
        "ES02-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12058520/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "Correction2025-04-17, updated2025-06-04",
      "preciseLocator": "S4 substantive correction paragraph; S2 Future fate paragraphs4 and6",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-P4",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "2025更正：崩溃定义有阈值：条件",
      "text": "作者结论依赖南大洋风、太平洋翻转与白令海峡条件。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S4",
        "ES02-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S4 substantive correction paragraph; S2 Future fate paragraphs4 and6"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-L4",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "2025更正：崩溃定义有阈值：限制",
      "text": "不是“零风险”；不能混用低于6 Sv、归零或反转定义。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S4",
        "ES02-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S4 substantive correction paragraph; S2 Future fate paragraphs4 and6",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-C4",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "2025更正：崩溃定义有阈值",
      "text": "更正明确本世纪“不太可能崩溃”结论的定义为低于6 Sv，并把现实情景PMOC改为不形成或较弱。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S4",
        "ES02-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ES02-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ES02-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "2024 CESM、2025 CMIP6极端试验及2026 CESM速率研究；原ES02问题不变。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-E5",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "2026：强迫速度影响临界行为：原文依据",
      "text": "2026 Fig.1c–d在同一背景淡水水平比较三种CO₂增长率。",
      "source_id": "ES02-S3",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-026-02730-w",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Climate Change VOR2026-08-13",
      "preciseLocator": "S3 Stable AMOC under extreme climate change, paragraphs beginning To further test and The AMOC collapses; Fig.1c–d",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-P5",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "2026：强迫速度影响临界行为：条件",
      "text": "慢0.5、快2.5/5 ppm每年；温升相对该模型PI45on状态；与2024同模型研究脉络。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S3 Stable AMOC under extreme climate change, paragraphs beginning To further test and The AMOC collapses; Fig.1c–d"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-L5",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "2026：强迫速度影响临界行为：限制",
      "text": "不是地球统一2°C门槛；背景偏差校正、状态和路径均决定结论。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S3 Stable AMOC under extreme climate change, paragraphs beginning To further test and The AMOC collapses; Fig.1c–d",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-C5",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "2026：强迫速度影响临界行为",
      "text": "CESM背景加淡水0.45 Sv时，慢CO₂增加仍在+5.5°C稳定；较快路径约+2°C开始崩溃。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors model/statistical inference or formal source description",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ES02-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ES02-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "2024 CESM、2025 CMIP6极端试验及2026 CESM速率研究；原ES02问题不变。",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重复、外部验证或更正改变结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-E6",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "编辑结论：比较条件而非新闻胜负：原文依据",
      "text": "各原文的强迫、临界定义、时间尺度和模型偏差不相同。",
      "source_id": "ES02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S1",
        "ES02-S2",
        "ES02-S3",
        "ES02-S4"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC10857529/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "Science Advances2024 doi10.1126/sciadv.adk1189; PMC current fulltext retrieved2026-10-04",
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Discussion; S2 Methods/Future fate; S3 Discussion; S4 correction",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-P6",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "编辑结论：比较条件而非新闻胜负：条件",
      "text": "先对齐模型、初始盐度、背景强迫、变化速度、临界定义与时间跨度。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S1",
        "ES02-S2",
        "ES02-S3",
        "ES02-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-E6"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Discussion; S2 Methods/Future fate; S3 Discussion; S4 correction"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-L6",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "编辑结论：比较条件而非新闻胜负：限制",
      "text": "不制造确定倒计时，也不把未崩溃模型读成现实安全保证；非全领域系统综述。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S1",
        "ES02-S2",
        "ES02-S3",
        "ES02-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-E6"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "S1 Discussion; S2 Methods/Future fate; S3 Discussion; S4 correction",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-C6",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "编辑结论：比较条件而非新闻胜负",
      "text": "编辑判断：模型崩溃与韧性结果未在同一强迫、时段和定义下互相推翻；现实门槛仍需观测约束。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "project editorial synthesis; not expert consensus",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S1",
        "ES02-S2",
        "ES02-S3",
        "ES02-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-E6",
        "ES02-V05-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ES02-P6"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ES02-L6",
        "ES02-V05-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "2024 CESM、2025 CMIP6极端试验及2026 CESM速率研究；原ES02问题不变。",
      "status": "editorial_assessment",
      "what_would_change_status": "持续环流/盐度/输运观测、跨模型偏差检验与预先定义的外部预警验证。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "v05_update": {
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-Q1",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "开放问题（编辑性整合）",
      "text": "能否给出经观测约束、稳健跨模型的 AMOC 失稳条件与预警，而非一个脆弱的倒计时？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "status": "open_in_this_evidence_chain",
      "affirmative_answer_not_established": "经观测约束、稳健跨模型的真实AMOC失稳条件与可用预警。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S1",
        "ES02-S2",
        "ES02-S3",
        "ES02-S4",
        "ES02-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-E1",
        "ES02-E2",
        "ES02-E3",
        "ES02-E4",
        "ES02-E5",
        "ES02-E6",
        "ES02-V05-E1",
        "ES02-V05-E2"
      ],
      "what_would_change_status": [
        "延长直接环流、盐度、淡水输运及南大洋观测",
        "校验再分析和代理指标能否真实反映稳定性",
        "比较含冰融水、涡旋、南大洋及太平洋反馈的模型和临界定义"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named primary fulltext sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "v05_update": {
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_audit": "pending",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "title": "IPBES Nexus Assessment, Chapter 5.1: Options for delivering sustainable approaches to biodiversity conservation, restoration and sustainable use",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/18165236/files/2025%20IPBES_ASSESSMENT%20NEXUS%20%28CHAPTER%205_FULL%29_V2.pdf?download=1",
      "metadataUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/13850322",
      "sourceVersion": "2025 IPBES_ASSESSMENT NEXUS (CHAPTER 5_FULL)_V2.pdf; Chapter 5.1",
      "publication_status": "official intergovernmental assessment; chapters accepted December 2024; laid-out V2 file",
      "publication_date": "2024-12-16",
      "version_date": "V2 filename observed; exact file revision date not verified",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "5.1.3.5–5.1.3.7, pp.405–407",
        "5.1.3.9–5.1.3.10, pp.409–412",
        "5.1.4 pp.420–421",
        "5.1.5 pp.426–427",
        "5.1.6 opening p.428"
      ],
      "access": "open_primary_assessment_pdf_downloaded_and_text_extracted",
      "independence_group": "IPBES_NEXUS_2024_CHAPTER5_SHARED_ASSESSMENT",
      "text": "本章是原始评估文本；其引用的案例和综合分析没有在本轮逐项独立重验。",
      "license": "正文及图示含各自权利标识；图5.1.6标CC BY-NC-ND，图5.1.7标CC BY-NC 4.0。不复制图示或全文；仅保留来源链接与原创释义。",
      "id": "ES03-S1",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "IPBES Nexus Assessment, Chapter 5.1: Options for delivering sustainable approaches to biodiversity conservation, restoration and sustainable use",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "all cited studies",
        "raw data and executable analysis"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-E1",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "恢复的目标不等于树冠增加：原文依据",
      "text": "5.1.3.5将森林景观恢复界定为持续恢复生态功能、景观功能与人的福祉，并列社会和生态权衡。",
      "source_id": "ES03-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/18165236/files/2025%20IPBES_ASSESSMENT%20NEXUS%20%28CHAPTER%205_FULL%29_V2.pdf?download=1",
      "sourceVersion": "2025 IPBES_ASSESSMENT NEXUS (CHAPTER 5_FULL)_V2.pdf; Chapter 5.1",
      "preciseLocator": "5.1.3.5 Forest landscape restoration (B05), printed p.405, first three paragraphs and final trade-off paragraph",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-P1",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "恢复的目标不等于树冠增加：必要前提",
      "text": "评判对象是退化景观的功能与福利，不只计种树或覆盖面积。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES03-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "5.1.3.5 Forest landscape restoration (B05), printed p.405, first three paragraphs and final trade-off paragraph",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-L1",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "恢复的目标不等于树冠增加：边界",
      "text": "这是评估采用的多目标框架；不能由定义推出任何具体造林项目有效。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES03-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "5.1.3.5 Forest landscape restoration (B05), printed p.405, first three paragraphs and final trade-off paragraph",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-C1",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "恢复的目标不等于树冠增加",
      "text": "按该评估的操作框架，树木覆盖增加不足以单独证明森林景观恢复成功。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES03-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ES03-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ES03-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "Nexus章5.1对森林景观恢复的定义与评价",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "项目同时测得功能、福利与基线，或采用不同且明示的恢复目标。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-E2",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "支付机制仍有实施边界：原文依据",
      "text": "正文列支付森林生态系统服务作为融资方式，同时说明大尺度社会与生态双收益的证据有限，转用农业用地会涉及生产、进入权、土地权属和权力差异。",
      "source_id": "ES03-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/18165236/files/2025%20IPBES_ASSESSMENT%20NEXUS%20%28CHAPTER%205_FULL%29_V2.pdf?download=1",
      "sourceVersion": "2025 IPBES_ASSESSMENT NEXUS (CHAPTER 5_FULL)_V2.pdf; Chapter 5.1",
      "preciseLocator": "5.1.3.5, p.405, paragraph starting While many actors and column continuation on land conversion",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-P2",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "支付机制仍有实施边界：必要前提",
      "text": "双收益须在同一项目及受影响人群测量；融资工具与生态结果应分别验证。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES03-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "5.1.3.5, p.405, paragraph starting While many actors and column continuation on land conversion",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-L2",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "支付机制仍有实施边界：边界",
      "text": "评估章节不是支付措施的随机试验；没有重新计算所引研究的平均处理效应。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES03-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "5.1.3.5, p.405, paragraph starting While many actors and column continuation on land conversion",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-C2",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "支付机制仍有实施边界",
      "text": "该评估没有把生态系统服务付费视作已证明能在所有大景观同时提高生态与社会结果的办法。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES03-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ES03-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ES03-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "森林景观恢复融资、土地转换的章节综合",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "有长期可比较、多地点的生态和分配结果，可改变具体措施的判断。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-E3",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "短期存活率不能替代功能：原文依据",
      "text": "沿海海洋恢复段说明许多项目短期执行且只计物种存活，妨碍评价长期功能、社会经济收益和失败原因。",
      "source_id": "ES03-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/18165236/files/2025%20IPBES_ASSESSMENT%20NEXUS%20%28CHAPTER%205_FULL%29_V2.pdf?download=1",
      "sourceVersion": "2025 IPBES_ASSESSMENT NEXUS (CHAPTER 5_FULL)_V2.pdf; Chapter 5.1",
      "preciseLocator": "5.1.3.6 Restoration of coastal and marine systems (B06), p.406, paragraphs starting New approaches and Ethical considerations",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-P3",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "短期存活率不能替代功能：必要前提",
      "text": "恢复可历时数十年，气候驱动、物种生长和演替改变结果；多个终点需分别观测。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES03-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "5.1.3.6 Restoration of coastal and marine systems (B06), p.406, paragraphs starting New approaches and Ethical considerations",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-L3",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "短期存活率不能替代功能：边界",
      "text": "这是原始评估对研究范围的诊断；本轮没有估计全球项目失败率。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES03-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "5.1.3.6 Restoration of coastal and marine systems (B06), p.406, paragraphs starting New approaches and Ethical considerations",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-C3",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "短期存活率不能替代功能",
      "text": "沿海与海洋恢复的物种存活观测只能覆盖部分终点，不能当作长期生态功能及社区收益的完整测量。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES03-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ES03-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ES03-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "章5.1.3.6所评沿海海洋恢复文献",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "多年功能、成本、失败与分配指标共同报告的项目评价。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-E4",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "权利是治理评价的一部分：原文依据",
      "text": "5.1.3.10区分程序性与实质性权利，并说明权利路径超越仅邀请参与；覆盖决策、管理、收益分享及领土归属。",
      "source_id": "ES03-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/18165236/files/2025%20IPBES_ASSESSMENT%20NEXUS%20%28CHAPTER%205_FULL%29_V2.pdf?download=1",
      "sourceVersion": "2025 IPBES_ASSESSMENT NEXUS (CHAPTER 5_FULL)_V2.pdf; Chapter 5.1",
      "preciseLocator": "5.1.3.10 Rights-based approaches (B10), pp.411–412, opening three paragraphs and Figure 5.1.7 caption",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-P4",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "权利是治理评价的一部分：必要前提",
      "text": "规范上的权利要求与经验上的保护效果是两种不同证成；参与不等于已认可权利。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES03-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "5.1.3.10 Rights-based approaches (B10), pp.411–412, opening three paragraphs and Figure 5.1.7 caption",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-L4",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "权利是治理评价的一部分：边界",
      "text": "本卡陈述框架内容，不宣布该框架在所有法域有相同法律效力，也不代理权利主体同意。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES03-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "5.1.3.10 Rights-based approaches (B10), pp.411–412, opening three paragraphs and Figure 5.1.7 caption",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-C4",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "权利是治理评价的一部分",
      "text": "此评估的权利路径包含应尊重的权利及治理安排，不能被压缩成单一生物多样性效果指标。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "descriptive account of an explicitly normative governance framework",
      "normative": true,
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES03-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ES03-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ES03-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "IPBES所述权利治理框架；非特定地区法律意见",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "当地权利主体、制度文本和实施评价可校验具体适用方式。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-E5",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "多目标与长期结果仍缺数据：原文依据",
      "text": "5.1.5指出多数研究只覆盖少数nexus元素，结构指标多于功能；食物、水和健康获取、负面结果、总成本与长期动态记录不足。",
      "source_id": "ES03-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/18165236/files/2025%20IPBES_ASSESSMENT%20NEXUS%20%28CHAPTER%205_FULL%29_V2.pdf?download=1",
      "sourceVersion": "2025 IPBES_ASSESSMENT NEXUS (CHAPTER 5_FULL)_V2.pdf; Chapter 5.1",
      "preciseLocator": "5.1.5 Knowledge gaps, pp.426–427; opening paragraph and paragraphs on underreporting, distributional equity, long-term monitoring and policy mixes",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-P5",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "多目标与长期结果仍缺数据：必要前提",
      "text": "同一实施案例需同时记录多个结果、未显著和负面结果、劳动与社区成本。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES03-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "5.1.5 Knowledge gaps, pp.426–427; opening paragraph and paragraphs on underreporting, distributional equity, long-term monitoring and policy mixes",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-L5",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "多目标与长期结果仍缺数据：边界",
      "text": "报告提出缺口是截至评估文献范围的判断；本轮狭窄更新检索不能证明之后没有任何解决案例。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES03-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "5.1.5 Knowledge gaps, pp.426–427; opening paragraph and paragraphs on underreporting, distributional equity, long-term monitoring and policy mixes",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-C5",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "多目标与长期结果仍缺数据",
      "text": "该章节明确保留组合措施、分配公平和长期动态的知识缺口；跨元素潜在收益不是全面已测收益。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES03-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ES03-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ES03-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "2024评估的V2章节及2026-10-04窄范围更新检查",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "可追踪多元素、跨边界和多年结果的独立评价及新综合评估。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-Q1",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "编辑综合的开放问题",
      "text": "哪些地区的恢复组合真正改善生态功能和居民福利，代价如何分配，是否把损失转移到区域外？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES03-E1",
        "ES03-E2",
        "ES03-E3",
        "ES03-E4",
        "ES03-E5"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "not_a_source_quote": true
    },
    {
      "title": "Joint environmental and social benefits from diversified agriculture",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379572082_Joint_environmental_and_social_benefits_from_diversified_agriculture",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adj1914",
      "sourceVersion": "Science 384:87–93, original 5 April 2024 publisher PDF text, before author-list correction",
      "publication_date": "2024-04-04 online; 2024-04-05 issue",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed research; 2024-05-14 author-list correction separately checked via publisher index",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Interdisciplinary and participatory data synthesis, pp.87–89",
        "More diversification strategies or practices are better, pp.89–90",
        "Maximizing win-wins, minimizing trade-offs, pp.91–92",
        "Role of landscape composition and Outlook, p.92"
      ],
      "access": "public_primary_publisher_pdf_text_on_researchgate; publisher and institutional copies attempted",
      "independence_group": "RASMUSSEN_2024_24_STUDIES_2655_FARMS",
      "license": "PDF says copyright 2024 authors, exclusive license AAAS, some rights reserved. No full-text redistribution; original paraphrases and links only.",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "Supplementary Materials tables S1–S13 and figures S1–S10",
        "raw farm records and R model rerun",
        "corrected author-list PDF not directly fetched"
      ],
      "id": "AG01-S1",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Joint environmental and social benefits from diversified agriculture",
      "text": "Joint environmental and social benefits from diversified agriculture",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "title": "Long-term agricultural diversification increases financial profitability, biodiversity, and ecosystem services: a second-order meta-analysis",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-67757-7",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Communications 17,1016 (2026), publisher HTML",
      "publication_date": "2026-01-26",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed original second-order meta-analysis",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Results and discussion, Fig.1 and Fig.2 captions",
        "Research gaps and limitations, paragraphs on long-term data",
        "Methods: Literature search and data compilation",
        "Methods: Data analysis"
      ],
      "access": "open_fulltext_html",
      "independence_group": "RAVELOARITIANA_WANGER_2026_META_REVIEW_OVERLAP_NOT_FULLY_AUDITED",
      "license": "Open access indicated; detailed reuse licence not inspected; no source text redistributed.",
      "id": "AG01-S2",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Long-term agricultural diversification increases financial profitability, biodiversity, and ecosystem services: a second-order meta-analysis",
      "text": "Long-term agricultural diversification increases financial profitability, biodiversity, and ecosystem services: a second-order meta-analysis",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "all cited studies",
        "raw data and executable analysis"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-E1",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "研究设计决定因果上限：原文依据",
      "text": "正文把24个资料集、2655农场的措施数量置入含study ID随机效应的线性混合模型，并明确采用由农户选择而非实验操控。",
      "source_id": "AG01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379572082_Joint_environmental_and_social_benefits_from_diversified_agriculture",
      "sourceVersion": "Science 384:87–93, original 5 April 2024 publisher PDF text, before author-list correction",
      "preciseLocator": "Interdisciplinary and participatory data synthesis, pp.87–89, final paragraph immediately before More diversification strategies or practices are better",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-P1",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "研究设计决定因果上限：必要前提",
      "text": "采用选择、地理、农场能力等未测差异仍可能混杂；study ID随机效应不自动实现因果识别。",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Interdisciplinary and participatory data synthesis, pp.87–89, final paragraph immediately before More diversification strategies or practices are better",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-L1",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "研究设计决定因果上限：边界",
      "text": "关联不等于无价值，也不能从非随机设计推断不存在因果效应。",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Interdisciplinary and participatory data synthesis, pp.87–89, final paragraph immediately before More diversification strategies or practices are better",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-C1",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "研究设计决定因果上限",
      "text": "2024研究支持现实农场的措施—结果关联，不是对措施组合随机分配的因果估计。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "AG01-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "AG01-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "11国24研究中的农场层资料",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "有可信反事实、分配机制和同类终点的实验或准实验。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-E2",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "组合关联也有测量条件：原文依据",
      "text": "More diversification节和Fig.2 F–G显示更多措施/策略与生物多样性及食物安全指标的正向关联；正文说明生物多样性与生态服务分别只有11、12研究测量。",
      "source_id": "AG01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379572082_Joint_environmental_and_social_benefits_from_diversified_agriculture",
      "sourceVersion": "Science 384:87–93, original 5 April 2024 publisher PDF text, before author-list correction",
      "preciseLocator": "More diversification strategies or practices are better, pp.89–90, opening paragraphs, weighting sensitivity paragraph; Figure 2 F–G",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-P2",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "组合关联也有测量条件：必要前提",
      "text": "汇合结局可比、模型处理异质性合理；相关敏感性只检验若干替代加权方式。",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "More diversification strategies or practices are better, pp.89–90, opening paragraphs, weighting sensitivity paragraph; Figure 2 F–G",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-L2",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "组合关联也有测量条件：边界",
      "text": "补充材料未逐表复算；正文说等权重后总体方向保留，不代表所有具体结果都稳定。",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "More diversification strategies or practices are better, pp.89–90, opening paragraphs, weighting sensitivity paragraph; Figure 2 F–G",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-C2",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "组合关联也有测量条件",
      "text": "组合采用呈正向关联的同时，结论受结局覆盖和研究权重影响，不能理解为每一农场的保证收益。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "AG01-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "AG01-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "2024汇合模型及正文所述加权检验",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "公开数据独立复算与新情境重复，包括负面结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-E3",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "得失依结果和景观而异：原文依据",
      "text": "Maximizing节报告非作物多样化的食物安全指标正向而福祉负向；景观分析按3公里半径半自然栖地分层，贫乏景观中的社会收益未伴随环境收益。",
      "source_id": "AG01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379572082_Joint_environmental_and_social_benefits_from_diversified_agriculture",
      "sourceVersion": "Science 384:87–93, original 5 April 2024 publisher PDF text, before author-list correction",
      "preciseLocator": "Maximizing win-wins, minimizing trade-offs, pp.91–92; Role of landscape composition, p.92; Figure 4 caption",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-P3",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "得失依结果和景观而异：必要前提",
      "text": "福祉、膳食多样性、生物多样性与产量分别操作化；不能互换这些终点。",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Maximizing win-wins, minimizing trade-offs, pp.91–92; Role of landscape composition, p.92; Figure 4 caption",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-L3",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "得失依结果和景观而异：边界",
      "text": "所提劳动和现金作物面积机制主要是解释候选，未在本轮建立中介因果识别。",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Maximizing win-wins, minimizing trade-offs, pp.91–92; Role of landscape composition, p.92; Figure 4 caption",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-C3",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "得失依结果和景观而异",
      "text": "平均组合关联掩盖结果间权衡和景观异质性；更多多样化不能简单等同于所有目标同步改善。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "AG01-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "AG01-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "五种措施及三类景观的模型比较",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "同一农场的成本、劳动、收入和生态结果长期联合观测。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-E4",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "长期综合补充部分证据：原文依据",
      "text": "2026二阶meta回归使用184项meta分析；Fig.1报告利润、部分生态指标随实施时长增加，而产量时间趋势不显著。",
      "source_id": "AG01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-67757-7",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Communications 17,1016 (2026), publisher HTML",
      "preciseLocator": "Results and discussion: Socioeconomic... benefits mostly increase over time, opening paragraphs and Figure 1; Methods: Literature search and data compilation, first paragraph",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-P4",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "长期综合补充部分证据：必要前提",
      "text": "纳入文献检索截止2022-12-31；时长是不同研究的调节变量，效应依赖meta回归模型。",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results and discussion: Socioeconomic... benefits mostly increase over time, opening paragraphs and Figure 1; Methods: Literature search and data compilation, first paragraph",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-L4",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "长期综合补充部分证据：边界",
      "text": "长时段数据稀疏；不同底层研究可能重叠，已按作者规则去重但本轮未独立核对。",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results and discussion: Socioeconomic... benefits mostly increase over time, opening paragraphs and Figure 1; Methods: Literature search and data compilation, first paragraph",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-C4",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "长期综合补充部分证据",
      "text": "2026综合把时间维度纳入评价，提供长期收益的汇合线索；这不等于2026新增了一组数十年随机农场试验。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "AG01-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "AG01-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "发表在2026、检索至2022的二阶汇合分析",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "新增多年试验、更均匀地区资料与底层研究重叠审计。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-E5",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "长期收益未闭合可负担链：原文依据",
      "text": "方法的纳入终点是产量、财务盈利和生态指标，时长缺精确值时作中点或加2年的编码，作者另做精确时长敏感性分析。",
      "source_id": "AG01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-67757-7",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Communications 17,1016 (2026), publisher HTML",
      "preciseLocator": "Methods: Literature search and data compilation, duration coding paragraphs; Data analysis, exact-duration sensitivity paragraphs; Results: Research gaps and limitations",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-P5",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "长期收益未闭合可负担链：必要前提",
      "text": "农场盈利与消费者可负担性是不同终点，必须另接市场、价格、收入与膳食资料。",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Methods: Literature search and data compilation, duration coding paragraphs; Data analysis, exact-duration sensitivity paragraphs; Results: Research gaps and limitations",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-L5",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "长期收益未闭合可负担链：边界",
      "text": "这是从实际纳入指标得出的编辑边界，不能当作任何农业措施一定提高或降低食品价格的结论。",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Methods: Literature search and data compilation, duration coding paragraphs; Data analysis, exact-duration sensitivity paragraphs; Results: Research gaps and limitations",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-C5",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "长期收益未闭合可负担链",
      "text": "这组长期农场综合未直接识别消费者价格、家庭购买力和健康膳食可负担性之间的传递效应。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "AG01-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "AG01-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "2026文章的测量范围，不评价SOFI全球数值",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "把农业措施与市场价格和家庭膳食连接的可信因果设计。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-Q1",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "编辑综合的开放问题",
      "text": "哪些组合在具体土壤、气候、劳动力与市场条件下带来持续收益，收益是否传给消费者，成本由谁承担？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-S1",
        "AG01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-E1",
        "AG01-E2",
        "AG01-E3",
        "AG01-E4",
        "AG01-E5"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "not_a_source_quote": true
    },
    {
      "title": "One Health in Practice: Using Integrated Bite Case Management to Increase Detection of Rabid Animals in Tanzania",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00013/full",
      "sourceVersion": "Frontiers in Public Health 8:13 (2020), publisher HTML",
      "publication_date": "2020-02-14",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed original implementation study",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Methodology: Study Area, IBCM Framework, Application, Training",
        "Results: Bite Patient Risk Assessments, Table 1; Animal Investigations",
        "Discussion and Conclusion"
      ],
      "access": "open_fulltext_html",
      "independence_group": "TANZANIA_IBCM_SHARED_PROGRAMME_2018_2024",
      "license": "Frontiers open-access text; specific footer licence not independently inspected; paraphrases and links only.",
      "id": "VH01-S1",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "One Health in Practice: Using Integrated Bite Case Management to Increase Detection of Rabid Animals in Tanzania",
      "text": "One Health in Practice: Using Integrated Bite Case Management to Increase Detection of Rabid Animals in Tanzania",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "all cited studies",
        "raw data and executable analysis"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies for provisioning rabies post-exposure vaccines",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/375932/1/375932.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "Vaccine 74 (2026) 128178, Version of Record PDF",
      "publication_date": "2026-01-20",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed original decision-tree model and surveillance analysis",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "2.1–2.3 pp.2–3",
        "3.2–3.3, Table 5 and Figure 6, pp.7–9",
        "4.1–4.3 pp.7–10"
      ],
      "access": "open_author_institution_fulltext_pdf",
      "independence_group": "TANZANIA_IBCM_SHARED_PROGRAMME_2018_2024",
      "license": "CC BY 4.0 stated on PDF p.1",
      "id": "VH01-S2",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies for provisioning rabies post-exposure vaccines",
      "text": "Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies for provisioning rabies post-exposure vaccines",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "all cited studies",
        "raw data and executable analysis"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-E1",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "前后报告变化：原文依据",
      "text": "月均新咬伤就诊记录由55.7到92.2；被医务人员评为疑似狂犬动物咬伤的比例由26.9%到64.9%。",
      "source_id": "VH01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00013/full",
      "sourceVersion": "Frontiers in Public Health 8:13 (2020), publisher HTML",
      "preciseLocator": "Results: Bite Patient Risk Assessments, first paragraph and Table 1; Methodology: Training, final paragraph",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-P1",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "前后报告变化：必要前提",
      "text": "比较的是常规纸面记录与IBCM后的报告；培训和检测流程同时改变。",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results: Bite Patient Risk Assessments, first paragraph and Table 1; Methodology: Training, final paragraph",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-L1",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "前后报告变化：边界",
      "text": "非随机前后比较，地区有暴发；不能由记录增多推断真实疾病上升或已经降低死亡。",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results: Bite Patient Risk Assessments, first paragraph and Table 1; Methodology: Training, final paragraph",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-C1",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "前后报告变化",
      "text": "2018–2019实施前后，已参加机构的咬伤记录及高风险分类上升。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "VH01-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "VH01-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "坦桑尼亚4地区20行政区，实施约1年",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "恒定检测条件下的对照与完整发病、死亡资料。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-E2",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "疑似与确诊应分开：原文依据",
      "text": "823次动物调查中404例按症状或快速检测判为可能狂犬病；实际快速检测10份，其中8阳性；202例状态未知。",
      "source_id": "VH01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00013/full",
      "sourceVersion": "Frontiers in Public Health 8:13 (2020), publisher HTML",
      "preciseLocator": "Results: Animal Investigations, first–fourth paragraphs; Figure 4",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-P2",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "疑似与确诊应分开：必要前提",
      "text": "临床/流行病学分类与检测阳性分别计数；调查样本由高风险警报或社群报告产生。",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results: Animal Investigations, first–fourth paragraphs; Figure 4",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-L2",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "疑似与确诊应分开：边界",
      "text": "只有小部分动物有可检样本，且存在失踪动物和选择偏差；不能估计全体犬只患病率。",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results: Animal Investigations, first–fourth paragraphs; Figure 4",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-C2",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "疑似与确诊应分开",
      "text": "49.1%的调查对象被归为可能病例，不是49.1%全部经实验室确诊。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "VH01-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "VH01-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "IBCM的823次调查",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "具有明确抽样框和更完整实验室诊断的追踪。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-E3",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "运行依赖资源与覆盖：原文依据",
      "text": "Discussion说明私立转诊机构、未就诊死于家中的人漏入；研究团队有跨区远程支持，交通、训练和人员更替影响实施。",
      "source_id": "VH01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00013/full",
      "sourceVersion": "Frontiers in Public Health 8:13 (2020), publisher HTML",
      "preciseLocator": "Discussion, paragraphs beginning Limitations of our study through Government supported training, and From the animal health side",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-P3",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "运行依赖资源与覆盖：必要前提",
      "text": "病例发现、转诊、样本获取、库存和人员培训都须持续运转。",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Discussion, paragraphs beginning Limitations of our study through Government supported training, and From the animal health side",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-L3",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "运行依赖资源与覆盖：边界",
      "text": "可推广性限制与本地可行性不同；本研究没有随机估计每项支持要素的独立贡献。",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Discussion, paragraphs beginning Limitations of our study through Government supported training, and From the animal health side",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-C3",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "运行依赖资源与覆盖",
      "text": "可行性发生在明确支持条件下，尚不能直接外推为无额外资源的全国持续服务。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "VH01-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "VH01-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "2020实施研究报告的政府机构与技术支持体系",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "停止或内化外部支持后的长期运行与成本资料。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-E4",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "未来死亡数属于模型输出：原文依据",
      "text": "2019–2024四地区IBCM数据输入决策树，Table 5给2026–2030死亡数S1为3800、S2为2300、S3为2000，均附预测区间。",
      "source_id": "VH01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/375932/1/375932.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "Vaccine 74 (2026) 128178, Version of Record PDF",
      "preciseLocator": "2.1–2.3 pp.2–3; 3.2 and Table 5 printed p.7",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-P4",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "未来死亡数属于模型输出：必要前提",
      "text": "全国外推使用地区咬伤发生范围及就医、开始和完成预防服务概率；未模拟犬疫苗带来的传播下降。",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2.1–2.3 pp.2–3; 3.2 and Table 5 printed p.7",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-L4",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "未来死亡数属于模型输出：边界",
      "text": "同一项目资料与2020研究不完全独立；模型不是随机政策试验，预测区间不囊括全部结构误差。 补充材料显示的不完整PEP死亡方程与Table2条件概率定义有待代码对应核对的表面不一致；不据此断言模型结果有错。",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-S2",
        "VH01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-E4",
        "VH01-V05-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2.1–2.3 pp.2–3; 3.2 and Table 5 printed p.7",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-C4",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "未来死亡数属于模型输出",
      "text": "S3相对S2较少的死亡是给定政策情景和行为假设的预测，不是已观察到的全国政策成效。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-S2",
        "VH01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-E4",
        "VH01-V05-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "VH01-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "VH01-L4",
        "VH01-V05-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "坦桑尼亚2026–2030情景，医疗提供方视角",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "政策实施后的预先规定对照、完整结局与预测校准。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-E5",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "成本视角不是完整One Health：原文依据",
      "text": "4.2明确未纳入动物调查、建立IBCM的训练、家庭交通和时间成本，以及更广泛供应链等成本；长期就医改变假设无法验证。",
      "source_id": "VH01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/375932/1/375932.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "Vaccine 74 (2026) 128178, Version of Record PDF",
      "preciseLocator": "4.2 Strengths and limitations, pp.9–10, paragraphs beginning A further limitation; 4.3 Broader context, p.10",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-P5",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "成本视角不是完整One Health：必要前提",
      "text": "解释经济结果必须保留医疗机构成本视角和遗漏项，价值权衡不由每避免一例死亡成本自动决定。",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "4.2 Strengths and limitations, pp.9–10, paragraphs beginning A further limitation; 4.3 Broader context, p.10",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-L5",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "成本视角不是完整One Health：边界",
      "text": "没有重运行模型；正文不同段落的增量数字与Table 5不尽一致，引用只采用表中情景总量，增量解释待审计。",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "4.2 Strengths and limitations, pp.9–10, paragraphs beginning A further limitation; 4.3 Broader context, p.10",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-C5",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "成本视角不是完整One Health",
      "text": "报告的成本效果不能视作已覆盖人、动物与家庭的完整跨部门成本收益。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-S2",
        "VH01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-E5",
        "VH01-V05-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "VH01-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "VH01-L5",
        "VH01-V05-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "2026发表版模型成本核算，不作为暴露处置建议",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "补齐跨部门微观成本，核实行为参数并独立复算情景差额。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-Q1",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "编辑综合的开放问题",
      "text": "如何把更敏感的监测转为持续降低人和动物疾病负担的服务，同时验证全部成本、可及性、动物福利和跨部门分配？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-S1",
        "VH01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-E1",
        "VH01-E2",
        "VH01-E3",
        "VH01-E4",
        "VH01-E5"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "not_a_source_quote": true
    },
    {
      "title": "The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://cpi.stanford.edu/_media/pdf/Reference%20Media/Acemoglu,%20Johnson,%20and%20Robinson_2001_Development%20Economics.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "AER 91(5):1369–1401 (2001), publisher PDF institutional copy",
      "publication_date": "2001-12",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed original research",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Introduction pp.1370–1372",
        "III.B Data on Potential Settler Mortality pp.1382–1383",
        "IV.A–B and Table 4 pp.1383–1386",
        "overidentification discussion p.1393"
      ],
      "access": "open_institutional_primary_fulltext_pdf",
      "independence_group": "AJR_COLONIAL_MORTALITY_SHARED_DATA",
      "id": "SS01-S1",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation",
      "text": "The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending",
      "license": "No general reuse permission verified; preserve links and original paraphrases only; do not redistribute source full text.",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "all cited studies",
        "raw data and executable analysis"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Comment",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://davidalbouy.com/s/AJRrev.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://davidalbouy.com/research/2c8b9hmaes954fuqu6qnvgiesvvlfq",
      "sourceVersion": "AER102(6):3059–3076 (2012), publisher PDF from author's current website",
      "publication_date": "2012-10",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed original data critique and reanalysis",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Introduction pp.3059–3060",
        "II Sensitivity of Empirical Results pp.3067–3072",
        "Table1 p.3066; Table3 p.3073; TableA1 pp.3074–3075",
        "Conclusion p.3073"
      ],
      "access": "open_author_posted_publisher_fulltext_pdf",
      "independence_group": "AJR_COLONIAL_MORTALITY_SHARED_DATA",
      "text": "同一历史资料的批判性重分析，不是独立抽样；本轮已取得并阅读最终评论指定段落。",
      "license": "No redistribution permission inspected; author-provided public PDF read for research, paraphrases and links only.",
      "id": "SS01-S2",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Comment",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "all cited studies",
        "raw data and executable analysis"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Reply",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/publications/The%20Colonial%20Origins%20of%20Compatayive%20Development%20-%20.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "AER 102(6):3077–3110 (2012), publisher PDF author institution",
      "publication_date": "2012-10",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed author reply and reanalysis",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Introduction pp.3077–3079",
        "Table 2A pp.3095–3096",
        "Table 2B and associated discussion pp.3097–3098",
        "II.E campaign dummy discussion p.3098"
      ],
      "access": "open_author_institution_fulltext_pdf",
      "independence_group": "AJR_COLONIAL_MORTALITY_SHARED_DATA",
      "id": "SS01-S3",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Reply",
      "text": "The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Reply",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending",
      "license": "No general reuse permission verified; preserve links and original paraphrases only; do not redistribute source full text.",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "all cited studies",
        "raw data and executable analysis"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-E1",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "限定的制度指标与估计：原文依据",
      "text": "Table 4列64国基准样本；因变量1995 PPP人均GDP对数，制度代理为1985–1995征收风险保护指数；2SLS系数0.94，标准误0.16。",
      "source_id": "SS01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://cpi.stanford.edu/_media/pdf/Reference%20Media/Acemoglu,%20Johnson,%20and%20Robinson_2001_Development%20Economics.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "AER 91(5):1369–1401 (2001), publisher PDF institutional copy",
      "preciseLocator": "2001 paper IV.B and Table 4 Panel A column 1 and table notes, pp.1385–1386",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-P1",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "限定的制度指标与估计：必要前提",
      "text": "风险保护指数是0–10代理而非所有制度的完整测量；历史死亡率须满足相关性及排除限制。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS01-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2001 paper IV.B and Table 4 Panel A column 1 and table notes, pp.1385–1386",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-L1",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "限定的制度指标与估计：边界",
      "text": "0.94是每一指数单位对应的对数收入系数，不是普遍政策提升百分比；本轮没有复算。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS01-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2001 paper IV.B and Table 4 Panel A column 1 and table notes, pp.1385–1386",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-C1",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "限定的制度指标与估计",
      "text": "AJR在特定历史样本和工具变量模型下报告制度代理与收入的大幅正向因果估计。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "SS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS01-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "SS01-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "SS01-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "64个前殖民地、指定历史指标及1995终点",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立史料编码、弱工具稳健推断与外部样本重估。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-E2",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "排除限制并未由显著性证明：原文依据",
      "text": "作者明确要求历史欧洲人死亡率对当代收入只能经制度路径起作用，并讨论现代疾病环境直接影响收入的风险；过度识别测试在相关工具均失效时可能不拒绝。",
      "source_id": "SS01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://cpi.stanford.edu/_media/pdf/Reference%20Media/Acemoglu,%20Johnson,%20and%20Robinson_2001_Development%20Economics.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "AER 91(5):1369–1401 (2001), publisher PDF institutional copy",
      "preciseLocator": "Introduction p.1371, exclusion restriction paragraph; IV.A p.1383; overidentification discussion p.1393",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-P2",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "排除限制并未由显著性证明：必要前提",
      "text": "存在其他持久历史路径时，工具会把其收入影响归给制度；测试有前提。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS01-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Introduction p.1371, exclusion restriction paragraph; IV.A p.1383; overidentification discussion p.1393",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-L2",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "排除限制并未由显著性证明：边界",
      "text": "这项识别边界不等于证明工具必然失效，亦不等于制度没有作用。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS01-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Introduction p.1371, exclusion restriction paragraph; IV.A p.1383; overidentification discussion p.1393",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-C2",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "排除限制并未由显著性证明",
      "text": "第一阶段相关和2SLS显著不足以单独确立排除限制。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "SS01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS01-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "SS01-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "SS01-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "AJR2001提出并辩护的识别策略",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立变异来源或可信负对照、机制及历史证据能进一步检验替代路径。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-E3",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "最终评论定位到史料编码：原文依据",
      "text": "2012评论指出64国只有28国死亡率来自本国内，36国由别国外推；士兵战役、营房及劳工资料的组合影响可比性，并公开逐国指标表。",
      "source_id": "SS01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://davidalbouy.com/s/AJRrev.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "AER102(6):3059–3076 (2012), publisher PDF from author's current website",
      "preciseLocator": "2012 Comment Introduction p.3060; Table1 p.3066; II pp.3067–3069; TableA1 pp.3074–3075",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-P3",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "最终评论定位到史料编码：必要前提",
      "text": "本国史料也不是无误差真值；删样本和来源分类须有历史理由，不能只看显著性。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS01-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2012 Comment Introduction p.3060; Table1 p.3066; II pp.3067–3069; TableA1 pp.3074–3075",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-L3",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "最终评论定位到史料编码：边界",
      "text": "AJR答复明确反对其删样本及campaign编码；评论的批评不是双方已同意的数据判决。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS01-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2012 Comment Introduction p.3060; Table1 p.3066; II pp.3067–3069; TableA1 pp.3074–3075",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-C3",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "最终评论定位到史料编码",
      "text": "Albouy最终评论挑战死亡率代理的地域指派、可比性和聚类处理，要求把史料构造纳入识别审计。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "SS01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS01-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "SS01-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "SS01-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "最终AER2012评论的资料与规格；非所有制度研究",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "双方史料逐项核对，复现各自编码与控制规格。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-E4",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "作者答复提供相反稳健性结果：原文依据",
      "text": "2012答复认为大幅删样本及战役编码不合理，Table 2A/B比较去掉Gambia、死亡率截顶250等处理后第一阶段和第二阶段。",
      "source_id": "SS01-S3",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS01-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/publications/The%20Colonial%20Origins%20of%20Compatayive%20Development%20-%20.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "AER 102(6):3077–3110 (2012), publisher PDF author institution",
      "preciseLocator": "Reply pp.3078–3079; Table 2A pp.3095–3096; Table 2B pp.3097–3098; II.E p.3098",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-P4",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "作者答复提供相反稳健性结果：必要前提",
      "text": "截顶、排除特定国家及控制变量都改变模型；应共同审查而非按论文数量投票。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS01-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS01-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Reply pp.3078–3079; Table 2A pp.3095–3096; Table 2B pp.3097–3098; II.E p.3098",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-L4",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "作者答复提供相反稳健性结果：边界",
      "text": "答复与原文及批评复用数据；不是第三个独立历史自然实验。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS01-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS01-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Reply pp.3078–3079; Table 2A pp.3095–3096; Table 2B pp.3097–3098; II.E p.3098",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-C4",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "作者答复提供相反稳健性结果",
      "text": "答复报告部分替代处理保留正向估计，使争论成为史料、异常值与模型选择的实质分歧。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "SS01-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS01-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "SS01-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "SS01-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "2012 Reply所列重分析，不裁决整个学术论争",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "可复现的共同史料基准及多套合理规格的独立审计。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-E5",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "弱工具下区间可能失去约束：原文依据",
      "text": "Table3 D/E组合剔除推定资料与控制campaign/laborer来源，多项Anderson–Rubin置信集合覆盖整个实数轴或不相连；点估计仍可能为正或变大。",
      "source_id": "SS01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://davidalbouy.com/s/AJRrev.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "AER102(6):3059–3076 (2012), publisher PDF from author's current website",
      "preciseLocator": "II.B Instrumental Variable Estimates discussion pp.3071–3072; Table3 panels D/E and notes p.3073",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-P5",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "弱工具下区间可能失去约束：必要前提",
      "text": "弱第一阶段时常规Wald区间可能不可靠，应保留AR检验和聚类规则。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS01-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "II.B Instrumental Variable Estimates discussion pp.3071–3072; Table3 panels D/E and notes p.3073",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-L5",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "弱工具下区间可能失去约束：边界",
      "text": "区间不受约束说明该规格信息不足，不证明真效应为零；替代规格的历史合理性仍被争论。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS01-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "II.B Instrumental Variable Estimates discussion pp.3071–3072; Table3 panels D/E and notes p.3073",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-C5",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "弱工具下区间可能失去约束",
      "text": "在这些有争议但明确的替代规格中，正的IV点估计也可能伴随几乎无信息的稳健区间。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "SS01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS01-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "SS01-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "SS01-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "Albouy2012 Table3的限定重分析",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "更强独立工具、可靠补充史料与共同复现可改变信息量。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-Q1",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "编辑综合的开放问题",
      "text": "哪些具体制度及历史过程造成发展差异，怎样用可核查史料与独立识别区分制度、疾病和其他持久路径？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS01-S1",
        "SS01-S2",
        "SS01-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS01-E1",
        "SS01-E2",
        "SS01-E3",
        "SS01-E4",
        "SS01-E5"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "not_a_source_quote": true
    },
    {
      "title": "General Equilibrium Effects of Cash Transfers: Experimental Evidence From Kenya",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.3982/ECTA17945",
      "sourceVersion": "Econometrica 90(6):2603–2643 (2022), publisher full HTML",
      "publication_date": "2022-11-22",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed cluster-randomized field study",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "2.1–2.3 Study Design",
        "3.1 Household Data; 3.6 Price Data",
        "4.3 Enterprise Effects and Table III",
        "4.4 Non-Recipient Household Effects",
        "4.5 prices",
        "5 Transfer Multiplier, 5.1 and Table V",
        "1 Introduction and 8 Conclusion"
      ],
      "access": "publisher_fulltext_html",
      "independence_group": "EGGER_KENYA_GD_653_VILLAGES_2014_2017",
      "license": "Publisher full-text readable; no redistribution licence verified; links and original summaries only.",
      "id": "SS02-S1",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "General Equilibrium Effects of Cash Transfers: Experimental Evidence From Kenya",
      "text": "General Equilibrium Effects of Cash Transfers: Experimental Evidence From Kenya",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "all cited studies",
        "raw data and executable analysis"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-E1",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "两层随机化覆盖空间外溢：原文依据",
      "text": "653村、84 sublocations；先分高低覆盖区域，再按2/3和1/3比例随机选处理村并随机实施顺序；约1/3家庭按茅草屋顶资格取得一次性转移。",
      "source_id": "SS02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS02-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.3982/ECTA17945",
      "sourceVersion": "Econometrica 90(6):2603–2643 (2022), publisher full HTML",
      "preciseLocator": "2.1 Setting; 2.2 Intervention; 2.3 Experimental Design, all paragraphs",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-P1",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "两层随机化覆盖空间外溢：必要前提",
      "text": "资格、随机分配、区域暴露及空间模型按研究定义实施；不能假设村间无干扰。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS02-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2.1 Setting; 2.2 Intervention; 2.3 Experimental Design, all paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-L1",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "两层随机化覆盖空间外溢：边界",
      "text": "目的性挑选贫困地区，不是全肯尼亚随机抽样；后续空间规格仍有模型假设。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS02-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2.1 Setting; 2.2 Intervention; 2.3 Experimental Design, all paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-C1",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "两层随机化覆盖空间外溢",
      "text": "设计既创造直接受益比较，也创造邻近地区转移强度变化，可用于估计当地外溢。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "SS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS02-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "SS02-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "SS02-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "Siaya乡村，2014至2017实施及调查",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "随机化核验、替代空间半径和边界地区资料的独立复算。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-E2",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "非受益家庭与企业也有收益：原文依据",
      "text": "4.4报告非受益家庭支出正向；Table III企业收入增加但利润估计不显著，投资变化小。",
      "source_id": "SS02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS02-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.3982/ECTA17945",
      "sourceVersion": "Econometrica 90(6):2603–2643 (2022), publisher full HTML",
      "preciseLocator": "4.3 Enterprise Effects, Table III Panels A–C and following paragraphs; 4.4 first two paragraphs",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-P2",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "非受益家庭与企业也有收益：必要前提",
      "text": "家庭、企业及就业收入分别测量；区分总效应与单纯处理村减控制村的差。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS02-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "4.3 Enterprise Effects, Table III Panels A–C and following paragraphs; 4.4 first two paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-L2",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "非受益家庭与企业也有收益：边界",
      "text": "机制中的需求扩张和闲置产能是结合模式作出的解释，不是已单独随机识别的中介。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS02-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "4.3 Enterprise Effects, Table III Panels A–C and following paragraphs; 4.4 first two paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-C2",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "非受益家庭与企业也有收益",
      "text": "该研究的正外溢体现在消费及企业收入等终点，不能把营业额增加等同于利润、生产率或永久资本积累。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "SS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS02-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "SS02-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "SS02-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "终期调查中当地家庭与企业结果",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "长期企业进入、利润、生产率和就业时间利用的直接测量。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-E3",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "当地乘数有抽样与核算误差：原文依据",
      "text": "Table V支出乘数2.58（SE1.44），收入乘数2.47（SE1.71）；联合检验乘数≤1的p为0.07，单个检验分别0.14/0.20。",
      "source_id": "SS02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS02-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.3982/ECTA17945",
      "sourceVersion": "Econometrica 90(6):2603–2643 (2022), publisher full HTML",
      "preciseLocator": "5 definition and 5.1 Multiplier Estimates, Table V Panels A–C and notes",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-P3",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "当地乘数有抽样与核算误差：必要前提",
      "text": "乘数是一定时段真实本地GDP增量除实际转移；动态支出、进口和存量核算需成立。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS02-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "5 definition and 5.1 Multiplier Estimates, Table V Panels A–C and notes",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-L3",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "当地乘数有抽样与核算误差：边界",
      "text": "两种核算来自同一实验，不是独立重复试验；标准误较大，初期数据不完整。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS02-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "5 definition and 5.1 Multiplier Estimates, Table V Panels A–C and notes",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-C3",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "当地乘数有抽样与核算误差",
      "text": "约2.5是两种当地GDP核算的条件估计，不能表述为每种估计都在5%水平明确大于1。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "SS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS02-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "SS02-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "SS02-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "表V的联合估计和明示检验，不对全球财政乘数赋常数",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立重算、完整早期高频资料或新地点同设计实验。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-E4",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "融资和规模限制推广：原文依据",
      "text": "5节明示资金从研究区外慈善捐入，相对国家经济小；因此回避国内税债融资、货币政策及汇率反应。价格调查显示平均涨幅有限。",
      "source_id": "SS02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS02-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.3982/ECTA17945",
      "sourceVersion": "Econometrica 90(6):2603–2643 (2022), publisher full HTML",
      "preciseLocator": "1 Introduction, paragraphs on external donors; 5 first three paragraphs; 3.6 and 4.5 price measurement and market-access discussion",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-P4",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "融资和规模限制推广：必要前提",
      "text": "外部效度要比较融资、市场连通、供给弹性及宏观政策，而非只比较发现金的形式。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS02-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "1 Introduction, paragraphs on external donors; 5 first three paragraphs; 3.6 and 4.5 price measurement and market-access discussion",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-L4",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "融资和规模限制推广：边界",
      "text": "本地因果识别较强与可推广性未定同时成立；不构成全国政策必然失效的证据。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS02-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "1 Introduction, paragraphs on external donors; 5 first three paragraphs; 3.6 and 4.5 price measurement and market-access discussion",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-C4",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "融资和规模限制推广",
      "text": "局部低通胀和正乘数不能独自预测全国、长期或税债融资的转移结果。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "SS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS02-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "SS02-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "SS02-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "一次性、外部资助的地方转移向其他政策外推",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "不同融资/覆盖尺度的试验与可验证一般均衡模型。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-Q1",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "编辑综合的开放问题",
      "text": "同类现金转移在别国、全国、长期和不同融资约束下会有什么净收益、价格和分配后果？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS02-E1",
        "SS02-E2",
        "SS02-E3",
        "SS02-E4"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "not_a_source_quote": true
    },
    {
      "title": "Measuring the predictability of life outcomes with a scientific mass collaboration",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/api/core/bitstreams/3880cec9-bccf-43af-b761-1ba299afe5f1/content",
      "sourceVersion": "PNAS117:8398–8403 (2020), original publisher PDF institutional copy; read with separate 2021 correction",
      "publication_date": "2020-03-30",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed original research; correction exists",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "task/data design pp.8399–8400, Eq.1",
        "Results pp.8400–8402, Figures3–4",
        "Discussion p.8402"
      ],
      "access": "open_institutional_fulltext_pdf",
      "independence_group": "FFC_2017_SHARED_COHORT_AND_CHALLENGE",
      "id": "SS03-S1",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Measuring the predictability of life outcomes with a scientific mass collaboration",
      "text": "Measuring the predictability of life outcomes with a scientific mass collaboration",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending",
      "license": "No general reuse permission verified; preserve links and original paraphrases only; do not redistribute source full text.",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "all cited studies",
        "raw data and executable analysis"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "Correction for Salganik et al., Measuring the predictability of life outcomes with a scientific mass collaboration",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2118703118",
      "sourceVersion": "PNAS118(50)e2118703118 (2021), correction HTML",
      "publication_date": "2021-12-02",
      "publication_status": "publisher correction, not an independent study",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "complete correction notice paragraphs",
        "corrected Fig.3 caption",
        "SI amendments S15 and S18"
      ],
      "access": "publisher_fulltext_correction_html",
      "independence_group": "FFC_2017_SHARED_COHORT_AND_CHALLENGE",
      "license": "PNAS licence shown; paraphrase only.",
      "id": "SS03-S2",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Correction for Salganik et al., Measuring the predictability of life outcomes with a scientific mass collaboration",
      "text": "Correction for Salganik et al., Measuring the predictability of life outcomes with a scientific mass collaboration",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "all cited studies",
        "raw data and executable analysis"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "The origins of unpredictability in life outcome prediction tasks",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4883/af15f5e446dda2ac524d2466861c8a4de434.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2322973121",
      "sourceVersion": "PNAS121(24)e2322973121 (2024), Version of Record PDF",
      "publication_date": "2024-06-04",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed original mixed-methods study",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "1 Conceptual Framework, Eq.1 pp.2–3",
        "2 study/sampling pp.3–4",
        "3.1 sources of irreducible error p.4",
        "4.1 Generalizing pp.5–6"
      ],
      "access": "open_CC_BY_primary_fulltext_pdf",
      "independence_group": "FFC_2017_SHARED_COHORT_AND_CHALLENGE",
      "license": "CC BY 4.0 stated p.1",
      "text": "新访谈但源于同一纵向队列和竞赛；不是独立人群重复。",
      "id": "SS03-S3",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "The origins of unpredictability in life outcome prediction tasks",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "all cited studies",
        "raw data and executable analysis"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-E1",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "预测任务并非纯前瞻预报：原文依据",
      "text": "4242家庭、12942背景变量，六个15岁自报结局；训练集含一半家庭15岁标签，另分leaderboard及末期才揭晓holdout。",
      "source_id": "SS03-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/api/core/bitstreams/3880cec9-bccf-43af-b761-1ba299afe5f1/content",
      "sourceVersion": "PNAS117:8398–8403 (2020), original publisher PDF institutional copy; read with separate 2021 correction",
      "preciseLocator": "2020 paper p.8399, paragraphs starting When we began, Wave 6, In order to predict and The half; Fig.2 p.8400",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-P1",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "预测任务并非纯前瞻预报：必要前提",
      "text": "留出集不用于训练且背景/标签定义固定；前瞻时间外与样本外检验要分开。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS03-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2020 paper p.8399, paragraphs starting When we began, Wave 6, In order to predict and The half; Fig.2 p.8400",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-L1",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "预测任务并非纯前瞻预报：边界",
      "text": "六项自报指标和单队列不能代表所有人生终点；地理和遗传信息未开放给参赛者。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS03-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2020 paper p.8399, paragraphs starting When we began, Wave 6, In order to predict and The half; Fig.2 p.8400",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-C1",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "预测任务并非纯前瞻预报",
      "text": "这是以同队列部分15岁标签学习后预测留出家庭的共同任务，不等于在任何15岁结果产生前进行纯时间外预报。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS03-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "SS03-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "SS03-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "2017 FFC任务及所测队列",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "结局发生前注册的时间外和其他地区重复。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-E2",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "留出表现有限：原文依据",
      "text": "Eq.1以训练集均值预测误差为分母；Results报告最佳模型对物质困难和GPA约0.2，其余约0.05。",
      "source_id": "SS03-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/api/core/bitstreams/3880cec9-bccf-43af-b761-1ba299afe5f1/content",
      "sourceVersion": "PNAS117:8398–8403 (2020), original publisher PDF institutional copy; read with separate 2021 correction",
      "preciseLocator": "2020 pp.8400–8401 Eq.1 and Results first paragraph; best-submission selection caveat p.8401",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-P2",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "留出表现有限：必要前提",
      "text": "R²_holdout是相对训练均值的预测指标；不等于因果解释度或不可约误差的直接估计。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS03-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2020 pp.8400–8401 Eq.1 and Results first paragraph; best-submission selection caveat p.8401",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-L2",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "留出表现有限：边界",
      "text": "从同一留出集挑最佳模型并估计性能存在乐观选择偏差；未重跑原代码。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS03-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2020 pp.8400–8401 Eq.1 and Results first paragraph; best-submission selection caveat p.8401",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-C2",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "留出表现有限",
      "text": "最佳参赛模型在这些终点的样本外误差改善有限；这些分数不是人生有多少百分比被决定。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS03-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "SS03-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "SS03-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "160队模型的既定数据与六项任务",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "更好的盲测模型、测量、训练样本或时间窗口可以改变可预测表现。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-E3",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "更正改变基线实现：原文依据",
      "text": "更正说二元结局基线代码误用了线性回归；更新Fig.3、SI图和部分文本，layoff比较四倍改为三倍。",
      "source_id": "SS03-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2118703118",
      "sourceVersion": "PNAS118(50)e2118703118 (2021), correction HTML",
      "preciseLocator": "2021 correction notice, coding-error paragraph; SI S15 and S18 amendment paragraphs",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-P3",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "更正改变基线实现：必要前提",
      "text": "原始代码实现与方法描述一致性属于可再现性；更正版本与原研究同一证据组。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS03-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2021 correction notice, coding-error paragraph; SI S15 and S18 amendment paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-L3",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "更正改变基线实现：边界",
      "text": "作者称总论不变是作者说明，本轮未独立验证所有更新图或数值。v0.5 取回的 Europe PMC SI 在 S15/S18 仍保留被 2021 更正替换的旧值；所需的已更正 SI、图 S6–S9 与 S17–S18 仍未核验。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-S2",
        "SS03-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS03-E3",
        "SS03-V05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2021 correction notice, coding-error paragraph; SI S15 and S18 amendment paragraphs | Retrieved SI S15/S18 versus 2021 correction SI-amendment paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary",
      "v05_update": {
        "gap_ids": [
          "SS03-G01"
        ],
        "new_source_ids": [
          "SS03-V05-S1"
        ],
        "new_evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-V05-E1"
        ],
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "scope": "Only the explicitly changed reading/version boundary is updated; baseline substantive claims and prior review are preserved."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-C3",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "更正改变基线实现",
      "text": "任何基线比较应连同2021更正读取，不能沿用未更正的二元基线实现和精确比值。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS03-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "SS03-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "SS03-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "PNAS更正指明的基线、SI及软件版本",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "使用更正代码和锁定数据的独立复算。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-E4",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "不可约误差依任务定义：原文依据",
      "text": "2024 Eq.1把平方预测误差分成给定特征后的条件方差与学习误差；40家庭114次访谈用于形成未测、测量不准和观察窗后事件的解释框架。",
      "source_id": "SS03-S3",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4883/af15f5e446dda2ac524d2466861c8a4de434.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "PNAS121(24)e2322973121 (2024), Version of Record PDF",
      "preciseLocator": "2024 section1 Eq.1 pp.2–3; section2 sampling p.3; section3.1 p.4",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-P4",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "不可约误差依任务定义：必要前提",
      "text": "固定任务与平方误差损失；访谈解释的经验范围和数学分解需分别对待。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS03-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2024 section1 Eq.1 pp.2–3; section2 sampling p.3; section3.1 p.4",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-L4",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "不可约误差依任务定义：边界",
      "text": "40家庭有目的地过采样难预测者；不能由访谈计算各误差来源在总体中的比例。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS03-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2024 section1 Eq.1 pp.2–3; section2 sampling p.3; section3.1 p.4",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-C4",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "不可约误差依任务定义",
      "text": "这里不可约误差是相对于选定特征、结局和预测窗口的定义，不是证明所有更好数据都无用。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS03-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "SS03-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "SS03-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "GPA任务、同队列三城市样本与数学框架",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "系统改变测量/时间窗并预注册评估，检验误差来源。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-E5",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "一般化仍是待检验论断：原文依据",
      "text": "4.1明说只研究一种任务，不能对一般可预测性下定论；增加样本主要作用于学习误差，增加特征同时改变两部分，作者要求新预测检验。",
      "source_id": "SS03-S3",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4883/af15f5e446dda2ac524d2466861c8a4de434.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "PNAS121(24)e2322973121 (2024), Version of Record PDF",
      "preciseLocator": "2024 section4.1 Generalizing to Other Life Outcome Prediction Tasks, pp.5–6, all paragraphs",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-P5",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "一般化仍是待检验论断：必要前提",
      "text": "特征、样本规模、时间跨度与目标同时影响可预测性；行政资料性能仍属经验问题。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS03-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2024 section4.1 Generalizing to Other Life Outcome Prediction Tasks, pp.5–6, all paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-L5",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "一般化仍是待检验论断：边界",
      "text": "推广段有明确推测性质；不能把作者预期当已获全球验证的事实。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS03-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2024 section4.1 Generalizing to Other Life Outcome Prediction Tasks, pp.5–6, all paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-C5",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "一般化仍是待检验论断",
      "text": "该后续研究深化为什么预测会失败，未建立所有人生结局普遍不可预测的定理。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS03-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "SS03-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "SS03-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "2024框架及作者明确的一般化边界",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "跨数据源、多任务与新队列的预注册结果可验证或反驳。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-Q1",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "编辑综合的开放问题",
      "text": "哪些误差可由新测量、样本和短窗口改善，哪些在明确任务下持续存在，怎样测量而不把预测变成人的命运判断？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-S1",
        "SS03-S2",
        "SS03-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS03-E1",
        "SS03-E2",
        "SS03-E3",
        "SS03-E4",
        "SS03-E5"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "not_a_source_quote": true
    },
    {
      "title": "Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://repository.essex.ac.uk/42105/7/replicability.fullmanuscript.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-10078-y",
      "sourceVersion": "University of Essex accepted full manuscript, 140-page PDF; cover identifies Nature accepted version",
      "publication_date": "2026-04-01 (journal publication)",
      "version_date": "accepted manuscript; exact acceptance-file date not printed in inspected cover",
      "publication_status": "accepted manuscript of peer-reviewed Nature article; selected passages compared with final published layout in v0.5 (SS04-V05-S1), without treating versions as independent studies",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Results and Table1 manuscript pp.4–5",
        "replication criteria pp.5–7 and Fig.1",
        "effect sizes pp.8–9 and Table2",
        "Discussion pp.11–14",
        "Methods sampling/design pp.14–16"
      ],
      "access": "open_institutional_accepted_manuscript_fulltext_pdf",
      "independence_group": "SCORE_REPLICATION_274_CLAIMS_164_PAPERS",
      "license": "Repository cover allows access but does not confirm broad reuse; no full-text redistribution. Original paraphrases and URLs only.",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "complete 140-page accepted-manuscript package",
        "each individual replication report and raw data",
        "complete final publisher layout and all 106 pages of official SI; only named relevant passages were read under SS04-V05-S1/S2"
      ],
      "id": "SS04-S1",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences",
      "text": "Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending",
      "v05_update": {
        "gap_ids": [
          "SS04-G01"
        ],
        "new_source_ids": [
          "SS04-V05-S1",
          "SS04-V05-S2"
        ],
        "new_evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-V05-E1"
        ],
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "scope": "Only the explicitly changed reading/version boundary is updated; baseline substantive claims and prior review are preserved."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-E1",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "统计单位影响重复比例：原文依据",
      "text": "同模式且显著的主张为151/274=55.1%（95%CI49.2–60.9）；每篇论文逆权重后为80.8/164=49.3%（43.8–54.7）。",
      "source_id": "SS04-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://repository.essex.ac.uk/42105/7/replicability.fullmanuscript.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "University of Essex accepted full manuscript, 140-page PDF; cover identifies Nature accepted version",
      "preciseLocator": "Accepted manuscript p.5, Evaluating the replication outcome against the null hypothesis of no effect, weighted and unweighted paragraphs",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-P1",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "统计单位影响重复比例：必要前提",
      "text": "同论文多个主张的相关性及每篇权重须明确；分子80.8是加权值而非小数篇实物。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS04-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Accepted manuscript p.5, Evaluating the replication outcome against the null hypothesis of no effect, weighted and unweighted paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-L1",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "统计单位影响重复比例：边界",
      "text": "只入选有正统计主张的论文，未覆盖定性研究或零结果；本轮没有重新计算置信区间。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS04-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Accepted manuscript p.5, Evaluating the replication outcome against the null hypothesis of no effect, weighted and unweighted paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-C1",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "统计单位影响重复比例",
      "text": "55.1%与49.3%对应不同加权单位，不能任选其一作为全部社科的真理比例。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS04-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "SS04-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "SS04-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "2009–2018特定期刊、完成的274项主张",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "改变抽样框或权重、纳入未完成项目可改变比率。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-E2",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "成功标准不是唯一刻度：原文依据",
      "text": "13种二元判据给28.6%到74.8%，不是每种都适用于所有研究；合并原研究与重复的meta判据也包含原正结果。",
      "source_id": "SS04-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://repository.essex.ac.uk/42105/7/replicability.fullmanuscript.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "University of Essex accepted full manuscript, 140-page PDF; cover identifies Nature accepted version",
      "preciseLocator": "pp.6–7, Evaluating replication success with a variety of binary assessments; Fig.1; Discussion Assessing replicability p.12",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-P2",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "成功标准不是唯一刻度：必要前提",
      "text": "先问关注方向、显著性、精确效应还是累积证据；原结果参与的合并检验并非独立测试。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS04-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "pp.6–7, Evaluating replication success with a variety of binary assessments; Fig.1; Discussion Assessing replicability p.12",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-L2",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "成功标准不是唯一刻度：边界",
      "text": "文章没有指定全领域唯一最佳判据；不能把所有率平均成成熟度分数。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS04-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "pp.6–7, Evaluating replication success with a variety of binary assessments; Fig.1; Discussion Assessing replicability p.12",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-C2",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "成功标准不是唯一刻度",
      "text": "不同重复率部分来自判据、假设和可评子样本差异；最高比例不能当独立重复最强证据。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS04-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "SS04-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "SS04-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "所检验的13种指标及适用研究",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "同一子样本上的判据比较、预设决策目标与测量研究。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-E3",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "效应减小与显著性分开：原文依据",
      "text": "可转Pearson r的加权论文中，原中位效应0.25、重复0.10；Table2限定157论文/249主张子集。",
      "source_id": "SS04-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://repository.essex.ac.uk/42105/7/replicability.fullmanuscript.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "University of Essex accepted full manuscript, 140-page PDF; cover identifies Nature accepted version",
      "preciseLocator": "pp.8–9 Evaluating replication effect size against original effect size; Fig.3 and Table2",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-P3",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "效应减小与显著性分开：必要前提",
      "text": "r转换和合并主张的规则成立；这是指定可转换子样本的中位数。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS04-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "pp.8–9 Evaluating replication effect size against original effect size; Fig.3 and Table2",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-L3",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "效应减小与显著性分开：边界",
      "text": "不同研究的中位效应差不是每条原结论夸大相同比例；正结果入选带来回归均值。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS04-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "pp.8–9 Evaluating replication effect size against original effect size; Fig.3 and Table2",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-C3",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "效应减小与显著性分开",
      "text": "重复资料总体倾向更小效应，不能只用显著/不显著叙述结果差异。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS04-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "SS04-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "SS04-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "具有可转换r的157论文及249主张",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原研究选择机制及潜在真实效应分布的联合建模、再重复。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-E4",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "完成样本失去完全随机性：原文依据",
      "text": "初始3900论文跨62期刊分层抽样，1500有资格；匹配研究队时受可行性、资源和专长选择。27项复用原数据的混合重复排除主分析。",
      "source_id": "SS04-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://repository.essex.ac.uk/42105/7/replicability.fullmanuscript.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "University of Essex accepted full manuscript, 140-page PDF; cover identifies Nature accepted version",
      "preciseLocator": "Methods Sampling frame and selection of claims for replication, pp.14–16; Table1; Constraints on generalizability pp.13–14",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-P4",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "完成样本失去完全随机性：必要前提",
      "text": "区分抽样、匹配、启动、完成各阶段，独立新资料和原资料混合也须区分。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS04-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Methods Sampling frame and selection of claims for replication, pp.14–16; Table1; Constraints on generalizability pp.13–14",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-L4",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "完成样本失去完全随机性：边界",
      "text": "可行性选择方向未知，不能凭直觉断言总体真正重复率必然更高或更低。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS04-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Methods Sampling frame and selection of claims for replication, pp.14–16; Table1; Constraints on generalizability pp.13–14",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-C4",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "完成样本失去完全随机性",
      "text": "随机抽取候选不使最终完成样本自动代表全部社会行为研究。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS04-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "SS04-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "SS04-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "SCORE本项目流程及独立性定义",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "未匹配和未完成项目的透明分析及新抽样框。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-E5",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "重复不等于解释有效：原文依据",
      "text": "Discussion说明失败可能来自抽样、未识别情境调节或执行问题；成功也可能共享混杂或测量缺陷。",
      "source_id": "SS04-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://repository.essex.ac.uk/42105/7/replicability.fullmanuscript.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "University of Essex accepted full manuscript, 140-page PDF; cover identifies Nature accepted version",
      "preciseLocator": "Discussion Understanding replicability, p.13, paragraphs Failure to replicate and Successful replication",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-P5",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "重复不等于解释有效：必要前提",
      "text": "观测结果、构念测量、因果识别和跨情境推广属于不同检查。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS04-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Discussion Understanding replicability, p.13, paragraphs Failure to replicate and Successful replication",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-L5",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "重复不等于解释有效：边界",
      "text": "这是文章阐明的方法论边界，不替任何具体失败研究免责；个案需要具体诊断。",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS04-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Discussion Understanding replicability, p.13, paragraphs Failure to replicate and Successful replication",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-C5",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "重复不等于解释有效",
      "text": "单次失败不证明原结论错误，单次成功也不证明对效应的因果或理论解释成立。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS04-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "SS04-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "SS04-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "重复研究结果的解释规则",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "多方法、多情境和机制证据共同约束某个具体主张。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-Q1",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "编辑综合的开放问题",
      "text": "如何区分不可靠发现、较小真实效应和情境调节，并建立适合研究目的的重复及推广标准？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS04-E1",
        "SS04-E2",
        "SS04-E3",
        "SS04-E4",
        "SS04-E5"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "not_a_source_quote": true
    },
    {
      "title": "Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, 590 U.S. 644 (2020)",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/590us2r44_6kgn.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "official U.S. Reports preliminary print, 590 U.S.644–805, PDF",
      "publication_date": "2020-06-15",
      "publication_status": "official Supreme Court majority and dissenting opinions; preliminary print",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Syllabus pp.644–647 (orientation only)",
        "Court opinion II.A pp.654–659 and II.B pp.659–662",
        "Court opinion pp.674–676 on phrasal meaning",
        "Kavanaugh dissent I pp.783–790"
      ],
      "access": "official_primary_formal_fulltext_pdf",
      "independence_group": "BOSTOCK_2020_SAME_CASE_RECORD",
      "license": "Official US judicial opinion; no source reproduction used beyond original paraphrase.",
      "text": "2020制度决定与解释争论的原始记录，不作为2026全部现行相关法律核查。",
      "id": "LW01-S1",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, 590 U.S. 644 (2020)",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "all cited studies",
        "raw data and executable analysis"
      ]
    },
    {
      "title": "Against ‘Legal Facts’",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-law-and-jurisprudence/article/against-legal-facts/DF9402D8DC897258103C788ADEFD5047",
      "sourceVersion": "Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence39(1):68–104 (2026), publisher HTML",
      "publication_date": "2026-02-23",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed original legal-philosophical argument",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "1 Introduction",
        "2.1 and 2.2 Varieties of legal facts",
        "3 opening and 3.1 membership versus formulations",
        "4.2 and 4.2.1 discretion"
      ],
      "access": "open_fulltext_html",
      "independence_group": "CARPENTIER_2026_ORIGINAL_ARGUMENT",
      "license": "CC BY4.0 explicitly displayed",
      "id": "LW01-S2",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Against ‘Legal Facts’",
      "text": "Against ‘Legal Facts’",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "all cited studies",
        "raw data and executable analysis"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-E1",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "有约束力决定的历史内容：原文依据",
      "text": "法院多数意见按Title VII个体与but-for标准解释因性别作出的解雇，判定仅因同性恋或跨性别身份解雇违反该条；不同上诉裁判分别被维持或撤销发回。",
      "source_id": "LW01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/590us2r44_6kgn.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "official U.S. Reports preliminary print, 590 U.S.644–805, PDF",
      "preciseLocator": "official printed pp.654–662, Court opinion II.A–B; disposition p.683; syllabus disposition p.647",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-P1",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "有约束力决定的历史内容：必要前提",
      "text": "须固定法域、法条、裁判日期、程序及多数意见身份；syllabus不替代正式多数理由。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "official printed pp.654–662, Court opinion II.A–B; disposition p.683; syllabus disposition p.647",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-L1",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "有约束力决定的历史内容：边界",
      "text": "不将本案扩大为所有性别政策、全部法律或2026效力更新；此卡非个案法律建议。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "official printed pp.654–662, Court opinion II.A–B; disposition p.683; syllabus disposition p.647",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-C1",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "有约束力决定的历史内容",
      "text": "Bostock记录2020最高法院对该Title VII问题的制度决定。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "formal institutional record, not experimental measurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LW01-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LW01-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "美国最高法院2020年本案Title VII裁判",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "后续有权裁判、法条修订或范围争论需另立现行法更新任务。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-E2",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "多数意见的因果解释：原文依据",
      "text": "II.A pp.656–657说明有多个but-for原因时性别不必是唯一原因；II.B用改变个人性别且其余不变的例子展开。",
      "source_id": "LW01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/590us2r44_6kgn.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "official U.S. Reports preliminary print, 590 U.S.644–805, PDF",
      "preciseLocator": "Court opinion II.A printed pp.656–657; II.B pp.659–662",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-P2",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "多数意见的因果解释：必要前提",
      "text": "法律的but-for测试和法条所关切个体单位成立；现实案情认定另需证据。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Court opinion II.A printed pp.656–657; II.B pp.659–662",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-L2",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "多数意见的因果解释：边界",
      "text": "准确复述判决理由不等于本项目证明其为唯一哲学上正确解释。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Court opinion II.A printed pp.656–657; II.B pp.659–662",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-C2",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "多数意见的因果解释",
      "text": "多数意见把个体反事实比较与法定文本联系起来，这是法律解释论证而非对真实雇佣行为的统计因果估计。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "source-attributed legal interpretive argument",
      "normative": true,
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LW01-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LW01-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "多数法官陈述的文本及判例推理",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "更精确的文本、判例或反例分析可改变论证评价。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-E3",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "异议争论语言分析单位：原文依据",
      "text": "Kavanaugh I强调词组通常含义而非单词字面拼合，并以法治可预见性和民主问责支持；多数在pp.674–676也承认词组可能异于单字但认为本案不适用。",
      "source_id": "LW01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/590us2r44_6kgn.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "official U.S. Reports preliminary print, 590 U.S.644–805, PDF",
      "preciseLocator": "Kavanaugh dissent printed pp.783–790, especially pp.784–789; Court opinion pp.674–676",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-P3",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "异议争论语言分析单位：必要前提",
      "text": "两套论证需各按自己的前提和反例比较；描述争议与采纳异议应区分。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Kavanaugh dissent printed pp.783–790, especially pp.784–789; Court opinion pp.674–676",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-L3",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "异议争论语言分析单位：边界",
      "text": "异议不具有多数裁判的决定地位；言语直觉本身不是完整的语料测量研究。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Kavanaugh dissent printed pp.783–790, especially pp.784–789; Court opinion pp.674–676",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-C3",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "异议争论语言分析单位",
      "text": "本案争议部分在如何识别词组的通常含义及其规范理由，不能简化为一方读文本、另一方完全不读文本。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": true,
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LW01-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LW01-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "2020多数及Kavanaugh异议的解释性争论",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "历史语用材料和对论证的明确反例，而不是单纯引用票数。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-E4",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "法律事实类别需要拆开：原文依据",
      "text": "2.1列八种命题，区分法律体系、规范归属、规范表达、规范内容和具体应然；2.2的假设例子展示知道规则属于体系不等于掌握其精确内容。",
      "source_id": "LW01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-law-and-jurisprudence/article/against-legal-facts/DF9402D8DC897258103C788ADEFD5047",
      "sourceVersion": "Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence39(1):68–104 (2026), publisher HTML",
      "preciseLocator": "2.1 Facts about law, propositions(1)–(8); 2.2 membership/content discussion ending at author disclaimer before section3",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-P4",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "法律事实类别需要拆开：必要前提",
      "text": "接受其规范个体化和概念区分，才能接受进一步反对笼统法律事实框架的论证。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2.1 Facts about law, propositions(1)–(8); 2.2 membership/content discussion ending at author disclaimer before section3",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-L4",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "法律事实类别需要拆开：边界",
      "text": "这是作者原创立场；不是司法裁决、经验事实或法学界共识。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "2.1 Facts about law, propositions(1)–(8); 2.2 membership/content discussion ending at author disclaimer before section3",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-C4",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "法律事实类别需要拆开",
      "text": "Carpentier主张规则归属与内容可区分，并明确承认这不是所有实证主义者共享的划分。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "faithful account of author's conceptual argument",
      "normative": true,
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LW01-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LW01-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "2026文章自己的论证文本",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "竞争概念方案、反例及作者回应可能改变此划分的说服力。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-E5",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "道德理由与制度成立不同：原文依据",
      "text": "4.2.1讨论裁量：法官采用道德理由可能是在应用既有规范，也可能是形成新规范的背景，不能省略两者差别。",
      "source_id": "LW01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-law-and-jurisprudence/article/against-legal-facts/DF9402D8DC897258103C788ADEFD5047",
      "sourceVersion": "Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence39(1):68–104 (2026), publisher HTML",
      "preciseLocator": "4.2.1 Discretion, paragraphs beginning Roughly speaking, If a moral argument, and The same goes for judicial law-making",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-P5",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "道德理由与制度成立不同：必要前提",
      "text": "区分理由、制度生成事实、既有规则适用以及价值正当化。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "4.2.1 Discretion, paragraphs beginning Roughly speaking, If a moral argument, and The same goes for judicial law-making",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-L5",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "道德理由与制度成立不同：边界",
      "text": "这是争论中的论证，不证明 Carpentier 已驳倒 Greenberg、Plunkett 或所有 grounding 理论。v0.5 已补读 Greenberg 2004 与 Plunkett 2012 的指定论证段落，分别按其作者归属新增命题；仍未完整复审两文或裁决争论。",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-S2",
        "LW01-V05-S1",
        "LW01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-E5",
        "LW01-V05-E1",
        "LW01-V05-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "4.2.1 Discretion, paragraphs beginning Roughly speaking, If a moral argument, and The same goes for judicial law-making | Greenberg pp.164–165,173,178–180,187–189,197–198; Plunkett pp.199–203, especially p.201",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary",
      "v05_update": {
        "gap_ids": [
          "LW01-G01",
          "LW01-G02"
        ],
        "new_source_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-S1",
          "LW01-V05-S2"
        ],
        "new_evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-E1",
          "LW01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "scope": "Only the explicitly changed reading/version boundary is updated; baseline substantive claims and prior review are preserved."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-C5",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "道德理由与制度成立不同",
      "text": "按作者的论证，道德论证参与裁判不自动决定法律内容的形而上根据，也不能独自证明制度正当性。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": true,
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LW01-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LW01-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "Carpentier2026裁量章节，不外推所有法传统",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "针对其裁量例子与区分的直接回应及竞争解释。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-Q1",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "编辑综合的开放问题",
      "text": "怎样分别论证法律的制度成立、具体内容、裁判效果及正当性，并检验文本、先例和价值理由在其中的作用？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-S1",
        "LW01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-E1",
        "LW01-E2",
        "LW01-E3",
        "LW01-E4",
        "LW01-E5"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "not_a_source_quote": true
    },
    {
      "title": "A weakly structured stem for human origins in Africa",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://apragsdale.github.io/african-structure-paper/_downloads/98deb932360076cb8d052781c1cc2138/paper.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06055-y",
      "sourceVersion": "author-hosted 14-page manuscript; title/author identity matches 2023 Nature paper; manuscript exact revision date not printed",
      "publication_date": "2023-05-17 (journal work)",
      "publication_status": "author manuscript of peer-reviewed work; final layout not read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Results and sampling pp.2–3",
        "A weakly structured stem and Table1 pp.3–5",
        "Reconciling lines of genetic evidence p.5",
        "Discussion and Contrasting ancestral structure pp.6–8"
      ],
      "access": "open_author_hosted_primary_fulltext_pdf",
      "independence_group": "HUMAN_ORIGINS_SHARED_1000GP_GENOMES_PARTIAL_OVERLAP",
      "license": "2023-07-17 publisher correction changes journal licence from CC BY to exclusive licence; no broad manuscript reuse assumed. Links/paraphrases only.",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "supplementary data and simulations",
        "2017 Jebel Irhoud original fossil paper",
        "current restricted genomic data"
      ],
      "id": "HU01-S1",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "A weakly structured stem for human origins in Africa",
      "text": "A weakly structured stem for human origins in Africa",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "title": "A structured coalescent model reveals deep ancestral structure shared by all modern humans",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/api/core/bitstreams/da430a5f-bc49-4527-aa16-7083680e3489/content",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-025-02117-1",
      "sourceVersion": "Cambridge author manuscript, 27-page line-numbered PDF",
      "publication_date": "2025-03-18 (journal work)",
      "publication_status": "author manuscript of peer-reviewed Nature Genetics57:856–864 work",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Results lines57–135 pp.3–4",
        "Inference on human data lines137–179 p.5",
        "Discussion lines273–342 pp.8–9",
        "Methods model-fitting lines754–770 p.21"
      ],
      "access": "open_author_institution_fulltext_pdf",
      "independence_group": "HUMAN_ORIGINS_SHARED_1000GP_GENOMES_PARTIAL_OVERLAP",
      "license": "Author applies CC BY to accepted-manuscript version, stated lines351–352.",
      "id": "HU01-S2",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "A structured coalescent model reveals deep ancestral structure shared by all modern humans",
      "text": "A structured coalescent model reveals deep ancestral structure shared by all modern humans",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "all cited studies",
        "raw data and executable analysis"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-E1",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "现代样本与模型的对应：原文依据",
      "text": "2023作者稿用多个非洲群体、英国样本和Vindija尼安德特基因组计算单位点及双位点统计，再拟合群体分裂、规模、迁移和混合。",
      "source_id": "HU01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://apragsdale.github.io/african-structure-paper/_downloads/98deb932360076cb8d052781c1cc2138/paper.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "author-hosted 14-page manuscript; title/author identity matches 2023 Nature paper; manuscript exact revision date not printed",
      "preciseLocator": "author manuscript Results opening, p.2; Introduction four classes of models pp.1–2",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-P1",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "现代样本与模型的对应：必要前提",
      "text": "所选群体、统计量、重组与时间标定能约束候选模型；采样覆盖仍有限。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "author manuscript Results opening, p.2; Introduction four classes of models pp.1–2",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-L1",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "现代样本与模型的对应：边界",
      "text": "缺乏同时代非洲古DNA；现存群体不能直接等同于稳定古代stem。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "author manuscript Results opening, p.2; Introduction four classes of models pp.1–2",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-C1",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "现代样本与模型的对应",
      "text": "弱结构祖先史是对现存及有限古基因资料的条件重建，不是直接观察数十万年前的群体。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU01-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU01-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "2023作者稿的四非洲群体及辅助样本",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "更均匀地理样本、早期非洲古DNA/蛋白及独立校时。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-E2",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "迁移改善指定模型拟合：原文依据",
      "text": "Table1与正文比较有/无stem间迁移；连续迁移和多次合并模型均可较好描述数据，参数与拓扑依赖模型。",
      "source_id": "HU01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://apragsdale.github.io/african-structure-paper/_downloads/98deb932360076cb8d052781c1cc2138/paper.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "author-hosted 14-page manuscript; title/author identity matches 2023 Nature paper; manuscript exact revision date not printed",
      "preciseLocator": "A weakly structured stem within Africa pp.3–4, Table1 and following paragraphs",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-P2",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "迁移改善指定模型拟合：必要前提",
      "text": "比较限定所测试模型族及似然统计；拟合优势不是对全部可能历史的穷尽证明。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "A weakly structured stem within Africa pp.3–4, Table1 and following paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-L2",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "迁移改善指定模型拟合：边界",
      "text": "同一批基因统计不能算多次独立复制；作者仍允许结构与古人类混合并存的更复杂模型。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "A weakly structured stem within Africa pp.3–4, Table1 and following paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-C2",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "迁移改善指定模型拟合",
      "text": "允许长期基因交流能改善这些候选模型的拟合；不需要把所有信号都归于长期完全隔离的古人类混入。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU01-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU01-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "该作者稿指定候选模型比较",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "替代模型在独立统计或新样本预测更好，可改变相对偏好。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-E3",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "模型内区间小不等于历史确定：原文依据",
      "text": "作者明确模型假设比bootstrap区间更影响参数；Discussion列分裂、迁移、规模混淆及新增stem/混合模型可能。",
      "source_id": "HU01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://apragsdale.github.io/african-structure-paper/_downloads/98deb932360076cb8d052781c1cc2138/paper.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "author-hosted 14-page manuscript; title/author identity matches 2023 Nature paper; manuscript exact revision date not printed",
      "preciseLocator": "p.3 A weakly structured stem, confidence-interval paragraph; Discussion p.6 opening two paragraphs",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-P3",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "模型内区间小不等于历史确定：必要前提",
      "text": "参数、模型和资料不足三层不确定性须分开，地理对应在文中有推测标签。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "p.3 A weakly structured stem, confidence-interval paragraph; Discussion p.6 opening two paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-L3",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "模型内区间小不等于历史确定：边界",
      "text": "本轮不据遗传模型裁决化石分类、形态或文化史；已补读2017化石及定年原文指定段落，但未独立重验形态或定年。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-S1",
        "HU01-V05-S3",
        "HU01-V05-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-E3",
        "HU01-V05-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "p.3 A weakly structured stem, confidence-interval paragraph; Discussion p.6 opening two paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-C3",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "模型内区间小不等于历史确定",
      "text": "不能把模型内较窄区间或某一分裂时间画成人类唯一出生时间与发源地。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-S1",
        "HU01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-E3",
        "HU01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU01-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU01-L3",
        "HU01-V05-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "深历史时间和地理解释的边界",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "多模型共同预测、可靠独立定年及新化石古分子资料。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-E4",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "2025方法给另一结构方案：原文依据",
      "text": "cobraa利用相邻共祖时间转换信息，在26个1000GP个体及HGDP比较结构与泛交模型；作者稿给约1.5Ma分离、约290ka混合及79/21祖源比例。",
      "source_id": "HU01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/api/core/bitstreams/da430a5f-bc49-4527-aa16-7083680e3489/content",
      "sourceVersion": "Cambridge author manuscript, 27-page line-numbered PDF",
      "preciseLocator": "Results Identifiability lines57–82 pp.3; Inference on human data lines137–170 p.5; Fig.4 caption pp.11–12",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-P4",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "2025方法给另一结构方案：必要前提",
      "text": "B群体规模固定、分离间隔隔离、离散时间及突变/代际标定；参数数目与拟合需共同考虑。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results Identifiability lines57–82 pp.3; Inference on human data lines137–170 p.5; Fig.4 caption pp.11–12",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-L4",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "2025方法给另一结构方案：边界",
      "text": "1000GP与先前研究部分复用；不是独立化石证实的固定80/20起源故事。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results Identifiability lines57–82 pp.3; Inference on human data lines137–170 p.5; Fig.4 caption pp.11–12",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-C4",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "2025方法给另一结构方案",
      "text": "2025研究提供另一种数据支持的祖先结构参数化，仍是指定HMM和脉冲历史下的估计。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-S2",
        "HU01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-E4",
        "HU01-V05-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU01-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU01-L4",
        "HU01-V05-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "2025作者稿cob​​raa模型与数据（去除零宽字符不影响方法名）",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "允许持续迁移、多次混合及变动B规模后比较预测与可辨识性。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-E5",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "新方案未消除模型分歧：原文依据",
      "text": "Discussion直接比较Ragsdale：其持续基因流与近约100–120ka合并，和cobraa隔离后约300ka混合不同；作者承认多次事件或持续交流不能排除。",
      "source_id": "HU01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/api/core/bitstreams/da430a5f-bc49-4527-aa16-7083680e3489/content",
      "sourceVersion": "Cambridge author manuscript, 27-page line-numbered PDF",
      "preciseLocator": "Discussion lines289–299 p.8 and caveats lines321–342 p.9",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-P5",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "新方案未消除模型分歧：必要前提",
      "text": "需比较模型允许什么，而不能只比较某个数值；不同方法的共享数据限制独立性。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Discussion lines289–299 p.8 and caveats lines321–342 p.9",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-L5",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "新方案未消除模型分歧：边界",
      "text": "相异结果不是自动互相否定；原文将差异可能归于模型空间，尚无本轮独立裁决。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Discussion lines289–299 p.8 and caveats lines321–342 p.9",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-C5",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "新方案未消除模型分歧",
      "text": "两项工作共同反对过简泛交史，但并未对交换时机、持续性及古人类对应取得唯一答案。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-S2",
        "HU01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-E5",
        "HU01-V05-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU01-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU01-L5",
        "HU01-V05-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "2023/2025的明确方法比较",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "统一数据与模拟、共同模型空间及新古基因资料的交叉检验。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-Q1",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "编辑综合的开放问题",
      "text": "非洲祖先群体如何分合并交流，哪些模型能被独立遗传、化石和定年证据区分，形态及文化事件又如何对应？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-S1",
        "HU01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-E1",
        "HU01-E2",
        "HU01-E3",
        "HU01-E4",
        "HU01-E5"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "not_a_source_quote": true
    },
    {
      "title": "IE-CoR: Indo-European Cognate Relationships database documentation",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://iecor.clld.org/",
      "metadataUrl": "https://paulheggarty.info/ieutest/",
      "sourceVersion": "rendered 2026-10-04; application source f98c9f0 exposed; database content revision not specified",
      "publication_date": "2023 associated Science publication; documentation update date not stated",
      "publication_status": "primary research database and author-maintained documentation",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "What are Cognate Relationships?",
        "The IE-CoR Database System",
        "IE-CoR: for the Indo-European family; all landing-page explanatory paragraphs"
      ],
      "access": "open_primary_database_documentation_html",
      "independence_group": "IECOR_SHARED_LEXICAL_DATA_AND_CRITICAL_REANALYSIS",
      "dependency_note": "S2作者独立评价，但复用同一IE-CoR词表，不能计作新独立语言采样。",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "all individual lexical records and coding histories",
        "2023 Science complete article and supplement",
        "database executable phylogenetic analyses"
      ],
      "id": "HU02-S1",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "IE-CoR: Indo-European Cognate Relationships database documentation",
      "text": "IE-CoR: Indo-European Cognate Relationships database documentation",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending",
      "license": "No general reuse permission verified; preserve links and original paraphrases only; do not redistribute source full text."
    },
    {
      "title": "Do ‘language trees with sampled ancestors’ really support a ‘hybrid model’ for the origin of Indo-European? Thoughts on the most recent attempt at yet another IE phylogeny",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-025-04986-7",
      "sourceVersion": "published HTML; Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 12, article 682 (2025)",
      "publication_date": "2025-05-16",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed original critical analysis",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Introduction",
        "Dataset (IE-CoR), selection paragraph and Standard Bulgarian, Hittite, Gothic, Peloponnese Tsakonian Greek and Kashmiri subsections",
        "Genealogical tree opening methodological paragraphs",
        "2026-10-04 additional reading: Genealogical tree; Discussion and conclusions, including MRC reconstruction and shared posterior-tree dependence"
      ],
      "access": "open_publisher_primary_fulltext_html",
      "independence_group": "IECOR_SHARED_LEXICAL_DATA_AND_CRITICAL_REANALYSIS",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "independent recoding or historical-linguistic adjudication of every disputed item",
        "all references and supplementary datasets"
      ],
      "id": "HU02-S2",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Do ‘language trees with sampled ancestors’ really support a ‘hybrid model’ for the origin of Indo-European? Thoughts on the most recent attempt at yet another IE phylogeny",
      "text": "Do ‘language trees with sampled ancestors’ really support a ‘hybrid model’ for the origin of Indo-European? Thoughts on the most recent attempt at yet another IE phylogeny",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against baseline named sections plus specified v0.5 Genealogical tree and Discussion passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "v05_named_additional_passages_audited; no independent lexical adjudication or tree rerun"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending",
      "license": "No general reuse permission verified; preserve links and original paraphrases only; do not redistribute source full text.",
      "prior_review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "title": "The genetic origin of the Indo-Europeans",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://reich.hms.harvard.edu/sites/reich.hms.harvard.edu/files/inline-files/2025_LazaridisPattersonAnthonyVyazov_IndoEuropean_Nature_0.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08531-5",
      "sourceVersion": "author-laboratory hosted publisher early-online PDF, printed online pages 1 onward; do not substitute final volume pages 132–142 for these locators",
      "publication_date": "2025-02-05",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed Nature work; 2025-02-20 correction adds an author affiliation",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "online p.2 sampling and Three pre-Bronze Age genetic clines",
        "online p.6 CLV impact in Armenia and Anatolia",
        "online p.8 The origin of Indo-Anatolian languages",
        "online p.9 final two columns comparing eastern/western routes"
      ],
      "access": "open_author_hosted_primary_fulltext_pdf; public direct download and local text extraction",
      "independence_group": "LAZARIDIS_2025_EURASIAN_ANCIENT_DNA_WITH_COMPANION_DATA_OVERLAP",
      "dependency_note": "435人中一部分在伴随论文正式发表，不能与伴随数据视作全部独立复制。",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "complete supplementary information and individual sequence data",
        "qpAdm reproduction",
        "full revised publisher layout after affiliation correction"
      ],
      "id": "HU02-S3",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "The genetic origin of the Indo-Europeans",
      "text": "The genetic origin of the Indo-Europeans",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending",
      "license": "No general reuse permission verified; preserve links and original paraphrases only; do not redistribute source full text."
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-E1",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "同源词编码是特定观测层：原文依据",
      "text": "IE-CoR说明把词根的历史同源关系与词汇替换问题区分，系统支持不同层次的同源信息；以Jena170概念表汇合既有词表，并收录语言形式、转写和相关注释。",
      "source_id": "HU02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://iecor.clld.org/",
      "sourceVersion": "rendered 2026-10-04; application source f98c9f0 exposed; database content revision not specified",
      "preciseLocator": "IE-CoR landing page: What are Cognate Relationships? paragraphs 1–3; The IE-CoR Database System; IE-CoR: for the Indo-European family",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-P1",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "同源词编码是特定观测层：必要前提",
      "text": "概念选择、词项取舍、借词识别和同源编码必须可检查，才能把其用作谱系推断输入。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "IE-CoR landing page: What are Cognate Relationships? paragraphs 1–3; The IE-CoR Database System; IE-CoR: for the Indo-European family",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-L1",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "同源词编码是特定观测层：边界",
      "text": "本轮未逐项审计全部词表；官方数据库说明也不能代替2023论文的定年模型与先验核验。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "IE-CoR landing page: What are Cognate Relationships? paragraphs 1–3; The IE-CoR Database System; IE-CoR: for the Indo-European family",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-C1",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "同源词编码是特定观测层",
      "text": "词汇数据库记录的是经语言学判断的形式与同源关系，不是人口移动、文化身份或语言年代的直接读数。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU02-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU02-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "IE-CoR的公开操作定义和数据组织",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "公开版本化编码、不同专家复核和树/接触网络敏感性分析。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-E2",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "2025批评针对可定位的编码选择：原文依据",
      "text": "Kassian与Starostin说明按自己的专长抽查161个词表中的5个，总体肯定词汇资料质量；同时在Gothic的同义词取舍以及Tsakonian、Kashmiri的借词/继承分类提出具体反例。",
      "source_id": "HU02-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-025-04986-7",
      "sourceVersion": "published HTML; Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 12, article 682 (2025)",
      "preciseLocator": "Dataset (IE-CoR): paragraph beginning Relying on our own expertise; Standard Bulgarian, Hittite, Gothic, Peloponnese Tsakonian Greek and Kashmiri subsections",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-P2",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "2025批评针对可定位的编码选择：必要前提",
      "text": "抽查按专长选取而非随机；批评者的语源判断本身也须接受学科核查。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Dataset (IE-CoR): paragraph beginning Relying on our own expertise; Standard Bulgarian, Hittite, Gothic, Peloponnese Tsakonian Greek and Kashmiri subsections",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-L2",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "2025批评针对可定位的编码选择：边界",
      "text": "5个词表不是161个词表的代表性统计样本；本卡不裁定每一争议词源，也不把重复使用同一数据算独立复制。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Dataset (IE-CoR): paragraph beginning Relying on our own expertise; Standard Bulgarian, Hittite, Gothic, Peloponnese Tsakonian Greek and Kashmiri subsections",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-C2",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "2025批评针对可定位的编码选择",
      "text": "2025批评列出词项争议并质疑拓扑与年代；结论承认输入数据已明显改善。它重用原后验树，足以要求敏感性检验，但不是全库错误率估计、独立采样复制或已经推翻整个家族树。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-S2",
        "HU02-V05-S1",
        "HU02-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-E2",
        "HU02-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU02-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU02-L2",
        "HU02-V05-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "作者实际抽查的5个语言词表及其论证",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "双方公开逐项回应、修订编码后重跑、由独立语言专家评议反例。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-E3",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "古DNA样本和模型比较的单位：原文依据",
      "text": "原文报告367个新增个体并提升68个个体数据质量，共435；本文正式报告其中291与63，其余属伴随研究；超过80%来自俄罗斯。p.2说明以qpWave/qpAdm比较候选混合来源，先对外群过滤，再在候选来源间竞争。",
      "source_id": "HU02-S3",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://reich.hms.harvard.edu/sites/reich.hms.harvard.edu/files/inline-files/2025_LazaridisPattersonAnthonyVyazov_IndoEuropean_Nature_0.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "author-laboratory hosted publisher early-online PDF, printed online pages 1 onward; do not substitute final volume pages 132–142 for these locators",
      "preciseLocator": "publisher early-online PDF p.2, paragraph beginning We present a genetic analysis; Three pre-Bronze Age genetic clines, qpWave/qpAdm competition paragraph",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-P3",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "古DNA样本和模型比较的单位：必要前提",
      "text": "取样时空、来源代理与遗传漂变模型可合理约束候选解释；缺失群体仍可能改变拟合。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "publisher early-online PDF p.2, paragraph beginning We present a genetic analysis; Three pre-Bronze Age genetic clines, qpWave/qpAdm competition paragraph",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-L3",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "古DNA样本和模型比较的单位：边界",
      "text": "俄罗斯及特定墓地集中，伴随论文部分共用个体；PCA轴与模型来源也不等于实际稳定族群或语言共同体。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "publisher early-online PDF p.2, paragraph beginning We present a genetic analysis; Three pre-Bronze Age genetic clines, qpWave/qpAdm competition paragraph",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-C3",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "古DNA样本和模型比较的单位",
      "text": "这批古DNA能比较限定候选群体间的遗传混合历史；样本数量与模型拟合不能直接成为全欧亚迁徙人口普查。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU02-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU02-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "该2025研究的435个体分析与指定竞争框架",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "更均匀时空古DNA、未采样地区材料和独立候选模型预测检验。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-E4",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "拟合祖源不唯一指认迁徙源：原文依据",
      "text": "安纳托利亚段给多个可拟合来源方案；作者明确无法精确确定草原祖源的具体来源，并结合时间及语言分支理由排除部分统计可行解释。",
      "source_id": "HU02-S3",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://reich.hms.harvard.edu/sites/reich.hms.harvard.edu/files/inline-files/2025_LazaridisPattersonAnthonyVyazov_IndoEuropean_Nature_0.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "author-laboratory hosted publisher early-online PDF, printed online pages 1 onward; do not substitute final volume pages 132–142 for these locators",
      "preciseLocator": "publisher early-online PDF p.6, CLV impact in Armenia and Anatolia, paragraphs beginning We show that Central Anatolians and The exact source of the steppe ancestry",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-P4",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "拟合祖源不唯一指认迁徙源：必要前提",
      "text": "年代约束、模型适配与语言学推断须分项呈现；统计适配不能替代时间先后。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "publisher early-online PDF p.6, CLV impact in Armenia and Anatolia, paragraphs beginning We show that Central Anatolians and The exact source of the steppe ancestry",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-L4",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "拟合祖源不唯一指认迁徙源：边界",
      "text": "来源代理不是实际祖先的身份证；正文承认源群体不确定，语言身份在个体层面不可知。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "publisher early-online PDF p.6, CLV impact in Armenia and Anatolia, paragraphs beginning We show that Central Anatolians and The exact source of the steppe ancestry",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-C4",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "拟合祖源不唯一指认迁徙源",
      "text": "中部安纳托利亚祖源结果收窄了候选历史，却没有仅凭最佳遗传拟合唯一定位移民的实际出发群体。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU02-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU02-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "文中早青铜、亚述殖民与古赫梯时期的中部安纳托利亚样本",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "迁徙路径上更早、连续样本及独立年代和铭文材料。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-E5",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "语言传播仍需要跨证据桥梁：原文依据",
      "text": "p.8把共同CLV祖源联系到原始印欧—安纳托利亚语时，显式保留早期无混合语言转移的例外，也说不能辨认最初说前印欧—安纳托利亚语的人；p.9承认绕过本地人或海路可解释没有欧洲祖源。",
      "source_id": "HU02-S3",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://reich.hms.harvard.edu/sites/reich.hms.harvard.edu/files/inline-files/2025_LazaridisPattersonAnthonyVyazov_IndoEuropean_Nature_0.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "author-laboratory hosted publisher early-online PDF, printed online pages 1 onward; do not substitute final volume pages 132–142 for these locators",
      "preciseLocator": "publisher early-online PDF p.8, The origin of Indo-Anatolian languages, paragraphs beginning We use and Yamnaya and Anatolians; p.9 final two columns, Second, the attestation…",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-P5",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "语言传播仍需要跨证据桥梁：必要前提",
      "text": "须分别检验语言、基因、考古年代是否协调，并保留接触、精英转语或资料缺失等替代机制。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "publisher early-online PDF p.8, The origin of Indo-Anatolian languages, paragraphs beginning We use and Yamnaya and Anatolians; p.9 final two columns, Second, the attestation…",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-L5",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "语言传播仍需要跨证据桥梁：边界",
      "text": "作者的重建具有支持理由但非直接语言测量；没有铭文的样本不能因此获得确定语言或民族标签。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "publisher early-online PDF p.8, The origin of Indo-Anatolian languages, paragraphs beginning We use and Yamnaya and Anatolians; p.9 final two columns, Second, the attestation…",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-C5",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "语言传播仍需要跨证据桥梁",
      "text": "DNA与语言史的关联是依赖传播假设的综合解释，不能直接读出古人所说语言，也未排除所有不伴明显基因混合的转语路径。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU02-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU02-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "该文关于印欧—安纳托利亚起源和传播路线的条件解释",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "新铭文、可可靠关联的考古层位、早期路径样本及竞争传播模型。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-Q1",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "编辑综合的开放问题",
      "text": "哪些语言变化确与人口移动相连，哪些由接触、借词或转语造成；不同证据怎样在不混同祖源、语言与文化身份的前提下相互约束？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-S1",
        "HU02-S2",
        "HU02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-E1",
        "HU02-E2",
        "HU02-E3",
        "HU02-E4",
        "HU02-E5"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "not_a_source_quote": true
    },
    {
      "title": "Entwined African and Asian genetic roots of medieval peoples of the Swahili coast",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05754-w",
      "sourceVersion": "published Nature HTML main article and Methods as retrieved 2026-10-04; DOI 10.1038/s41586-023-05754-w",
      "publication_date": "2023-03-29",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed original ancient-DNA and historical study",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Main: Kilwa Chronicle and historical interpretation opening paragraphs",
        "Dataset overview",
        "Proportions of Persian and Indian ancestry",
        "Relating medieval to present-day Swahili coast peoples",
        "Discussion",
        "Methods: Inclusion and ethics statement; qpAdm ancestry modelling; Sex-biased admixture"
      ],
      "access": "open_publisher_primary_fulltext_html",
      "independence_group": "SWAHILI_2023_ANCIENT_DNA_AND_ASSOCIATED_HISTORY_STUDY",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "all supplementary tables and sequence files",
        "independent archaeological or oral-history source re-editions",
        "replication of ancestry or admixture-date estimates"
      ],
      "license": "Publisher labels open access; exact licence/reuse scope not reverified in this pass, so no fulltext or figure redistribution.",
      "id": "HU03-S1",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Entwined African and Asian genetic roots of medieval peoples of the Swahili coast",
      "text": "Entwined African and Asian genetic roots of medieval peoples of the Swahili coast",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-E1",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "墓葬资料并非全社会随机样本：原文依据",
      "text": "Dataset overview从156份骨骼样本制作179个文库，80个个体通过真实性检验；仅33人有直接放射性碳日期，其余结合考古或亲属线索。用于较高分辨率全基因组分析的54人另排除了低覆盖、近亲、污染等个体。",
      "source_id": "HU03-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05754-w",
      "sourceVersion": "published Nature HTML main article and Methods as retrieved 2026-10-04; DOI 10.1038/s41586-023-05754-w",
      "preciseLocator": "Dataset overview, first four paragraphs, including paragraphs beginning We generated and We excluded; Discussion sampling-limit paragraph",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-P1",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "墓葬资料并非全社会随机样本：必要前提",
      "text": "真实性、覆盖度与日期分配可信；墓葬选择与筛除机制需要和人口推断一起记录。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU03-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Dataset overview, first four paragraphs, including paragraphs beginning We generated and We excluded; Discussion sampling-limit paragraph",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-L1",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "墓葬资料并非全社会随机样本：边界",
      "text": "精英墓地和肯尼亚北部偏重，早期时期及其他海岸地区稀缺；海洋食物库效应也可能使碳日期偏老。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU03-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Dataset overview, first four paragraphs, including paragraphs beginning We generated and We excluded; Discussion sampling-limit paragraph",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-C1",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "墓葬资料并非全社会随机样本",
      "text": "研究重建的是入样、保存并通过筛选的特定墓葬人群；80个古个体不能代表整个斯瓦希里社会或全部世纪。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU03-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU03-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU03-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "所测沿海城镇及Makwasinyi古样本，不推广到未采样人群",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "普通人墓地、十二世纪前材料、更多海岸与内陆样本及稳健年代校正。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-E2",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "祖源标签是比较代理：原文依据",
      "text": "Dataset overview末段定义各地理时间代理群体；Proportions一节以古非洲人与现今伊朗、印度相关参考群体拟合混合。Methods说明qpAdm比较候选来源模型，而非直接观察移民自称。",
      "source_id": "HU03-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05754-w",
      "sourceVersion": "published Nature HTML main article and Methods as retrieved 2026-10-04; DOI 10.1038/s41586-023-05754-w",
      "preciseLocator": "Dataset overview final paragraph defining ancestry terminology; Proportions of Persian and Indian ancestry opening paragraphs; Methods qpAdm ancestry modelling",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-P2",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "祖源标签是比较代理：必要前提",
      "text": "代理样本与历史来源相关，但未必就是实际来源人口；合适拟合须与其他可能来源比较。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU03-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Dataset overview final paragraph defining ancestry terminology; Proportions of Persian and Indian ancestry opening paragraphs; Methods qpAdm ancestry modelling",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-L2",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "祖源标签是比较代理：边界",
      "text": "参考群体、未采样来源和模型选择都会影响解读；遗传距离并不测量文化创造、语言使用或身份认同。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU03-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Dataset overview final paragraph defining ancestry terminology; Proportions of Persian and Indian ancestry opening paragraphs; Methods qpAdm ancestry modelling",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-C2",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "祖源标签是比较代理",
      "text": "模型中的非洲、波斯或印度相关祖源是相对参考样本的遗传关系，不能直接量化文化归属或赋予某古人确定民族身份。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU03-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU03-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU03-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "本研究所定义的祖源代理与混合模型",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "更接近迁徙时空的古参考样本、替代来源比较和独立历史证据。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-E3",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "性别偏向不识别具体社会机制：原文依据",
      "text": "研究对常染色体与X染色体祖源差异建模，Methods分别写出男女贡献的线性关系，并模拟参数不确定性；Discussion明确遗传数据本身不能揭示产生这些模式的过程。",
      "source_id": "HU03-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05754-w",
      "sourceVersion": "published Nature HTML main article and Methods as retrieved 2026-10-04; DOI 10.1038/s41586-023-05754-w",
      "preciseLocator": "Methods Sex-biased admixture, equations for autosomal and X ancestry and simulation paragraph; Discussion paragraph beginning However, such genetic data cannot reveal",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-P3",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "性别偏向不识别具体社会机制：必要前提",
      "text": "X/常染色体差异可用于该混合模型的性别来源估计；须保留估计误差及人口史假设。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU03-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Methods Sex-biased admixture, equations for autosomal and X ancestry and simulation paragraph; Discussion paragraph beginning However, such genetic data cannot reveal",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-L3",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "性别偏向不识别具体社会机制：边界",
      "text": "多种社会过程可产生相似遗传格局；原文的社会历史解释需要墓葬、制度与文本材料独立支撑。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU03-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Methods Sex-biased admixture, equations for autosomal and X ancestry and simulation paragraph; Discussion paragraph beginning However, such genetic data cannot reveal",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-C3",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "性别偏向不识别具体社会机制",
      "text": "资料支持特定样本人群中亚洲相关男性与非洲相关女性贡献的偏向；单凭这个模式不能断定婚姻、奴役、强迫或具体权力关系。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU03-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU03-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU03-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "文中可估计祖源的中世纪/近世沿海样本及其模型",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "同时期社会史、亲属网络、地位相关考古及更复杂人口模型。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-E4",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "时间吻合不证实整篇起源叙事：原文依据",
      "text": "Main说明Kilwa Chronicle的传承和后期成文背景；Discussion把约公元1000年左右的非洲—波斯混合与该传统并置，同时讨论此前将外来起源等同文明来源的历史框架问题。",
      "source_id": "HU03-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05754-w",
      "sourceVersion": "published Nature HTML main article and Methods as retrieved 2026-10-04; DOI 10.1038/s41586-023-05754-w",
      "preciseLocator": "Main paragraphs on the Kilwa Chronicle and competing historical narratives; Discussion opening paragraphs on admixture around AD 1000 and Persian-related ancestry",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-P4",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "时间吻合不证实整篇起源叙事：必要前提",
      "text": "遗传混合日期、口述传统记忆与文本成书日期是不同对象，不能强行当作同一事件时间。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU03-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Main paragraphs on the Kilwa Chronicle and competing historical narratives; Discussion opening paragraphs on admixture around AD 1000 and Persian-related ancestry",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-L4",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "时间吻合不证实整篇起源叙事：边界",
      "text": "本轮没有独立校勘编年史版本；遗传支持部分历史联系，不等于认可全部叙事或外源文明论。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU03-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Main paragraphs on the Kilwa Chronicle and competing historical narratives; Discussion opening paragraphs on admixture around AD 1000 and Persian-related ancestry",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-C4",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "时间吻合不证实整篇起源叙事",
      "text": "混合时间和来源的相容性可提高某类跨海联系叙事的可信度，却不独自证实编年史每个人名、航行、精英谱系或文明起源说。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU03-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU03-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU03-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "研究对Kilwa Chronicle与古DNA相互印证的有限解释",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立文本校勘、可靠港口与贸易考古，以及可与特定事件关联的材料。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-E5",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "现代比较依赖招募与身份定义：原文依据",
      "text": "Relating medieval to present-day一节比较89名既有与93名新增现代参与者，指出招募方式与自我定义差异会改变祖源分布；Methods记录社区参与及反馈，但不是把样本当成所有人的授权。",
      "source_id": "HU03-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05754-w",
      "sourceVersion": "published Nature HTML main article and Methods as retrieved 2026-10-04; DOI 10.1038/s41586-023-05754-w",
      "preciseLocator": "Relating medieval to present-day Swahili coast peoples, paragraphs contrasting 89 previously analysed and 93 newly analysed individuals; Methods Inclusion and ethics statement",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-P5",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "现代比较依赖招募与身份定义：必要前提",
      "text": "需要区分研究中的自我认同、招募分类及遗传模型定义；社群参与程序须按项目具体核查。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU03-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Relating medieval to present-day Swahili coast peoples, paragraphs contrasting 89 previously analysed and 93 newly analysed individuals; Methods Inclusion and ethics statement",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-L5",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "现代比较依赖招募与身份定义：边界",
      "text": "参与者不是所有社群的代表；作者报告的咨询也不授权本项目重新使用个人基因数据或替人定义身份。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU03-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Relating medieval to present-day Swahili coast peoples, paragraphs contrasting 89 previously analysed and 93 newly analysed individuals; Methods Inclusion and ethics statement",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-C5",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "现代比较依赖招募与身份定义",
      "text": "古今样本差异不能自动成为当代斯瓦希里身份的真实性或纯度检验；现代招募标准和社群语境是解释的一部分。",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU03-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU03-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU03-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "该研究两个现代样本集合及报告的参与程序",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "更透明招募、社区共同解释与经授权的数据使用，可检验样本差异而不设身份纯度标准。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-Q1",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "编辑综合的开放问题",
      "text": "新遗传证据能改变哪些可检验的历史事件主张；哪些社会过程、文化意义与当代身份问题仍要由文本、考古、社区知识和明确解释理由共同约束？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU03-E1",
        "HU03-E2",
        "HU03-E3",
        "HU03-E4",
        "HU03-E5"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "not_a_source_quote": true
    },
    {
      "title": "Conjectures on World Literature",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://pdodds.w3.uvm.edu/files/papers/others/2000/moretti2000.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii1/articles/franco-moretti-conjectures-on-world-literature",
      "sourceVersion": "institutionally hosted scan/PDF of New Left Review 1 (January–February 2000), printed pp.54–68",
      "publication_date": "2000-01/02",
      "publication_status": "published original comparative-literature argument; author's text is the primary research object",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "opening pp.54–55",
        "Distant reading pp.56–58",
        "The Western European novel: rule or exception? p.58 and narrative-voice discussion pp.65–66",
        "Trees, waves and cultural history pp.66–68"
      ],
      "access": "open_institutionally_hosted_primary_article_pdf",
      "independence_group": "MORETTI_2000_WORLD_LITERATURE_ARGUMENT",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "all literary works and specialist studies cited by Moretti",
        "Arac, Anglo-Globalism?, New Left Review 16 (July–August 2002), pp.35–45: continuous full original still unread after the v0.5 bounded search; indexed fragments are not a complete argument review",
        "claim that this program is globally accepted"
      ],
      "license": "No licence or general redistribution permission observed; paraphrase and bibliographic links only.",
      "id": "AR01-S1",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Conjectures on World Literature",
      "text": "Conjectures on World Literature",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending",
      "v05_update": {
        "gap_ids": [
          "AR01-G01"
        ],
        "new_source_ids": [],
        "new_evidence_ids": [],
        "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "scope": "Only the explicitly changed reading/version boundary is updated; baseline substantive claims and prior review are preserved."
      }
    },
    {
      "title": "Too Long, Didn’t Model: Decomposing LLM Long Context Understanding With Novels",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://aclanthology.org/2026.latechclfl-1.28.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://aclanthology.org/2026.latechclfl-1.28/",
      "sourceVersion": "published SIGHUM LaTeCH-CLfL 2026 proceedings, pp.295–304, DOI 10.18653/v1/2026.latechclfl-1.28; fixed conference PDF",
      "publication_date": "2026-03",
      "publication_status": "peer-reviewed conference proceedings version",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Methods pp.296–297",
        "Evaluation p.297",
        "Table1 model list p.297 and Table2/results p.298",
        "Discussion and Limitations p.299"
      ],
      "access": "open_official_proceedings_primary_fulltext_pdf",
      "independence_group": "TLDM_40_NOVELS_EARLY2025_MODEL_RUNS",
      "version_history": "Also read arXiv 2505.14925v1 (2025-05-20); same work, not a second independent experiment. Claims below use the newer conference-page locators.",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "all released benchmark files",
        "newer-than-early-2025 model runs",
        "independent human annotation or task replication"
      ],
      "license": "arXiv v1 explicitly displays CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; do not automatically transfer that licence to every proceedings component. No source figures/fulltext redistributed.",
      "id": "AR01-S2",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Too Long, Didn’t Model: Decomposing LLM Long Context Understanding With Novels",
      "text": "Too Long, Didn’t Model: Decomposing LLM Long Context Understanding With Novels",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-E1",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "远读首先是一项研究方案：原文依据",
      "text": "Moretti在Distant reading节提出借助他人专题研究，并把分析单位移向小于或大于单部作品的形式、体裁或系统；他承认获取尺度以损失某些细节为代价。",
      "source_id": "AR01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://pdodds.w3.uvm.edu/files/papers/others/2000/moretti2000.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "institutionally hosted scan/PDF of New Left Review 1 (January–February 2000), printed pp.54–68",
      "preciseLocator": "NLR printed pp.56–58, Distant reading section; p.58 transition to The Western European novel: rule or exception?",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-P1",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "远读首先是一项研究方案：必要前提",
      "text": "研究者先说明希望解释的尺度与对象，并评估被依赖的专门研究和抽象操作。",
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AR01-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "NLR printed pp.56–58, Distant reading section; p.58 transition to The Western European novel: rule or exception?",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-L1",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "远读首先是一项研究方案：边界",
      "text": "作者的方案不能代言全部文学传统；文中的世界体系概括与个案仍需要自己的文本及史料检验。",
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AR01-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "NLR printed pp.56–58, Distant reading section; p.58 transition to The Western European novel: rule or exception?",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-C1",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "远读首先是一项研究方案",
      "text": "Moretti的论述给扩大文学研究范围提供一种可争论的方法论理由，不是已经实验证明远读普遍优于细读的定律。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "attributed methodological argument, not empirical causal finding",
      "normative": true,
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AR01-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "AR01-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "AR01-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "Moretti 2000原文的提议与自述取舍",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "比较具体研究问题、遗漏文本及竞争解释，可修正方案适用性，而非只扩大语料数。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-E2",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "规模不能替代语言与语境能力：原文依据",
      "text": "在叙述声音讨论和Trees, waves一节，Moretti承认某些形式分析需要其不具备的语言能力，强调本地文学研究者与跨尺度分析的协作；结尾仍保留不同视角间的争论。",
      "source_id": "AR01-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://pdodds.w3.uvm.edu/files/papers/others/2000/moretti2000.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "institutionally hosted scan/PDF of New Left Review 1 (January–February 2000), printed pp.54–68",
      "preciseLocator": "NLR printed pp.65–66, discussion of foreign form/local material/local narrative voice and beginning of Trees, waves and cultural history; p.68 concluding paragraphs",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-P2",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "规模不能替代语言与语境能力：必要前提",
      "text": "二手研究及翻译可用于明确问题，但其选择、误差和语境损失须公开。",
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AR01-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "NLR printed pp.65–66, discussion of foreign form/local material/local narrative voice and beginning of Trees, waves and cultural history; p.68 concluding paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-L2",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "规模不能替代语言与语境能力：边界",
      "text": "这是对作者论证的限定解读，不是已经证明所有读法等价，也不是独立核实他所援引的各国语言个案。",
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AR01-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "NLR printed pp.65–66, discussion of foreign form/local material/local narrative voice and beginning of Trees, waves and cultural history; p.68 concluding paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-C2",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "规模不能替代语言与语境能力",
      "text": "即使采用远读，语言能力、细部形式和具体历史解释仍是检验大尺度猜想的必要工作；读法目标不同也可能留下有理由的分歧。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "attributed literary-method argument",
      "normative": true,
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AR01-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "AR01-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "AR01-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "作者关于叙述声音、专家分工与解释视角的原文",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "原语言文本反例、不同档案与翻译史可迫使修改大尺度猜想。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-E3",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "基准取样和任务覆盖有限：原文依据",
      "text": "Methods从6219部候选英语公版小说中挑选40部，按长度分4档；要求清晰章节和单一时间顺序叙事、排除选集。任务是逐章一句摘要、人物最后位置和叙事时间，模型表仍列早期2025年的7个模型。",
      "source_id": "AR01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://aclanthology.org/2026.latechclfl-1.28.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "published SIGHUM LaTeCH-CLfL 2026 proceedings, pp.295–304, DOI 10.18653/v1/2026.latechclfl-1.28; fixed conference PDF",
      "preciseLocator": "conference pp.296–297, Methods/Data selection and Tasks; p.297 Table1",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-P3",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "基准取样和任务覆盖有限：必要前提",
      "text": "任务和取样条件必须与拟推广的作品、语言、模型版本相匹配。",
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AR01-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "conference pp.296–297, Methods/Data selection and Tasks; p.297 Table1",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-L3",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "基准取样和任务覆盖有限：边界",
      "text": "筛选排除了部分文学形式；长度分档的tokenizer和文本版本也影响可比性；40部小说不是世界文学代表性概率样本。",
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AR01-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "conference pp.296–297, Methods/Data selection and Tasks; p.297 Table1",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-C3",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "基准取样和任务覆盖有限",
      "text": "TLDM检验的是指定英语小说、三项操作任务与一组早期2025模型，不能直接概括全球文学、复杂非线性叙事或2026最新模型。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AR01-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "AR01-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "AR01-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "2026正式版报告的40部小说、7模型、3任务",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "更多语言、非线性作品、版本与更新模型的预先定义复测。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-E4",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "输出一致性不是人工确认的正确性：原文依据",
      "text": "Evaluation不采用人类标注真值，而将模型逐章输出拼合或聚合为参照，与长输入输出比较；不同任务使用语义相似、Jaccard或相对误差并归一化。",
      "source_id": "AR01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://aclanthology.org/2026.latechclfl-1.28.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "published SIGHUM LaTeCH-CLfL 2026 proceedings, pp.295–304, DOI 10.18653/v1/2026.latechclfl-1.28; fixed conference PDF",
      "preciseLocator": "conference p.297, Evaluation section, paragraphs defining task-specific metrics and short-context reference outputs; p.299 Limitations",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-P4",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "输出一致性不是人工确认的正确性：必要前提",
      "text": "短输入输出只能作为内部参照；应把稳定性、准确性和解释质量分开验证。",
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AR01-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "conference p.297, Evaluation section, paragraphs defining task-specific metrics and short-context reference outputs; p.299 Limitations",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-L4",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "输出一致性不是人工确认的正确性：边界",
      "text": "同一模型在两种输入下可以稳定地犯同一错误；相似度或地点集合指标不测量审美价值与解释说服力。",
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AR01-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "conference p.297, Evaluation section, paragraphs defining task-specific metrics and short-context reference outputs; p.299 Limitations",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-C4",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "输出一致性不是人工确认的正确性",
      "text": "这些分数主要衡量长短上下文输出的一致性，不能凭高分认定文学事实正确，也不能凭低分判决一切文学理解失败。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AR01-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "AR01-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "AR01-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "该论文的三项自动评分及其内部基准",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立人类标注、可追溯文本证据与异议记录，可以检验准确性和任务构念。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-E5",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "分块效果取决于任务与处理方式：原文依据",
      "text": "Results及Table2报告较长小说下多项任务的一致性下降；截取窗口对相应窗口任务有帮助，而简单把章节包装成多条消息并未一致改善，叙事时间任务的表现也不同。",
      "source_id": "AR01-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://aclanthology.org/2026.latechclfl-1.28.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "published SIGHUM LaTeCH-CLfL 2026 proceedings, pp.295–304, DOI 10.18653/v1/2026.latechclfl-1.28; fixed conference PDF",
      "preciseLocator": "conference p.298, Table2 and Results paragraphs comparing T2/T3/T4; pp.298–299 Discussion",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-P5",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "分块效果取决于任务与处理方式：必要前提",
      "text": "比较在同一论文限定模型、文本、提示及评分设计内成立，不能跨任务偷换指标。",
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AR01-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "conference p.298, Table2 and Results paragraphs comparing T2/T3/T4; pp.298–299 Discussion",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-L5",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "分块效果取决于任务与处理方式：边界",
      "text": "没有人类真值限制效应解释；本轮未复跑，也未把会议发表日期当作被测模型的新版本日期。",
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AR01-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "conference p.298, Table2 and Results paragraphs comparing T2/T3/T4; pp.298–299 Discussion",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-C5",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "分块效果取决于任务与处理方式",
      "text": "本次实验支持按任务检验长上下文与分块策略，不能从一个提示技巧推出通用的长篇阅读修复方案。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "conditional source-reported inference",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AR01-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "AR01-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "AR01-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "正式版报告的处理方式对比，不覆盖全部长上下文策略",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "独立复跑、不同提示与文本结构、人工事实核验及最新模型对照。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-Q1",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "编辑综合的开放问题",
      "text": "怎样根据研究目标扩大阅读范围，让语言细读、史料和可审查计算结果相互检验，同时保留解释理由与价值判断的责任？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-S1",
        "AR01-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AR01-E1",
        "AR01-E2",
        "AR01-E3",
        "AR01-E4",
        "AR01-E5"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "not_a_source_quote": true
    },
    {
      "title": "Equality of What?",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://ophi.org.uk/sites/default/files/Sen-1979_Equality-of-What.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://tannerlectures.org/lectures/equality-of-what/",
      "sourceVersion": "OPHI-hosted Tanner lecture text; delivered Stanford 1979-05-22; printed pp.197–220, 26-page PDF including preliminaries",
      "publication_date": "1979-05-22 (lecture delivery; not asserted as printed volume date)",
      "publication_status": "published original philosophical lecture/argument",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Introduction pp.197–198",
        "1. Utilitarian Equality pp.198–204",
        "3. Rawlsian Equality pp.213–216",
        "4. Basic Capability Equality pp.217–219",
        "5. Concluding Remarks pp.219–220"
      ],
      "access": "open_institution_hosted_primary_fulltext_pdf via web reader; shell request returned HTTP403",
      "independence_group": "SEN_1979_EQUALITY_ARGUMENT",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "all of section2 Total Utility Equality",
        "Rawls's complete original works",
        "later capability literature in full"
      ],
      "license": "No general source redistribution licence observed; link and original paraphrase only.",
      "id": "HU04-S1",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Equality of What?",
      "text": "Equality of What?",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "title": "Chapter 2. Conceptualizing the diverse values of nature and their contributions to people",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/7701874/files/2022%20IPBES_ASSESSMENT%20ON%20VALUES%20%28CHAPTER%202%29.pdf?download=1",
      "metadataUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/7701874",
      "sourceVersion": "IPBES Values Assessment, 2022 typeset Chapter2 PDF deposited in official Zenodo record 7701874; chapter DOI 10.5281/zenodo.6493134",
      "publication_date": "2022",
      "publication_status": "governmental/intergovernmental primary assessment chapter; synthesis and conceptual framework, not independent experiment",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "2.2.3.2 Specific values categorized as intrinsic, instrumental and relational values, definition paragraphs pp.61–62",
        "2.2.3.3 Policy relevance of considering diverse value types and their overlaps pp.65–66",
        "Figure2.13 and caption p.65"
      ],
      "access": "open_official_assessment_fulltext_pdf; direct public download and local text extraction",
      "independence_group": "IPBES_VALUES_2022_ASSESSMENT_SHARED_LITERATURE",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "complete Chapter2 and other chapters",
        "all underlying systematic-review studies and Annex2.10",
        "independent replication of case studies"
      ],
      "license": "Report copyright/reuse terms were not fully inspected; no source figures/fulltext redistributed.",
      "id": "HU04-S2",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Chapter 2. Conceptualizing the diverse values of nature and their contributions to people",
      "text": "Chapter 2. Conceptualizing the diverse values of nature and their contributions to people",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-E1",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "边际效用相等不等于处境公平：原文依据",
      "text": "Sen从固定总量的功利分配例子说明边际效用均等化的条件，并以获得较低总效用和较低边际效用的弱势个体构造反例；他并不把这种假设强加给所有现实残障者。",
      "source_id": "HU04-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU04-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://ophi.org.uk/sites/default/files/Sen-1979_Equality-of-What.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "OPHI-hosted Tanner lecture text; delivered Stanford 1979-05-22; printed pp.197–220, 26-page PDF including preliminaries",
      "preciseLocator": "printed pp.198–204, 1. Utilitarian Equality, marginal-utility argument and disadvantage counterexample",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-P1",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "边际效用相等不等于处境公平：必要前提",
      "text": "反例暂接受指定效用函数和可比较性，检验的是由这些前提推出的伦理后果。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU04-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "printed pp.198–204, 1. Utilitarian Equality, marginal-utility argument and disadvantage counterexample",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-L1",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "边际效用相等不等于处境公平：边界",
      "text": "这不是关于现实残障群体效用的经验测量，也不是证明所有功利主义版本都已被反驳。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU04-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "printed pp.198–204, 1. Utilitarian Equality, marginal-utility argument and disadvantage counterexample",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-C1",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "边际效用相等不等于处境公平",
      "text": "在Sen给出的规范反例中，总效用最大化可能减少对某些弱势者的资源分配；是否公平需要额外评价理由，不能由最大化运算自行回答。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "author's normative counterexample; no empirical causal identification",
      "normative": true,
      "source_ids": [
        "HU04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU04-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU04-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU04-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "Sen所设分配问题及其论证",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "更强的规范辩护、反例或替代前提可改变论证评价；新增事实只能检验现实适用。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-E2",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "相同资源不保证相同实际机会：原文依据",
      "text": "Sen在Rawlsian Equality节讨论基本物品，并以身体状况等差异说明人们把同一资源转化成可实现生活的能力不同；批评对象是只以资源指标评估差异的局限。",
      "source_id": "HU04-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU04-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://ophi.org.uk/sites/default/files/Sen-1979_Equality-of-What.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "OPHI-hosted Tanner lecture text; delivered Stanford 1979-05-22; printed pp.197–220, 26-page PDF including preliminaries",
      "preciseLocator": "printed pp.213–216, 3. Rawlsian Equality, primary-goods discussion and human-diversity paragraphs",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-P2",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "相同资源不保证相同实际机会：必要前提",
      "text": "评价目的关心人能实际做到什么，而不仅是物品持有；这一本身是需要说明的规范选择。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU04-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "printed pp.213–216, 3. Rawlsian Equality, primary-goods discussion and human-diversity paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-L2",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "相同资源不保证相同实际机会：边界",
      "text": "本卡只准确呈现Sen对Rawls的批评，不以此代替Rawls原文全貌或宣布争论已经解决。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU04-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "printed pp.213–216, 3. Rawlsian Equality, primary-goods discussion and human-diversity paragraphs",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-C2",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "相同资源不保证相同实际机会",
      "text": "按Sen的论证，资源分配信息对评价人的实际机会并不总是充分，需要考虑资源向生活能力的转换条件。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "attributed normative argument about informational sufficiency",
      "normative": true,
      "source_ids": [
        "HU04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU04-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU04-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU04-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "1979讲稿的基本物品批评论证",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "对评价对象、转换差异和正当分配原则的更完整论证或反例。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-E3",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "能力建议拓宽了评价对象：原文依据",
      "text": "Basic Capability Equality以行动、营养、衣着、居所和参与社区等基本活动说明建议，强调满意程度或物品清单可能遗漏重要差异。",
      "source_id": "HU04-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU04-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://ophi.org.uk/sites/default/files/Sen-1979_Equality-of-What.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "OPHI-hosted Tanner lecture text; delivered Stanford 1979-05-22; printed pp.197–220, 26-page PDF including preliminaries",
      "preciseLocator": "printed pp.217–219, 4. Basic Capability Equality, opening examples and paragraph defining basic capabilities",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-P3",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "能力建议拓宽了评价对象：必要前提",
      "text": "需要为被选能力的重要性、可行机会与实际实现的关系提供理由，而不能仅凭术语获得正当性。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU04-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "printed pp.217–219, 4. Basic Capability Equality, opening examples and paragraph defining basic capabilities",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-L3",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "能力建议拓宽了评价对象：边界",
      "text": "举例不等于一份已获全球同意的封闭能力清单；本轮不声称1979文本已完成后续能力理论。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU04-E3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "printed pp.217–219, 4. Basic Capability Equality, opening examples and paragraph defining basic capabilities",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-C3",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "能力建议拓宽了评价对象",
      "text": "Sen提出把可实现的基本活动纳入平等评价，是关于什么值得评价的规范提案；它并未测量出唯一正确的幸福或善好生活。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "primary philosophical proposal, not empirical discovery of a unique good",
      "normative": true,
      "source_ids": [
        "HU04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU04-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU04-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU04-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "该讲稿的基本能力概念与举例",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "对能力清单、优先次序、个人选择与共同生活的公开论证及反例。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-E4",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "能力也没有消除权重与规则分歧：原文依据",
      "text": "p.219讨论能力指标的文化相关权重、部分排序或约定；Concluding Remarks说能力平等只是道德善的部分指引，效用和物品仍可相关，同一能力指标可用于不同聚合规则。",
      "source_id": "HU04-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU04-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://ophi.org.uk/sites/default/files/Sen-1979_Equality-of-What.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "OPHI-hosted Tanner lecture text; delivered Stanford 1979-05-22; printed pp.197–220, 26-page PDF including preliminaries",
      "preciseLocator": "printed p.219, final paragraph of 4. Basic Capability Equality; pp.219–220, 5. Concluding Remarks",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-P4",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "能力也没有消除权重与规则分歧：必要前提",
      "text": "信息选择、人与人之间的比较、分配规则和制度实现是不同层次，不能相互偷代。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU04-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "printed p.219, final paragraph of 4. Basic Capability Equality; pp.219–220, 5. Concluding Remarks",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-L4",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "能力也没有消除权重与规则分歧：边界",
      "text": "开放权重不等于所有排序同样可信；经验数据可检验后果，却不能替代分配规则的价值前提。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU04-E4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "printed p.219, final paragraph of 4. Basic Capability Equality; pp.219–220, 5. Concluding Remarks",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-C4",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "能力也没有消除权重与规则分歧",
      "text": "即使接受能力作为信息维度，如何加权、聚合以及处理其他道德理由仍需独立规范论证，不能从一个指标机械推出完整公平制度。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "explicit limits of the author's normative proposal",
      "normative": true,
      "source_ids": [
        "HU04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU04-E4"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU04-P4"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU04-L4"
      ],
      "scope": "Sen对自身建议范围和未决选择的明示限制",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "清楚的权重理由、可接受程序、具体制度反例与后果证据共同推进。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-E5",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "价值多元不等于所有价值都不可比较：原文依据",
      "text": "IPBES区分工具性、内在和关系价值，说明类别常有重叠；2.2.3.3区分可用共同指标直接比较、只能间接协调及须并行考虑的情况，并指出多元估值有复杂性与资源成本。",
      "source_id": "HU04-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU04-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/7701874/files/2022%20IPBES_ASSESSMENT%20ON%20VALUES%20%28CHAPTER%202%29.pdf?download=1",
      "sourceVersion": "IPBES Values Assessment, 2022 typeset Chapter2 PDF deposited in official Zenodo record 7701874; chapter DOI 10.5281/zenodo.6493134",
      "preciseLocator": "Chapter2, 2.2.3.2 pp.61–62 definition paragraphs; Figure2.13 p.65; 2.2.3.3 pp.65–66, paragraphs on overlap, comparability and resources",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-P5",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "价值多元不等于所有价值都不可比较：必要前提",
      "text": "选用指标、可替代性假设及参与范围须与具体价值和决策情境一致。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU04-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU04-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Chapter2, 2.2.3.2 pp.61–62 definition paragraphs; Figure2.13 p.65; 2.2.3.3 pp.65–66, paragraphs on overlap, comparability and resources",
      "origin": "source_method_and_editorial_assumption"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-L5",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "价值多元不等于所有价值都不可比较：边界",
      "text": "这是政府间评估对概念与文献的综合，不是每种规范结论的独立实验验证；未复核章内所有案例。",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU04-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU04-E5"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Chapter2, 2.2.3.2 pp.61–62 definition paragraphs; Figure2.13 p.65; 2.2.3.3 pp.65–66, paragraphs on overlap, comparability and resources",
      "origin": "source_limit_plus_explicit_editorial_boundary"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-C5",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "价值多元不等于所有价值都不可比较",
      "text": "官方评估提供分辨价值类型及可比条件的框架，支持逐案说明哪些内容能比较；它不授权把所有自然价值压成一个价格，也不宣称一切价值永不可比较。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "primary assessment of value concepts and comparison conditions; not a unique normative verdict",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "HU04-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU04-E5"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU04-P5"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU04-L5"
      ],
      "scope": "2022评估第二章所读概念与方法范围",
      "status": "source_reported_conditional_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "具体决策的价值陈述、可比性论证、后果与分配资料，以及受影响者的正当参与。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "independent_audit": "pending"
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-Q1",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "type": "question",
      "label": "编辑综合的开放问题",
      "text": "在效用、资源、能力与多种关系价值冲突时，应保护什么，由谁以何种理由和程序作出选择；哪些新事实会改变后果判断，哪些分歧仍需要规范论证？",
      "origin": "editorial_synthesis",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU04-S1",
        "HU04-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU04-E1",
        "HU04-E2",
        "HU04-E3",
        "HU04-E4",
        "HU04-E5"
      ],
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named primary full-text sections",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "passed_at_declared_card_scope"
      },
      "not_a_source_quote": true
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-V05-S1",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Joint environmental and social benefits from diversified agriculture",
      "text": "新增阅读范围或版本定位；不是独立复现。",
      "title": "Joint environmental and social benefits from diversified agriculture",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://karp.ucdavis.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/310/2024/08/Rasmussen_etal_2024_Science_DiversificationSocioEcological.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adj1914",
      "sourceVersion": "Science384:87–93(2024),corrected14May2024 publisher PDF at author university",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_or_official_source",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "lawful_original_scoped_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Corrected publisher-layout PDFp.1 author list and correction label; p.7 Author contributions"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "Original ScienceSI still required",
        "No raw-data or R reanalysis",
        "Consumer price-transmission causal evidence not supplied"
      ],
      "license": "No fulltext redistribution permission assumed; public patch contains original paraphrases and source links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No source fulltexts, figures or tables redistributed.",
      "independence_group": "RASMUSSEN_2024_24_STUDIES_2655_FARMS",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Corrected PDFp.1 author list/correction label and p.7 Author contributions; Publisher correction notice14May2024; Dryad and Zenodo file inventories",
      "id": "AG01-V05-E1",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "2024作者名单更正：原文依据",
      "text": "Corrected PDF explicitly identifies14May2024 and includes Aidee Guzman as21st author and A.G. in data collection/entry contributions. Correction is authorship attribution, not a declared change to methods/results. Named Science supplementary tablesS1–S13/figuresS1–S10 remain unread; Dryad raw data and Zenodo analysis.R are not substitutes for that PDF.",
      "source_id": "AG01-V05-S1",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://karp.ucdavis.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/310/2024/08/Rasmussen_etal_2024_Science_DiversificationSocioEcological.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "Science384:87–93(2024),corrected14May2024 publisher PDF at author university",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Corrected PDFp.1 author list/correction label and p.7 Author contributions; Publisher correction notice14May2024; Dryad and Zenodo file inventories",
      "id": "AG01-V05-P1",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "2024作者名单更正：条件",
      "text": "作者机构托管的出版PDF首页有明确更正标记；末页贡献与出版更正说明一致。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-V05-E1"
      ]
    },
    {
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Corrected PDFp.1 author list/correction label and p.7 Author contributions; Publisher correction notice14May2024; Dryad and Zenodo file inventories",
      "id": "AG01-V05-L1",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "2024作者名单更正：限制",
      "text": "Science指定SI仍未读；作者名单更正不能作为结果更稳健或独立重复证据。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Corrected PDFp.1 author list/correction label and p.7 Author contributions; Publisher correction notice14May2024; Dryad and Zenodo file inventories",
      "id": "AG01-V05-C1",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "2024作者名单更正",
      "text": "14May2024更正版已直接核对：补入第21作者Aidee Guzman及作者贡献A.G.；未声明修改科学结果。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors source-reported scoped result or explicitly bounded editorial version comparison",
      "normative": false,
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "AG01-V05-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "AG01-V05-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "Only named passages and source versions; no replication or expert review.",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "Author correction, independent validation, missing source recovery or expert review changes the scoped interpretation.",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-V05-S2",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World2025",
      "text": "新增阅读范围或版本定位；不是独立复现。",
      "title": "The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World2025",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://openknowledge.fao.org/bitstreams/e3c60970-7123-4de4-9d82-81f4a08912e4/download",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.4060/cd6008en",
      "sourceVersion": "FAO/IFAD/UNICEF/WFP/WHO2025 original report; repository PDF ISBN978-92-5-139937-8",
      "publication_status": "official_statistical_report",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "lawful_original_scoped_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "§2.2 printed pp.21–24; Table2.5 printed p.23; §2.2.2 and Figure2.7",
        "Printed p.22 methodological updates: India income series and2021 ICP PPP factors"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "No underlying country microdata audit",
        "No causal price-transmission study completed",
        "This fixed2025 edition does not substitute for current2026 report"
      ],
      "license": "No fulltext redistribution permission assumed; public patch contains original paraphrases and source links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No source fulltexts, figures or tables redistributed.",
      "independence_group": "SOFI2025_FAO_JOINT_STATISTICS",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§2.2 printed pp.21–24; Table2.5 printed p.23; §2.2.2 and Figure2.7; Printed p.22 methodological updates: India income series and2021 ICP PPP factors",
      "id": "AG01-V05-E2",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "健康膳食可负担性的统计对象：原文依据",
      "text": "SOFI2025 estimates2.60billion people unable to afford a healthy diet in2024 and mean minimum cost4.46PPP dollars/person/day. Country means, income distributions and essential nonfood allowance enter the measure. The report revises historical India affordability estimates and PPP factors; editions should not be naively differenced. It does not identify diversified-farm practices as the causal mechanism behind consumer prices.",
      "source_id": "AG01-V05-S2",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://openknowledge.fao.org/bitstreams/e3c60970-7123-4de4-9d82-81f4a08912e4/download",
      "sourceVersion": "FAO/IFAD/UNICEF/WFP/WHO2025 original report; repository PDF ISBN978-92-5-139937-8",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§2.2 printed pp.21–24; Table2.5 printed p.23; §2.2.2 and Figure2.7; Printed p.22 methodological updates: India income series and2021 ICP PPP factors",
      "id": "AG01-V05-P2",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "健康膳食可负担性的统计对象：条件",
      "text": "按最低本地食物组合成本、收入分布和必要非食物支出估计；2025版修订印度收入历史序列并采用2021ICP的PPP因子。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-V05-E2"
      ]
    },
    {
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§2.2 printed pp.21–24; Table2.5 printed p.23; §2.2.2 and Figure2.7; Printed p.22 methodological updates: India income series and2021 ICP PPP factors",
      "id": "AG01-V05-L2",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "健康膳食可负担性的统计对象：限制",
      "text": "此为固定2025版估计，不能把跨版差异全当真实趋势；没有识别多样化农场措施经价格传给消费者的因果链。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-V05-E2"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source_ids": [
        "AG01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "§2.2 printed pp.21–24; Table2.5 printed p.23; §2.2.2 and Figure2.7; Printed p.22 methodological updates: India income series and2021 ICP PPP factors",
      "id": "AG01-V05-C2",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "健康膳食可负担性的统计对象",
      "text": "SOFI2025估计2024年2.60十亿人无法负担健康膳食，国家最低健康膳食成本的全球均值为每人每日4.46PPP美元。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors source-reported scoped result or explicitly bounded editorial version comparison",
      "normative": false,
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AG01-V05-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "AG01-V05-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "AG01-V05-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "Only named passages and source versions; no replication or expert review.",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "Author correction, independent validation, missing source recovery or expert review changes the scoped interpretation.",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-V05-S1",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Beyond Plot: How Sentiment Analysis Reshapes Our Understanding of Narrative Structure",
      "label": "Beyond Plot: How Sentiment Analysis Reshapes Our Understanding of Narrative Structure",
      "text": "Beyond Plot: How Sentiment Analysis Reshapes Our Understanding of Narrative Structure; only the declared original passages are used.",
      "doi": "10.22148/001c.143671",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://culturalanalytics.org/article/990/galley/768/download/",
      "sourceVersion": "Journal of Cultural Analytics10(3),22-page publisher PDF; published10September2025; publisher XML galley767 also read; same title/DOI/authorship",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Introduction pipeline/model/smoothing pp.2–3",
        "Woolf case implications pp.5–6",
        "section5 feature extraction and close reading pp.13–14",
        "section7 LLM promise/limits pp.17–19"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "license": "Public reading access does not imply redistribution permission; retain original paraphrases, bibliographic metadata and links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No copyrighted full text or source figures included in this patch.",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "Selected sections only; no model rerun, external case-study reanalysis, universal superiority claim, current-model benchmark, or inference of humanities consensus."
      ],
      "raw_file_sha256": "9a4a53e9b535fc0dc834fcfd310ce636c8063bbc00744b660b898ec916795767",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      },
      "authors": [
        "Katherine Elkins"
      ],
      "publication_date": "2025-09-10",
      "publication_date_precision": "day",
      "version_date": "2025-09-10 published article; current publisher PDF and XML galleys",
      "publication_status": "published original methodological/case-based argument in Journal of Cultural Analytics 10(3)",
      "independence_group": "ELKINS_2025_BEYOND_PLOT_ORIGINAL_ARGUMENT",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.143671",
      "access": "public_publisher_pdf_and_XML_named_passages_read"
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-V05-E1",
      "type": "evidence",
      "text": "Introduction pp.2–3 separates sentiment language from plot and describes model comparison/smoothing; pp.13–14 require interpreting extracted crux passages, not replacing criticism. Section7 pp.17–19 presents LLM directions as possibilities and explicitly retains bias, overreliance and subtle-text validation concerns.",
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "supports_claim_ids": [
        "AR01-V05-C1"
      ],
      "related_baseline_ids": [
        "AR01-C1",
        "AR01-C2",
        "AR01-L1",
        "AR01-L2",
        "AR01-Q1"
      ],
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "label": "Elkins 的人参与情感弧分析：原文依据",
      "source_id": "AR01-V05-S1",
      "sourceVersion": "Journal of Cultural Analytics10(3),22-page publisher PDF; published10September2025; publisher XML galley767 also read; same title/DOI/authorship",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://culturalanalytics.org/article/990/galley/768/download/",
      "preciseLocator": "Publisher PDF printed/PDF pp.2–3,5–6,13–14,17–19; XML sections1,2,5,7",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "original paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-V05-P1",
      "type": "premise",
      "text": "This is a methodological/case-based argument; cited supporting case studies and model outputs are not independently reproduced here.",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "label": "Elkins 的人参与情感弧分析：解释前提",
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AR01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Publisher PDF printed/PDF pp.2–3,5–6,13–14,17–19; XML sections1,2,5,7",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_explicit_editorial_interpretation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-V05-L1",
      "type": "limitation",
      "text": "Selected sections only; no model rerun, external case-study reanalysis, universal superiority claim, current-model benchmark, or inference of humanities consensus.",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "label": "Elkins 的人参与情感弧分析：边界",
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AR01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Publisher PDF printed/PDF pp.2–3,5–6,13–14,17–19; XML sections1,2,5,7",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_explicit_editorial_interpretation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-V05-C1",
      "type": "claim",
      "text": "Elkins proposes human-guided emotional-arc analysis as a way to select and interpret narrative passages; the article itself treats model choice, smoothing and subtle multilingual texts as continuing methodological questions.",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "label": "Elkins 的人参与情感弧分析",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "Elkins 原创方法与个案论证的文本归纳；未复跑模型或独立核验被引个案。",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "AR01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "AR01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "AR01-V05-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "AR01-V05-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "Elkins 2025, selected pipeline, case, feature-extraction and LLM-limit passages on pp.2–3,5–6,13–14,17–19.",
      "status": "source_attributed_argument_conditionally_supported",
      "what_would_change_status": "可比较的文本版本、语言与模型验证及独立解释评议可改变方法适用性；本项目不由该文推出文学界共识。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-V05-S1",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Supplementary Appendix: Generative AI Without Guardrails Can Harm Learning",
      "label": "Supplementary Appendix: Generative AI Without Guardrails Can Harm Learning",
      "text": "Supplementary Appendix: Generative AI Without Guardrails Can Harm Learning; only the declared original passages are used.",
      "doi": "10.1073/pnas.2422633122",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12232635/supplementaryFiles",
      "sourceVersion": "Official PNAS-associated pnas.2422633122.sapp.pdf via Europe PMC public supplement package; 43 pages; title/authors agree; p.1 Osbert affiliation is Computer and Information Science, consistent with corrected article, but SI itself has no explicit revision date",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "A.1 p.2 model and tool design",
        "A.4–A.6 pp.7–8 assignment, grading and preregistration",
        "TableA.2/A.3 p.10 direct contrasts",
        "B.1/B.2 pp.11–12 noncompliance/alternative analyses",
        "B.6 pp.17–18 attendance"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "license": "Public reading access does not imply redistribution permission; retain original paraphrases, bibliographic metadata and links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No copyrighted full text or source figures included in this patch.",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "SI revision timestamp not stated; affiliation alignment is not proof of complete version identity. No data/code rerun or independent clustering reanalysis. Direct contrast does not prove equivalence to control, long-term retention, or isolate one guardrail feature."
      ],
      "raw_file_sha256": "9b3d8577eb4425a7906b5de53751f91e5bb4abc5df80c517b11ba480cfc7e8a5",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      },
      "authors": [
        "Hamsa Bastani",
        "Osbert Bastani",
        "Alp Sungu",
        "Haosen Ge",
        "Özge Kabakcı",
        "Rei Mariman"
      ],
      "publication_date": "2025-06-25",
      "publication_date_precision": "associated_article_day_from_baseline_metadata",
      "version_date": "SI revision date not printed; affiliation agrees with corrected article; article correction notice 2025-08-20",
      "publication_status": "official PNAS-associated Supplementary Appendix via Europe PMC public supplement package; exact SI revision date unverified",
      "independence_group": "ED01_SINGLE_TURKEY_SCHOOL_TRIAL",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422633122",
      "access": "public_official_repository_supplement_pdf_named_passages_and_Table_A2_visually_read"
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-V05-E1",
      "type": "evidence",
      "text": "A.1 specifies GPT-4-0613; A.4 classes retain assigned arm across4 sessions under scheduling constraints; A.6 separates preregistered t-tests from main clustered regression. TableA.2 p.10 gives Tutor–Base normalized exam-score difference .028,95%CI[.005,.052],p=.019; Tutor–Control −.006,p=.613.",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "supports_claim_ids": [
        "ED01-V05-C1"
      ],
      "related_baseline_ids": [
        "ED01-S01",
        "ED01-S02",
        "ED01-S03",
        "ED01-C01",
        "ED01-C04",
        "ED01-L02",
        "ED01-L04",
        "ED01-Q01"
      ],
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "label": "补充材料中的两两组间比较：原文依据",
      "source_id": "ED01-V05-S1",
      "sourceVersion": "Official PNAS-associated pnas.2422633122.sapp.pdf via Europe PMC public supplement package; 43 pages; title/authors agree; p.1 Osbert affiliation is Computer and Information Science, consistent with corrected article, but SI itself has no explicit revision date",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12232635/supplementaryFiles",
      "preciseLocator": "Official SI A.1 p.2; A.4–A.6 pp.7–8; TablesA.2/A.3 p.10 (visually checked); B.1/B.2 pp.11–12; B.6 pp.17–18",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "original paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-V05-P1",
      "type": "premise",
      "text": "Interpret TableA.2 as the reported pairwise t-test on the main sample; do not relabel it a classroom-cluster-adjusted estimate or substitute it for main Table1.",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "label": "补充材料中的两两组间比较：解释前提",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Official SI A.1 p.2; A.4–A.6 pp.7–8; TablesA.2/A.3 p.10 (visually checked); B.1/B.2 pp.11–12; B.6 pp.17–18",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_explicit_editorial_interpretation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-V05-L1",
      "type": "limitation",
      "text": "SI revision timestamp not stated; affiliation alignment is not proof of complete version identity. No data/code rerun or independent clustering reanalysis. Direct contrast does not prove equivalence to control, long-term retention, or isolate one guardrail feature.",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "label": "补充材料中的两两组间比较：边界",
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Official SI A.1 p.2; A.4–A.6 pp.7–8; TablesA.2/A.3 p.10 (visually checked); B.1/B.2 pp.11–12; B.6 pp.17–18",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_explicit_editorial_interpretation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-V05-C1",
      "type": "claim",
      "text": "官方 SI 表 A.2 的预注册两两组间 t 检验报告 Tutor−Base 无辅助考试归一化成绩差为 0.028（95% CI 0.005–0.052，p=0.019）；这一比较与主表1的协变量调整、班级聚类回归是不同分析。",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "label": "补充材料中的两两组间比较",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "作者报告的预注册两两组间 t 检验；与主表1的协变量调整、班级聚类回归分开。",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ED01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ED01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ED01-V05-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ED01-V05-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "Official SI Table A.2 main-sample normalized unassisted-exam score contrasts in the same single-school four-session trial; A.6 explains preregistered pairwise t-tests.",
      "status": "source_reported_conditionally_supported",
      "what_would_change_status": "经班级聚类处理的直接组间比较、可重复的原始数据分析或更正可改变统计解释；长期保持和组件机制仍需相应设计的新增证据。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      },
      "values": {
        "analysis": "preregistered two-group t-test contrasts, Table A.2 main sample",
        "outcome": "normalized unassisted-exam score",
        "contrast": "GPT Tutor minus GPT Base",
        "difference": 0.028,
        "ci95": [
          0.005,
          0.052
        ],
        "p_value": 0.019,
        "classroom_clustered_regression_estimate": false
      },
      "reporting_guardrail": {
        "chinese_label": "两两组间t检验",
        "effect_label": "归一化成绩差0.028",
        "do_not_write": [
          "28%提升",
          "配对样本t检验",
          "classroom-clustered estimate"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-V05-S1",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "IPCC AR6 WGI第9章最终版",
      "text": "IPCC AR6 WGI第9章最终版",
      "title": "IPCC AR6 WGI第9章最终版",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/F61263910A16BD9FDE86921E85E1E4D5/9781009157889c9_1211-1362.pdf/ocean-cryosphere-and-sea-level-change.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/F61263910A16BD9FDE86921E85E1E4D5/9781009157889c9_1211-1362.pdf/ocean-cryosphere-and-sea-level-change.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "AR6finalchapter;Cambridge2023online;DOI10.1017/9781009157896.011",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "publication_status": "AR6finalchapter;Cambridge2023online;DOI10.1017/9781009157896.011",
      "access": "public_original_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "printedpp.1236–1239 complete§9.2.3.1/Fig9.10caption"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "wholechapter",
        "allcitedstudies",
        "postAR6evidence"
      ],
      "independence_group": "IPCC_AR6_ASSESSMENT_SYNTHESIS",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "license": "Original paraphrase and links only; no fulltext or figures redistributed",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "Private raw retrievals excluded from public deliverable",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-V05-E1",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "AR6区分衰弱与突变",
      "text": "最终章区分很可能本世纪衰弱、对2100年前不突变的中等信心，以及对时点/幅度的低信心；正文保留盐度偏差与缺少格陵兰融水等模型限制。",
      "source_id": "ES02-V05-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-V05-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/F61263910A16BD9FDE86921E85E1E4D5/9781009157889c9_1211-1362.pdf/ocean-cryosphere-and-sea-level-change.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "AR6finalchapter;Cambridge2023online;DOI10.1017/9781009157896.011",
      "preciseLocator": "pp.1236–1239§9.2.3.1;especiallyp.1239finalAMOCparagraph",
      "extraction": "original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-V05-P1",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "适用条件",
      "text": "AR6当时的观测、模型与过程理解；依该章分开的信心措辞。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-V05-E1"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-V05-L1",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "v0.5 限定",
      "text": "不是2026更新或安全保证；后续研究不能仅凭新旧日期视为推翻或替代。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-V05-E1"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_editorial_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-V05-C1",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "AR6限定评估",
      "text": "IPCC AR6认为AMOC很可能在21世纪衰弱，但对2100年前不会突变只有中等信心，对模型预测的时点和幅度信心较低。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "attributed author inference or assessment; not independent project measurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ES02-V05-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ES02-V05-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "AR6WGI§9.2.3.1的历史评估",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "可核验的新原文、经审查的方法或独立复核改变该限定结论。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-V05-E2",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "预警的平衡态条件",
      "text": "2026原文Discussion说明淡水收支/FovS稳定性指标只有在足够接近平衡时有意义，快速气候变化下不适用；文中也避免把辐射强迫下持续弱状态直接称已证明的鞍结分岔。",
      "source_id": "ES02-S3",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S3"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-026-02730-w",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Climate Change VOR2026-08-13",
      "preciseLocator": "Discussion paragraphbeginning In the slow CO2 ramp; StableAMOC paragraphbeginning Different radiative forcing simulations",
      "extraction": "original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-V05-L2",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "v0.5 限定",
      "text": "2024准平衡FovS预警不能无条件外推到快速瞬变路径；必须匹配背景状态、强迫速度及“崩溃”定义。",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES02-S1",
        "ES02-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES02-V05-E2"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_editorial_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-V05-S1",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "IPBES 2019 Global Assessment: Summary for Policymakers",
      "label": "IPBES 2019 Global Assessment: Summary for Policymakers",
      "text": "IPBES 2019 Global Assessment: Summary for Policymakers; only the declared original passages are used.",
      "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.3553579",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/3553579/files/ipbes_global_assessment_report_summary_for_policymakers.pdf?download=1",
      "sourceVersion": "Official IPBES assessment SPM, 2019, 60-page PDF; Zenodo record 3553579 version summary for policy makers; approved at IPBES-7 May 2019; record publication November 25, 2019",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Key messages A1–A5 and B/B1 pp.10–12",
        "background paragraph 10 p.28"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "license": "Public reading access does not imply redistribution permission; retain original paraphrases, bibliographic metadata and links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No copyrighted full text or source figures included in this patch.",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "SPM is an original assessment synthesis, not independently rechecked underlying experiments. Only named SPM passages read; not whole assessment chapters or local causal restoration effects."
      ],
      "raw_file_sha256": "baa39de770154c471226ea3f60998ada1bd70cd0d6e1f6cff4b70efa643bb9e1",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      },
      "authors": [
        "Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)"
      ],
      "publication_date": "2019",
      "publication_date_precision": "year",
      "version_date": "2019-11-25 Zenodo record publication; SPM approved May 2019",
      "publication_status": "official intergovernmental assessment Summary for Policymakers",
      "independence_group": "IPBES_GLOBAL_ASSESSMENT_2019_SPM",
      "metadataUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/3553579",
      "access": "public_official_assessment_repository_pdf_named_passages_read"
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-V05-E1",
      "type": "evidence",
      "text": "SPM A3 p.11 reports 14 of 18 assessed contribution categories declining since 1970 despite higher provisioning; A4/A5 pp.11–12 report widespread biodiversity decline with qualifications; B/B1 p.12 and background para.10 p.28 rank land-use change highest on land/freshwater and direct exploitation highest in oceans.",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-V05-S1"
      ],
      "supports_claim_ids": [
        "ES03-V05-C1"
      ],
      "related_baseline_ids": [
        "ES03-C1",
        "ES03-C5",
        "ES03-L1",
        "ES03-L5",
        "ES03-Q1"
      ],
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "label": "IPBES 2019 全球趋势及驱动因素：原文依据",
      "source_id": "ES03-V05-S1",
      "sourceVersion": "Official IPBES assessment SPM, 2019, 60-page PDF; Zenodo record 3553579 version summary for policy makers; approved at IPBES-7 May 2019; record publication November 25, 2019",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/3553579/files/ipbes_global_assessment_report_summary_for_policymakers.pdf?download=1",
      "preciseLocator": "SPM printed pp.10–12 (PDF pp.12–14); background para.10 printed p.28 (PDF p.30)",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "original paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-V05-P1",
      "type": "premise",
      "text": "Assessment-level synthesis with distinct biodiversity, ecosystem-service and contribution indicators; historical assessment scope, not a 2026 trend update.",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "label": "IPBES 2019 全球趋势及驱动因素：解释前提",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES03-V05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "SPM printed pp.10–12 (PDF pp.12–14); background para.10 printed p.28 (PDF p.30)",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_explicit_editorial_interpretation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-V05-L1",
      "type": "limitation",
      "text": "SPM is an original assessment synthesis, not independently rechecked underlying experiments. Only named SPM passages read; not whole assessment chapters or local causal restoration effects.",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "label": "IPBES 2019 全球趋势及驱动因素：边界",
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES03-V05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "SPM printed pp.10–12 (PDF pp.12–14); background para.10 printed p.28 (PDF p.30)",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_explicit_editorial_interpretation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-V05-C1",
      "type": "claim",
      "text": "The 2019 IPBES assessment reports broad biodiversity deterioration while recognizing increased material provisioning and declines in many regulating/non-material contributions; direct-driver importance differs between terrestrial/freshwater and marine systems.",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "label": "IPBES 2019 全球趋势及驱动因素",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "原始评估综合结论的限定转述；底层研究没有逐项重验。",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "ES03-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "ES03-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "ES03-V05-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "ES03-V05-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "IPBES 2019 global assessment SPM historical global trends and ecosystem-specific driver ranking; named SPM passages only.",
      "status": "source_reported_conditionally_supported",
      "what_would_change_status": "后续可比指标、评估更正或底层证据复核可修订趋势归纳；地方修复成效仍需独立地方证据。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-S1",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "A weakly structured stem for human origins in Africa",
      "text": "新增阅读范围或版本定位；不是独立复现。",
      "title": "A weakly structured stem for human origins in Africa",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC10208968/fullTextXML",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06055-y",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature617,755–763 (2023), publisher XML PMC10208968.1; official SI with Nature DOI cover and author date March16,2023",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_or_official_source",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "lawful_original_scoped_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Final publisher XML: A Late Pleistocene common ancestry; A weakly structured stem within Africa; Discussion / Contrasting ancestral structure models",
        "Final XML body interval110–135ka, abstract/Table1 footnote120–135ka; Table1 point estimates135ka and119ka."
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "Not complete line-by-line manuscript diff",
        "No raw genomic access or simulation replication",
        "Main manuscript exact revision date remains unverified",
        "Abstract/body interval discrepancy retained; requires author clarification or exact interpretation, not silently harmonized"
      ],
      "license": "No fulltext redistribution permission assumed; public patch contains original paraphrases and source links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No source fulltexts, figures or tables redistributed.",
      "independence_group": "HUMAN_ORIGINS_SHARED_1000GP_GENOMES_PARTIAL_OVERLAP",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      },
      "associated_materials": [
        {
          "title": "Official Supplementary Information",
          "url": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-023-06055-y/MediaObjects/41586_2023_6055_MOESM1_ESM.pdf",
          "sourceVersion": "Publisher-linked67-page PDF with Nature DOI cover; author document datedMarch16,2023; linked to Nature617,755–763(2023)",
          "retrieved_scope": [
            "§3.2 printedp.10 lines430–452 (PDFp.11)",
            "§5.2 printedp.12 lines531–554 (PDFp.13)",
            "§6 opening printedp.14 (PDFp.15)"
          ],
          "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
          "sha256": "00fa1d9d6705316beb29d3fee79ff583d2cfc2c8e158dbd69f1795f8712b3fc5",
          "access": "official publisher PDF specified sections read; not whole67pages"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-S1",
        "HU01-S1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Final main: A Late Pleistocene common ancestry; A weakly structured stem within Africa; Discussion/Contrasting ancestral structure models; Official SI §3.2 printed p.10 lines430–452; §5.2 printed p.12 lines531–554; §6 opening printed p.14; Author main p.2 body:110–135ka and abstract:120–135ka; final publisher XML A Late Pleistocene common ancestry retains110–135ka while final abstract/Table1 footnote use120–135ka.",
      "id": "HU01-V05-E1",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "正式正文与SI的精确定义：原文依据",
      "text": "The original author body and final publisher XML both contain110–135ka, whereas their abstracts/Table1 footnote use120–135ka. This is a source-internal precision mismatch, not an author-to-final correction. Table1 specifies135ka continuous migration and119ka merger estimates. Official SI defines the1–4% shared-differentiation result through an f-statistic projection; it is not1–4% total ancestry. Composite likelihood, block-bootstrap intervals and model assumptions remain important.",
      "source_id": "HU01-V05-S1",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC10208968/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature617,755–763 (2023), publisher XML PMC10208968.1; official SI with Nature DOI cover and author date March16,2023",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-S1",
        "HU01-S1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Final main: A Late Pleistocene common ancestry; A weakly structured stem within Africa; Discussion/Contrasting ancestral structure models; Official SI §3.2 printed p.10 lines430–452; §5.2 printed p.12 lines531–554; §6 opening printed p.14; Author main p.2 body:110–135ka and abstract:120–135ka; final publisher XML A Late Pleistocene common ancestry retains110–135ka while final abstract/Table1 footnote use120–135ka.",
      "id": "HU01-V05-P1",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "正式正文与SI的精确定义：条件",
      "text": "Table1连续迁移模型135ka、合并模型119ka；SI §5.2通过f统计量投影定义分化比例。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-E1"
      ]
    },
    {
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-S1",
        "HU01-S1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Final main: A Late Pleistocene common ancestry; A weakly structured stem within Africa; Discussion/Contrasting ancestral structure models; Official SI §3.2 printed p.10 lines430–452; §5.2 printed p.12 lines531–554; §6 opening printed p.14; Author main p.2 body:110–135ka and abstract:120–135ka; final publisher XML A Late Pleistocene common ancestry retains110–135ka while final abstract/Table1 footnote use120–135ka.",
      "id": "HU01-V05-L1",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "正式正文与SI的精确定义：限制",
      "text": "不得把1–4%写成总祖源比例，或把窄区间视作人类单一起点；抽样bootstrap不穷尽模型设定误差。此不一致未被冒充为正式版更正。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-S1",
        "HU01-S1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Final main: A Late Pleistocene common ancestry; A weakly structured stem within Africa; Discussion/Contrasting ancestral structure models; Official SI §3.2 printed p.10 lines430–452; §5.2 printed p.12 lines531–554; §6 opening printed p.14; Author main p.2 body:110–135ka and abstract:120–135ka; final publisher XML A Late Pleistocene common ancestry retains110–135ka while final abstract/Table1 footnote use120–135ka.",
      "id": "HU01-V05-C1",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "正式正文与SI的精确定义",
      "text": "正式版本仍有正文110–135ka与摘要/表注120–135ka的精度差异；1–4%指当代群体间分化与古stem分化的对应比例。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors source-reported scoped result or explicitly bounded editorial version comparison",
      "normative": false,
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "Only named passages and source versions; no replication or expert review.",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "Author correction, independent validation, missing source recovery or expert review changes the scoped interpretation.",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-S2",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "A structured coalescent model reveals deep ancestral structure shared by all modern humans",
      "text": "新增阅读范围或版本定位；不是独立复现。",
      "title": "A structured coalescent model reveals deep ancestral structure shared by all modern humans",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-025-02117-1",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-025-02117-1",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Genetics57,856–864, VOR2025-03-18 publisher HTML compared with Cambridge line-numbered manuscript",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_or_official_source",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "lawful_original_scoped_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Final Results: Inference on human data; Fig.4",
        "Final Discussion paragraphs comparing ref.16, limitations and ancient-genome mapping",
        "Final Methods: Model summaries"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "Not whole-paper redline or complete SI audit",
        "No model fit/rerun",
        "No ranking of modern populations"
      ],
      "license": "No fulltext redistribution permission assumed; public patch contains original paraphrases and source links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No source fulltexts, figures or tables redistributed.",
      "independence_group": "HUMAN_ORIGINS_SHARED_1000GP_GENOMES_PARTIAL_OVERLAP",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-S2",
        "HU01-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Final Results: Inference on human data; Fig.4; Final Discussion paragraphs comparing ref.16, limitations and ancient-genome mapping; Final Methods: Model summaries; Cambridge lines137–179,289–299,754–770",
      "id": "HU01-V05-E2",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "2025正式版本核对：原文依据",
      "text": "Final results preserve~1.5Ma split,~290ka admixture and79:21 ancestry within the fitted pulse model. The final Discussion retains the manuscript’s explicit comparison with Ragsdale2023: isolation after splitting versus continuous gene flow, and flexible major-lineage size/bottleneck versus fixed stem-size assumptions. Methods constrain the ghost population size because of identifiability. No scoped numerical reversal found in compared passages.",
      "source_id": "HU01-V05-S2",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-025-02117-1",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature Genetics57,856–864, VOR2025-03-18 publisher HTML compared with Cambridge line-numbered manuscript",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-S2",
        "HU01-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Final Results: Inference on human data; Fig.4; Final Discussion paragraphs comparing ref.16, limitations and ancient-genome mapping; Final Methods: Model summaries; Cambridge lines137–179,289–299,754–770",
      "id": "HU01-V05-P2",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "2025正式版本核对：条件",
      "text": "所核段落与Cambridge稿相符；ghost群体大小被固定以缓解可识别性问题。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-E2"
      ]
    },
    {
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-S2",
        "HU01-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Final Results: Inference on human data; Fig.4; Final Discussion paragraphs comparing ref.16, limitations and ancient-genome mapping; Final Methods: Model summaries; Cambridge lines137–179,289–299,754–770",
      "id": "HU01-V05-L2",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "2025正式版本核对：限制",
      "text": "不排除更多分裂、汇合或持续基因流；不是以更新年份裁决模型优劣，也不是已与化石一一对应的80/20起源史。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-E2"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-S2",
        "HU01-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Final Results: Inference on human data; Fig.4; Final Discussion paragraphs comparing ref.16, limitations and ancient-genome mapping; Final Methods: Model summaries; Cambridge lines137–179,289–299,754–770",
      "id": "HU01-V05-C2",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "2025正式版本核对",
      "text": "2025正式版保留脉冲模型约1.5Ma分裂、约290ka汇合和79:21估计，并明确与2023持续交流模型的假设差异。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors source-reported scoped result or explicitly bounded editorial version comparison",
      "normative": false,
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "Only named passages and source versions; no replication or expert review.",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "Author correction, independent validation, missing source recovery or expert review changes the scoped interpretation.",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-S3",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "New fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco and the pan-African origin of Homo sapiens",
      "text": "新增阅读范围或版本定位；不是独立复现。",
      "title": "New fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco and the pan-African origin of Homo sapiens",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.eva.mpg.de/fileadmin/content_files/human_evolution/Homo_Sapiens_presskit/nature22336_Hublin.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22336",
      "sourceVersion": "2017 Nature original early-online publisher PDFs hosted by Max Planck; internal pages1 onward rather than final volume pagination",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_or_official_source",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "lawful_original_scoped_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Hublin original PDFpp.1–3; facial reconstruction Fig.1 and morphological comparison Fig.3 captions"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "No independent fossil reconstruction or dosimetry recalculation",
        "No claim to update every later fossil date",
        "Early-online layout retained in locators"
      ],
      "license": "No fulltext redistribution permission assumed; public patch contains original paraphrases and source links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No source fulltexts, figures or tables redistributed.",
      "independence_group": "JEBEL_IRHOUD2017_FOSSILS_AND_CONTEXT_DATES",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-S4",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "The age of the hominin fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco, and the origins of the Middle Stone Age",
      "text": "新增阅读范围或版本定位；不是独立复现。",
      "title": "The age of the hominin fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco, and the origins of the Middle Stone Age",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.eva.mpg.de/fileadmin/content_files/human_evolution/Homo_Sapiens_presskit/nature22335_McPherron.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22335",
      "sourceVersion": "2017 Nature original early-online publisher PDFs hosted by Max Planck; internal pages1 onward rather than final volume pagination",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_or_official_source",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "lawful_original_scoped_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Richter original PDFpp.1–3; Table1 and following paragraph giving weighted layer7 context age"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "No independent fossil reconstruction or dosimetry recalculation",
        "No claim to update every later fossil date",
        "Early-online layout retained in locators"
      ],
      "license": "No fulltext redistribution permission assumed; public patch contains original paraphrases and source links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No source fulltexts, figures or tables redistributed.",
      "independence_group": "JEBEL_IRHOUD2017_FOSSILS_AND_CONTEXT_DATES",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-S3",
        "HU01-V05-S4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Hublin original PDF pp.1–3, facial reconstruction Fig.1 and morphological comparison Fig.3 captions; Richter original PDF pp.1–3; Table1 and paragraph following: weighted layer7 context age",
      "id": "HU01-V05-E3",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "化石与定年的不同对象：原文依据",
      "text": "Fossils combine comparatively modern facial/dental features with more primitive neurocranial form. The315±34ka age refers to a weighted thermoluminescence context age of heated flints associated with layer7 fossils; the companion paper recalculates Irhoud3 tooth U-series/ESR as286±32ka. These dates constrain fossil context and mosaic anatomy, not genomic lineage splits or one exclusive geographic birthplace.",
      "source_id": "HU01-V05-S3",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.eva.mpg.de/fileadmin/content_files/human_evolution/Homo_Sapiens_presskit/nature22336_Hublin.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "2017 Nature original early-online publisher PDFs hosted by Max Planck; internal pages1 onward rather than final volume pagination",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-S3",
        "HU01-V05-S4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Hublin original PDF pp.1–3, facial reconstruction Fig.1 and morphological comparison Fig.3 captions; Richter original PDF pp.1–3; Table1 and paragraph following: weighted layer7 context age",
      "id": "HU01-V05-P3",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "化石与定年的不同对象：条件",
      "text": "化石形态论文与直接定年伴随论文共同阅读；层7加权TL背景年龄与Irhoud3牙US/ESR重新估年分开。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-E3"
      ]
    },
    {
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-S3",
        "HU01-V05-S4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Hublin original PDF pp.1–3, facial reconstruction Fig.1 and morphological comparison Fig.3 captions; Richter original PDF pp.1–3; Table1 and paragraph following: weighted layer7 context age",
      "id": "HU01-V05-L3",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "化石与定年的不同对象：限制",
      "text": "未独立重建化石、重算剂量或裁决物种归属；不能从一个遗址推出唯一地理起源。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-E3"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-S3",
        "HU01-V05-S4"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Hublin original PDF pp.1–3, facial reconstruction Fig.1 and morphological comparison Fig.3 captions; Richter original PDF pp.1–3; Table1 and paragraph following: weighted layer7 context age",
      "id": "HU01-V05-C3",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "化石与定年的不同对象",
      "text": "Jebel Irhoud原研究支持镶嵌形态，315±34ka是与化石伴出的加热燧石层位定年；不是该遗传模型某一分裂的直接测年。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors source-reported scoped result or explicitly bounded editorial version comparison",
      "normative": false,
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "Only named passages and source versions; no replication or expert review.",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "Author correction, independent validation, missing source recovery or expert review changes the scoped interpretation.",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-V05-S1",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Guide to Supplementary Data and Results Files, and Online Resources for Heggarty et al.(2023)",
      "text": "新增阅读范围或版本定位；不是独立复现。",
      "title": "Guide to Supplementary Data and Results Files, and Online Resources for Heggarty et al.(2023)",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/8147476/files/Guide_to_Data_and_Results_Files.pdf/content",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8147476",
      "sourceVersion": "Science381,eabg0818,28July2023; supplementary-data Guide version in Zenodo8147476 v1,28July2023; old8090561 explicitly superseded",
      "publication_status": "author_original_reproducibility_guide",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "lawful_original_scoped_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Guide to Data and Results Files PDFpp.1–5 §§1–3 and p.7 §5.1; no2023 Science main article or100-pageSI contained here"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "Full2023 main and claim-relevantSI needed to adjudicate robustness/prior claims",
        "No independent lexical adjudication or tree rerun",
        "No evidence of retraction found in checked metadata, not an exhaustive guarantee"
      ],
      "license": "No fulltext redistribution permission assumed; public patch contains original paraphrases and source links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No source fulltexts, figures or tables redistributed.",
      "independence_group": "IECOR_SHARED_LEXICAL_DATA_AND_CRITICAL_REANALYSIS",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-V05-S1",
        "HU02-S1",
        "HU02-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Official author Guide pp.1–5 §1–3 and p.7 §5.1; data ZIP inventory; Publisher/MPG abstract and DOI metadata; actual2023 full main and100-pageSI not obtained; New re-read of2025 critique Genealogical tree and Discussion and conclusions",
      "id": "HU02-V05-E1",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "语言学争议及共享输入：原文依据",
      "text": "Original Guide verifies the binary matrix of161 language taxa and4990 columns (4820 cognate sets plus170 ascertainment columns) and the BEAST input/output dependence. It does not supply the full original tree-age argument or100-pageSI. The 2025 critique reconstructs MRC from the original posterior trees with25% burn-in, so that comparison is dependent re-expression, not independent sampling. Its conclusion says input errors are not the key shortcoming, placing more weight on topology, taxon/character ratio, contact/homoplasy and chronology.",
      "source_id": "HU02-V05-S1",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/8147476",
      "sourceVersion": "Science381,eabg0818,28July2023; supplementary-data Guide version in Zenodo8147476 v1,28July2023; old8090561 explicitly superseded",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-V05-S1",
        "HU02-S1",
        "HU02-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Official author Guide pp.1–5 §1–3 and p.7 §5.1; data ZIP inventory; Publisher/MPG abstract and DOI metadata; actual2023 full main and100-pageSI not obtained; New re-read of2025 critique Genealogical tree and Discussion and conclusions",
      "id": "HU02-V05-P1",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "语言学争议及共享输入：条件",
      "text": "Guide说明相同IE-CoR矩阵到BEAST输入/输出；批评用原posterior trees并舍弃25% burn-in，未建立新的独立词汇样本。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-V05-E1"
      ]
    },
    {
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-V05-S1",
        "HU02-S1",
        "HU02-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Official author Guide pp.1–5 §1–3 and p.7 §5.1; data ZIP inventory; Publisher/MPG abstract and DOI metadata; actual2023 full main and100-pageSI not obtained; New re-read of2025 critique Genealogical tree and Discussion and conclusions",
      "id": "HU02-V05-L1",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "语言学争议及共享输入：限制",
      "text": "2023完整正文和百页SI仍未读，不能据此裁决其先验/稳健性辩护；批评不是撤稿或全词表错误率估计。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-V05-E1"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-V05-S1",
        "HU02-S1",
        "HU02-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Official author Guide pp.1–5 §1–3 and p.7 §5.1; data ZIP inventory; Publisher/MPG abstract and DOI metadata; actual2023 full main and100-pageSI not obtained; New re-read of2025 critique Genealogical tree and Discussion and conclusions",
      "id": "HU02-V05-C1",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "语言学争议及共享输入",
      "text": "2025批评的MRC树重用2023的后验样本；其结论承认输入策划改善，并将主要疑问扩至拓扑、年代、接触/语言同塑（独立产生的相似特征）和性状数量。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors source-reported scoped result or explicitly bounded editorial version comparison",
      "normative": false,
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU02-V05-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU02-V05-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "Only named passages and source versions; no replication or expert review.",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "Author correction, independent validation, missing source recovery or expert review changes the scoped interpretation.",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-V05-S2",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Author Correction: The genetic origin of the Indo-Europeans",
      "text": "新增阅读范围或版本定位；不是独立复现。",
      "title": "Author Correction: The genetic origin of the Indo-Europeans",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08789-3",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08789-3",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature639,E14; published20February2025",
      "publication_status": "publisher_author_correction",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "lawful_original_scoped_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Author Correction substantive paragraph: second affiliation for Viktor Trifonov; correction date and linked-original DOI"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "Final revised publisher PDF/layout still not obtained",
        "PMC accepted manuscript is not final corrected layout",
        "No raw ancientDNA or qpAdm reproduction",
        "Numerical manuscript inconsistency is not attributed to affiliation correction"
      ],
      "license": "No fulltext redistribution permission assumed; public patch contains original paraphrases and source links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No source fulltexts, figures or tables redistributed.",
      "independence_group": "LAZARIDIS_2025_EURASIAN_ANCIENT_DNA_WITH_COMPANION_DATA_OVERLAP",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-V05-S3",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "The Genetic Origin of the Indo-Europeans (accepted author manuscript)",
      "text": "新增阅读范围或版本定位；不是独立复现。",
      "title": "The Genetic Origin of the Indo-Europeans (accepted author manuscript)",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11922553/fullTextXML",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08531-5",
      "sourceVersion": "PMC11922553 explicitly author manuscript,available19March2025",
      "publication_status": "accepted_manuscript_not_corrected_vor",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "lawful_original_scoped_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "PMC11922553 accepted-manuscript abstract:428 individuals; Introduction:367newly reported plus68improved datasets; author-manuscript version label"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "Final revised publisher PDF/layout still not obtained",
        "PMC accepted manuscript is not final corrected layout",
        "No raw ancientDNA or qpAdm reproduction",
        "Numerical manuscript inconsistency is not attributed to affiliation correction"
      ],
      "license": "No fulltext redistribution permission assumed; public patch contains original paraphrases and source links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No source fulltexts, figures or tables redistributed.",
      "independence_group": "LAZARIDIS_2025_EURASIAN_ANCIENT_DNA_WITH_COMPANION_DATA_OVERLAP",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-V05-S2",
        "HU02-V05-S3",
        "HU02-S3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Correction paragraph and final HTML author-affiliation61; Author-lab published PDFpp.1–2,8–10; PMC11922553 author manuscript abstract and Introduction; Crossref correction relation",
      "id": "HU02-V05-E2",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "更正范围与版本数字：原文依据",
      "text": "Correction adds Viktor Trifonov’s second affiliation only; no results amendment is stated. Publisher final abstract reports435 individuals; PMC accepted-manuscript abstract reports428 while its Introduction says367 newly reported plus68 improved datasets. The author-lab early-online PDF matches435 but lacks added affiliation. These versions must not be silently mixed. No complete corrected-layout article comparison was possible.",
      "source_id": "HU02-V05-S2",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08789-3",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature639,E14; published20February2025",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-V05-S2",
        "HU02-V05-S3",
        "HU02-S3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Correction paragraph and final HTML author-affiliation61; Author-lab published PDFpp.1–2,8–10; PMC11922553 author manuscript abstract and Introduction; Crossref correction relation",
      "id": "HU02-V05-P2",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "更正范围与版本数字：条件",
      "text": "更正原文、出版摘要、作者机构PDF和PMC作者稿逐项区分；遗传史与Indo-Anatolian/Indo-European术语范围另须对齐。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-V05-E2"
      ]
    },
    {
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-V05-S2",
        "HU02-V05-S3",
        "HU02-S3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Correction paragraph and final HTML author-affiliation61; Author-lab published PDFpp.1–2,8–10; PMC11922553 author manuscript abstract and Introduction; Crossref correction relation",
      "id": "HU02-V05-L2",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "更正范围与版本数字：限制",
      "text": "完整更正版布局仍缺；不把单位更正视为科学结论被撤回。古DNA测祖源，个体语言或族群身份仍非直接可观测量。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-V05-E2"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source_ids": [
        "HU02-V05-S2",
        "HU02-V05-S3",
        "HU02-S3"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Correction paragraph and final HTML author-affiliation61; Author-lab published PDFpp.1–2,8–10; PMC11922553 author manuscript abstract and Introduction; Crossref correction relation",
      "id": "HU02-V05-C2",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "更正范围与版本数字",
      "text": "2025Nature更正只补作者单位；不能解释或抹平作者稿428、正文367+68和出版摘要435之间的版本差异。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors source-reported scoped result or explicitly bounded editorial version comparison",
      "normative": false,
      "evidence_ids": [
        "HU02-V05-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "HU02-V05-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "HU02-V05-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "Only named passages and source versions; no replication or expert review.",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "Author correction, independent validation, missing source recovery or expert review changes the scoped interpretation.",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-V05-S1",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Two-Eyed Seeing and other lessons learned within a co-learning journey of bringing together indigenous and mainstream knowledges and ways of knowing",
      "label": "Two-Eyed Seeing and other lessons learned within a co-learning journey of bringing together indigenous and mainstream knowledges and ways of knowing",
      "text": "Two-Eyed Seeing and other lessons learned within a co-learning journey of bringing together indigenous and mainstream knowledges and ways of knowing; only the declared original passages are used.",
      "doi": "10.1007/s13412-012-0086-8",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://iaac-aeic.gc.ca/050/documents/p80156/132968E.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "J Environ Stud Sci 2:331–340 (2012), published online 16 August 2012; publisher-layout government-registry PDF",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Abstract/author setting pp.331–332",
        "program history and eight lessons pp.333–335",
        "knowledge-holder/authenticity and contextual validation p.337",
        "uptake/limits p.338"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "license": "Public reading access does not imply redistribution permission; retain original paraphrases, bibliographic metadata and links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No copyrighted full text or source figures included in this patch.",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "Public reading grants no authority over underlying community knowledge or local evaluation. Reported program experiences and uptake are not causal efficacy or enduring implementation evidence; no independent program audit conducted."
      ],
      "raw_file_sha256": "6280a5587a64f9fc70ad75e4af414e8e1b10654159bfd1ea645e6558cdf994a6",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      },
      "authors": [
        "Cheryl Bartlett",
        "Murdena Marshall",
        "Albert Marshall"
      ],
      "publication_date": "2012-08-16",
      "publication_date_precision": "day",
      "version_date": "2012 article; registry deposit revision date not verified",
      "publication_status": "published original situated process/reflection article; publisher-layout copy in Canadian assessment registry",
      "independence_group": "BARTLETT_MARSHALL_MARSHALL_2012_INTEGRATIVE_SCIENCE_PROCESS",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-012-0086-8",
      "access": "public_government_registry_pdf_named_passages_read"
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-V05-E1",
      "type": "evidence",
      "text": "The authors describe a Cape Breton/Mi’kmaw co-learning process, offer eight lessons and distinguish knowledge systems (pp.334–335). Program history records no new enrolments since 2007 and institutional/resource trouble (p.333). P.337 emphasizes recognized community knowledge holders, topic-specific expertise and living relationships.",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "related_baseline_ids": [
        "IK01-C1",
        "IK01-C5",
        "IK01-C6",
        "IK01-L5",
        "IK01-L6",
        "IK01-Q1"
      ],
      "supports_claim_ids": [
        "IK01-V05-C1"
      ],
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "label": "Two-Eyed Seeing 的情境化共同学习经验：原文依据",
      "source_id": "IK01-V05-S1",
      "sourceVersion": "J Environ Stud Sci 2:331–340 (2012), published online 16 August 2012; publisher-layout government-registry PDF",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://iaac-aeic.gc.ca/050/documents/p80156/132968E.pdf",
      "preciseLocator": "Printed pp.331–335,337–338; PDF pp.1–5,7–8",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "original paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-V05-P1",
      "type": "premise",
      "text": "This is a situated process/reflection article coauthored by Mi’kmaw Elders, not a controlled comparison of universal methods.",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "label": "Two-Eyed Seeing 的情境化共同学习经验：解释前提",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Printed pp.331–335,337–338; PDF pp.1–5,7–8",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_explicit_editorial_interpretation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-V05-L1",
      "type": "limitation",
      "text": "Public reading grants no authority over underlying community knowledge or local evaluation. Reported program experiences and uptake are not causal efficacy or enduring implementation evidence; no independent program audit conducted.",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "label": "Two-Eyed Seeing 的情境化共同学习经验：边界",
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Printed pp.331–335,337–338; PDF pp.1–5,7–8",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_explicit_editorial_interpretation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-V05-C1",
      "type": "claim",
      "text": "Bartlett and the Marshalls describe Two-Eyed Seeing as situated co-learning with distinct knowledge systems and community knowledge holders; their process account also records institutional conditions that undermined the original undergraduate program.",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "label": "Two-Eyed Seeing 的情境化共同学习经验",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "作者情境化过程经验与方法建议的文本归纳；不是控制试验效果。",
      "normative": true,
      "source_ids": [
        "IK01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "IK01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "IK01-V05-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "IK01-V05-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "Cape Breton Integrative Science co-learning experience described by Bartlett, Murdena Marshall and Albert Marshall in 2012, especially pp.331–335,337–338.",
      "status": "source_attributed_process_account_conditionally_supported",
      "what_would_change_status": "社群授权的情境评价及实施记录可改变效果判断；其他知识持有者和语境的认可不能由本篇或本项目代行。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-V05-S1",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Causal variant underestimation is a major overlooked driver of sequence-to-function model underperformance",
      "text": "仅核身份、摘要或索引片段与访问处置；完整原文未读。",
      "title": "Causal variant underestimation is a major overlooked driver of sequence-to-function model underperformance",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.08.750172v1.full",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.08.750172",
      "sourceVersion": "bioRxivv1,posted2026-09-11; official API says published:NA",
      "publication_status": "preprint_metadata_only",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "full_original_reading_target_unresolved",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Publisher abstract and official API metadata; indexed fulltext excerpts only, not reliable full Methods reading"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "Full original Methods/Results and validation details needed",
        "Preprint not peer reviewed",
        "Cannot equate this task with AlphaGenome broad benchmarks or Systema perturbation task"
      ],
      "license": "No fulltext redistribution permission assumed; public patch contains original paraphrases and source links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No source fulltexts, figures or tables redistributed.",
      "independence_group": "LS01_VERSION_FAMILY_SHARED_INPUT",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant checked identity, abstract/indexed excerpts and access disposition only; complete original full text was not read",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "identity_and_access_disposition_audited; not full-original-passage validation"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-V05-L1",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "原文缺口仍保留",
      "text": "Still an unread-fulltext evidence gap; more precise version and lawful route trace now recorded. Full original Methods/Results and validation details needed Preprint not peer reviewed Cannot equate this task with AlphaGenome broad benchmarks or Systema perturbation task",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [],
      "preciseLocator": "Publisher abstract and official API metadata; indexed fulltext excerpts only, not reliable full Methods reading",
      "origin": "bounded_access_gap_not_negative_scientific_evidence"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-V05-S2",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "AlphaGenome Atlas: in silico mutagenesis of the entire human genome improves prioritization and interpretation of non-coding variants",
      "text": "新增阅读范围或版本定位；不是独立复现。",
      "title": "AlphaGenome Atlas: in silico mutagenesis of the entire human genome improves prioritization and interpretation of non-coding variants",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13596691/fullTextXML",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.16.26363192",
      "sourceVersion": "medRxiv v1 posted 2026-09-20; Europe PMC deposited preprint PMC13596691",
      "publication_status": "preprint_not_peer_reviewed",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "lawful_original_scoped_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Results: AVI prioritization helped resolve a rare disease case",
        "Methods: Training Data; Data Split; Overlap Filtering during Evaluation; GREGoR retrospective",
        "Discussion first two paragraphs; Figure 3A caption"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "Preprint, not peer reviewed",
        "No independent benchmark rerun or complete supplement audit",
        "No general disease-outcome prediction established"
      ],
      "license": "No fulltext redistribution permission assumed; public patch contains original paraphrases and source links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No source fulltexts, figures or tables redistributed.",
      "independence_group": "ALPHAGENOME_ATLAS2026_SHARED_MODEL_AND_INPUTS",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results: AVI prioritization helped resolve a rare disease case; Methods: Training Data; Data Split; Overlap Filtering during Evaluation; GREGoR retrospective; Discussion first two paragraphs; Figure 3A caption",
      "id": "LS01-V05-E1",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "Atlas回顾性排序：原文依据",
      "text": "AVI combines AlphaGenome features with conservation, AlphaMissense and annotations, trained using gnomAD allele-frequency proxy labels. In 112 previously solved GREGoR variants, top-50 recall was 29.5% versus 12.5% for CADD; an allele-frequency-filtered subset of 105 variants gave 74.3% versus 61%. These are retrospective prioritization endpoints, not population-wide diagnostic accuracy. Coordinate-overlap exclusions are specified. Discussion preserves missing cell-type/RNA coverage and unmodelled trans effects.",
      "source_id": "LS01-V05-S2",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13596691/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "medRxiv v1 posted 2026-09-20; Europe PMC deposited preprint PMC13596691",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results: AVI prioritization helped resolve a rare disease case; Methods: Training Data; Data Split; Overlap Filtering during Evaluation; GREGoR retrospective; Discussion first two paragraphs; Figure 3A caption",
      "id": "LS01-V05-P1",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "Atlas回顾性排序：条件",
      "text": "AVI整合AlphaGenome、保守性与其他特征；112个既有致病/可能致病变异，低频筛选后105个。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS01-V05-E1"
      ]
    },
    {
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results: AVI prioritization helped resolve a rare disease case; Methods: Training Data; Data Split; Overlap Filtering during Evaluation; GREGoR retrospective; Discussion first two paragraphs; Figure 3A caption",
      "id": "LS01-V05-L2",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "Atlas回顾性排序：限制",
      "text": "不是全人群诊断准确率；模型还缺少部分细胞/RNA覆盖和trans机制。预印本未获独立复现；与AlphaGenome原论文和Systema不是同一任务。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Results: AVI prioritization helped resolve a rare disease case; Methods: Training Data; Data Split; Overlap Filtering during Evaluation; GREGoR retrospective; Discussion first two paragraphs; Figure 3A caption",
      "id": "LS01-V05-C1",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "Atlas回顾性排序",
      "text": "AVI在指定已解决病例的回顾性候选排序中优于所比较CADD基线；该结论有明确分母和筛选条件。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors source-reported scoped result or explicitly bounded editorial version comparison",
      "normative": false,
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS01-V05-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS01-V05-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "Only named passages and source versions; no replication or expert review.",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "Author correction, independent validation, missing source recovery or expert review changes the scoped interpretation.",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-V05-S1",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Lecanemab in Early Alzheimer’s Disease",
      "text": "仅核身份、摘要或索引片段与访问处置；完整原文未读。",
      "title": "Lecanemab in Early Alzheimer’s Disease",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/oa_4/2191/",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2212948",
      "sourceVersion": "NEJM388:9–21(2023),online2022-11-29; publisher Notable Articles2023 anthology contains original abstract page9 and research summary, not whole13-page trial",
      "publication_status": "published_trial_abstract_and_summary_only",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "full_original_reading_target_unresolved",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Publisher abstract and indexed Discussion limitations; Notable Articles2023 physical PDFpp.65–66 (anthology61–62)",
        "Washington University permission/reprint metadata"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "Original full Methods/Results/harms table still needed",
        "No full Supplementary Appendix or protocol audit"
      ],
      "license": "No fulltext redistribution permission assumed; public patch contains original paraphrases and source links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No source fulltexts, figures or tables redistributed.",
      "independence_group": "LS04_VERSION_FAMILY_SHARED_INPUT",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant checked identity, abstract/indexed excerpts and access disposition only; complete original full text was not read",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "identity_and_access_disposition_audited; not full-original-passage validation"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-V05-L1",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "原文缺口仍保留",
      "text": "Source identity, official abstract and lawful institutional reprint located; full original efficacy/harms text remains incompletely read. Original full Methods/Results/harms table still needed No full Supplementary Appendix or protocol audit",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [],
      "preciseLocator": "Publisher abstract and indexed Discussion limitations; Notable Articles2023 physical PDFpp.65–66 (anthology61–62); Washington University permission/reprint metadata",
      "origin": "bounded_access_gap_not_negative_scientific_evidence"
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-V05-S2",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Comparison of double-blind and open-label decline rates in lecanemab and donanemab trials in Alzheimer’s disease",
      "text": "新增阅读范围或版本定位；不是独立复现。",
      "title": "Comparison of double-blind and open-label decline rates in lecanemab and donanemab trials in Alzheimer’s disease",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13475089/fullTextXML",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2026-001649",
      "sourceVersion": "BMJ Neurology Open 8(2), e001649 (2026); original deposited full XML PMC13475089",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_or_official_source",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "lawful_original_scoped_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Methods: Overview of simulation framework; Trial populations; Data extraction and calibration; Statistical analysis",
        "Results: Comparison of DB and OLE slopes in lecanemab and donanemab; Figure 1 and 2 captions",
        "Discussion: limitations paragraph beginning One of the primary limitations"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "No individual trial data obtained",
        "Supplemental code not rerun",
        "Not new randomized evidence; expert review pending"
      ],
      "license": "No fulltext redistribution permission assumed; public patch contains original paraphrases and source links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No source fulltexts, figures or tables redistributed.",
      "independence_group": "CLARITY_AD_AND_TRAILBLAZER_REANALYSIS_SHARED_AGGREGATE_INPUTS",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-V05-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Methods: Overview of simulation framework; Trial populations; Data extraction and calibration; Statistical analysis; Results: Comparison of DB and OLE slopes in lecanemab and donanemab; Figure 1 and 2 captions; Discussion: limitations paragraph beginning One of the primary limitations",
      "id": "LS04-V05-E1",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "延长研究的依赖性重分析：原文依据",
      "text": "Authors fit simulations to published aggregate trajectories and digitized figures, and separately compare aggregate observed slopes. They report faster open-label than double-blind treated-group decline and challenge increasing-benefit claims based on historical untreated cohorts. Their simulated participant records are not sponsor individual-level observations; random attrition and uncertain within-person correlation are stated limitations. Cross-phase slope comparison lacks a contemporaneous untreated randomized extension control and cannot itself establish no causal long-term benefit or prove a placebo mechanism.",
      "source_id": "LS04-V05-S2",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13475089/fullTextXML",
      "sourceVersion": "BMJ Neurology Open 8(2), e001649 (2026); original deposited full XML PMC13475089",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-V05-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Methods: Overview of simulation framework; Trial populations; Data extraction and calibration; Statistical analysis; Results: Comparison of DB and OLE slopes in lecanemab and donanemab; Figure 1 and 2 captions; Discussion: limitations paragraph beginning One of the primary limitations",
      "id": "LS04-V05-P1",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "延长研究的依赖性重分析：条件",
      "text": "模拟个体数据不是申办方原始个体数据；比较双盲与开放阶段，另有汇总观察斜率分析。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS04-V05-E1"
      ]
    },
    {
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-V05-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Methods: Overview of simulation framework; Trial populations; Data extraction and calibration; Statistical analysis; Results: Comparison of DB and OLE slopes in lecanemab and donanemab; Figure 1 and 2 captions; Discussion: limitations paragraph beginning One of the primary limitations",
      "id": "LS04-V05-L2",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "延长研究的依赖性重分析：限制",
      "text": "随机脱落等假设和跨阶段差异仍可能影响结论；不能仅由此证明长期因果效应为零、机制为安慰剂，或取消短期随机效应。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS04-V05-E1"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source_ids": [
        "LS04-V05-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Methods: Overview of simulation framework; Trial populations; Data extraction and calibration; Statistical analysis; Results: Comparison of DB and OLE slopes in lecanemab and donanemab; Figure 1 and 2 captions; Discussion: limitations paragraph beginning One of the primary limitations",
      "id": "LS04-V05-C1",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "延长研究的依赖性重分析",
      "text": "2026重分析质疑以历史对照解释开放延长期递增获益；其依据是已发表汇总轨迹的模拟校准和阶段斜率比较。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors source-reported scoped result or explicitly bounded editorial version comparison",
      "normative": false,
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LS04-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LS04-V05-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LS04-V05-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "Only named passages and source versions; no replication or expert review.",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "Author correction, independent validation, missing source recovery or expert review changes the scoped interpretation.",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-S1",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "How Facts Make Law",
      "label": "How Facts Make Law",
      "text": "How Facts Make Law; only the declared original passages are used.",
      "doi": "10.1017/S1352325204040212",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://escholarship.org/content/qt2fr3n5h2/qt2fr3n5h2.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "Legal Theory 10 (2004), 157–198 publisher-layout article with UCLA repository cover; repository deposit 2005-08-30 is not publication date",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Introduction pp.157–159",
        "rational-relation doctrine pp.164–165",
        "scope p.173",
        "model argument opening pp.178–180",
        "value facts/conceptual truth pp.187–189",
        "conclusion and limits pp.197–198"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "license": "Public reading access does not imply redistribution permission; retain original paraphrases, bibliographic metadata and links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No copyrighted full text or source figures included in this patch.",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "Selected argumentative sections read, not every footnote or all cited literature. This is Greenberg’s argument, not a demonstrated consensus or update to current law."
      ],
      "raw_file_sha256": "bef13644338c39726ad250279fcd4ae8aa489e5510318dd462ccc3761f4bdbdd",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      },
      "authors": [
        "Mark Greenberg"
      ],
      "publication_date": "2004",
      "publication_date_precision": "year",
      "version_date": "2004 article; repository deposit 2005-08-30",
      "publication_status": "published original legal-philosophical argument; publisher-layout copy in UCLA repository",
      "independence_group": "GREENBERG_2004_ORIGINAL_ARGUMENT",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325204040212",
      "access": "public_institutional_repository_pdf_named_passages_read"
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-E1",
      "type": "evidence",
      "text": "Greenberg argues practices need independent standards to determine their contribution to legal content; the rational-relation requirement concerns intelligibility of grounding, not goodness of every law. At pp.197–198 he denies that moral attractiveness alone makes a legal proposition true and does not conclusively exclude all internal legal-value accounts.",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "related_baseline_ids": [
        "LW01-C4",
        "LW01-C5",
        "LW01-L5",
        "LW01-Q1"
      ],
      "supports_claim_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-C1"
      ],
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "label": "Greenberg 的构成解释论证：原文依据",
      "source_id": "LW01-V05-S1",
      "sourceVersion": "Legal Theory 10 (2004), 157–198 publisher-layout article with UCLA repository cover; repository deposit 2005-08-30 is not publication date",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://escholarship.org/content/qt2fr3n5h2/qt2fr3n5h2.pdf",
      "preciseLocator": "Legal Theory printed pp.164–165, 173, 178–180, 187–189, 197–198; PDF pp.9–10,18,23–25,32–34,42–43",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "original paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-P1",
      "type": "premise",
      "text": "Argument conditional on determinate legal requirements and practices partly determining them (p.173); intelligibility is an additional premise (pp.164–165).",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "label": "Greenberg 的构成解释论证：解释前提",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Legal Theory printed pp.164–165, 173, 178–180, 187–189, 197–198; PDF pp.9–10,18,23–25,32–34,42–43",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_explicit_editorial_interpretation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-L1",
      "type": "limitation",
      "text": "Selected argumentative sections read, not every footnote or all cited literature. This is Greenberg’s argument, not a demonstrated consensus or update to current law.",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "label": "Greenberg 的构成解释论证：边界",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Legal Theory printed pp.164–165, 173, 178–180, 187–189, 197–198; PDF pp.9–10,18,23–25,32–34,42–43",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_explicit_editorial_interpretation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-C1",
      "type": "claim",
      "text": "Greenberg argues that practices alone cannot give a rationally intelligible constitutive account of determinate legal content; his proposed value role does not imply that moral attractiveness alone makes a legal proposition true.",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "label": "Greenberg 的构成解释论证",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "原文哲学论证的限定归纳；不是经验测量或本项目认可其前提。",
      "normative": true,
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "Greenberg 2004, selected argument passages pp.164–165,173,178–180,187–189,197–198; constitutive explanation of determinate legal content.",
      "status": "source_attributed_argument_conditionally_supported",
      "what_would_change_status": "原文其他段落或相关批评若改变此处的论证归属和限定，应修订转述；解决争论须另行评估前提与反论证。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-S2",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "A Positivist Route for Explaining How Facts Make Law",
      "label": "A Positivist Route for Explaining How Facts Make Law",
      "text": "A Positivist Route for Explaining How Facts Make Law; only the declared original passages are used.",
      "doi": "10.1017/S1352325212000079",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.plunkett.host.dartmouth.edu/a-positivist-route-for.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "Legal Theory 18 (2012), 139–207; author-institution hosted publisher-layout PDF with DOI",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Abstract and introduction pp.139–143",
        "argument construction and limits pp.199–203"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "license": "Public reading access does not imply redistribution permission; retain original paraphrases, bibliographic metadata and links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No copyrighted full text or source figures included in this patch.",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "Only named sections read; no ruling between competitors or survey of contemporary legal-philosophy consensus. The author’s provisional route must not be reported as an established defeat of Greenberg."
      ],
      "raw_file_sha256": "3348dde68f2ed812adffdf9b8bb64c79b83dfafefd7887e44ae14b5924b91c26",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      },
      "authors": [
        "David Plunkett"
      ],
      "publication_date": "2012",
      "publication_date_precision": "year",
      "version_date": "2012 article; exact repository-file revision date not stated",
      "publication_status": "published original legal-philosophical argument; publisher-layout copy on author Dartmouth site",
      "independence_group": "PLUNKETT_2012_ORIGINAL_ARGUMENT",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325212000079",
      "access": "public_author_institution_pdf_named_passages_read"
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-E2",
      "type": "evidence",
      "text": "Plunkett combines a version of Shapiro’s planning theory with Chalmers/Jackson-style conceptual facts to make social grounding intelligible (pp.199–200). He explicitly says p.201 that his outline does not conclusively establish those conceptual facts or successful completion of the challenge, and requires defense of planning and grounding accounts.",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "related_baseline_ids": [
        "LW01-C4",
        "LW01-C5",
        "LW01-L5",
        "LW01-Q1"
      ],
      "supports_claim_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-C2"
      ],
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "label": "Plunkett 的候选实证主义回应：原文依据",
      "source_id": "LW01-V05-S2",
      "sourceVersion": "Legal Theory 18 (2012), 139–207; author-institution hosted publisher-layout PDF with DOI",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.plunkett.host.dartmouth.edu/a-positivist-route-for.pdf",
      "preciseLocator": "Printed pp.199–203, especially p.201 (PDF pp.61–65, especially p.63)",
      "evidence_kind": "primary_text_report",
      "extraction": "original paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-P2",
      "type": "premise",
      "text": "Uses a proposed conceptual link between legal institutions and legal norms, plus a particular account of concepts, plans and constitutive explanation.",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "label": "Plunkett 的候选实证主义回应：解释前提",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Printed pp.199–203, especially p.201 (PDF pp.61–65, especially p.63)",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_explicit_editorial_interpretation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-L2",
      "type": "limitation",
      "text": "Only named sections read; no ruling between competitors or survey of contemporary legal-philosophy consensus. The author’s provisional route must not be reported as an established defeat of Greenberg.",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "label": "Plunkett 的候选实证主义回应：边界",
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-E2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Printed pp.199–203, especially p.201 (PDF pp.61–65, especially p.63)",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_explicit_editorial_interpretation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-C2",
      "type": "claim",
      "text": "Plunkett proposes a planning-theoretic, conceptual-facts route to meeting Greenberg’s rational-relation challenge, explicitly leaving its full defense unfinished.",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "label": "Plunkett 的候选实证主义回应",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "原文候选反论证的限定归纳；未宣布其已完成反驳。",
      "normative": true,
      "source_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "Plunkett 2012, introduction pp.139–143 and proposal/limits pp.199–203.",
      "status": "source_attributed_argument_conditionally_supported",
      "what_would_change_status": "完整论证与批评若显示该路线已完成或无法满足所声明前提，应修改其暂定地位；本轮没有作此裁决。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-V05-S1",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Sexual dimorphism in the complete Drosophila male central nervous system connectome",
      "text": "新增阅读范围或版本定位；不是独立复现。",
      "title": "Sexual dimorphism in the complete Drosophila male central nervous system connectome",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/api/core/bitstreams/014024cf-3435-4a89-a5ed-bc34e2385772/content",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2026.08.015",
      "sourceVersion": "Cell 189,5504–5526.e15, 2026-09-03 published version; Cambridge Apollo PDF, CC BY",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_or_official_source",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "lawful_original_scoped_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Published pp.5504–5505 Summary and Creating the male CNS connectome (PDF pp.2–3)",
        "Published p.5520 Limitations of the study (PDF p.18)",
        "STAR Methods dimorphic-edge filtering paragraphs (text lines2412–2494)"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "No raw EM proofreading audit or code reproduction",
        "Not all supplementary figures reviewed",
        "Female CNS comparison and functional confirmation remain incomplete"
      ],
      "license": "No fulltext redistribution permission assumed; public patch contains original paraphrases and source links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No source fulltexts, figures or tables redistributed.",
      "independence_group": "MALE_CNS_BERG2026_SINGLE_MALE_COMPARISON",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-V05-S1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Published pp.5504–5505 Summary and Creating the male CNS connectome (PDF pp.2–3); Published p.5520 Limitations of the study (PDF p.18); STAR Methods dimorphic-edge filtering paragraphs (text lines2412–2494)",
      "id": "NS02-V05-E1",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "雄性CNS结构资源：原文依据",
      "text": "The published study reports 166,700 proofread/annotated neurons across male brain and nerve cord and 11,710 types. Cross-sex brain comparisons distinguish 8,069 isomorphic,138 dimorphic,289 male-specific and71 female-specific types. Methods filter weak/variable connections and control false discovery. Limitations explicitly state that female nerve-cord comparisons remain restricted and behavioral/information-flow predictions require functional confirmation.",
      "source_id": "NS02-V05-S1",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/api/core/bitstreams/014024cf-3435-4a89-a5ed-bc34e2385772/content",
      "sourceVersion": "Cell 189,5504–5526.e15, 2026-09-03 published version; Cambridge Apollo PDF, CC BY",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-V05-S1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Published pp.5504–5505 Summary and Creating the male CNS connectome (PDF pp.2–3); Published p.5520 Limitations of the study (PDF p.18); STAR Methods dimorphic-edge filtering paragraphs (text lines2412–2494)",
      "id": "NS02-V05-P1",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "雄性CNS结构资源：条件",
      "text": "雄性脑与神经索结构重建；8,069同构、138异形、289雄性特异、71雌性特异类型属于脑比较。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS02-V05-E1"
      ]
    },
    {
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-V05-S1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Published pp.5504–5505 Summary and Creating the male CNS connectome (PDF pp.2–3); Published p.5520 Limitations of the study (PDF p.18); STAR Methods dimorphic-edge filtering paragraphs (text lines2412–2494)",
      "id": "NS02-V05-L1",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "雄性CNS结构资源：限制",
      "text": "完整雌性CNS比较未完成；边差异分析左右半球各性别n=2并非独立多动物重复，技术伪影和单动物快照仍重要。功能/行为预测须实验确认。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS02-V05-E1"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-V05-S1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Published pp.5504–5505 Summary and Creating the male CNS connectome (PDF pp.2–3); Published p.5520 Limitations of the study (PDF p.18); STAR Methods dimorphic-edge filtering paragraphs (text lines2412–2494)",
      "id": "NS02-V05-C1",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "雄性CNS结构资源",
      "text": "2026发表的雄蝇CNS资源含166,700个经校对标注神经元、11,710种类型；跨性别类型计数只针对脑的比较。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors source-reported scoped result or explicitly bounded editorial version comparison",
      "normative": false,
      "evidence_ids": [
        "NS02-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "NS02-V05-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "NS02-V05-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "Only named passages and source versions; no replication or expert review.",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "Author correction, independent validation, missing source recovery or expert review changes the scoped interpretation.",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-V05-S2",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Connectome-constrained modeling identifies neurons and synapses that sustain spontaneous activity in Drosophila",
      "text": "仅核身份、摘要或索引片段与访问处置；完整原文未读。",
      "title": "Connectome-constrained modeling identifies neurons and synapses that sustain spontaneous activity in Drosophila",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.21.745055v1.full",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.21.745055",
      "sourceVersion": "bioRxivv1,posted2026-08-25; official API says published:NA",
      "publication_status": "preprint_metadata_only",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "full_original_reading_target_unresolved",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Publisher-indexed excerpts and API metadata only; original fulltext could not be directly obtained"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "Original fulltext and control architecture/supplement needed",
        "No model rerun or live-animal intervention verification"
      ],
      "license": "No fulltext redistribution permission assumed; public patch contains original paraphrases and source links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No source fulltexts, figures or tables redistributed.",
      "independence_group": "NS02_VERSION_FAMILY_SHARED_INPUT",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant checked identity, abstract/indexed excerpts and access disposition only; complete original full text was not read",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "identity_and_access_disposition_audited; not full-original-passage validation"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-V05-L2",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "原文缺口仍保留",
      "text": "Version is now crosschecked, but fulltext evidence gap remains open. Original fulltext and control architecture/supplement needed No model rerun or live-animal intervention verification",
      "source_ids": [
        "NS02-V05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [],
      "preciseLocator": "Publisher-indexed excerpts and API metadata only; original fulltext could not be directly obtained",
      "origin": "bounded_access_gap_not_negative_scientific_evidence"
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-V05-S1",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "DESI DR2 Results II · v3",
      "text": "DESI DR2 Results II · v3",
      "title": "DESI DR2 Results II · v3",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2503.14738v3",
      "metadataUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2503.14738v3",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv2503.14738v3;2025-10-09; PRD112083515 DOI10.1103/tr6y-kpc6",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "publication_status": "arXiv2503.14738v3;2025-10-09; PRD112083515 DOI10.1103/tr6y-kpc6",
      "access": "public_original_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "VII.1 Fig11 and Table6; CMB/SNe combination context"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "all figures/data/chains"
      ],
      "independence_group": "DESI_DR2_LYA_AND_SHARED_JOINT_DATA",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "license": "Original paraphrase and links only; no fulltext or figures redistributed",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "Private raw retrievals excluded from public deliverable",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-V05-E1",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "联合显著性语境复核",
      "text": "DR2IV图10、式32后和Table4一致列DES-Dovekie组合3.2σ，结论仍写泛称SNe的3.1σ。DR2II的3.1σ对应不含SNe的BAO+CMB，不能代替解释；DR2IV附录C也未含LyαFS。",
      "source_id": "P02-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P02-S1",
        "P02-V05-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/html/2607.27410v3",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv:2607.27410v3",
      "preciseLocator": "DR2IV VI.1,VI.4.1 Fig10/Eq32,VI.5 Table4,VII,AppendixC Fig16; DR2II VII.1/Table6",
      "extraction": "original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-V05-L1",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "v0.5 限定",
      "text": "已检查两幅相关图的图例和原始组合；仍无原始更正或匹配似然结果解释末位差异，保留P02-L4。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P02-S1",
        "P02-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P02-V05-E1"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_editorial_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-V05-S1",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "H0DN A&A最终发表版",
      "text": "H0DN A&A最终发表版",
      "title": "H0DN A&A最终发表版",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/240623/1/aa57993-25.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/240623/1/aa57993-25.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "A&A708A166(2026); DOI10.1051/0004-6361/202557993; published2026-04-10",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "publication_status": "A&A708A166(2026); DOI10.1051/0004-6361/202557993; published2026-04-10",
      "access": "public_original_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "journal p.5 selected §2.4.1 opening; p.9 Table4; pp.10–11 Eq1/baseline; p.13 CMB; p.18 §5.3.2; p.20 Figs12–13/§6; p.21 significance"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "full-document line-by-line comparison",
        "raw-data reanalysis"
      ],
      "independence_group": "H0DN_LOCAL_DISTANCE_NETWORK",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "license": "Original paraphrase and links only; no fulltext or figures redistributed",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "Private raw retrievals excluded from public deliverable",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-V05-E1",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "正式版保留五项限定",
      "text": "正式版保留73.50±0.81、无造父72.509±1.296、无Ia73.434±1.795，以及19路径相关性、缺少完整跨梯级协方差和指定CMB+平直ΛCDM的7.1σ语境。O2等行存在小改动，不能称全文与v1相同。",
      "source_id": "P03-V05-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P03-V05-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/240623/1/aa57993-25.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "A&A708A166(2026); DOI10.1051/0004-6361/202557993; published2026-04-10",
      "preciseLocator": "journal p.9 Table4 V00/V08/V13/O2; pp.10–13 §4; p.18 §5.3.2; p.20 §6/Fig13; p.21",
      "extraction": "original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-S1",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "96K论文最终链接补充信息",
      "text": "96K论文最终链接补充信息",
      "title": "96K论文最终链接补充信息",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-025-09954-4/MediaObjects/41586_2025_9954_MOESM1_ESM.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-025-09954-4/MediaObjects/41586_2025_9954_MOESM1_ESM.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature publisher-linked SI; six-page file read2026-10-04",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "publication_status": "Nature publisher-linked SI; six-page file read2026-10-04",
      "access": "public_original_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "pp.1–6 all text/captions; p.3 visual"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw diffraction data",
        "all plot pixels",
        "final main VoR"
      ],
      "independence_group": "LI_NICKELATE_HIGH_PRESSURE_2501_14584",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "license": "Original paraphrase and links only; no fulltext or figures redistributed",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "Private raw retrievals excluded from public deliverable",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-E1",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "SI为结构支持",
      "text": "补充图1–3是衍射拟合和晶格参数；并未新增96K的零电阻或Meissner端点。96K限定仍应按已读接受稿和正式扩展图10。",
      "source_id": "P12-V05-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-V05-S1",
        "P12-S1",
        "P12-S4"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-025-09954-4/MediaObjects/41586_2025_9954_MOESM1_ESM.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "Nature publisher-linked SI; six-page file read2026-10-04",
      "preciseLocator": "SIpp.2–5 contents/Figs1–3; finalED10 caption; acceptedpp.6–7",
      "extraction": "original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-L1",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "v0.5 限定",
      "text": "补充结构材料的回收不把96K电阻onset升级为96K体Meissner或零电阻。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-V05-S1",
        "P12-S1",
        "P12-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-V05-E1"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_editorial_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-S2",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Korolev与Talantsev的体积分数批评",
      "text": "Korolev与Talantsev的体积分数批评",
      "title": "Korolev与Talantsev的体积分数批评",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.23240",
      "metadataUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.23240",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv2602.23240v1;2026-02-26; preprint",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "publication_status": "arXiv2602.23240v1;2026-02-26; preprint",
      "access": "public_original_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "pp.1–5 argument/Eqs1–12; references scanned"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "independent data reanalysis",
        "expert adjudication"
      ],
      "independence_group": "KOROLEV_TALANTSEV_METHOD_CRITIQUE",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "license": "Original paraphrase and links only; no fulltext or figures redistributed",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "Private raw retrievals excluded from public deliverable",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-S3",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Li等对体积分数批评的回应",
      "text": "Li等对体积分数批评的回应",
      "title": "Li等对体积分数批评的回应",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.23842",
      "metadataUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.23842",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv2602.23842v1;2026-02-27; preprint",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "publication_status": "arXiv2602.23842v1;2026-02-27; preprint",
      "access": "public_original_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "pp.2–4 responses1–3/Eqs1–8; p.3 visually inspected"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "independent replication",
        "expert adjudication"
      ],
      "independence_group": "LI_NICKELATE_HIGH_PRESSURE_2501_14584",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "license": "Original paraphrase and links only; no fulltext or figures redistributed",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "Private raw retrievals excluded from public deliverable",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-E2",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "批评的计算与限定",
      "text": "批评者以理想Meissner磁矩比和N=0.81548算出22.8%，并质疑未知超导区域几何下体积分数的唯一性；其正文明确不否认测得抗磁性。",
      "source_id": "P12-V05-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-V05-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.23240",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv2602.23240v1;2026-02-26; preprint",
      "preciseLocator": "pp.1–5 especiallyEq9 and geometry discussionpp.4–5",
      "extraction": "original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-E3",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "回应的自洽模型",
      "text": "回应者以χint≈−f及随实际磁矩改变的退磁场推得f=−χmeas/(1−Nχmeas)，维持约62.1%；并以均匀性证据和背景解释回应FC与几何质疑。",
      "source_id": "P12-V05-S3",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-V05-S3",
        "P12-S4"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.23842",
      "sourceVersion": "arXiv2602.23842v1;2026-02-27; preprint",
      "preciseLocator": "replypp.2–4 responses1–3,Eq7; originalacceptedp.15",
      "extraction": "original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-P2",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "适用条件",
      "text": "使用理想Meissner磁矩比、指定圆盘退磁因子及可能不同的超导区域几何。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-V05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-V05-E2"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-L2",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "v0.5 限定",
      "text": "批评为预印本方法主张；不是已接受勘误，也没有否定实际抗磁观测。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-V05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-V05-E2"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_editorial_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-C2",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "方法批评（归属原作者）",
      "text": "Korolev与Talantsev认为原文超导体积分数估计有误，并认为有限磁矩不能唯一确定实际超导体积。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "attributed author inference or assessment; not independent project measurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-V05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-V05-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P12-V05-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P12-V05-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "La2SmNi2O7在20.6GPa的磁响应及体积分数解释",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "可核验的新原文、经审查的方法或独立复核改变该限定结论。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-P3",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "适用条件",
      "text": "固有磁化率近似−f、采用整体样品几何N=0.849，背景已扣除。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-V05-S3",
        "P12-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-V05-E3"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-L3",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "v0.5 限定",
      "text": "作者回应不是独立重复；几何/均匀性与推断假设仍需领域审查。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-V05-S3",
        "P12-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-V05-E3"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_editorial_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-C3",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "作者回应（归属原作者）",
      "text": "Li等认为自洽退磁修正与均匀单晶证据支持原来的约62.1%估计，批评没有使其失效。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "attributed author inference or assessment; not independent project measurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-V05-S3",
        "P12-S4"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-V05-E3"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P12-V05-P3"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P12-V05-L3"
      ],
      "scope": "同一La2SmNi2O7磁样品；不等于La1.57Sm1.43Ni2O7−δ的96K输运onset",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "可核验的新原文、经审查的方法或独立复核改变该限定结论。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-L4",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "v0.5 限定",
      "text": "这是真实方法分歧，应并列归属，不能把22.8%当已生效更正，也不能凭回应较新就认为争论解决。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-S4",
        "P12-V05-S2",
        "P12-V05-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-V05-E2",
        "P12-V05-E3"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_editorial_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-S4",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "原作者Zenodo数据存档v2",
      "text": "原作者Zenodo数据存档v2",
      "title": "原作者Zenodo数据存档v2",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/18245895",
      "metadataUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/18245895",
      "sourceVersion": "Zenodo18245895v2;2026-01-15",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "publication_status": "Zenodo18245895v2;2026-01-15",
      "access": "public_original_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "record description/version and SI identity"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "ExtendedDataFig4 numeric before/after delta",
        "all raw data"
      ],
      "independence_group": "LI_NICKELATE_HIGH_PRESSURE_2501_14584",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "license": "Original paraphrase and links only; no fulltext or figures redistributed",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "Private raw retrievals excluded from public deliverable",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-E4",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "数据版本更新有界",
      "text": "存档v2说明相对v1更新了ExtendedDataFig4源数据。没有据此证明正文更正或撤稿；本次未审计其数值差异。",
      "source_id": "P12-V05-S4",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-V05-S4"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/18245895",
      "sourceVersion": "Zenodo18245895v2;2026-01-15",
      "preciseLocator": "Description paragraph2 and files list",
      "extraction": "original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-L5",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "v0.5 限定",
      "text": "数据文件版本更新、arXiv元数据/内容错配、以及方法争论是三个不同事件。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P12-V05-S4",
        "P12-V05-S2",
        "P12-V05-S3"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P12-V05-E4",
        "P12-V05-E2",
        "P12-V05-E3"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_editorial_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-V05-S1",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Hu et al. supplementary stability figure39",
      "label": "补充图39：48小时稳定性测试条件",
      "text": "正式论文公开关联补充材料；本轮只核对身份页及第53页图39。",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41467-026-69506-w/MediaObjects/41467_2026_69506_MOESM1_ESM.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69506-w",
      "sourceVersion": "Publisher-linked 69-page Supplementary Information for Nature Communications17,2684(2026), DOI10.1038/s41467-026-69506-w; article published2026-02-12, VoR2026-03-23; SI PDF metadata2026-02-10",
      "version_date": "2026-03-23",
      "publication_status": "publisher-hosted supplementary information linked from peer-reviewed article",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "SIp.1 title/author identity",
        "SIp.53 Fig.39 visually inspected at1600px plus caption text",
        "Publisher HTML relevant48-hour Results paragraph, supplement link and publication dates"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "public_publisher_pdf_named_figure_read_and_visually_checked",
      "license": "Main article marked CC BY-NC-ND4.0; no fulltext or figure redistributed; original paraphrase and source link only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No fulltext/figure redistribution.",
      "independence_group": "HU2026_THERMAL_CO2_FLOWCELL",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "not_reviewed": [
        "No raw-data digitization/reanalysis",
        "No complete69-page SI review",
        "48-hour maintained bench run does not establish maintenance-free industrial lifetime or variable-power performance"
      ],
      "raw_file_sha256": "5ff52e07eb7ff820bf19917d96b7769fad771a002f18383e9bf58159452de0c7",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against title and Fig.39; independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-V05-E1",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "图39显示运行条件与电解液补加",
      "text": "补充图39给出−200mA/cm²、348K、1.0M KOH下的稳定性轨迹，并在约28小时标注补加电解液；因此48小时记录包含这一维护操作。",
      "source_id": "P13-V05-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P13-V05-S1"
      ],
      "sourceVersion": "Publisher-linked 69-page Supplementary Information for Nature Communications17,2684(2026), DOI10.1038/s41467-026-69506-w; article published2026-02-12, VoR2026-03-23; SI PDF metadata2026-02-10",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41467-026-69506-w/MediaObjects/41467_2026_69506_MOESM1_ESM.pdf",
      "preciseLocator": "Supplementary Information PDF/printedp.53,Fig.39:caption,plot axes and electrolyte-addition arrow atabout28h",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-V05-S1",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Mi论文当前已更正SI",
      "text": "Mi论文当前已更正SI",
      "title": "Mi论文当前已更正SI",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-025-09675-8/MediaObjects/41586_2025_9675_MOESM1_ESM.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-025-09675-8/MediaObjects/41586_2025_9675_MOESM1_ESM.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "publisher SI retrieved2026-10-04 after2026-07-29 correction",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "publication_status": "publisher SI retrieved2026-10-04 after2026-07-29 correction",
      "access": "public_original_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "PDFpp.24–26/printed23–25; Fig11e/f visually checked"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "main manuscript",
        "rest of109-pageSI",
        "raw curves"
      ],
      "independence_group": "MI2025_DUCTILE_SEI",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "license": "Original paraphrase and links only; no fulltext or figures redistributed",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "Private raw retrievals excluded from public deliverable",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-V05-E1",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "更正已落到SI",
      "text": "当前SI的Fig11f与Table3列PALA迁移数0.71；Fig11e说明10mV极化试验，与已读正式更正的目标相符。",
      "source_id": "P14-V05-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P14-V05-S1",
        "P14-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-025-09675-8/MediaObjects/41586_2025_9675_MOESM1_ESM.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "publisher SI retrieved2026-10-04 after2026-07-29 correction",
      "preciseLocator": "PDFpp.24–26 Fig11e–f andTable3",
      "extraction": "original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-V05-S1",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "逆偏压论文新增Note10",
      "text": "逆偏压论文新增Note10",
      "title": "逆偏压论文新增Note10",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41560-026-02067-w/MediaObjects/41560_2026_2067_MOESM1_ESM.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41560-026-02067-w/MediaObjects/41560_2026_2067_MOESM1_ESM.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "publisher SI updated2026-08-12;54pages",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "publication_status": "publisher SI updated2026-08-12;54pages",
      "access": "public_original_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "pp.13–14 Note10 lines282–306"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "main text",
        "instrument-specific raw tracing audit",
        "rest ofSI"
      ],
      "independence_group": "WANG2026_GRADED_DIELECTRIC",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "license": "Original paraphrase and links only; no fulltext or figures redistributed",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "Private raw retrievals excluded from public deliverable",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-V05-E1",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "新增说明的实际内容",
      "text": "Note10用DAC/ADC量化、量程和数字滤波解释不变的数字MPP/PCE输出；没有单独提供该器件实际量化误差审计。",
      "source_id": "P16-V05-S1",
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-V05-S1"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41560-026-02067-w/MediaObjects/41560_2026_2067_MOESM1_ESM.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "publisher SI updated2026-08-12;54pages",
      "preciseLocator": "pp.13–14 lines282–306",
      "extraction": "original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-V05-L1",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "v0.5 限定",
      "text": "一般仪器机制说明不是独立稳定性验证；不把恒定输出自动解释为真实完全不变。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-V05-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P16-V05-E1"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_editorial_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-V05-S2",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "EU PVSEC2024四端户外小组件研究",
      "text": "EU PVSEC2024四端户外小组件研究",
      "title": "EU PVSEC2024四端户外小组件研究",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/20841591/files/abstract%20eupvsec.pdf?download=1",
      "metadataUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/20841591/files/abstract%20eupvsec.pdf?download=1",
      "sourceVersion": "five-page2024conference proceedings;DOI10.4229/EUPVSEC2024/2DO.9.5; depositedZenodo2026-06-25",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "publication_status": "five-page2024conference proceedings;DOI10.4229/EUPVSEC2024/2DO.9.5; depositedZenodo2026-06-25",
      "access": "public_original_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "PDFpp.1–5 methods/results/conclusions; p.1 visuallychecked"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "raw field measurements",
        "peer-reviewed-journal follow-on",
        "commercial MPP reliability"
      ],
      "independence_group": "NORTON_CYPRUS_FIVE_4T_MINIMODULES",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "license": "Original paraphrase and links only; no fulltext or figures redistributed",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "Private raw retrievals excluded from public deliverable",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-V05-E2",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "原始户外方法与结果",
      "text": "实际文件为五页论文：5个小组件、4cm²活性面积、2023年1月至2024年9月，晴天筛选及I–V之间开路；首年钙钛矿PCE约减半，随后稳定或恢复。",
      "source_id": "P16-V05-S2",
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-V05-S2"
      ],
      "fulltextUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/20841591/files/abstract%20eupvsec.pdf?download=1",
      "sourceVersion": "five-page2024conference proceedings;DOI10.4229/EUPVSEC2024/2DO.9.5; depositedZenodo2026-06-25",
      "preciseLocator": "pp.1–2 §§2.1–2.2/3.1; pp.3–4 §§3.2–4.2; p.5 conclusion",
      "extraction": "original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-V05-P2",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "适用条件",
      "text": "塞浦路斯单站点、每组件4cm²活性面积、晴天I–V读数；测量间开路。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-V05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P16-V05-E2"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-V05-L2",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "v0.5 限定",
      "text": "小样本/小面积/开路暴露与商业MPP、多地点、多年寿命不同；未复算原始数据。",
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-V05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P16-V05-E2"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_editorial_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-V05-C2",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "特定小组件户外结果",
      "text": "Norton等的五个四端小组件在约20个月户外暴露中显示先衰减、后稳定或部分恢复的钙钛矿子组件PCE。",
      "claim_class": "measured",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors processed field measurements; not independent project measurement",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "P16-V05-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "P16-V05-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "P16-V05-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "P16-V05-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "该2024会议论文的五个4T小组件与实际方法",
      "status": "source_reported_scoped_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "可核验的新原文、经审查的方法或独立复核改变该限定结论。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against exact newly declared original passages",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code replication"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-V05-S1",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Supplementary Information: Measuring the predictability of life outcomes using a scientific mass collaboration",
      "label": "Supplementary Information: Measuring the predictability of life outcomes using a scientific mass collaboration",
      "text": "Supplementary Information: Measuring the predictability of life outcomes using a scientific mass collaboration; only the declared original passages are used.",
      "doi": "10.1073/pnas.1915006117",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC7165437/supplementaryFiles",
      "sourceVersion": "69-page pnas.1915006117.sapp.pdf in official Europe PMC public supplementary-files package, retrieved2026-10-04. Text retains pre-2021-correction values; NOT the verified corrected SI.",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "S2.2 printed/PDF S15 and S18; S15 rendered visually",
        "title/contents for article association"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "license": "Public reading access does not imply redistribution permission; retain original paraphrases, bibliographic metadata and links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No copyrighted full text or source figures included in this patch.",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "Updated SI not obtained; current comparative numerical/figure claims stay anchored only to the already-read correction.",
        "No raw-data or executable-analysis reproduction."
      ],
      "raw_file_sha256": "9d9fdd2f84f4d42ce2b52a397db237c9db11361c3e580bc7da4e5ef9c5902aba",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      },
      "authors": [
        "Matthew J Salganik",
        "Ian Lundberg",
        "Alexander T Kindel",
        "Caitlin E Ahearn",
        "Khaled Al-Ghoneim",
        "Abdullah Almaatouq",
        "Drew M Altschul",
        "Jennie E Brand",
        "Nicole Bohme Carnegie",
        "Ryan James Compton",
        "Debanjan Datta",
        "Thomas Davidson",
        "Anna Filippova",
        "Connor Gilroy",
        "Brian J Goode",
        "Eaman Jahani",
        "Ridhi Kashyap",
        "Antje Kirchner",
        "Stephen McKay",
        "Allison C Morgan",
        "Alex Pentland",
        "Kivan Polimis",
        "Louis Raes",
        "Daniel E Rigobon",
        "Claudia V Roberts",
        "Diana M Stanescu",
        "Yoshihiko Suhara",
        "Adaner Usmani",
        "Erik H Wang",
        "Muna Adem",
        "Abdulla Alhajri",
        "Bedoor AlShebli",
        "Redwane Amin",
        "Ryan B Amos",
        "Lisa P Argyle",
        "Livia Baer-Bositis",
        "Moritz Büchi",
        "Bo-Ryehn Chung",
        "William Eggert",
        "Gregory Faletto",
        "Zhilin Fan",
        "Jeremy Freese",
        "Tejomay Gadgil",
        "Josh Gagné",
        "Yue Gao",
        "Andrew Halpern-Manners",
        "Sonia P Hashim",
        "Sonia Hausen",
        "Guanhua He",
        "Kimberly Higuera",
        "Bernie Hogan",
        "Ilana M Horwitz",
        "Lisa M Hummel",
        "Naman Jain",
        "Kun Jin",
        "David Jurgens",
        "Patrick Kaminski",
        "Areg Karapetyan",
        "E H Kim",
        "Ben Leizman",
        "Naijia Liu",
        "Malte Möser",
        "Andrew E Mack",
        "Mayank Mahajan",
        "Noah Mandell",
        "Helge Marahrens",
        "Diana Mercado-Garcia",
        "Viola Mocz",
        "Katariina Mueller-Gastell",
        "Ahmed Musse",
        "Qiankun Niu",
        "William Nowak",
        "Hamidreza Omidvar",
        "Andrew Or",
        "Karen Ouyang",
        "Katy M Pinto",
        "Ethan Porter",
        "Kristin E Porter",
        "Crystal Qian",
        "Tamkinat Rauf",
        "Anahit Sargsyan",
        "Thomas Schaffner",
        "Landon Schnabel",
        "Bryan Schonfeld",
        "Ben Sender",
        "Jonathan D Tang",
        "Emma Tsurkov",
        "Austin van Loon",
        "Onur Varol",
        "Xiafei Wang",
        "Zhi Wang",
        "Julia Wang",
        "Flora Wang",
        "Samantha Weissman",
        "Kirstie Whitaker",
        "Maria K Wolters",
        "Wei Lee Woon",
        "James Wu",
        "Catherine Wu",
        "Kengran Yang"
      ],
      "publication_date": "2020-03-30",
      "publication_date_precision": "associated_article_day",
      "version_date": "retrieved 2026-10-04; S15/S18 retain wording superseded by the 2021 correction; corrected file identity not established",
      "publication_status": "official-repository original-article SI copy with superseded text; not verified corrected SI",
      "independence_group": "FFC_2017_SHARED_COHORT_AND_CHALLENGE",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1915006117",
      "access": "public_official_repository_supplement_pdf_named_version_markers_read",
      "evidence_use_restriction": "Use only for version-mismatch evidence, never as current corrected binary-benchmark values."
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-V05-E1",
      "type": "evidence",
      "text": "S15 retains four times and S18 retains100%; the already-read correction specifies three times and95%, respectively.",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-V05-S1",
        "SS03-S2"
      ],
      "supports_claim_ids": [
        "SS03-V05-C1"
      ],
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "label": "存储库 SI 保留已更正旧值：原文依据",
      "source_id": "SS03-V05-S1",
      "sourceVersion": "69-page pnas.1915006117.sapp.pdf in official Europe PMC public supplementary-files package, retrieved2026-10-04. Text retains pre-2021-correction values; NOT the verified corrected SI.",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC7165437/supplementaryFiles",
      "preciseLocator": "SI printed/PDF S15,S18; correction paragraphs beginning In the SI Appendix and On page S18",
      "evidence_kind": "version_comparison",
      "extraction": "original paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-V05-P1",
      "type": "premise",
      "text": "Version validation requires matching known correction markers; public official hosting does not itself prove the attached file is updated.",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "label": "存储库 SI 保留已更正旧值：解释前提",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-V05-S1",
        "SS03-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS03-V05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "SI printed/PDF S15,S18; correction paragraphs beginning In the SI Appendix and On page S18",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_explicit_editorial_interpretation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-V05-L1",
      "type": "limitation",
      "text": "Corrected SI original still needed, especially FigsS6–S9,S17–S18 and computational-version details. Do not treat stale-file recovery as successful corrected-SI closure.",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "label": "存储库 SI 保留已更正旧值：边界",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-V05-S1",
        "SS03-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS03-V05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "SI printed/PDF S15,S18; correction paragraphs beginning In the SI Appendix and On page S18",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_explicit_editorial_interpretation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-V05-C1",
      "type": "claim",
      "text": "The Europe PMC SI copy retrieved in this pass retains two textual values superseded by the2021 correction, so that file cannot serve as verified corrected-SI evidence.",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "label": "存储库 SI 保留已更正旧值",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "已取回文件的版本标记与已读官方更正比较；不是预测结果重分析。",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "SS03-V05-S1",
        "SS03-S2"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS03-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "SS03-V05-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "SS03-V05-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "The exact Europe PMC supplementary-file bytes retrieved 2026-10-04, S15 and S18, compared with the 2021 correction paragraphs.",
      "status": "retrieved_copy_version_mismatch_supported",
      "what_would_change_status": "取得匹配 three times/95% 标记及更正图 S6–S9、S17–S18 的完整授权公开 SI，可关闭所需版本资料缺口；不自动验证代码或更正后的全部结果。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-V05-S1",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences",
      "label": "Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences",
      "text": "Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences; only the declared original passages are used.",
      "doi": "10.1038/s41586-025-10078-y",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://ssyoon.github.io/publications/2026_Nature.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "Final published Nature 652:143–150, issue 2 April 2026 / online 1 April 2026; coauthor Sangsuk Yoon hosted publisher-layout PDF with article DOI, copyright, full published pages, Methods and Extended Data",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "printed pp.144–145: replication count/unit and criteria",
        "printed p.147 Table2 and interpretation limits",
        "printed p.148 success/generalizability limits",
        "Methods Sampling and selecting claims, PDF p.9"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "license": "Public reading access does not imply redistribution permission; retain original paraphrases, bibliographic metadata and links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No copyrighted full text or source figures included in this patch.",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "Only named claim-relevant passages compared; no complete line-by-line version diff, full SI audit, individual replication reanalysis, or CI recalculation. The final document is coauthor-hosted, crosschecked against publisher metadata, not publisher-download bytes."
      ],
      "raw_file_sha256": "af94ae17dc769cae3a09f6ed76c2a0dc331faecc3c2e75e5ad2852f56f4b7dc5",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      },
      "authors": [
        "Tyner, Andrew H.",
        "Abatayo, Anna Lou",
        "Daley, Mason",
        "Field, Samuel",
        "Fox, Nicholas",
        "Haber, Noah A.",
        "Hahn, Krystal M.",
        "Struhl, Melissa Kline",
        "Mawhinney, Brinna",
        "Miske, Olivia",
        "Silverstein, Priya",
        "Soderberg, Courtney K.",
        "Stankov, Theresa",
        "Abbasi, Ahmed",
        "Aberson, Christopher L.",
        "Aczel, Balazs",
        "Adamkovič, Matúš",
        "Albayrak, Nihan",
        "Allen, Peter J.",
        "Andreychik, Michael",
        "Awtrey, Eli",
        "Axxe, Erick",
        "Azevedo, Flavio",
        "Bader, Miles D.",
        "Bago, Bence",
        "Bailey, James",
        "Bakker, Marjan",
        "Banik, Gabriel",
        "Banks, George C.",
        "Baskin, Ernest",
        "Batruch, Anatolia",
        "Beatteay, Annika",
        "Behr, Sophie M.",
        "Berente, Nicholas",
        "Berry, Zachariah",
        "Białkowski, Jędrzej",
        "Bodroža, Bojana",
        "Boeschoten, Laura",
        "Bognar, Miklos",
        "Bokhove, Christian",
        "Bonfiglio, Diane",
        "Bouwman, Robin",
        "Brady, Timothy F.",
        "Braithwaite, Scott R.",
        "Briceño Jiménez, Gabriel",
        "Brick, Cameron",
        "Bricka, Traci",
        "Briker, Roman",
        "Brown, Annette N.",
        "Brown, Gordon D. A.",
        "van Aert, Robbie C. M.",
        "Caldwell, Kathryn",
        "Capitan, Sara",
        "Capitán, Tabaré",
        "Chandler, Jesse",
        "Charles, Tessa",
        "Chartier, Christopher R.",
        "Chawdhary, Rahul",
        "Cheng, Kent Jason",
        "Chopik, William J.",
        "Clark, Bruce",
        "Colvin, Victoria E.",
        "Comer, C. Cozette",
        "Costantini, Giulio",
        "Coupé, Tom",
        "Cummins, Jamie",
        "Czernatowicz-Kukuczka, Aneta",
        "de Leeuw, Joshua",
        "Dobolyi, David",
        "Druckman, James N.",
        "Duan, Jianhua",
        "Dujmović, Marin",
        "Dunleavy, Daniel J.",
        "Durkee, Patrick K.",
        "Emery, Cécile",
        "Esterling, Kevin M.",
        "Evans, Thomas R.",
        "Fedor, Anna",
        "Fernández-Castilla, Belén",
        "Fiala, Nathan",
        "Field, James G.",
        "Fong, Nathan",
        "Fonseca, Miguel A.",
        "Freeman, Alexandra L. J.",
        "Freese, Jeremy",
        "Geiger, Sandra J.",
        "Geng, Jing",
        "Getz, Laura M.",
        "Geven, Linda Marjoleine",
        "Gleibs, Ilka Helene",
        "Gonzales, Donna Pamella",
        "Gooty, Janaki",
        "Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie",
        "Greculescu, Cristina",
        "Griffin, Siobhán M.",
        "Grigoryan, Lusine",
        "Grunow, Martina",
        "Gunby, Nicholas",
        "Hall, Braeden",
        "Hanel, Paul H. P.",
        "Hannon, Erin E.",
        "Harper, Sam",
        "Held, Marco Jürgen",
        "Hickman, Louis",
        "Higgins, Nathan C.",
        "Hippel, Svenja",
        "Hoeppner, Sven",
        "Hong, Sanghyun",
        "Hostler, Thomas J.",
        "Inzlicht, Michael",
        "Izydorczak, Kamil",
        "Jaeger, Bastian",
        "Jankowsky, Kristin",
        "Jarke-Neuert, Johannes",
        "Jensen, Matthew",
        "Jokić, Biljana",
        "Jolles, Daniel",
        "Jolly, Phillip",
        "Jones, Angela M.",
        "Juanchich, Marie",
        "Kačmár, Pavol",
        "Kapoor, Hansika",
        "Keljanovic, Andjela",
        "Koirala, Samjhana",
        "Kołczyńska, Marta",
        "Kouroupaki, Dimitra",
        "Kühnen, Ulrich",
        "Landgrave, Michelangelo",
        "Larson, Michael J.",
        "Laulié, Lyonel",
        "Lawrence, Alice C. E.",
        "Le Forestier, Joel M.",
        "Leahy, Katelin E.",
        "Lee, Sungmok",
        "Leslie, Jared",
        "Lewis, Savannah C.",
        "Limnios, Christopher",
        "Lin, Hause",
        "Liu, An-Chiao",
        "Lloyd, John Wills",
        "Ludvig, Elliot A.",
        "Lynott, Dermot",
        "MacDonald, Jordan",
        "Mallik, Peter",
        "Mallinson, Daniel J.",
        "Marinazzo, Daniele",
        "Martarelli, Corinna S.",
        "Matacotta, Joshua",
        "McBride, Andrew",
        "McHugh, Cillian",
        "McMillan, Gail",
        "Méndez, Esteban",
        "Metzger, Mitchell",
        "Michaelides, Michalis P.",
        "Michalak, Johannes",
        "Micheli, Leticia",
        "Miller, Jeremy K.",
        "Milyavskaya, Marina",
        "Molden, Daniel C.",
        "Monjaras, Ambar G.",
        "Moreau, David",
        "Morrow, Audrey",
        "Moya, Cristóbal",
        "Mudrik, Liad",
        "Mulder, Laetitia B.",
        "Munt, Katie A.",
        "Nandi, Arijit",
        "Nason, Kathryn",
        "Nast, Carolin",
        "Nave, Gideon",
        "Nax, Heinrich H.",
        "Neubauer, Florian",
        "Nguyen, Phuong Linh L.",
        "Nichols, Austin Lee",
        "Nilsonne, Gustav",
        "O’Boyle, Ernest",
        "Oettinghaus, Jule",
        "Oh, Jeewon",
        "Oshana, Adoril",
        "Ostermann, Thomas",
        "Ostrowski, Rachel P.",
        "Oyebanjo, Abiola",
        "Panczak, Radoslaw",
        "Patrianakos, Jamie",
        "Pavez, Ignacio",
        "Pavlov, Yuri G.",
        "Persson, Sofia",
        "Perugini, Marco",
        "Peters, Kim",
        "Pieters, Constant",
        "Ponizovskiy, Vladimir",
        "Porter, Nathaniel D.",
        "Prenoveau, Jason M.",
        "Purić, Danka",
        "Purol, Mariah F.",
        "Puthillam, Arathy",
        "Quinn, Kimberly A.",
        "Ramljak, Marco",
        "Reed, W. Robert",
        "Ritchie, Michaela",
        "Ritzau, Margaret",
        "Roche, Sean Patrick",
        "Rodela, Romina",
        "Röer, Jan Philipp",
        "Ropovik, Ivan",
        "Rothschild, Jacob",
        "Saal, Justine",
        "Safadi, Hani",
        "Samaha, Jason",
        "Sanchez, Mary",
        "Sankaran, Soorya",
        "Santos, David",
        "Sargent, Amanda C.",
        "Sauter, Marian",
        "Schmidt, Kathleen",
        "Schnabel, Landon",
        "Schroeder, Amber N.",
        "Schuetz, Sebastian W.",
        "Schuetze, Brendan A.",
        "Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael",
        "Schütz, Astrid",
        "Sevigny, Eric L.",
        "Shackleton, Ellie",
        "Shafranek, Richard M.",
        "Shaki, Samuel",
        "Shakya, Shishir",
        "Sirota, Miroslav",
        "Sisco, Matthew Ryan",
        "Sitnikov, Maksim M.",
        "Slevc, L. Robert",
        "Smalarz, Laura",
        "Smith, Colin Tucker",
        "Snyder, Joel S.",
        "Sommet, Nicolas",
        "Sonmez, Fatih",
        "Spellman, Barbara A.",
        "Stanulewicz-Buckley, Natalia",
        "Stock, George",
        "Street, Chris N. H.",
        "Strømland, Eirik",
        "Sundelin, Tina",
        "Syed, Moin",
        "Szabelska, Anna",
        "Szaszi, Barnabas",
        "Szumowska, Ewa",
        "Tagat, Anirudh",
        "Täuber, Susanne",
        "Tay, Louis",
        "Thapa, Stuti",
        "Thatcher, Jason",
        "Tsaklakidou, Domna",
        "Tummers, Lars",
        "Turkovich, Elise",
        "Tutor, Melba Verra",
        "Urbanska, Karolina",
        "van ’t Veer, Anna Elisabeth",
        "van Assen, Marcel",
        "van de Ven, Niels",
        "van den Goorbergh, Ruben",
        "Vargo, Elisabeth Julie",
        "Vaughn, Leigh Ann",
        "Vazire, Simine",
        "Vermeulen, Jentien M.",
        "Vo, Diem Thi Hong",
        "Volkman, Victor",
        "Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan",
        "Wagner, Deliah",
        "Walasek, Lukasz",
        "Walter, Frank",
        "Warmelink, Lara",
        "Wei, Liuqing",
        "Weißflog, Marie Isabelle",
        "Weller, Nicholas",
        "Wichman, Aaron L.",
        "Wilbiks, Jonathan",
        "Williams, Jamal R.",
        "Wolfe, Kelly",
        "Wort, Finnian",
        "Wright, Ryan",
        "Wulff, Jesper N.",
        "Xue, Xindong",
        "Yan, Veronica X.",
        "Yang, Yuzhi",
        "Yoon, Sangsuk",
        "Žeželj, Iris",
        "Zhang, Yinxian",
        "Ziano, Ignazio",
        "Zogmaister, Cristina",
        "Zupan, Zorana",
        "Zwaan, Rolf A.",
        "Nosek, Brian A.",
        "Errington, Timothy M."
      ],
      "publication_date": "2026-04-01",
      "publication_date_precision": "day",
      "version_date": "2026-04-02 issue; 2026-04-01 online publication",
      "publication_status": "final published peer-reviewed Nature article; coauthor-hosted publisher-layout PDF crosschecked against publisher",
      "independence_group": "SCORE_REPLICATION_274_CLAIMS_164_PAPERS",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-10078-y",
      "access": "public_coauthor_final_pdf_named_passages_compared_to_accepted_version"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-V05-S2",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "type": "source",
      "title": "Supplementary Information: Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences",
      "label": "Supplementary Information: Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences",
      "text": "Supplementary Information: Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences; only the declared original passages are used.",
      "doi": "10.1038/s41586-025-10078-y",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-025-10078-y/MediaObjects/41586_2025_10078_MOESM1_ESM.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "Publisher-hosted 106-page Supplementary Information including Nature DOI cover; internal SI numbered pp.1–105",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Sample and Data, SI pp.5–6",
        "phase/selection and exclusions SI pp.63–64",
        "effect-size conversion and TableS7 SI pp.64–65",
        "TableS8 and non-attempt selection discussion SI p.66"
      ],
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "license": "Public reading access does not imply redistribution permission; retain original paraphrases, bibliographic metadata and links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No copyrighted full text or source figures included in this patch.",
      "not_reviewed": [
        "Only named claim-relevant passages compared; no complete line-by-line version diff, full SI audit, individual replication reanalysis, or CI recalculation. The final document is coauthor-hosted, crosschecked against publisher metadata, not publisher-download bytes."
      ],
      "raw_file_sha256": "9c80b5e2b21af331c73bcbb3c68e998d1e70ba084af923993178e610c6f9879c",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      },
      "authors": [
        "Tyner, Andrew H.",
        "Abatayo, Anna Lou",
        "Daley, Mason",
        "Field, Samuel",
        "Fox, Nicholas",
        "Haber, Noah A.",
        "Hahn, Krystal M.",
        "Struhl, Melissa Kline",
        "Mawhinney, Brinna",
        "Miske, Olivia",
        "Silverstein, Priya",
        "Soderberg, Courtney K.",
        "Stankov, Theresa",
        "Abbasi, Ahmed",
        "Aberson, Christopher L.",
        "Aczel, Balazs",
        "Adamkovič, Matúš",
        "Albayrak, Nihan",
        "Allen, Peter J.",
        "Andreychik, Michael",
        "Awtrey, Eli",
        "Axxe, Erick",
        "Azevedo, Flavio",
        "Bader, Miles D.",
        "Bago, Bence",
        "Bailey, James",
        "Bakker, Marjan",
        "Banik, Gabriel",
        "Banks, George C.",
        "Baskin, Ernest",
        "Batruch, Anatolia",
        "Beatteay, Annika",
        "Behr, Sophie M.",
        "Berente, Nicholas",
        "Berry, Zachariah",
        "Białkowski, Jędrzej",
        "Bodroža, Bojana",
        "Boeschoten, Laura",
        "Bognar, Miklos",
        "Bokhove, Christian",
        "Bonfiglio, Diane",
        "Bouwman, Robin",
        "Brady, Timothy F.",
        "Braithwaite, Scott R.",
        "Briceño Jiménez, Gabriel",
        "Brick, Cameron",
        "Bricka, Traci",
        "Briker, Roman",
        "Brown, Annette N.",
        "Brown, Gordon D. A.",
        "van Aert, Robbie C. M.",
        "Caldwell, Kathryn",
        "Capitan, Sara",
        "Capitán, Tabaré",
        "Chandler, Jesse",
        "Charles, Tessa",
        "Chartier, Christopher R.",
        "Chawdhary, Rahul",
        "Cheng, Kent Jason",
        "Chopik, William J.",
        "Clark, Bruce",
        "Colvin, Victoria E.",
        "Comer, C. Cozette",
        "Costantini, Giulio",
        "Coupé, Tom",
        "Cummins, Jamie",
        "Czernatowicz-Kukuczka, Aneta",
        "de Leeuw, Joshua",
        "Dobolyi, David",
        "Druckman, James N.",
        "Duan, Jianhua",
        "Dujmović, Marin",
        "Dunleavy, Daniel J.",
        "Durkee, Patrick K.",
        "Emery, Cécile",
        "Esterling, Kevin M.",
        "Evans, Thomas R.",
        "Fedor, Anna",
        "Fernández-Castilla, Belén",
        "Fiala, Nathan",
        "Field, James G.",
        "Fong, Nathan",
        "Fonseca, Miguel A.",
        "Freeman, Alexandra L. J.",
        "Freese, Jeremy",
        "Geiger, Sandra J.",
        "Geng, Jing",
        "Getz, Laura M.",
        "Geven, Linda Marjoleine",
        "Gleibs, Ilka Helene",
        "Gonzales, Donna Pamella",
        "Gooty, Janaki",
        "Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie",
        "Greculescu, Cristina",
        "Griffin, Siobhán M.",
        "Grigoryan, Lusine",
        "Grunow, Martina",
        "Gunby, Nicholas",
        "Hall, Braeden",
        "Hanel, Paul H. P.",
        "Hannon, Erin E.",
        "Harper, Sam",
        "Held, Marco Jürgen",
        "Hickman, Louis",
        "Higgins, Nathan C.",
        "Hippel, Svenja",
        "Hoeppner, Sven",
        "Hong, Sanghyun",
        "Hostler, Thomas J.",
        "Inzlicht, Michael",
        "Izydorczak, Kamil",
        "Jaeger, Bastian",
        "Jankowsky, Kristin",
        "Jarke-Neuert, Johannes",
        "Jensen, Matthew",
        "Jokić, Biljana",
        "Jolles, Daniel",
        "Jolly, Phillip",
        "Jones, Angela M.",
        "Juanchich, Marie",
        "Kačmár, Pavol",
        "Kapoor, Hansika",
        "Keljanovic, Andjela",
        "Koirala, Samjhana",
        "Kołczyńska, Marta",
        "Kouroupaki, Dimitra",
        "Kühnen, Ulrich",
        "Landgrave, Michelangelo",
        "Larson, Michael J.",
        "Laulié, Lyonel",
        "Lawrence, Alice C. E.",
        "Le Forestier, Joel M.",
        "Leahy, Katelin E.",
        "Lee, Sungmok",
        "Leslie, Jared",
        "Lewis, Savannah C.",
        "Limnios, Christopher",
        "Lin, Hause",
        "Liu, An-Chiao",
        "Lloyd, John Wills",
        "Ludvig, Elliot A.",
        "Lynott, Dermot",
        "MacDonald, Jordan",
        "Mallik, Peter",
        "Mallinson, Daniel J.",
        "Marinazzo, Daniele",
        "Martarelli, Corinna S.",
        "Matacotta, Joshua",
        "McBride, Andrew",
        "McHugh, Cillian",
        "McMillan, Gail",
        "Méndez, Esteban",
        "Metzger, Mitchell",
        "Michaelides, Michalis P.",
        "Michalak, Johannes",
        "Micheli, Leticia",
        "Miller, Jeremy K.",
        "Milyavskaya, Marina",
        "Molden, Daniel C.",
        "Monjaras, Ambar G.",
        "Moreau, David",
        "Morrow, Audrey",
        "Moya, Cristóbal",
        "Mudrik, Liad",
        "Mulder, Laetitia B.",
        "Munt, Katie A.",
        "Nandi, Arijit",
        "Nason, Kathryn",
        "Nast, Carolin",
        "Nave, Gideon",
        "Nax, Heinrich H.",
        "Neubauer, Florian",
        "Nguyen, Phuong Linh L.",
        "Nichols, Austin Lee",
        "Nilsonne, Gustav",
        "O’Boyle, Ernest",
        "Oettinghaus, Jule",
        "Oh, Jeewon",
        "Oshana, Adoril",
        "Ostermann, Thomas",
        "Ostrowski, Rachel P.",
        "Oyebanjo, Abiola",
        "Panczak, Radoslaw",
        "Patrianakos, Jamie",
        "Pavez, Ignacio",
        "Pavlov, Yuri G.",
        "Persson, Sofia",
        "Perugini, Marco",
        "Peters, Kim",
        "Pieters, Constant",
        "Ponizovskiy, Vladimir",
        "Porter, Nathaniel D.",
        "Prenoveau, Jason M.",
        "Purić, Danka",
        "Purol, Mariah F.",
        "Puthillam, Arathy",
        "Quinn, Kimberly A.",
        "Ramljak, Marco",
        "Reed, W. Robert",
        "Ritchie, Michaela",
        "Ritzau, Margaret",
        "Roche, Sean Patrick",
        "Rodela, Romina",
        "Röer, Jan Philipp",
        "Ropovik, Ivan",
        "Rothschild, Jacob",
        "Saal, Justine",
        "Safadi, Hani",
        "Samaha, Jason",
        "Sanchez, Mary",
        "Sankaran, Soorya",
        "Santos, David",
        "Sargent, Amanda C.",
        "Sauter, Marian",
        "Schmidt, Kathleen",
        "Schnabel, Landon",
        "Schroeder, Amber N.",
        "Schuetz, Sebastian W.",
        "Schuetze, Brendan A.",
        "Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael",
        "Schütz, Astrid",
        "Sevigny, Eric L.",
        "Shackleton, Ellie",
        "Shafranek, Richard M.",
        "Shaki, Samuel",
        "Shakya, Shishir",
        "Sirota, Miroslav",
        "Sisco, Matthew Ryan",
        "Sitnikov, Maksim M.",
        "Slevc, L. Robert",
        "Smalarz, Laura",
        "Smith, Colin Tucker",
        "Snyder, Joel S.",
        "Sommet, Nicolas",
        "Sonmez, Fatih",
        "Spellman, Barbara A.",
        "Stanulewicz-Buckley, Natalia",
        "Stock, George",
        "Street, Chris N. H.",
        "Strømland, Eirik",
        "Sundelin, Tina",
        "Syed, Moin",
        "Szabelska, Anna",
        "Szaszi, Barnabas",
        "Szumowska, Ewa",
        "Tagat, Anirudh",
        "Täuber, Susanne",
        "Tay, Louis",
        "Thapa, Stuti",
        "Thatcher, Jason",
        "Tsaklakidou, Domna",
        "Tummers, Lars",
        "Turkovich, Elise",
        "Tutor, Melba Verra",
        "Urbanska, Karolina",
        "van ’t Veer, Anna Elisabeth",
        "van Assen, Marcel",
        "van de Ven, Niels",
        "van den Goorbergh, Ruben",
        "Vargo, Elisabeth Julie",
        "Vaughn, Leigh Ann",
        "Vazire, Simine",
        "Vermeulen, Jentien M.",
        "Vo, Diem Thi Hong",
        "Volkman, Victor",
        "Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan",
        "Wagner, Deliah",
        "Walasek, Lukasz",
        "Walter, Frank",
        "Warmelink, Lara",
        "Wei, Liuqing",
        "Weißflog, Marie Isabelle",
        "Weller, Nicholas",
        "Wichman, Aaron L.",
        "Wilbiks, Jonathan",
        "Williams, Jamal R.",
        "Wolfe, Kelly",
        "Wort, Finnian",
        "Wright, Ryan",
        "Wulff, Jesper N.",
        "Xue, Xindong",
        "Yan, Veronica X.",
        "Yang, Yuzhi",
        "Yoon, Sangsuk",
        "Žeželj, Iris",
        "Zhang, Yinxian",
        "Ziano, Ignazio",
        "Zogmaister, Cristina",
        "Zupan, Zorana",
        "Zwaan, Rolf A.",
        "Nosek, Brian A.",
        "Errington, Timothy M."
      ],
      "publication_date": "2026-04-01",
      "publication_date_precision": "associated_article_day",
      "version_date": "associated with 2026-04-01 article; separate SI revision timestamp not verified",
      "publication_status": "publisher-hosted Supplementary Information associated with the same Nature article",
      "independence_group": "SCORE_REPLICATION_274_CLAIMS_164_PAPERS",
      "metadataUrl": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-10078-y",
      "access": "public_publisher_supplement_pdf_named_passages_read"
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-V05-E1",
      "type": "evidence",
      "text": "Final pp.144–145 retain 151/274=55.1%, paper-weighted80.8/164=49.3%, and13-criterion range28.6–74.8%. Final Table2 p.147 retains157 papers/249 claims and weighted medians r=.25/.10. SI pp.64–66 distinguishes conversion assumptions and feasibility selection; Methods preserves exclusion of27 hybrid replications from main independent outcomes.",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-V05-S1",
        "SS04-V05-S2",
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "supports_claim_ids": [
        "SS04-V05-C1"
      ],
      "related_baseline_ids": [
        "SS04-S1",
        "SS04-E1",
        "SS04-E2",
        "SS04-E3",
        "SS04-E4",
        "SS04-E5",
        "SS04-C1",
        "SS04-C2",
        "SS04-C3",
        "SS04-C4",
        "SS04-C5",
        "SS04-Q1"
      ],
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "label": "正式版本与已接受稿的限定核对：原文依据",
      "source_id": "SS04-V05-S1",
      "sourceVersion": "Final published Nature 652:143–150, issue 2 April 2026 / online 1 April 2026; coauthor Sangsuk Yoon hosted publisher-layout PDF with article DOI, copyright, full published pages, Methods and Extended Data",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://ssyoon.github.io/publications/2026_Nature.pdf",
      "preciseLocator": "Final printed pp.144–145,147–148 (PDF pp.2–3,5–6); Methods PDF p.9. SI printed pp.5–6,63–66 (PDF pp.6–7,64–67). Accepted PDF pp.6–7,9–10,14,16 (internal pp.5–6,8–9,13,15).",
      "evidence_kind": "version_comparison",
      "extraction": "original paraphrase; no verbatim quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-V05-P1",
      "type": "premise",
      "text": "Match identical DOI/title and report-specific unit/denominator; convert accepted manuscript locators to final printed pages without treating versions as independent studies.",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "label": "正式版本与已接受稿的限定核对：解释前提",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-V05-S1",
        "SS04-V05-S2",
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS04-V05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Final printed pp.144–145,147–148 (PDF pp.2–3,5–6); Methods PDF p.9. SI printed pp.5–6,63–66 (PDF pp.6–7,64–67). Accepted PDF pp.6–7,9–10,14,16 (internal pp.5–6,8–9,13,15).",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_explicit_editorial_interpretation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-V05-L1",
      "type": "limitation",
      "text": "Only named claim-relevant passages compared; no complete line-by-line version diff, full SI audit, individual replication reanalysis, or CI recalculation. The final document is coauthor-hosted, crosschecked against publisher metadata, not publisher-download bytes.",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "label": "正式版本与已接受稿的限定核对：边界",
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-V05-S1",
        "SS04-V05-S2",
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS04-V05-E1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Final printed pp.144–145,147–148 (PDF pp.2–3,5–6); Methods PDF p.9. SI printed pp.5–6,63–66 (PDF pp.6–7,64–67). Accepted PDF pp.6–7,9–10,14,16 (internal pp.5–6,8–9,13,15).",
      "origin": "source_scope_and_explicit_editorial_interpretation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-V05-C1",
      "type": "claim",
      "text": "For the card’s specified units, effect-size subset and generalizability caveats, the final publication agrees with the Essex accepted text; its SI further details feasibility selection and effect-size conversion assumptions.",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "label": "正式版本与已接受稿的限定核对",
      "claim_class": "editorial",
      "claim_class_detail": "同一研究两个版本指定段落及 SI 的逐项文本比较；不构成独立重复研究。",
      "normative": false,
      "source_ids": [
        "SS04-V05-S1",
        "SS04-V05-S2",
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [
        "SS04-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "SS04-V05-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "SS04-V05-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "Specified counts, weighting units, effect-size subset and sampling/interpretation caveats in accepted manuscript versus final Nature article; SI pp.5–6,63–66.",
      "status": "text_comparison_supported_at_declared_scope",
      "what_would_change_status": "发现相同主张的版本差异或更正会改变一致性判断；完整版本差异、原始数据复算和个别重复研究审查仍未执行。",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against the named original passages; exact-patch independent audit pending",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "independent_text_review": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "not_performed": [
          "independent data/code or experiment reproduction",
          "domain expert review"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-V05-S1",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "One Health Joint Plan of Action2022–2026",
      "text": "新增阅读范围或版本定位；不是独立复现。",
      "title": "One Health Joint Plan of Action2022–2026",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.woah.org/app/uploads/2022/04/one-health-joint-plan-of-action-final.pdf",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.20506/9789295121430",
      "sourceVersion": "Quadripartite final2022 plan,86-page PDF, not March2022 consultation draft; WOAH DOI10.20506/9789295121430 and FAO DOI10.4060/cc2289en identify the same joint report",
      "publication_status": "official_nonbinding_plan_not_outcome_study",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "lawful_original_scoped_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "Final PDF contents and executive action-track list PDFpp.7,13 (web zero-basedP6,P12)",
        "Part3 Action track3 PDFp.48 (printed34)",
        "Part4 Implementation, monitoring and evaluation PDFpp.71–72 (printed57–58)"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "No program outcome evaluation inferred",
        "No knowledgeholder consultation or expert review",
        "Full report not exhaustively reviewed"
      ],
      "license": "No fulltext redistribution permission assumed; public patch contains original paraphrases and source links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No source fulltexts, figures or tables redistributed.",
      "independence_group": "QUADRIPARTITE_JOINT_PLAN2022",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Final PDF contents and executive action-track list PDFpp.7,13 (web zero-basedP6,P12); Part3 Action track3 PDFp.48 (printed34); Part4 Implementation, monitoring and evaluation PDFpp.71–72 (printed57–58)",
      "id": "VH01-V05-E1",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "One Health计划的证据类型：原文依据",
      "text": "The joint plan specifies six action tracks, institutional roles and a proposed monitoring/evaluation framework. Action track3 covers endemic zoonoses; governance and implementation sections propose future targets and indicators. This is authoritative program scope/planning, not evaluated evidence that the plan reduced disease burden.",
      "source_id": "VH01-V05-S1",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.woah.org/app/uploads/2022/04/one-health-joint-plan-of-action-final.pdf",
      "sourceVersion": "Quadripartite final2022 plan,86-page PDF, not March2022 consultation draft; WOAH DOI10.20506/9789295121430 and FAO DOI10.4060/cc2289en identify the same joint report",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Final PDF contents and executive action-track list PDFpp.7,13 (web zero-basedP6,P12); Part3 Action track3 PDFp.48 (printed34); Part4 Implementation, monitoring and evaluation PDFpp.71–72 (printed57–58)",
      "id": "VH01-V05-P1",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "One Health计划的证据类型：条件",
      "text": "2022正式四方报告；WOAH和FAO两个DOI指向同一联合报告。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-V05-E1"
      ]
    },
    {
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Final PDF contents and executive action-track list PDFpp.7,13 (web zero-basedP6,P12); Part3 Action track3 PDFp.48 (printed34); Part4 Implementation, monitoring and evaluation PDFpp.71–72 (printed57–58)",
      "id": "VH01-V05-L1",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "One Health计划的证据类型：限制",
      "text": "计划提出指标与未来行动，不是降低疾病或死亡的已测效果；不替代具体地区干预研究。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "Final PDF contents and executive action-track list PDFpp.7,13 (web zero-basedP6,P12); Part3 Action track3 PDFp.48 (printed34); Part4 Implementation, monitoring and evaluation PDFpp.71–72 (printed57–58)",
      "id": "VH01-V05-C1",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "One Health计划的证据类型",
      "text": "联合行动计划规定六条行动路线、治理与拟议监测框架，属于合作范围和实施计划。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors source-reported scoped result or explicitly bounded editorial version comparison",
      "normative": false,
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-V05-E1"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "VH01-V05-P1"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "VH01-V05-L1"
      ],
      "scope": "Only named passages and source versions; no replication or expert review.",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "Author correction, independent validation, missing source recovery or expert review changes the scoped interpretation.",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-V05-S2",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "type": "source",
      "label": "Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies for provisioning rabies post-exposure vaccines",
      "text": "新增阅读范围或版本定位；不是独立复现。",
      "title": "Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies for provisioning rabies post-exposure vaccines",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13201362/supplementaryFiles",
      "metadataUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.128178",
      "sourceVersion": "Vaccine74(2026)128178 supplementary material mmc2.docx; PMC13201362 deposit",
      "publication_status": "peer_reviewed_original_or_official_source",
      "retrieved_on": "2026-10-04",
      "access": "lawful_original_scoped_passages_read",
      "retrieved_scope": [
        "mmc2.docx rendered p.1: second death equation Deaths_incomplete_PEP, compared with third death equation and final PEP-completion equation; main article Table2 conditional probability definitions"
      ],
      "not_reviewed": [
        "No code or numeric output rerun",
        "Equation-to-code reconciliation needed",
        "Main-text scenario projections remain conditional rather than observed nationwide death reductions"
      ],
      "license": "No fulltext redistribution permission assumed; public patch contains original paraphrases and source links only.",
      "copyright_reuse_limits": "No source fulltexts, figures or tables redistributed.",
      "independence_group": "TANZANIA_IBCM_SHARED_PROGRAMME_2018_2024",
      "quote_word_count": 0,
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-V05-S2",
        "VH01-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "mmc2.docx rendered p.1: second death equation Deaths_incomplete_PEP, compared with third death equation and final PEP-completion equation; main article Table2 conditional probability definitions",
      "id": "VH01-V05-E2",
      "type": "evidence",
      "label": "补充方程需要代码对应核对：原文依据",
      "text": "Displayed incomplete-PEP death expression lacks P_start,rabid|seek, while complete-PEP deaths and PEP-completion expressions include it. Table2 defines completion conditional on initiation and gives P_start values0.847(S1) and0.907(S2/S3), so initiation is not identically one. XML contains literal runs for the entire incomplete-PEP equation and no omitted OMML object; rendered page confirms the absence. This is an apparent displayed-equation inconsistency, not evidence that executable code or published outcome estimates are wrong.",
      "source_id": "VH01-V05-S2",
      "fulltextUrl": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC13201362/supplementaryFiles",
      "sourceVersion": "Vaccine74(2026)128178 supplementary material mmc2.docx; PMC13201362 deposit",
      "extraction": "concise original paraphrase; no quotation",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-V05-S2",
        "VH01-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "mmc2.docx rendered p.1: second death equation Deaths_incomplete_PEP, compared with third death equation and final PEP-completion equation; main article Table2 conditional probability definitions",
      "id": "VH01-V05-P2",
      "type": "premise",
      "label": "补充方程需要代码对应核对：条件",
      "text": "已核DOCX literal XML并渲染目视确认；Table2定义完成概率以已开始为条件，开始概率0.847或0.907并非恒为1。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-V05-E2"
      ]
    },
    {
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-V05-S2",
        "VH01-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "mmc2.docx rendered p.1: second death equation Deaths_incomplete_PEP, compared with third death equation and final PEP-completion equation; main article Table2 conditional probability definitions",
      "id": "VH01-V05-L2",
      "type": "limitation",
      "label": "补充方程需要代码对应核对：限制",
      "text": "这是显示方程的表面不一致；未核代码对应或重算，不能断言执行模型/结果有错。全国死亡与成本仍是条件情景预测。",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-V05-E2"
      ],
      "origin": "source_scope_and_project_review_limit"
    },
    {
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source_ids": [
        "VH01-V05-S2",
        "VH01-S2"
      ],
      "preciseLocator": "mmc2.docx rendered p.1: second death equation Deaths_incomplete_PEP, compared with third death equation and final PEP-completion equation; main article Table2 conditional probability definitions",
      "id": "VH01-V05-C2",
      "type": "claim",
      "label": "补充方程需要代码对应核对",
      "text": "补充材料显示的不完整PEP死亡方程没有P_start|seek因子，而完成PEP方程包含；与Table2条件概率定义存在需核对的表面不一致。",
      "claim_class": "derived",
      "claim_class_detail": "authors source-reported scoped result or explicitly bounded editorial version comparison",
      "normative": false,
      "evidence_ids": [
        "VH01-V05-E2"
      ],
      "premise_ids": [
        "VH01-V05-P2"
      ],
      "limitation_ids": [
        "VH01-V05-L2"
      ],
      "scope": "Only named passages and source versions; no replication or expert review.",
      "status": "source_reported_result",
      "what_would_change_status": "Author correction, independent validation, missing source recovery or expert review changes the scoped interpretation.",
      "review": {
        "status": "expert_review_pending",
        "text_verified_by": "assistant against named original passages; bounded source recovery",
        "expert_verified_by": null,
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "not_performed": [
          "domain expert review",
          "independent raw-data or code reanalysis",
          "knowledgeholder review"
        ],
        "independent_text_review": "pending"
      }
    }
  ],
  "edges": [
    {
      "id": "P02-R01",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-E1",
      "target": "P02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "出处关系：证据定位属于该固定版本来源；不是独立研究。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R02",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-E2",
      "target": "P02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "出处关系：证据定位属于该固定版本来源；不是独立研究。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R03",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-E3",
      "target": "P02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "出处关系：证据定位属于该固定版本来源；不是独立研究。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R04",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-E4",
      "target": "P02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "出处关系：证据定位属于该固定版本来源；不是独立研究。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R05",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-E5",
      "target": "P02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "出处关系：证据定位属于该固定版本来源；不是独立研究。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R06",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-E1",
      "target": "P02-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "该原文定位支持命题的限定表述；编辑判断属于链层推论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R07",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-C1",
      "target": "P02-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释本命题时必须保留此前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R08",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-L1",
      "target": "P02-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围或验证层级，不自动推翻论文结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R09",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-L2",
      "target": "P02-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围或验证层级，不自动推翻论文结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R10",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-E2",
      "target": "P02-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "该原文定位支持命题的限定表述；编辑判断属于链层推论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R11",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-C2",
      "target": "P02-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释本命题时必须保留此前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R12",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-C2",
      "target": "P02-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释本命题时必须保留此前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R13",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-L1",
      "target": "P02-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围或验证层级，不自动推翻论文结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R14",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-L2",
      "target": "P02-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围或验证层级，不自动推翻论文结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R15",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-L3",
      "target": "P02-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围或验证层级，不自动推翻论文结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R16",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-E2",
      "target": "P02-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "该原文定位支持命题的限定表述；编辑判断属于链层推论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R17",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-E3",
      "target": "P02-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "该原文定位支持命题的限定表述；编辑判断属于链层推论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R18",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-C3",
      "target": "P02-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释本命题时必须保留此前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E2",
          "P02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R19",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-C3",
      "target": "P02-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释本命题时必须保留此前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E2",
          "P02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R20",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-L1",
      "target": "P02-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围或验证层级，不自动推翻论文结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E2",
          "P02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R21",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-L3",
      "target": "P02-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围或验证层级，不自动推翻论文结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E2",
          "P02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R22",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-E4",
      "target": "P02-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "该原文定位支持命题的限定表述；编辑判断属于链层推论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R23",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-C4",
      "target": "P02-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释本命题时必须保留此前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R24",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-C4",
      "target": "P02-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释本命题时必须保留此前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R25",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-L1",
      "target": "P02-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围或验证层级，不自动推翻论文结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R26",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-E1",
      "target": "P02-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "该原文定位支持命题的限定表述；编辑判断属于链层推论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R27",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-E2",
      "target": "P02-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "该原文定位支持命题的限定表述；编辑判断属于链层推论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R28",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-E3",
      "target": "P02-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "该原文定位支持命题的限定表述；编辑判断属于链层推论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R29",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-E4",
      "target": "P02-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "该原文定位支持命题的限定表述；编辑判断属于链层推论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R30",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-E5",
      "target": "P02-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "该原文定位支持命题的限定表述；编辑判断属于链层推论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R31",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-C5",
      "target": "P02-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释本命题时必须保留此前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E1",
          "P02-E2",
          "P02-E3",
          "P02-E4",
          "P02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R32",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-C5",
      "target": "P02-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释本命题时必须保留此前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E1",
          "P02-E2",
          "P02-E3",
          "P02-E4",
          "P02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R33",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-L1",
      "target": "P02-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围或验证层级，不自动推翻论文结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E1",
          "P02-E2",
          "P02-E3",
          "P02-E4",
          "P02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R34",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-L2",
      "target": "P02-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围或验证层级，不自动推翻论文结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E1",
          "P02-E2",
          "P02-E3",
          "P02-E4",
          "P02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R35",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-L3",
      "target": "P02-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围或验证层级，不自动推翻论文结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E1",
          "P02-E2",
          "P02-E3",
          "P02-E4",
          "P02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R36",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-C4",
      "target": "P02-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "高红移分量与总体联合偏好方向不同，联合拟合不等于所有观测各自支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E2",
          "P02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R37",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-C2",
      "target": "P02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "条件性2.7σ偏好不足以确立问题的肯定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E2",
          "P02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R38",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-C3",
      "target": "P02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "加入共享数据后的3.2σ不是独立重复，也不是暗能量本体已识别。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E2",
          "P02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R39",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-Q1",
      "target": "P02-C5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "开放状态以本链审慎评估为依据，不等于全领域系统综述。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E1",
          "P02-E2",
          "P02-E3",
          "P02-E4",
          "P02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R40",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-E6",
      "target": "P02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "该核对记录来自同一固定版本，不能充作新独立研究。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant source-location comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-R41",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-L4",
      "target": "P02-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "数值使用详细命名组合，结论段泛称的差别保留待核。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant source-location comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R01",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-V01",
      "target": "ED01-S01",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "定位与数值来自该版本来源。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V01"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R02",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-V01",
      "target": "ED01-C01",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "该正文定位支持限定主张；不超出该结局和样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V01"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R03",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-C01",
      "target": "ED01-P01",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "必须保留估计与测量前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V01"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R04",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-L01",
      "target": "ED01-C01",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限定适用范围、统计含义或验证层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V01"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R05",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-V02",
      "target": "ED01-S01",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "定位与数值来自该版本来源。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V02"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R06",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-V02",
      "target": "ED01-C02",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "该正文定位支持限定主张；不超出该结局和样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V02"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R07",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-C02",
      "target": "ED01-P02",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "必须保留估计与测量前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V02"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R08",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-L02",
      "target": "ED01-C02",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限定适用范围、统计含义或验证层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V02"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R09",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-V03",
      "target": "ED01-S01",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "定位与数值来自该版本来源。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V03"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R10",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-V03",
      "target": "ED01-C03",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "该正文定位支持限定主张；不超出该结局和样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V03"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R11",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-C03",
      "target": "ED01-P03",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "必须保留估计与测量前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V03"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R12",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-L03",
      "target": "ED01-C03",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限定适用范围、统计含义或验证层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V03"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R13",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-V04",
      "target": "ED01-S01",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "定位与数值来自该版本来源。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V04"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R14",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-V04",
      "target": "ED01-C04",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "该正文定位支持限定主张；不超出该结局和样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V04"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R15",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-C04",
      "target": "ED01-P04",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "必须保留估计与测量前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V04"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R16",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-L04",
      "target": "ED01-C04",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限定适用范围、统计含义或验证层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V04"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R17",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-V05",
      "target": "ED01-S01",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "定位与数值来自该版本来源。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V05"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R18",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-V05",
      "target": "ED01-C05",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "该正文定位支持限定主张；不超出该结局和样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V05"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R19",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-C05",
      "target": "ED01-P05",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "必须保留估计与测量前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V05"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R20",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-L05",
      "target": "ED01-C05",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限定适用范围、统计含义或验证层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V05"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R21",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-V06",
      "target": "ED01-S01",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "定位与数值来自该版本来源。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V06"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R22",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-V06",
      "target": "ED01-C06",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "该正文定位支持限定主张；不超出该结局和样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V06"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R23",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-C06",
      "target": "ED01-P06",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "必须保留估计与测量前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V06"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R24",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-L06",
      "target": "ED01-C06",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限定适用范围、统计含义或验证层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V06"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R25",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-C05",
      "target": "ED01-C02",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "练习相对变化的分子来自处理系数",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R26",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-C05",
      "target": "ED01-C03",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "无辅助相对变化的分子来自Base系数",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R27",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-C01",
      "target": "ED01-C03",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "仅限这套分配、测验及短期环境",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R28",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-C04",
      "target": "ED01-C03",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "相近底层模型的另一整套设计出现不同估计；不能泛化为所有AI",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R29",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-C02",
      "target": "ED01-Q01",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "当场辅助表现不能回答延迟无辅助迁移",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R30",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-C04",
      "target": "ED01-Q01",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "当场不显著差异不能证明长期学习改善",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R31",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-C06",
      "target": "ED01-C03",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制长期、跨工具及跨情境推断",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R32",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-Q01",
      "target": "ED01-C06",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "识别需要直接测量的边界",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R33",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-S02",
      "target": "ED01-S01",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "确认2025-08-20仅作者机构更正",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01",
          "ED01-S02"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-R34",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-S03",
      "target": "ED01-C01",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "补充核对GPT-4-0613和排课约束；作者稿与期刊SI版本不可混同",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-S01",
          "ED01-S03"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "assistant fulltext extraction or explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R01",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-V11",
      "target": "IK01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "定位属于这一出版版本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V11"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R02",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-V11",
      "target": "IK01-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "支持对来源文本/限定性的归纳。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V11"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R03",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-C1",
      "target": "IK01-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释这一规范/制度主张须保留情境及授权前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V11"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R04",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-L1",
      "target": "IK01-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "区分规范、名义制度、真实运行与经验结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V11"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R05",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-V21",
      "target": "IK01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "定位属于这一出版版本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V21"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R06",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-V21",
      "target": "IK01-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "支持对来源文本/限定性的归纳。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V21"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R07",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-C2",
      "target": "IK01-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释这一规范/制度主张须保留情境及授权前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V21"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R08",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-L2",
      "target": "IK01-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "区分规范、名义制度、真实运行与经验结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V21"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R09",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-V31",
      "target": "IK01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "定位属于这一出版版本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V31"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R10",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-V31",
      "target": "IK01-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "支持对来源文本/限定性的归纳。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V31"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R11",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-C3",
      "target": "IK01-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释这一规范/制度主张须保留情境及授权前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V31"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R12",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-L3",
      "target": "IK01-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "区分规范、名义制度、真实运行与经验结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V31"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R13",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-V41",
      "target": "IK01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "定位属于这一出版版本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V41"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R14",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-V41",
      "target": "IK01-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "支持对来源文本/限定性的归纳。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V41"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R15",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-C4",
      "target": "IK01-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释这一规范/制度主张须保留情境及授权前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V41"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R16",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-L4",
      "target": "IK01-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "区分规范、名义制度、真实运行与经验结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V41"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R17",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-V51",
      "target": "IK01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "定位属于这一出版版本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V51"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R18",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-V51",
      "target": "IK01-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "支持对来源文本/限定性的归纳。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V51"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R19",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-V52",
      "target": "IK01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "定位属于这一出版版本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V52"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R20",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-V52",
      "target": "IK01-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "支持对来源文本/限定性的归纳。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V52"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R21",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-C5",
      "target": "IK01-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释这一规范/制度主张须保留情境及授权前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1",
          "IK01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V51",
          "IK01-V52"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R22",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-L5",
      "target": "IK01-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "区分规范、名义制度、真实运行与经验结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1",
          "IK01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V51",
          "IK01-V52"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R23",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-V61",
      "target": "IK01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "定位属于这一出版版本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V61"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R24",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-V61",
      "target": "IK01-C6",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "提供编辑路线的规范/制度依据；不是证明提议的评价路线已有效。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V61"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R25",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-V62",
      "target": "IK01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "定位属于这一出版版本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V62"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R26",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-V62",
      "target": "IK01-C6",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "提供编辑路线的规范/制度依据；不是证明提议的评价路线已有效。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V62"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R27",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-C6",
      "target": "IK01-P6",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释这一规范/制度主张须保留情境及授权前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1",
          "IK01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V61",
          "IK01-V62"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R28",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-L6",
      "target": "IK01-C6",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "区分规范、名义制度、真实运行与经验结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1",
          "IK01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V61",
          "IK01-V62"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R29",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-C3",
      "target": "IK01-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "阶段分类不可只凭人数或咨询活动判断。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R30",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-C5",
      "target": "IK01-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "应用建议不得提升为完成或有效的结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R31",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-S1",
      "target": "IK01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "框架及案例叙述不能回答实际权力和受益是否实现。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R32",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-S2",
      "target": "IK01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "规范原则本身不能提供该合作安排的评价结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R33",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-C6",
      "target": "IK01-C1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "本路线采用相关权利主体决定规则与受益判断的规范前提。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1",
          "IK01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R34",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-C6",
      "target": "IK01-C3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "将名义席位与可执行权限区分。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1",
          "IK01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-R35",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-Q1",
      "target": "IK01-C6",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "回答该开放问题需要获授权、可追踪且限定情境的评价路线。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-S1",
          "IK01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-03",
        "method": "primary fulltext content and explicitly labeled editorial interpretation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R01",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-E1",
      "target": "P06-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R02",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-E1",
      "target": "P06-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R03",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-C1",
      "target": "P06-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R04",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-L1",
      "target": "P06-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R05",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-E2",
      "target": "P06-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R06",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-E2",
      "target": "P06-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R07",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-C2",
      "target": "P06-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R08",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-L2",
      "target": "P06-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R09",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-E3",
      "target": "P06-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R10",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-E3",
      "target": "P06-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R11",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-C3",
      "target": "P06-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R12",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-L3",
      "target": "P06-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R13",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-E4",
      "target": "P06-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R14",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-E4",
      "target": "P06-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R15",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-C4",
      "target": "P06-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R16",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-L4",
      "target": "P06-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R17",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-E5",
      "target": "P06-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R18",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-E5",
      "target": "P06-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R19",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-C5",
      "target": "P06-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R20",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-L5",
      "target": "P06-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R21",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-C1",
      "target": "P06-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R22",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-C2",
      "target": "P06-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R23",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-C3",
      "target": "P06-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R24",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-C4",
      "target": "P06-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P06-R25",
      "case_id": "P06",
      "source": "P06-C5",
      "target": "P06-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P06-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P06-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R01",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-E1",
      "target": "P07-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R02",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-E1",
      "target": "P07-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R03",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-C1",
      "target": "P07-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R04",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-L1",
      "target": "P07-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R05",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-E2",
      "target": "P07-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R06",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-E2",
      "target": "P07-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R07",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-C2",
      "target": "P07-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R08",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-L2",
      "target": "P07-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R09",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-E3",
      "target": "P07-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R10",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-E3",
      "target": "P07-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R11",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-C3",
      "target": "P07-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R12",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-L3",
      "target": "P07-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R13",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-E4",
      "target": "P07-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R14",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-E4",
      "target": "P07-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R15",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-C4",
      "target": "P07-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R16",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-L4",
      "target": "P07-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R17",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-E5",
      "target": "P07-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S1",
          "P07-S2",
          "P07-S3",
          "P07-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R18",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-E5",
      "target": "P07-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S1",
          "P07-S2",
          "P07-S3",
          "P07-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R19",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-E5",
      "target": "P07-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S1",
          "P07-S2",
          "P07-S3",
          "P07-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R20",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-E5",
      "target": "P07-S4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S1",
          "P07-S2",
          "P07-S3",
          "P07-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R21",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-E5",
      "target": "P07-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S1",
          "P07-S2",
          "P07-S3",
          "P07-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R22",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-C5",
      "target": "P07-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S1",
          "P07-S2",
          "P07-S3",
          "P07-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R23",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-L5",
      "target": "P07-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S1",
          "P07-S2",
          "P07-S3",
          "P07-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R24",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-C1",
      "target": "P07-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R25",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-C2",
      "target": "P07-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R26",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-C3",
      "target": "P07-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R27",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-C4",
      "target": "P07-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P07-R28",
      "case_id": "P07",
      "source": "P07-C5",
      "target": "P07-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P07-S1",
          "P07-S2",
          "P07-S3",
          "P07-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P07-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R01",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-E1",
      "target": "P08-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R02",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-E1",
      "target": "P08-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R03",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-C1",
      "target": "P08-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R04",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-L1",
      "target": "P08-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R05",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-E2",
      "target": "P08-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R06",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-E2",
      "target": "P08-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R07",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-C2",
      "target": "P08-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R08",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-L2",
      "target": "P08-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R09",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-E3",
      "target": "P08-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R10",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-E3",
      "target": "P08-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R11",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-C3",
      "target": "P08-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R12",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-L3",
      "target": "P08-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R13",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-E4",
      "target": "P08-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S3",
          "P08-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R14",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-E4",
      "target": "P08-S4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S3",
          "P08-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R15",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-E4",
      "target": "P08-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S3",
          "P08-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R16",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-C4",
      "target": "P08-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S3",
          "P08-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R17",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-L4",
      "target": "P08-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S3",
          "P08-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R18",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-E5",
      "target": "P08-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S1",
          "P08-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R19",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-E5",
      "target": "P08-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S1",
          "P08-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R20",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-E5",
      "target": "P08-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S1",
          "P08-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R21",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-C5",
      "target": "P08-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S1",
          "P08-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R22",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-L5",
      "target": "P08-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S1",
          "P08-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R23",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-C1",
      "target": "P08-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R24",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-C2",
      "target": "P08-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R25",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-C3",
      "target": "P08-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R26",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-C4",
      "target": "P08-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S3",
          "P08-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P08-R27",
      "case_id": "P08",
      "source": "P08-C5",
      "target": "P08-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P08-S1",
          "P08-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P08-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R01",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-E1",
      "target": "P09-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R02",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-E1",
      "target": "P09-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R03",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-C1",
      "target": "P09-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R04",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-L1",
      "target": "P09-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R05",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-E2",
      "target": "P09-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R06",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-E2",
      "target": "P09-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R07",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-C2",
      "target": "P09-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R08",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-L2",
      "target": "P09-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R09",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-E3",
      "target": "P09-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R10",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-E3",
      "target": "P09-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R11",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-C3",
      "target": "P09-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R12",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-L3",
      "target": "P09-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R13",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-E4",
      "target": "P09-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S2",
          "P09-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R14",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-E4",
      "target": "P09-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S2",
          "P09-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R15",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-E4",
      "target": "P09-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S2",
          "P09-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R16",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-C4",
      "target": "P09-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S2",
          "P09-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R17",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-L4",
      "target": "P09-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S2",
          "P09-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R18",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-E5",
      "target": "P09-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R19",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-E5",
      "target": "P09-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R20",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-C5",
      "target": "P09-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R21",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-L5",
      "target": "P09-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R22",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-C1",
      "target": "P09-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R23",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-C2",
      "target": "P09-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R24",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-C3",
      "target": "P09-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R25",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-C4",
      "target": "P09-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S2",
          "P09-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P09-R26",
      "case_id": "P09",
      "source": "P09-C5",
      "target": "P09-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P09-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P09-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R01",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-E1",
      "target": "P10-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R02",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-E1",
      "target": "P10-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R03",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-C1",
      "target": "P10-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R04",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-L1",
      "target": "P10-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R05",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-E2",
      "target": "P10-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R06",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-E2",
      "target": "P10-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R07",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-C2",
      "target": "P10-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R08",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-L2",
      "target": "P10-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R09",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-E3",
      "target": "P10-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R10",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-E3",
      "target": "P10-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R11",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-C3",
      "target": "P10-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R12",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-L3",
      "target": "P10-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R13",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-E4",
      "target": "P10-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R14",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-E4",
      "target": "P10-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R15",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-C4",
      "target": "P10-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R16",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-L4",
      "target": "P10-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R17",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-E5",
      "target": "P10-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S1",
          "P10-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R18",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-E5",
      "target": "P10-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S1",
          "P10-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R19",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-E5",
      "target": "P10-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S1",
          "P10-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R20",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-C5",
      "target": "P10-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S1",
          "P10-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R21",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-L5",
      "target": "P10-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S1",
          "P10-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R22",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-C1",
      "target": "P10-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R23",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-C2",
      "target": "P10-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R24",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-C3",
      "target": "P10-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R25",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-C4",
      "target": "P10-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P10-R26",
      "case_id": "P10",
      "source": "P10-C5",
      "target": "P10-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P10-S1",
          "P10-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P10-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R01",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-E1",
      "target": "P11-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R02",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-E1",
      "target": "P11-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R03",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-C1",
      "target": "P11-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R04",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-L1",
      "target": "P11-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R05",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-E2",
      "target": "P11-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R06",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-E2",
      "target": "P11-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R07",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-C2",
      "target": "P11-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R08",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-L2",
      "target": "P11-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R09",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-E3",
      "target": "P11-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R10",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-E3",
      "target": "P11-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R11",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-C3",
      "target": "P11-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R12",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-L3",
      "target": "P11-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R13",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-E4",
      "target": "P11-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R14",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-E4",
      "target": "P11-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R15",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-C4",
      "target": "P11-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R16",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-L4",
      "target": "P11-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R17",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-E5",
      "target": "P11-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S1",
          "P11-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R18",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-E5",
      "target": "P11-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S1",
          "P11-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R19",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-E5",
      "target": "P11-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S1",
          "P11-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R20",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-C5",
      "target": "P11-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S1",
          "P11-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R21",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-L5",
      "target": "P11-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S1",
          "P11-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R22",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-C1",
      "target": "P11-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R23",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-C2",
      "target": "P11-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R24",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-C3",
      "target": "P11-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R25",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-C4",
      "target": "P11-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P11-R26",
      "case_id": "P11",
      "source": "P11-C5",
      "target": "P11-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P11-S1",
          "P11-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P11-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R01",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-E1",
      "target": "P01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R02",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-E1",
      "target": "P01-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R03",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-C1",
      "target": "P01-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R04",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-L1",
      "target": "P01-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R05",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-E2",
      "target": "P01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R06",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-E2",
      "target": "P01-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R07",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-C2",
      "target": "P01-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R08",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-L2",
      "target": "P01-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R09",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-E3",
      "target": "P01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R10",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-E3",
      "target": "P01-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R11",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-C3",
      "target": "P01-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R12",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-L3",
      "target": "P01-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R13",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-E4",
      "target": "P01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R14",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-E4",
      "target": "P01-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R15",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-C4",
      "target": "P01-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R16",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-L4",
      "target": "P01-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R17",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-E5",
      "target": "P01-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R18",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-E5",
      "target": "P01-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R19",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-C5",
      "target": "P01-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R20",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-L5",
      "target": "P01-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R21",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-E6",
      "target": "P01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S1",
          "P01-S2",
          "P01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R22",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-E6",
      "target": "P01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S1",
          "P01-S2",
          "P01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R23",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-E6",
      "target": "P01-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S1",
          "P01-S2",
          "P01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R24",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-E6",
      "target": "P01-C6",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S1",
          "P01-S2",
          "P01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R25",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-C6",
      "target": "P01-P6",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S1",
          "P01-S2",
          "P01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R26",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-L6",
      "target": "P01-C6",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S1",
          "P01-S2",
          "P01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R27",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-C1",
      "target": "P01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R28",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-C2",
      "target": "P01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R29",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-C3",
      "target": "P01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R30",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-C4",
      "target": "P01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R31",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-C5",
      "target": "P01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P01-R32",
      "case_id": "P01",
      "source": "P01-C6",
      "target": "P01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P01-S1",
          "P01-S2",
          "P01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P01-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R01",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-E1",
      "target": "P03-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R02",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-E1",
      "target": "P03-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R03",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-C1",
      "target": "P03-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R04",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-L1",
      "target": "P03-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R05",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-E2",
      "target": "P03-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R06",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-E2",
      "target": "P03-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R07",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-C2",
      "target": "P03-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R08",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-L2",
      "target": "P03-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R09",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-E3",
      "target": "P03-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R10",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-E3",
      "target": "P03-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R11",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-C3",
      "target": "P03-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R12",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-L3",
      "target": "P03-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R13",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-E4",
      "target": "P03-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R14",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-E4",
      "target": "P03-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R15",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-C4",
      "target": "P03-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R16",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-L4",
      "target": "P03-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R17",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-E5",
      "target": "P03-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R18",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-E5",
      "target": "P03-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R19",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-C5",
      "target": "P03-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R20",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-L5",
      "target": "P03-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R21",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-C1",
      "target": "P03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R22",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-C2",
      "target": "P03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R23",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-C3",
      "target": "P03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R24",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-C4",
      "target": "P03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-R25",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-C5",
      "target": "P03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R01",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-E1",
      "target": "P04-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R02",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-E1",
      "target": "P04-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R03",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-C1",
      "target": "P04-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R04",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-L1",
      "target": "P04-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R05",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-E2",
      "target": "P04-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R06",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-E2",
      "target": "P04-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R07",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-C2",
      "target": "P04-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R08",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-L2",
      "target": "P04-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R09",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-E3",
      "target": "P04-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R10",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-E3",
      "target": "P04-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R11",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-C3",
      "target": "P04-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R12",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-L3",
      "target": "P04-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R13",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-E4",
      "target": "P04-S4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R14",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-E4",
      "target": "P04-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R15",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-C4",
      "target": "P04-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R16",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-L4",
      "target": "P04-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R17",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-E5",
      "target": "P04-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S1",
          "P04-S2",
          "P04-S3",
          "P04-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R18",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-E5",
      "target": "P04-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S1",
          "P04-S2",
          "P04-S3",
          "P04-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R19",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-E5",
      "target": "P04-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S1",
          "P04-S2",
          "P04-S3",
          "P04-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R20",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-E5",
      "target": "P04-S4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S1",
          "P04-S2",
          "P04-S3",
          "P04-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R21",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-E5",
      "target": "P04-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S1",
          "P04-S2",
          "P04-S3",
          "P04-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R22",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-C5",
      "target": "P04-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S1",
          "P04-S2",
          "P04-S3",
          "P04-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R23",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-L5",
      "target": "P04-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S1",
          "P04-S2",
          "P04-S3",
          "P04-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R24",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-C1",
      "target": "P04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R25",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-C2",
      "target": "P04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R26",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-C3",
      "target": "P04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R27",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-C4",
      "target": "P04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P04-R28",
      "case_id": "P04",
      "source": "P04-C5",
      "target": "P04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P04-S1",
          "P04-S2",
          "P04-S3",
          "P04-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R01",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-E1",
      "target": "P05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R02",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-E1",
      "target": "P05-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R03",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-C1",
      "target": "P05-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R04",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-L1",
      "target": "P05-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R05",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-E2",
      "target": "P05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R06",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-E2",
      "target": "P05-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R07",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-C2",
      "target": "P05-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R08",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-L2",
      "target": "P05-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R09",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-E3",
      "target": "P05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R10",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-E3",
      "target": "P05-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R11",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-C3",
      "target": "P05-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R12",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-L3",
      "target": "P05-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R13",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-E4",
      "target": "P05-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R14",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-E4",
      "target": "P05-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R15",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-C4",
      "target": "P05-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R16",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-L4",
      "target": "P05-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R17",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-E5",
      "target": "P05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S1",
          "P05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R18",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-E5",
      "target": "P05-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S1",
          "P05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R19",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-E5",
      "target": "P05-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S1",
          "P05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R20",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-C5",
      "target": "P05-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S1",
          "P05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R21",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-L5",
      "target": "P05-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S1",
          "P05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R22",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-C1",
      "target": "P05-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R23",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-C2",
      "target": "P05-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R24",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-C3",
      "target": "P05-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R25",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-C4",
      "target": "P05-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P05-R26",
      "case_id": "P05",
      "source": "P05-C5",
      "target": "P05-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P05-S1",
          "P05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P05-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R01",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-E1",
      "target": "P12-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S4",
          "P12-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R02",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-E1",
      "target": "P12-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S4",
          "P12-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R03",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-C1",
      "target": "P12-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S4",
          "P12-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R04",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-L1",
      "target": "P12-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S4",
          "P12-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R05",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-E2",
      "target": "P12-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R06",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-E2",
      "target": "P12-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R07",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-C2",
      "target": "P12-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R08",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-L2",
      "target": "P12-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R09",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-E3",
      "target": "P12-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R10",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-E3",
      "target": "P12-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R11",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-C3",
      "target": "P12-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R12",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-L3",
      "target": "P12-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R13",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-E4",
      "target": "P12-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R14",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-E4",
      "target": "P12-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R15",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-C4",
      "target": "P12-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R16",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-L4",
      "target": "P12-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R17",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-E5",
      "target": "P12-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R18",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-E5",
      "target": "P12-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R19",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-C5",
      "target": "P12-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R20",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-L5",
      "target": "P12-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R21",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-E6",
      "target": "P12-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S4",
          "P12-S1",
          "P12-S2",
          "P12-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R22",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-E6",
      "target": "P12-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S4",
          "P12-S1",
          "P12-S2",
          "P12-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R23",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-E6",
      "target": "P12-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S4",
          "P12-S1",
          "P12-S2",
          "P12-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R24",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-E6",
      "target": "P12-C6",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S4",
          "P12-S1",
          "P12-S2",
          "P12-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R25",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-C6",
      "target": "P12-P6",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S4",
          "P12-S1",
          "P12-S2",
          "P12-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R26",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-L6",
      "target": "P12-C6",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S4",
          "P12-S1",
          "P12-S2",
          "P12-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R27",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-C1",
      "target": "P12-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S4",
          "P12-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R28",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-C2",
      "target": "P12-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R29",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-C3",
      "target": "P12-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R30",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-C4",
      "target": "P12-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R31",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-C5",
      "target": "P12-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R32",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-C6",
      "target": "P12-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S4",
          "P12-S1",
          "P12-S2",
          "P12-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R33",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-E1",
      "target": "P12-S4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "新增合法作者机构接受稿补足所列正文及方法依据；与P12-S1及同作arXiv版本属同一独立性组，不计为独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S4",
          "P12-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-R34",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-E6",
      "target": "P12-S4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "新增合法作者机构接受稿补足所列正文及方法依据；与P12-S1及同作arXiv版本属同一独立性组，不计为独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S4",
          "P12-S1",
          "P12-S2",
          "P12-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R01",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-E1",
      "target": "P13-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R02",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-E1",
      "target": "P13-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R03",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-C1",
      "target": "P13-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R04",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-L1",
      "target": "P13-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R05",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-C1",
      "target": "P13-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R06",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-E2",
      "target": "P13-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R07",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-E2",
      "target": "P13-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R08",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-C2",
      "target": "P13-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R09",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-L2",
      "target": "P13-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R10",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-C2",
      "target": "P13-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R11",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-E3",
      "target": "P13-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R12",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-E3",
      "target": "P13-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R13",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-C3",
      "target": "P13-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R14",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-L3",
      "target": "P13-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R15",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-C3",
      "target": "P13-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R16",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-E4",
      "target": "P13-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R17",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-E4",
      "target": "P13-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R18",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-C4",
      "target": "P13-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R19",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-L4",
      "target": "P13-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R20",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-C4",
      "target": "P13-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R21",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-E5",
      "target": "P13-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R22",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-E5",
      "target": "P13-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R23",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-C5",
      "target": "P13-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R24",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-L5",
      "target": "P13-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-R25",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-C5",
      "target": "P13-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R01",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-E1",
      "target": "P14-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R02",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-E1",
      "target": "P14-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R03",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-C1",
      "target": "P14-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R04",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-L1",
      "target": "P14-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R05",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-C1",
      "target": "P14-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R06",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-E2",
      "target": "P14-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R07",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-E2",
      "target": "P14-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R08",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-C2",
      "target": "P14-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R09",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-L2",
      "target": "P14-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R10",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-C2",
      "target": "P14-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R11",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-E3",
      "target": "P14-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R12",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-E3",
      "target": "P14-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R13",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-C3",
      "target": "P14-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R14",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-L3",
      "target": "P14-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R15",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-C3",
      "target": "P14-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R16",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-E4",
      "target": "P14-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R17",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-E4",
      "target": "P14-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R18",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-C4",
      "target": "P14-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R19",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-L4",
      "target": "P14-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R20",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-C4",
      "target": "P14-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R21",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-E5",
      "target": "P14-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S1",
          "P14-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R22",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-E5",
      "target": "P14-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S1",
          "P14-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R23",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-E5",
      "target": "P14-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S1",
          "P14-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R24",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-C5",
      "target": "P14-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S1",
          "P14-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R25",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-L5",
      "target": "P14-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S1",
          "P14-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-R26",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-C5",
      "target": "P14-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-S1",
          "P14-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R01",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-E1",
      "target": "P15-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R02",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-E1",
      "target": "P15-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R03",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-C1",
      "target": "P15-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R04",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-L1",
      "target": "P15-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R05",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-C1",
      "target": "P15-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R06",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-E2",
      "target": "P15-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R07",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-E2",
      "target": "P15-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R08",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-C2",
      "target": "P15-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R09",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-L2",
      "target": "P15-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R10",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-C2",
      "target": "P15-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R11",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-E3",
      "target": "P15-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R12",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-E3",
      "target": "P15-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R13",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-C3",
      "target": "P15-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R14",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-L3",
      "target": "P15-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R15",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-C3",
      "target": "P15-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R16",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-E4",
      "target": "P15-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R17",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-E4",
      "target": "P15-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R18",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-C4",
      "target": "P15-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R19",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-L4",
      "target": "P15-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R20",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-C4",
      "target": "P15-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R21",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-E5",
      "target": "P15-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S1",
          "P15-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R22",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-E5",
      "target": "P15-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S1",
          "P15-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R23",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-E5",
      "target": "P15-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S1",
          "P15-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R24",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-C5",
      "target": "P15-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S1",
          "P15-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R25",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-L5",
      "target": "P15-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S1",
          "P15-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P15-R26",
      "case_id": "P15",
      "source": "P15-C5",
      "target": "P15-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P15-S1",
          "P15-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P15-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R01",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-E1",
      "target": "P16-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R02",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-E1",
      "target": "P16-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R03",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-C1",
      "target": "P16-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R04",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-L1",
      "target": "P16-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R05",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-C1",
      "target": "P16-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R06",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-E2",
      "target": "P16-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R07",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-E2",
      "target": "P16-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R08",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-C2",
      "target": "P16-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R09",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-L2",
      "target": "P16-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R10",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-C2",
      "target": "P16-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R11",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-E3",
      "target": "P16-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R12",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-E3",
      "target": "P16-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R13",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-C3",
      "target": "P16-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R14",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-L3",
      "target": "P16-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R15",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-C3",
      "target": "P16-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R16",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-E4",
      "target": "P16-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R17",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-E4",
      "target": "P16-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R18",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-C4",
      "target": "P16-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R19",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-L4",
      "target": "P16-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R20",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-C4",
      "target": "P16-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R21",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-E5",
      "target": "P16-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S1",
          "P16-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R22",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-E5",
      "target": "P16-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S1",
          "P16-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R23",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-E5",
      "target": "P16-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S1",
          "P16-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R24",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-C5",
      "target": "P16-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S1",
          "P16-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R25",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-L5",
      "target": "P16-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S1",
          "P16-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-R26",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-C5",
      "target": "P16-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-S1",
          "P16-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R01",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-E1",
      "target": "LS01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R02",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-E1",
      "target": "LS01-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R03",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-C1",
      "target": "LS01-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R04",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-L1",
      "target": "LS01-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R05",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-C1",
      "target": "LS01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R06",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-E2",
      "target": "LS01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R07",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-E2",
      "target": "LS01-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R08",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-C2",
      "target": "LS01-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R09",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-L2",
      "target": "LS01-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R10",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-C2",
      "target": "LS01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R11",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-E3",
      "target": "LS01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R12",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-E3",
      "target": "LS01-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R13",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-C3",
      "target": "LS01-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R14",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-L3",
      "target": "LS01-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R15",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-C3",
      "target": "LS01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R16",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-E4",
      "target": "LS01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R17",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-E4",
      "target": "LS01-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R18",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-C4",
      "target": "LS01-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R19",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-L4",
      "target": "LS01-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R20",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-C4",
      "target": "LS01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R21",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-E5",
      "target": "LS01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S1",
          "LS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R22",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-E5",
      "target": "LS01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S1",
          "LS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R23",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-E5",
      "target": "LS01-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S1",
          "LS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R24",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-C5",
      "target": "LS01-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S1",
          "LS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R25",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-L5",
      "target": "LS01-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S1",
          "LS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-R26",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-C5",
      "target": "LS01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-S1",
          "LS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R01",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-E1",
      "target": "LS02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R02",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-E1",
      "target": "LS02-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R03",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-C1",
      "target": "LS02-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R04",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-L1",
      "target": "LS02-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R05",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-C1",
      "target": "LS02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R06",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-E2",
      "target": "LS02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R07",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-E2",
      "target": "LS02-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R08",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-C2",
      "target": "LS02-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R09",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-L2",
      "target": "LS02-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R10",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-C2",
      "target": "LS02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R11",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-E3",
      "target": "LS02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R12",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-E3",
      "target": "LS02-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R13",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-C3",
      "target": "LS02-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R14",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-L3",
      "target": "LS02-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R15",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-C3",
      "target": "LS02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R16",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-E4",
      "target": "LS02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R17",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-E4",
      "target": "LS02-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R18",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-C4",
      "target": "LS02-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R19",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-L4",
      "target": "LS02-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R20",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-C4",
      "target": "LS02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R21",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-E5",
      "target": "LS02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R22",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-E5",
      "target": "LS02-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R23",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-C5",
      "target": "LS02-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R24",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-L5",
      "target": "LS02-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS02-R25",
      "case_id": "LS02",
      "source": "LS02-C5",
      "target": "LS02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R01",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-E1",
      "target": "LS03-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R02",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-E1",
      "target": "LS03-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R03",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-C1",
      "target": "LS03-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R04",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-L1",
      "target": "LS03-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R05",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-C1",
      "target": "LS03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R06",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-E2",
      "target": "LS03-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R07",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-E2",
      "target": "LS03-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R08",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-C2",
      "target": "LS03-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R09",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-L2",
      "target": "LS03-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R10",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-C2",
      "target": "LS03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R11",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-E3",
      "target": "LS03-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R12",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-E3",
      "target": "LS03-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R13",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-C3",
      "target": "LS03-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R14",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-L3",
      "target": "LS03-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R15",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-C3",
      "target": "LS03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R16",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-E4",
      "target": "LS03-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R17",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-E4",
      "target": "LS03-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R18",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-C4",
      "target": "LS03-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R19",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-L4",
      "target": "LS03-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R20",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-C4",
      "target": "LS03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R21",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-E5",
      "target": "LS03-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R22",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-E5",
      "target": "LS03-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R23",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-C5",
      "target": "LS03-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R24",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-L5",
      "target": "LS03-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R25",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-C5",
      "target": "LS03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R26",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-E6",
      "target": "LS03-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S1",
          "LS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R27",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-E6",
      "target": "LS03-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S1",
          "LS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R28",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-E6",
      "target": "LS03-C6",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S1",
          "LS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R29",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-C6",
      "target": "LS03-P6",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S1",
          "LS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R30",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-L6",
      "target": "LS03-C6",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S1",
          "LS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS03-R31",
      "case_id": "LS03",
      "source": "LS03-C6",
      "target": "LS03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS03-S1",
          "LS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS03-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R01",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-E1",
      "target": "LS04-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R02",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-E1",
      "target": "LS04-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R03",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-C1",
      "target": "LS04-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R04",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-L1",
      "target": "LS04-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R05",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-C1",
      "target": "LS04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R06",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-E2",
      "target": "LS04-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R07",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-E2",
      "target": "LS04-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R08",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-C2",
      "target": "LS04-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R09",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-L2",
      "target": "LS04-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R10",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-C2",
      "target": "LS04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R11",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-E3",
      "target": "LS04-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R12",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-E3",
      "target": "LS04-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R13",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-C3",
      "target": "LS04-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R14",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-L3",
      "target": "LS04-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R15",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-C3",
      "target": "LS04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R16",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-E4",
      "target": "LS04-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R17",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-E4",
      "target": "LS04-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R18",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-C4",
      "target": "LS04-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R19",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-L4",
      "target": "LS04-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R20",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-C4",
      "target": "LS04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R21",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-E5",
      "target": "LS04-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S1",
          "LS04-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R22",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-E5",
      "target": "LS04-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S1",
          "LS04-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R23",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-E5",
      "target": "LS04-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S1",
          "LS04-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R24",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-C5",
      "target": "LS04-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S1",
          "LS04-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R25",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-L5",
      "target": "LS04-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S1",
          "LS04-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-R26",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-C5",
      "target": "LS04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-S1",
          "LS04-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R01",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-E1",
      "target": "LS05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R02",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-E1",
      "target": "LS05-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R03",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-C1",
      "target": "LS05-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R04",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-L1",
      "target": "LS05-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R05",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-C1",
      "target": "LS05-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R06",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-E2",
      "target": "LS05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R07",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-E2",
      "target": "LS05-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R08",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-C2",
      "target": "LS05-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R09",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-L2",
      "target": "LS05-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R10",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-C2",
      "target": "LS05-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R11",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-E3",
      "target": "LS05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R12",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-E3",
      "target": "LS05-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R13",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-C3",
      "target": "LS05-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R14",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-L3",
      "target": "LS05-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R15",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-C3",
      "target": "LS05-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R16",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-E4",
      "target": "LS05-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R17",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-E4",
      "target": "LS05-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R18",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-C4",
      "target": "LS05-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R19",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-L4",
      "target": "LS05-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R20",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-C4",
      "target": "LS05-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R21",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-E5",
      "target": "LS05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S1",
          "LS05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R22",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-E5",
      "target": "LS05-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S1",
          "LS05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R23",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-E5",
      "target": "LS05-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S1",
          "LS05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R24",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-C5",
      "target": "LS05-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S1",
          "LS05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R25",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-L5",
      "target": "LS05-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S1",
          "LS05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS05-R26",
      "case_id": "LS05",
      "source": "LS05-C5",
      "target": "LS05-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS05-S1",
          "LS05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS05-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R01",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-E1",
      "target": "NS01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R02",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-E1",
      "target": "NS01-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R03",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-C1",
      "target": "NS01-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R04",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-L1",
      "target": "NS01-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R05",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-C1",
      "target": "NS01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R06",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-E2",
      "target": "NS01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R07",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-E2",
      "target": "NS01-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R08",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-C2",
      "target": "NS01-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R09",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-L2",
      "target": "NS01-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R10",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-C2",
      "target": "NS01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R11",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-E3",
      "target": "NS01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R12",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-E3",
      "target": "NS01-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R13",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-C3",
      "target": "NS01-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R14",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-L3",
      "target": "NS01-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R15",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-C3",
      "target": "NS01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R16",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-E4",
      "target": "NS01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R17",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-E4",
      "target": "NS01-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R18",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-C4",
      "target": "NS01-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R19",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-L4",
      "target": "NS01-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R20",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-C4",
      "target": "NS01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R21",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-E5",
      "target": "NS01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R22",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-E5",
      "target": "NS01-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R23",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-C5",
      "target": "NS01-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R24",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-L5",
      "target": "NS01-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS01-R25",
      "case_id": "NS01",
      "source": "NS01-C5",
      "target": "NS01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R01",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-E1",
      "target": "NS02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R02",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-E1",
      "target": "NS02-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R03",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-C1",
      "target": "NS02-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R04",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-L1",
      "target": "NS02-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R05",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-C1",
      "target": "NS02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R06",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-E2",
      "target": "NS02-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R07",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-E2",
      "target": "NS02-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R08",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-C2",
      "target": "NS02-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R09",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-L2",
      "target": "NS02-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R10",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-C2",
      "target": "NS02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R11",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-E3",
      "target": "NS02-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R12",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-E3",
      "target": "NS02-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R13",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-C3",
      "target": "NS02-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R14",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-L3",
      "target": "NS02-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R15",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-C3",
      "target": "NS02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R16",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-E4",
      "target": "NS02-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R17",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-E4",
      "target": "NS02-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R18",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-C4",
      "target": "NS02-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R19",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-L4",
      "target": "NS02-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R20",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-C4",
      "target": "NS02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R21",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-E5",
      "target": "NS02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S1",
          "NS02-S2",
          "NS02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R22",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-E5",
      "target": "NS02-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S1",
          "NS02-S2",
          "NS02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R23",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-E5",
      "target": "NS02-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S1",
          "NS02-S2",
          "NS02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R24",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-E5",
      "target": "NS02-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S1",
          "NS02-S2",
          "NS02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R25",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-C5",
      "target": "NS02-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S1",
          "NS02-S2",
          "NS02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R26",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-L5",
      "target": "NS02-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S1",
          "NS02-S2",
          "NS02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-R27",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-C5",
      "target": "NS02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-S1",
          "NS02-S2",
          "NS02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R01",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-E1",
      "target": "ES01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R02",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-E1",
      "target": "ES01-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R03",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-C1",
      "target": "ES01-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R04",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-L1",
      "target": "ES01-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R05",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-E2",
      "target": "ES01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R06",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-E2",
      "target": "ES01-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R07",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-C2",
      "target": "ES01-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R08",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-L2",
      "target": "ES01-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R09",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-E3",
      "target": "ES01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R10",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-E3",
      "target": "ES01-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R11",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-C3",
      "target": "ES01-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R12",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-L3",
      "target": "ES01-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R13",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-E4",
      "target": "ES01-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R14",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-E4",
      "target": "ES01-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R15",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-C4",
      "target": "ES01-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R16",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-L4",
      "target": "ES01-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R17",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-E5",
      "target": "ES01-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R18",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-E5",
      "target": "ES01-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R19",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-C5",
      "target": "ES01-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R20",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-L5",
      "target": "ES01-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R21",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-E6",
      "target": "ES01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S1",
          "ES01-S2",
          "ES01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R22",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-E6",
      "target": "ES01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S1",
          "ES01-S2",
          "ES01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R23",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-E6",
      "target": "ES01-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据依赖所列固定来源及定位；同一作品不同版本不构成独立重复。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S1",
          "ES01-S2",
          "ES01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R24",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-E6",
      "target": "ES01-C6",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "所读原文支持该有限范围表述；编辑命题仅获得所列依据支持，不是实验确证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S1",
          "ES01-S2",
          "ES01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R25",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-C6",
      "target": "ES01-P6",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题成立或可正确解释，须保留此前提及操作定义。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S1",
          "ES01-S2",
          "ES01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R26",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-L6",
      "target": "ES01-C6",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "该限制缩小命题的适用范围、确定程度或本轮核查层级。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S1",
          "ES01-S2",
          "ES01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R27",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-C1",
      "target": "ES01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R28",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-C2",
      "target": "ES01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R29",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-C3",
      "target": "ES01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R30",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-C4",
      "target": "ES01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R31",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-C5",
      "target": "ES01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES01-R32",
      "case_id": "ES01",
      "source": "ES01-C6",
      "target": "ES01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "这一受限结果或编辑判断不足以回答整张卡的开放问题；不等于证明问题的否定答案。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES01-S1",
          "ES01-S2",
          "ES01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES01-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "original fulltext textual extraction; explicitly editorial inference where labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R01",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-E1",
      "target": "ES02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R02",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-E1",
      "target": "ES02-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R03",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-C1",
      "target": "ES02-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R04",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-L1",
      "target": "ES02-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R05",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-C1",
      "target": "ES02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R06",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-E2",
      "target": "ES02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R07",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-E2",
      "target": "ES02-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R08",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-C2",
      "target": "ES02-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R09",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-L2",
      "target": "ES02-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R10",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-C2",
      "target": "ES02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R11",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-E3",
      "target": "ES02-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R12",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-E3",
      "target": "ES02-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R13",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-C3",
      "target": "ES02-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R14",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-L3",
      "target": "ES02-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R15",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-C3",
      "target": "ES02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R16",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-E4",
      "target": "ES02-S4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S4",
          "ES02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R17",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-E4",
      "target": "ES02-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S4",
          "ES02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R18",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-E4",
      "target": "ES02-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S4",
          "ES02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R19",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-C4",
      "target": "ES02-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S4",
          "ES02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R20",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-L4",
      "target": "ES02-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S4",
          "ES02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R21",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-C4",
      "target": "ES02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S4",
          "ES02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R22",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-E5",
      "target": "ES02-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R23",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-E5",
      "target": "ES02-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R24",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-C5",
      "target": "ES02-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R25",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-L5",
      "target": "ES02-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R26",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-C5",
      "target": "ES02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R27",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-E6",
      "target": "ES02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S1",
          "ES02-S2",
          "ES02-S3",
          "ES02-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R28",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-E6",
      "target": "ES02-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S1",
          "ES02-S2",
          "ES02-S3",
          "ES02-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R29",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-E6",
      "target": "ES02-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S1",
          "ES02-S2",
          "ES02-S3",
          "ES02-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R30",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-E6",
      "target": "ES02-S4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据定位依赖这一来源版本；同作品版本不当作独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S1",
          "ES02-S2",
          "ES02-S3",
          "ES02-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R31",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-E6",
      "target": "ES02-C6",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "指定原文支持该限定命题；编辑性命题仅获论据支持。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S1",
          "ES02-S2",
          "ES02-S3",
          "ES02-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R32",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-C6",
      "target": "ES02-P6",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "解释须保持该研究设计和操作条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S1",
          "ES02-S2",
          "ES02-S3",
          "ES02-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R33",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-L6",
      "target": "ES02-C6",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制适用范围与推断强度，不等同于否定结果。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S1",
          "ES02-S2",
          "ES02-S3",
          "ES02-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-R34",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-C6",
      "target": "ES02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该局部结果不足以单独确立原问题的全面肯定答案，也不证明不可能。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S1",
          "ES02-S2",
          "ES02-S3",
          "ES02-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-E6"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant primary-text extraction; editorial relations explicitly labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R01",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-E1",
      "target": "ES03-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R02",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-E1",
      "target": "ES03-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R03",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-C1",
      "target": "ES03-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R04",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-L1",
      "target": "ES03-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R05",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-E2",
      "target": "ES03-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R06",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-E2",
      "target": "ES03-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R07",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-C2",
      "target": "ES03-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R08",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-L2",
      "target": "ES03-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R09",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-E3",
      "target": "ES03-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R10",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-E3",
      "target": "ES03-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R11",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-C3",
      "target": "ES03-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R12",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-L3",
      "target": "ES03-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R13",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-E4",
      "target": "ES03-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R14",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-E4",
      "target": "ES03-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R15",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-C4",
      "target": "ES03-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R16",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-L4",
      "target": "ES03-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R17",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-E5",
      "target": "ES03-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R18",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-E5",
      "target": "ES03-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R19",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-C5",
      "target": "ES03-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R20",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-L5",
      "target": "ES03-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R21",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-C1",
      "target": "ES03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R22",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-C2",
      "target": "ES03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R23",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-C3",
      "target": "ES03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R24",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-C4",
      "target": "ES03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-R25",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-C5",
      "target": "ES03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R01",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-E1",
      "target": "AG01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R02",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-E1",
      "target": "AG01-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R03",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-C1",
      "target": "AG01-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R04",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-L1",
      "target": "AG01-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R05",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-E2",
      "target": "AG01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R06",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-E2",
      "target": "AG01-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R07",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-C2",
      "target": "AG01-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R08",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-L2",
      "target": "AG01-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R09",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-E3",
      "target": "AG01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R10",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-E3",
      "target": "AG01-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R11",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-C3",
      "target": "AG01-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R12",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-L3",
      "target": "AG01-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R13",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-E4",
      "target": "AG01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R14",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-E4",
      "target": "AG01-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R15",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-C4",
      "target": "AG01-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R16",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-L4",
      "target": "AG01-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R17",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-E5",
      "target": "AG01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R18",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-E5",
      "target": "AG01-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R19",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-C5",
      "target": "AG01-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R20",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-L5",
      "target": "AG01-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R21",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-C1",
      "target": "AG01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R22",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-C2",
      "target": "AG01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R23",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-C3",
      "target": "AG01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R24",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-C4",
      "target": "AG01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-R25",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-C5",
      "target": "AG01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R01",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-E1",
      "target": "VH01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R02",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-E1",
      "target": "VH01-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R03",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-C1",
      "target": "VH01-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R04",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-L1",
      "target": "VH01-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R05",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-E2",
      "target": "VH01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R06",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-E2",
      "target": "VH01-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R07",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-C2",
      "target": "VH01-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R08",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-L2",
      "target": "VH01-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R09",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-E3",
      "target": "VH01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R10",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-E3",
      "target": "VH01-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R11",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-C3",
      "target": "VH01-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R12",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-L3",
      "target": "VH01-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R13",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-E4",
      "target": "VH01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R14",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-E4",
      "target": "VH01-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R15",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-C4",
      "target": "VH01-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R16",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-L4",
      "target": "VH01-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R17",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-E5",
      "target": "VH01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R18",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-E5",
      "target": "VH01-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R19",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-C5",
      "target": "VH01-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R20",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-L5",
      "target": "VH01-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R21",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-C1",
      "target": "VH01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R22",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-C2",
      "target": "VH01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R23",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-C3",
      "target": "VH01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R24",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-C4",
      "target": "VH01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-R25",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-C5",
      "target": "VH01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R01",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-E1",
      "target": "SS01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R02",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-E1",
      "target": "SS01-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R03",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-C1",
      "target": "SS01-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R04",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-L1",
      "target": "SS01-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R05",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-E2",
      "target": "SS01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R06",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-E2",
      "target": "SS01-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R07",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-C2",
      "target": "SS01-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R08",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-L2",
      "target": "SS01-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R09",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-E3",
      "target": "SS01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R10",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-E3",
      "target": "SS01-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R11",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-C3",
      "target": "SS01-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R12",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-L3",
      "target": "SS01-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R13",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-E4",
      "target": "SS01-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R14",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-E4",
      "target": "SS01-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R15",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-C4",
      "target": "SS01-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R16",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-L4",
      "target": "SS01-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R17",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-E5",
      "target": "SS01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R18",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-E5",
      "target": "SS01-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R19",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-C5",
      "target": "SS01-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R20",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-L5",
      "target": "SS01-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R21",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-C1",
      "target": "SS01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R22",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-C2",
      "target": "SS01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R23",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-C3",
      "target": "SS01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R24",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-C4",
      "target": "SS01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS01-R25",
      "case_id": "SS01",
      "source": "SS01-C5",
      "target": "SS01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-R01",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "source": "SS02-E1",
      "target": "SS02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-R02",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "source": "SS02-E1",
      "target": "SS02-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-R03",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "source": "SS02-C1",
      "target": "SS02-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-R04",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "source": "SS02-L1",
      "target": "SS02-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-R05",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "source": "SS02-E2",
      "target": "SS02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-R06",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "source": "SS02-E2",
      "target": "SS02-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-R07",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "source": "SS02-C2",
      "target": "SS02-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-R08",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "source": "SS02-L2",
      "target": "SS02-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-R09",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "source": "SS02-E3",
      "target": "SS02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-R10",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "source": "SS02-E3",
      "target": "SS02-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-R11",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "source": "SS02-C3",
      "target": "SS02-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-R12",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "source": "SS02-L3",
      "target": "SS02-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-R13",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "source": "SS02-E4",
      "target": "SS02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-R14",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "source": "SS02-E4",
      "target": "SS02-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-R15",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "source": "SS02-C4",
      "target": "SS02-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-R16",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "source": "SS02-L4",
      "target": "SS02-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-R17",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "source": "SS02-C1",
      "target": "SS02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-R18",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "source": "SS02-C2",
      "target": "SS02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-R19",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "source": "SS02-C3",
      "target": "SS02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS02-R20",
      "case_id": "SS02",
      "source": "SS02-C4",
      "target": "SS02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R01",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-E1",
      "target": "SS03-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R02",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-E1",
      "target": "SS03-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R03",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-C1",
      "target": "SS03-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R04",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-L1",
      "target": "SS03-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R05",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-E2",
      "target": "SS03-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R06",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-E2",
      "target": "SS03-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R07",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-C2",
      "target": "SS03-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R08",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-L2",
      "target": "SS03-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R09",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-E3",
      "target": "SS03-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R10",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-E3",
      "target": "SS03-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R11",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-C3",
      "target": "SS03-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R12",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-L3",
      "target": "SS03-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R13",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-E4",
      "target": "SS03-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R14",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-E4",
      "target": "SS03-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R15",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-C4",
      "target": "SS03-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R16",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-L4",
      "target": "SS03-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R17",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-E5",
      "target": "SS03-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R18",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-E5",
      "target": "SS03-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R19",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-C5",
      "target": "SS03-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R20",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-L5",
      "target": "SS03-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R21",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-C1",
      "target": "SS03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R22",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-C2",
      "target": "SS03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R23",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-C3",
      "target": "SS03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R24",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-C4",
      "target": "SS03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-R25",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-C5",
      "target": "SS03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R01",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-E1",
      "target": "SS04-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R02",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-E1",
      "target": "SS04-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R03",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-C1",
      "target": "SS04-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R04",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-L1",
      "target": "SS04-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R05",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-E2",
      "target": "SS04-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R06",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-E2",
      "target": "SS04-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R07",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-C2",
      "target": "SS04-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R08",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-L2",
      "target": "SS04-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R09",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-E3",
      "target": "SS04-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R10",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-E3",
      "target": "SS04-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R11",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-C3",
      "target": "SS04-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R12",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-L3",
      "target": "SS04-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R13",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-E4",
      "target": "SS04-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R14",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-E4",
      "target": "SS04-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R15",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-C4",
      "target": "SS04-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R16",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-L4",
      "target": "SS04-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R17",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-E5",
      "target": "SS04-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R18",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-E5",
      "target": "SS04-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R19",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-C5",
      "target": "SS04-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R20",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-L5",
      "target": "SS04-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R21",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-C1",
      "target": "SS04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R22",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-C2",
      "target": "SS04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R23",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-C3",
      "target": "SS04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R24",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-C4",
      "target": "SS04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-R25",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-C5",
      "target": "SS04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R01",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-E1",
      "target": "LW01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R02",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-E1",
      "target": "LW01-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R03",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-C1",
      "target": "LW01-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R04",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-L1",
      "target": "LW01-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R05",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-E2",
      "target": "LW01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R06",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-E2",
      "target": "LW01-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R07",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-C2",
      "target": "LW01-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R08",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-L2",
      "target": "LW01-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R09",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-E3",
      "target": "LW01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R10",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-E3",
      "target": "LW01-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R11",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-C3",
      "target": "LW01-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R12",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-L3",
      "target": "LW01-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R13",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-E4",
      "target": "LW01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R14",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-E4",
      "target": "LW01-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R15",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-C4",
      "target": "LW01-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R16",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-L4",
      "target": "LW01-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R17",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-E5",
      "target": "LW01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R18",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-E5",
      "target": "LW01-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R19",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-C5",
      "target": "LW01-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R20",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-L5",
      "target": "LW01-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R21",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-C1",
      "target": "LW01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R22",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-C2",
      "target": "LW01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R23",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-C3",
      "target": "LW01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R24",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-C4",
      "target": "LW01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-R25",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-C5",
      "target": "LW01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R01",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-E1",
      "target": "HU01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R02",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-E1",
      "target": "HU01-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R03",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-C1",
      "target": "HU01-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R04",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-L1",
      "target": "HU01-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R05",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-E2",
      "target": "HU01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R06",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-E2",
      "target": "HU01-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R07",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-C2",
      "target": "HU01-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R08",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-L2",
      "target": "HU01-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R09",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-E3",
      "target": "HU01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R10",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-E3",
      "target": "HU01-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R11",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-C3",
      "target": "HU01-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R12",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-L3",
      "target": "HU01-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R13",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-E4",
      "target": "HU01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R14",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-E4",
      "target": "HU01-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R15",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-C4",
      "target": "HU01-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R16",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-L4",
      "target": "HU01-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R17",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-E5",
      "target": "HU01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R18",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-E5",
      "target": "HU01-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R19",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-C5",
      "target": "HU01-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R20",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-L5",
      "target": "HU01-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R21",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-C1",
      "target": "HU01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R22",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-C2",
      "target": "HU01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R23",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-C3",
      "target": "HU01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R24",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-C4",
      "target": "HU01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-R25",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-C5",
      "target": "HU01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R01",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-E1",
      "target": "HU02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R02",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-E1",
      "target": "HU02-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R03",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-C1",
      "target": "HU02-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R04",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-L1",
      "target": "HU02-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R05",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-E2",
      "target": "HU02-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R06",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-E2",
      "target": "HU02-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R07",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-C2",
      "target": "HU02-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R08",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-L2",
      "target": "HU02-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R09",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-E3",
      "target": "HU02-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R10",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-E3",
      "target": "HU02-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R11",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-C3",
      "target": "HU02-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R12",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-L3",
      "target": "HU02-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R13",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-E4",
      "target": "HU02-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R14",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-E4",
      "target": "HU02-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R15",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-C4",
      "target": "HU02-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R16",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-L4",
      "target": "HU02-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R17",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-E5",
      "target": "HU02-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R18",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-E5",
      "target": "HU02-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R19",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-C5",
      "target": "HU02-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R20",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-L5",
      "target": "HU02-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R21",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-C1",
      "target": "HU02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R22",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-C2",
      "target": "HU02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R23",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-C3",
      "target": "HU02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R24",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-C4",
      "target": "HU02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-R25",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-C5",
      "target": "HU02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R01",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-E1",
      "target": "HU03-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R02",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-E1",
      "target": "HU03-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R03",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-C1",
      "target": "HU03-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R04",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-L1",
      "target": "HU03-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R05",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-E2",
      "target": "HU03-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R06",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-E2",
      "target": "HU03-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R07",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-C2",
      "target": "HU03-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R08",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-L2",
      "target": "HU03-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R09",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-E3",
      "target": "HU03-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R10",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-E3",
      "target": "HU03-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R11",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-C3",
      "target": "HU03-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R12",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-L3",
      "target": "HU03-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R13",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-E4",
      "target": "HU03-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R14",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-E4",
      "target": "HU03-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R15",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-C4",
      "target": "HU03-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R16",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-L4",
      "target": "HU03-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R17",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-E5",
      "target": "HU03-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R18",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-E5",
      "target": "HU03-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R19",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-C5",
      "target": "HU03-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R20",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-L5",
      "target": "HU03-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R21",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-C1",
      "target": "HU03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R22",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-C2",
      "target": "HU03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R23",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-C3",
      "target": "HU03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R24",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-C4",
      "target": "HU03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU03-R25",
      "case_id": "HU03",
      "source": "HU03-C5",
      "target": "HU03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU03-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU03-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R01",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-E1",
      "target": "AR01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R02",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-E1",
      "target": "AR01-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R03",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-C1",
      "target": "AR01-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R04",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-L1",
      "target": "AR01-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R05",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-E2",
      "target": "AR01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R06",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-E2",
      "target": "AR01-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R07",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-C2",
      "target": "AR01-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R08",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-L2",
      "target": "AR01-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R09",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-E3",
      "target": "AR01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R10",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-E3",
      "target": "AR01-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R11",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-C3",
      "target": "AR01-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R12",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-L3",
      "target": "AR01-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R13",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-E4",
      "target": "AR01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R14",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-E4",
      "target": "AR01-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R15",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-C4",
      "target": "AR01-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R16",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-L4",
      "target": "AR01-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R17",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-E5",
      "target": "AR01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R18",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-E5",
      "target": "AR01-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R19",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-C5",
      "target": "AR01-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R20",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-L5",
      "target": "AR01-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R21",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-C1",
      "target": "AR01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R22",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-C2",
      "target": "AR01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R23",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-C3",
      "target": "AR01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R24",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-C4",
      "target": "AR01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-R25",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-C5",
      "target": "AR01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R01",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-E1",
      "target": "HU04-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R02",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-E1",
      "target": "HU04-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R03",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-C1",
      "target": "HU04-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R04",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-L1",
      "target": "HU04-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R05",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-E2",
      "target": "HU04-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R06",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-E2",
      "target": "HU04-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R07",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-C2",
      "target": "HU04-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R08",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-L2",
      "target": "HU04-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R09",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-E3",
      "target": "HU04-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R10",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-E3",
      "target": "HU04-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R11",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-C3",
      "target": "HU04-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R12",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-L3",
      "target": "HU04-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R13",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-E4",
      "target": "HU04-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R14",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-E4",
      "target": "HU04-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R15",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-C4",
      "target": "HU04-P4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R16",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-L4",
      "target": "HU04-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R17",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-E5",
      "target": "HU04-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "证据来自这一固定文本版本；同一来源分段不增加独立研究数。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R18",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-E5",
      "target": "HU04-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "具体原文定位支持这个限定命题；没有扩展成普遍因果结论。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R19",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-C5",
      "target": "HU04-P5",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "保留操作定义、识别假设或论证前提，才能使用该命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R20",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-L5",
      "target": "HU04-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "这项边界限制解释、证据层级或可推广范围，不自动否定原文。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R21",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-C1",
      "target": "HU04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R22",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-C2",
      "target": "HU04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R23",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-C3",
      "target": "HU04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R24",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-C4",
      "target": "HU04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU04-R25",
      "case_id": "HU04",
      "source": "HU04-C5",
      "target": "HU04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该有限结果不能独自回答跨机制、情境、价值与实施的综合问题；所需新增证据仍须分别检验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU04-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU04-E5"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named full-text extraction; editorial scope relation explicitly distinguished",
        "expert_review": "pending",
        "independent_audit": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-V05-R1",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-V05-S1",
      "target": "AG01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "同一2024研究的作者名单更正版本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-S1",
          "AG01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-V05-R2",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-V05-E1",
      "target": "AG01-V05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "此证据来自指定来源/版本，不是新独立样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-V05-R3",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-V05-E1",
      "target": "AG01-V05-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "仅支持此处明确归属来源的窄命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-V05-R4",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-V05-C1",
      "target": "AG01-V05-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题依赖所列方法与适用条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-V05-R5",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-V05-L1",
      "target": "AG01-V05-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制该命题的外推与证据强度。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-V05-R6",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-V05-C1",
      "target": "AG01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "新增指定阅读并未解决整个科学前沿问题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-V05-R7",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-V05-E2",
      "target": "AG01-V05-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "此证据来自指定来源/版本，不是新独立样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-V05-R8",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-V05-E2",
      "target": "AG01-V05-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "仅支持此处明确归属来源的窄命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-V05-R9",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-V05-C2",
      "target": "AG01-V05-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题依赖所列方法与适用条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-V05-R10",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-V05-L2",
      "target": "AG01-V05-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制该命题的外推与证据强度。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-V05-R11",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-V05-C2",
      "target": "AG01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "新增指定阅读并未解决整个科学前沿问题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AG01-V05-R12",
      "case_id": "AG01",
      "source": "AG01-V05-L2",
      "target": "AG01-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "新增来源边界适用于此既有命题，不将不同研究当作同一实验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AG01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-V05-R01",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-V05-E1",
      "target": "AR01-V05-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "Named primary passages support this attributed scoped claim.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-V05-R02",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-V05-C1",
      "target": "AR01-V05-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "Keep the declared measurement, version or interpretive premise.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-V05-R03",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-V05-L1",
      "target": "AR01-V05-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "Preserve residual scope and non-replication limits.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-V05-R04",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-V05-C1",
      "target": "AR01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "Scoped source verification does not settle the card frontier.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "AR01-V05-R05",
      "case_id": "AR01",
      "source": "AR01-V05-E1",
      "target": "AR01-V05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "Evidence depends on this identified source/version; versions of one work are not independent studies.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "AR01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "AR01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-V05-R01",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-V05-E1",
      "target": "ED01-V05-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "Named primary passages support this attributed scoped claim.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-V05-R02",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-V05-C1",
      "target": "ED01-V05-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "Keep the declared measurement, version or interpretive premise.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-V05-R03",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-V05-L1",
      "target": "ED01-V05-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "Preserve residual scope and non-replication limits.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-V05-R04",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-V05-C1",
      "target": "ED01-Q01",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "Scoped source verification does not settle the card frontier.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-V05-R05",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-V05-E1",
      "target": "ED01-V05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "Evidence depends on this identified source/version; versions of one work are not independent studies.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ED01-V05-R06",
      "case_id": "ED01",
      "source": "ED01-V05-E1",
      "target": "ED01-L04",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "The SI provides a separately labelled direct two-group contrast while preserving the main Table 1 limitation and analysis distinction.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ED01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ED01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-V05-R01",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-V05-E1",
      "target": "ES02-V05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "出处与版本依赖；不增加独立实验证据。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-V05-R02",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-V05-E1",
      "target": "ES02-V05-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "原文支持注明主体和条件的命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-V05-R03",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-V05-C1",
      "target": "ES02-V05-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "该解释依赖所列条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-V05-R04",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-V05-L1",
      "target": "ES02-V05-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "保留推断与复核边界。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-V05-R05",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-V05-C1",
      "target": "ES02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "评估保留真实门槛与可用预警问题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-V05-R06",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-V05-E2",
      "target": "ES02-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "出处与版本依赖；不增加独立实验证据。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-V05-R07",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-V05-L2",
      "target": "ES02-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限定推断范围，不能自动视为反证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S1",
          "ES02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-V05-R08",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-V05-L2",
      "target": "ES02-C6",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限定推断范围，不能自动视为反证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S1",
          "ES02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES02-V05-R09",
      "case_id": "ES02",
      "source": "ES02-V05-L2",
      "target": "ES02-Q1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限定推断范围，不能自动视为反证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES02-S1",
          "ES02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES02-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-V05-R01",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-V05-E1",
      "target": "ES03-V05-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "Named primary passages support this attributed scoped claim.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-V05-R02",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-V05-C1",
      "target": "ES03-V05-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "Keep the declared measurement, version or interpretive premise.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-V05-R03",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-V05-L1",
      "target": "ES03-V05-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "Preserve residual scope and non-replication limits.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-V05-R04",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-V05-C1",
      "target": "ES03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "Scoped source verification does not settle the card frontier.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "ES03-V05-R05",
      "case_id": "ES03",
      "source": "ES03-V05-E1",
      "target": "ES03-V05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "Evidence depends on this identified source/version; versions of one work are not independent studies.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "ES03-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "ES03-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R1",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-S1",
      "target": "HU01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "同一研究的正式正文/附录定位，不计为独立复制。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S1",
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R2",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-E1",
      "target": "HU01-V05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "此证据来自指定来源/版本，不是新独立样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S1",
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R3",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-E1",
      "target": "HU01-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "此证据来自指定来源/版本，不是新独立样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S1",
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R4",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-E1",
      "target": "HU01-V05-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "仅支持此处明确归属来源的窄命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S1",
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R5",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-C1",
      "target": "HU01-V05-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题依赖所列方法与适用条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S1",
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R6",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-L1",
      "target": "HU01-V05-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制该命题的外推与证据强度。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S1",
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R7",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-C1",
      "target": "HU01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "新增指定阅读并未解决整个科学前沿问题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S1",
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R8",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-L1",
      "target": "HU01-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "新增来源边界适用于此既有命题，不将不同研究当作同一实验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S1",
          "HU01-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R9",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-S2",
      "target": "HU01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "同一工作的正式HTML与作者稿，不是新独立数据。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S2",
          "HU01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R10",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-E2",
      "target": "HU01-V05-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "此证据来自指定来源/版本，不是新独立样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S2",
          "HU01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R11",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-E2",
      "target": "HU01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "此证据来自指定来源/版本，不是新独立样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S2",
          "HU01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R12",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-E2",
      "target": "HU01-V05-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "仅支持此处明确归属来源的窄命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S2",
          "HU01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R13",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-C2",
      "target": "HU01-V05-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题依赖所列方法与适用条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S2",
          "HU01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R14",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-L2",
      "target": "HU01-V05-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制该命题的外推与证据强度。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S2",
          "HU01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R15",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-C2",
      "target": "HU01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "新增指定阅读并未解决整个科学前沿问题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S2",
          "HU01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R16",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-L2",
      "target": "HU01-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "新增来源边界适用于此既有命题，不将不同研究当作同一实验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S2",
          "HU01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R17",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-L2",
      "target": "HU01-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "新增来源边界适用于此既有命题，不将不同研究当作同一实验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S2",
          "HU01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R18",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-E3",
      "target": "HU01-V05-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "此证据来自指定来源/版本，不是新独立样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S3",
          "HU01-V05-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R19",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-E3",
      "target": "HU01-V05-S4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "此证据来自指定来源/版本，不是新独立样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S3",
          "HU01-V05-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R20",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-E3",
      "target": "HU01-V05-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "仅支持此处明确归属来源的窄命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S3",
          "HU01-V05-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R21",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-C3",
      "target": "HU01-V05-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题依赖所列方法与适用条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S3",
          "HU01-V05-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R22",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-L3",
      "target": "HU01-V05-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制该命题的外推与证据强度。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S3",
          "HU01-V05-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R23",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-C3",
      "target": "HU01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "新增指定阅读并未解决整个科学前沿问题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S3",
          "HU01-V05-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU01-V05-R24",
      "case_id": "HU01",
      "source": "HU01-V05-L3",
      "target": "HU01-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "新增来源边界适用于此既有命题，不将不同研究当作同一实验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-S3",
          "HU01-V05-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU01-V05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-V05-R1",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-V05-E1",
      "target": "HU02-V05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "此证据来自指定来源/版本，不是新独立样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-S1",
          "HU02-S1",
          "HU02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-V05-R2",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-V05-E1",
      "target": "HU02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "此证据来自指定来源/版本，不是新独立样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-S1",
          "HU02-S1",
          "HU02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-V05-R3",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-V05-E1",
      "target": "HU02-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "此证据来自指定来源/版本，不是新独立样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-S1",
          "HU02-S1",
          "HU02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-V05-R4",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-V05-E1",
      "target": "HU02-V05-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "仅支持此处明确归属来源的窄命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-S1",
          "HU02-S1",
          "HU02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-V05-R5",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-V05-C1",
      "target": "HU02-V05-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题依赖所列方法与适用条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-S1",
          "HU02-S1",
          "HU02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-V05-R6",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-V05-L1",
      "target": "HU02-V05-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制该命题的外推与证据强度。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-S1",
          "HU02-S1",
          "HU02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-V05-R7",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-V05-C1",
      "target": "HU02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "新增指定阅读并未解决整个科学前沿问题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-S1",
          "HU02-S1",
          "HU02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-V05-R8",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-V05-L1",
      "target": "HU02-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "新增来源边界适用于此既有命题，不将不同研究当作同一实验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-S1",
          "HU02-S1",
          "HU02-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-V05-R9",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-V05-E2",
      "target": "HU02-V05-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "此证据来自指定来源/版本，不是新独立样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-S2",
          "HU02-V05-S3",
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-V05-R10",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-V05-E2",
      "target": "HU02-V05-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "此证据来自指定来源/版本，不是新独立样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-S2",
          "HU02-V05-S3",
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-V05-R11",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-V05-E2",
      "target": "HU02-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "此证据来自指定来源/版本，不是新独立样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-S2",
          "HU02-V05-S3",
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-V05-R12",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-V05-E2",
      "target": "HU02-V05-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "仅支持此处明确归属来源的窄命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-S2",
          "HU02-V05-S3",
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-V05-R13",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-V05-C2",
      "target": "HU02-V05-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题依赖所列方法与适用条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-S2",
          "HU02-V05-S3",
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-V05-R14",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-V05-L2",
      "target": "HU02-V05-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制该命题的外推与证据强度。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-S2",
          "HU02-V05-S3",
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-V05-R15",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-V05-C2",
      "target": "HU02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "新增指定阅读并未解决整个科学前沿问题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-S2",
          "HU02-V05-S3",
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-V05-R16",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-V05-L2",
      "target": "HU02-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "新增来源边界适用于此既有命题，不将不同研究当作同一实验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-S2",
          "HU02-V05-S3",
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "HU02-V05-R17",
      "case_id": "HU02",
      "source": "HU02-V05-L2",
      "target": "HU02-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "新增来源边界适用于此既有命题，不将不同研究当作同一实验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-S2",
          "HU02-V05-S3",
          "HU02-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "HU02-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-V05-R01",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-V05-E1",
      "target": "IK01-V05-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "Named original passages support this narrowly attributed new claim.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-V05-R02",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-V05-C1",
      "target": "IK01-V05-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "Argument or process attribution depends on declared scope and assumptions.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-V05-R03",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-V05-L1",
      "target": "IK01-V05-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "Preserve non-consensus and non-efficacy reading boundaries.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-V05-R04",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-V05-C1",
      "target": "IK01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "The attributed original does not settle the card’s broader frontier question.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "IK01-V05-R05",
      "case_id": "IK01",
      "source": "IK01-V05-E1",
      "target": "IK01-V05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "Evidence depends on this identified source/version; versions of one work are not independent studies.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "IK01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "IK01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-V05-R1",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-V05-L1",
      "target": "LS01-Q1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "访问与阅读缺口，不是该研究为假的证据。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-V05-R2",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-V05-L1",
      "target": "LS01-V05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "未完成原文阅读的具体来源。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-V05-R3",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-V05-E1",
      "target": "LS01-V05-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "此证据来自指定来源/版本，不是新独立样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-V05-R4",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-V05-E1",
      "target": "LS01-V05-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "仅支持此处明确归属来源的窄命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-V05-R5",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-V05-C1",
      "target": "LS01-V05-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题依赖所列方法与适用条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-V05-R6",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-V05-L2",
      "target": "LS01-V05-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制该命题的外推与证据强度。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS01-V05-R7",
      "case_id": "LS01",
      "source": "LS01-V05-C1",
      "target": "LS01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "新增指定阅读并未解决整个科学前沿问题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS01-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-V05-R1",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-V05-L1",
      "target": "LS04-Q1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "访问与阅读缺口，不是该研究为假的证据。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-V05-R2",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-V05-L1",
      "target": "LS04-V05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "未完成原文阅读的具体来源。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-V05-R3",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-V05-E1",
      "target": "LS04-V05-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "此证据来自指定来源/版本，不是新独立样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-V05-R4",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-V05-E1",
      "target": "LS04-V05-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "仅支持此处明确归属来源的窄命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-V05-R5",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-V05-C1",
      "target": "LS04-V05-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题依赖所列方法与适用条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-V05-R6",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-V05-L2",
      "target": "LS04-V05-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制该命题的外推与证据强度。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-V05-R7",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-V05-C1",
      "target": "LS04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "新增指定阅读并未解决整个科学前沿问题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-V05-R8",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-V05-L2",
      "target": "LS04-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "新增来源边界适用于此既有命题，不将不同研究当作同一实验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LS04-V05-R9",
      "case_id": "LS04",
      "source": "LS04-V05-L2",
      "target": "LS04-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "新增来源边界适用于此既有命题，不将不同研究当作同一实验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LS04-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LS04-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-R01",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-V05-E1",
      "target": "LW01-V05-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "Named original passages support this narrowly attributed new claim.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-R02",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-V05-C1",
      "target": "LW01-V05-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "Argument or process attribution depends on declared scope and assumptions.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-R03",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-V05-L1",
      "target": "LW01-V05-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "Preserve non-consensus and non-efficacy reading boundaries.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-R04",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-V05-C1",
      "target": "LW01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "The attributed original does not settle the card’s broader frontier question.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-R05",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-V05-E1",
      "target": "LW01-V05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "Evidence depends on this identified source/version; versions of one work are not independent studies.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-R06",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-V05-E2",
      "target": "LW01-V05-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "Named original passages support this narrowly attributed new claim.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-R07",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-V05-C2",
      "target": "LW01-V05-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "Argument or process attribution depends on declared scope and assumptions.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-R08",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-V05-L2",
      "target": "LW01-V05-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "Preserve non-consensus and non-efficacy reading boundaries.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-R09",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-V05-C2",
      "target": "LW01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "The attributed original does not settle the card’s broader frontier question.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-R10",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-V05-E2",
      "target": "LW01-V05-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "Evidence depends on this identified source/version; versions of one work are not independent studies.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-R11",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-V05-E1",
      "target": "LW01-L5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "The selected Greenberg passages refine the formerly unread-original boundary; they do not support Carpentier-specific claims.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "LW01-V05-R12",
      "case_id": "LW01",
      "source": "LW01-V05-E2",
      "target": "LW01-L5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "The selected Plunkett passages refine the formerly unread-original boundary; they do not establish a refutation or consensus.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "LW01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-V05-R1",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-V05-E1",
      "target": "NS02-V05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "此证据来自指定来源/版本，不是新独立样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-V05-R2",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-V05-E1",
      "target": "NS02-V05-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "仅支持此处明确归属来源的窄命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-V05-R3",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-V05-C1",
      "target": "NS02-V05-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题依赖所列方法与适用条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-V05-R4",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-V05-L1",
      "target": "NS02-V05-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制该命题的外推与证据强度。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-V05-R5",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-V05-C1",
      "target": "NS02-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "新增指定阅读并未解决整个科学前沿问题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "NS02-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-V05-R6",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-V05-L2",
      "target": "NS02-Q1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "访问与阅读缺口，不是该研究为假的证据。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "NS02-V05-R7",
      "case_id": "NS02",
      "source": "NS02-V05-L2",
      "target": "NS02-V05-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "未完成原文阅读的具体来源。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "NS02-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-V05-R01",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-V05-E1",
      "target": "P02-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "出处与版本依赖；不增加独立实验证据。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1",
          "P02-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-V05-R02",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-V05-E1",
      "target": "P02-V05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "出处与版本依赖；不增加独立实验证据。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1",
          "P02-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P02-V05-R03",
      "case_id": "P02",
      "source": "P02-V05-L1",
      "target": "P02-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限定推断范围，不能自动视为反证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P02-S1",
          "P02-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P02-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-V05-R01",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-V05-E1",
      "target": "P03-V05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "出处与版本依赖；不增加独立实验证据。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-V05-R02",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-V05-E1",
      "target": "P03-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "最终版新增出处支持既有同一限定命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-V05-R03",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-V05-E1",
      "target": "P03-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "最终版新增出处支持既有同一限定命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-V05-R04",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-V05-E1",
      "target": "P03-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "最终版新增出处支持既有同一限定命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-V05-R05",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-V05-E1",
      "target": "P03-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "最终版新增出处支持既有同一限定命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P03-V05-R06",
      "case_id": "P03",
      "source": "P03-V05-E1",
      "target": "P03-C5",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "最终版新增出处支持既有同一限定命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P03-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P03-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-R01",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-V05-E1",
      "target": "P12-V05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "出处与版本依赖；不增加独立实验证据。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-V05-S1",
          "P12-S1",
          "P12-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-R02",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-V05-E1",
      "target": "P12-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "出处与版本依赖；不增加独立实验证据。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-V05-S1",
          "P12-S1",
          "P12-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-R03",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-V05-E1",
      "target": "P12-S4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "出处与版本依赖；不增加独立实验证据。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-V05-S1",
          "P12-S1",
          "P12-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-R04",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-V05-L1",
      "target": "P12-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限定推断范围，不能自动视为反证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-V05-S1",
          "P12-S1",
          "P12-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-R05",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-V05-E2",
      "target": "P12-V05-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "出处与版本依赖；不增加独立实验证据。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-R06",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-V05-E3",
      "target": "P12-V05-S3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "出处与版本依赖；不增加独立实验证据。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-V05-S3",
          "P12-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-V05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-R07",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-V05-E3",
      "target": "P12-S4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "出处与版本依赖；不增加独立实验证据。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-V05-S3",
          "P12-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-V05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-R08",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-V05-E2",
      "target": "P12-V05-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "原文支持注明主体和条件的命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-R09",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-V05-C2",
      "target": "P12-V05-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "该解释依赖所列条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-R10",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-V05-L2",
      "target": "P12-V05-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "保留推断与复核边界。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-R11",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-V05-E3",
      "target": "P12-V05-C3",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "原文支持注明主体和条件的命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-V05-S3",
          "P12-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-V05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-R12",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-V05-C3",
      "target": "P12-V05-P3",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "该解释依赖所列条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-V05-S3",
          "P12-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-V05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-R13",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-V05-L3",
      "target": "P12-V05-C3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "保留推断与复核边界。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-V05-S3",
          "P12-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-V05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-R14",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-V05-L4",
      "target": "P12-C6",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限定推断范围，不能自动视为反证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S4",
          "P12-V05-S2",
          "P12-V05-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-V05-E2",
          "P12-V05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-R15",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-V05-L4",
      "target": "P12-Q1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限定推断范围，不能自动视为反证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-S4",
          "P12-V05-S2",
          "P12-V05-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-V05-E2",
          "P12-V05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-R16",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-V05-E4",
      "target": "P12-V05-S4",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "出处与版本依赖；不增加独立实验证据。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-V05-S4"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-V05-E4"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P12-V05-R17",
      "case_id": "P12",
      "source": "P12-V05-L5",
      "target": "P12-Q1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限定推断范围，不能自动视为反证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P12-V05-S4",
          "P12-V05-S2",
          "P12-V05-S3"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P12-V05-E4",
          "P12-V05-E2",
          "P12-V05-E3"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-V05-R01",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-V05-E1",
      "target": "P13-V05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "Figure-specific evidence depends on the identified official supplement.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-V05-R02",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-V05-E1",
      "target": "P13-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "The visual plot and caption support the48-hour scoped stability attribution with electrolyte addition.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P13-V05-R03",
      "case_id": "P13",
      "source": "P13-V05-E1",
      "target": "P13-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "A short maintained bench run does not establish industrial net-carbon performance or long maintenance intervals.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P13-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P13-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-V05-R01",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-V05-E1",
      "target": "P14-V05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "出处与版本依赖；不增加独立实验证据。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-V05-S1",
          "P14-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-V05-R02",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-V05-E1",
      "target": "P14-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "出处与版本依赖；不增加独立实验证据。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-V05-S1",
          "P14-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P14-V05-R03",
      "case_id": "P14",
      "source": "P14-V05-E1",
      "target": "P14-C4",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "同一原研究的更正实施证据。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P14-V05-S1",
          "P14-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P14-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-V05-R01",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-V05-E1",
      "target": "P16-V05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "出处与版本依赖；不增加独立实验证据。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-V05-R02",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-V05-L1",
      "target": "P16-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限定推断范围，不能自动视为反证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-V05-R03",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-V05-L1",
      "target": "P16-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限定推断范围，不能自动视为反证。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-V05-R04",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-V05-E2",
      "target": "P16-V05-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "出处与版本依赖；不增加独立实验证据。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-V05-R05",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-V05-E2",
      "target": "P16-V05-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "原文支持注明主体和条件的命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-V05-R06",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-V05-C2",
      "target": "P16-V05-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "该解释依赖所列条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-V05-R07",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-V05-L2",
      "target": "P16-V05-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "保留推断与复核边界。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "P16-V05-R08",
      "case_id": "P16",
      "source": "P16-V05-C2",
      "target": "P16-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "该限定结果不确立大面积批量多年户外可靠性。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "P16-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "P16-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "scoped original-text reading; editorial relations labeled",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-V05-R01",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-V05-E1",
      "target": "SS03-V05-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "Direct comparison of retrieved original passages with correction markers.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-V05-S1",
          "SS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-V05-R02",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-V05-C1",
      "target": "SS03-V05-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "The comparison uses the identified correction as version criterion.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-V05-S1",
          "SS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-V05-R03",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-V05-L1",
      "target": "SS03-V05-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "This establishes a retrieved-copy mismatch, not the corrected figures.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-V05-S1",
          "SS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-V05-R04",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-V05-C1",
      "target": "SS03-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "Version control does not answer general predictability.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-V05-S1",
          "SS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-V05-R05",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-V05-E1",
      "target": "SS03-V05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "Evidence depends on this identified source/version; versions of one work are not independent studies.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-V05-R06",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-V05-E1",
      "target": "SS03-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "Evidence depends on this identified source/version; versions of one work are not independent studies.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS03-V05-R07",
      "case_id": "SS03",
      "source": "SS03-V05-E1",
      "target": "SS03-L3",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "The observed mismatch strengthens the retained corrected-SI reading limit without verifying corrected figures.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS03-V05-S1",
          "SS03-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS03-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-V05-R01",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-V05-E1",
      "target": "SS04-V05-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "Named primary passages support this attributed scoped claim.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-V05-S1",
          "SS04-V05-S2",
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-V05-R02",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-V05-C1",
      "target": "SS04-V05-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "Keep the declared measurement, version or interpretive premise.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-V05-S1",
          "SS04-V05-S2",
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-V05-R03",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-V05-L1",
      "target": "SS04-V05-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "Preserve residual scope and non-replication limits.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-V05-S1",
          "SS04-V05-S2",
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-V05-R04",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-V05-C1",
      "target": "SS04-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "Scoped source verification does not settle the card frontier.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-V05-S1",
          "SS04-V05-S2",
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-V05-R05",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-V05-E1",
      "target": "SS04-V05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "Evidence depends on this identified source/version; versions of one work are not independent studies.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-V05-R06",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-V05-E1",
      "target": "SS04-V05-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "Evidence depends on this identified source/version; versions of one work are not independent studies.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-V05-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SS04-V05-R07",
      "case_id": "SS04",
      "source": "SS04-V05-E1",
      "target": "SS04-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "Evidence depends on this identified source/version; versions of one work are not independent studies.",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "SS04-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "SS04-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "named original passage extraction or explicitly labelled version/scope comparison",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-V05-R1",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-V05-E1",
      "target": "VH01-V05-S1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "此证据来自指定来源/版本，不是新独立样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-V05-R2",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-V05-E1",
      "target": "VH01-V05-C1",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "仅支持此处明确归属来源的窄命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-V05-R3",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-V05-C1",
      "target": "VH01-V05-P1",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题依赖所列方法与适用条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-V05-R4",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-V05-L1",
      "target": "VH01-V05-C1",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制该命题的外推与证据强度。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-V05-R5",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-V05-C1",
      "target": "VH01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "新增指定阅读并未解决整个科学前沿问题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-S1"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-E1"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-V05-R6",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-V05-S2",
      "target": "VH01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "同一Vaccine2026研究的补充方程，不是独立研究。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-S2",
          "VH01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-V05-R7",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-V05-E2",
      "target": "VH01-V05-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "此证据来自指定来源/版本，不是新独立样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-S2",
          "VH01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-V05-R8",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-V05-E2",
      "target": "VH01-S2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "此证据来自指定来源/版本，不是新独立样本。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-S2",
          "VH01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-V05-R9",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-V05-E2",
      "target": "VH01-V05-C2",
      "type": "supports",
      "rationale": "仅支持此处明确归属来源的窄命题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-S2",
          "VH01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-V05-R10",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-V05-C2",
      "target": "VH01-V05-P2",
      "type": "depends_on",
      "rationale": "命题依赖所列方法与适用条件。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-S2",
          "VH01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-V05-R11",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-V05-L2",
      "target": "VH01-V05-C2",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "限制该命题的外推与证据强度。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-S2",
          "VH01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-V05-R12",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-V05-C2",
      "target": "VH01-Q1",
      "type": "does_not_establish",
      "rationale": "新增指定阅读并未解决整个科学前沿问题。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-S2",
          "VH01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-V05-R13",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-V05-L2",
      "target": "VH01-C4",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "新增来源边界适用于此既有命题，不将不同研究当作同一实验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-S2",
          "VH01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "VH01-V05-R14",
      "case_id": "VH01",
      "source": "VH01-V05-L2",
      "target": "VH01-C5",
      "type": "qualifies",
      "rationale": "新增来源边界适用于此既有命题，不将不同研究当作同一实验。",
      "provenance": {
        "source_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-S2",
          "VH01-S2"
        ],
        "evidence_ids": [
          "VH01-V05-E2"
        ],
        "reviewed_on": "2026-10-04",
        "method": "assistant bounded primary-text review and explicitly labeled editorial relation",
        "expert_review": "pending"
      }
    }
  ],
  "scope": {
    "base_card_count": 40,
    "case_card_ids": [
      "P06",
      "P07",
      "P08",
      "P09",
      "P10",
      "P11",
      "P01",
      "P02",
      "P03",
      "P04",
      "P05",
      "P12",
      "P13",
      "P14",
      "P15",
      "P16",
      "LS01",
      "LS02",
      "LS03",
      "LS04",
      "LS05",
      "NS01",
      "NS02",
      "ES01",
      "ES02",
      "ES03",
      "AG01",
      "VH01",
      "SS01",
      "SS02",
      "SS03",
      "SS04",
      "ED01",
      "LW01",
      "IK01",
      "HU01",
      "HU02",
      "HU03",
      "AR01",
      "HU04"
    ],
    "updated_case_ids": [
      "AG01",
      "AR01",
      "ED01",
      "ES02",
      "ES03",
      "HU01",
      "HU02",
      "IK01",
      "LS01",
      "LS04",
      "LW01",
      "NS02",
      "P02",
      "P03",
      "P12",
      "P13",
      "P14",
      "P16",
      "SS03",
      "SS04",
      "VH01"
    ],
    "review_level": "v0.4基线保持原有核查范围；v0.5仅新增清单中有界资料、版本及三项争议的指定原文核对。",
    "not_claimed": [
      "科学问题解决率",
      "完整文献或补充材料覆盖",
      "独立实验、统计或形式证明复现",
      "专家认证、领域共识或知识持有者授权",
      "未实际读取资料的结论",
      "所有40题已于本轮重新检查"
    ]
  },
  "provenance": {
    "baseline_public_graph_sha256": "e62a5a22de9d0afa64a122876d101b9cea668fd09a4c7e4a83b1a6049f89dc09",
    "baseline_version": "v0.4-All40-Evidence-r2",
    "baseline_provenance_preserved": {
      "base_cards": "Human_Knowledge_Boundary_v02_40_Cards.json (preserved baseline)",
      "base_cards_sha256": "c434c250c98d1e9e6a34d95e29a3d4b17b7d98edb39cbc21f68d7deba6206bcb",
      "frozen_pilot_sha256": "d1e378c95742a623c6f86a78b63e586b7b42c442f1f48dc1ab717e633d5dbe91",
      "preserved_pilot_assessment_date": "2026-10-03",
      "new_assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending",
      "independent_text_audit": "Exact-hash per-card dispositions saved alongside this graph; not domain-expert review.",
      "model_version": "not exposed by this task runtime",
      "public_primary_sources_only": true,
      "credentials_or_paid_access_used": false,
      "source_counts_are_not_independent_study_counts": true,
      "input_fragments": [
        {
          "card_id": "P06",
          "sha256": "e98a293d34441c4656df5a30d3e51a9c99bb49151cd08e400209f46000efc560",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "P07",
          "sha256": "6451db133484157b1cf32e7b5936c5b8d48912148d2876ab2486f86f7a2d3924",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "P08",
          "sha256": "67ed4a852832e2da3cc7c12c5bcd93267ae6830b535362fc4484f628dc9134a7",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            {
              "item": "complete proof and Lean dependency audit",
              "status": "not_performed_not_access_denial",
              "impact": "不得把本次原文范围核对称为独立证明验证。"
            }
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "P09",
          "sha256": "403a3207150b0b1b055eb4e2278809856ab29b6ac8fb8dd383370bd9fde9b414",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "P10",
          "sha256": "b19cae2dc2b73d116d0b3b527b5a3e391c6bec64c68254cc2f678832c70dcd12",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "P11",
          "sha256": "3377b30c3a0626f8fc22bfe8f1b530285f2f4b2220fcc6cb1d9fb86d32053752",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "P01",
          "sha256": "234beba6d5dc01dd6165973c5c112c42b85be82e2f0f017fee5291be7ca7ce18",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "P03",
          "sha256": "c505421abe4b822c26024f41f71b1660f8a1d85903c1265980aedacdfe2db2b5",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            {
              "item": "A&A final publisher fulltext",
              "url": "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361%2F202557993",
              "status": "403 on web fetch; legal arXiv v1 read instead",
              "impact": "精确数值和取舍仅锚定v1，不声称逐段比较正式版。"
            }
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "P04",
          "sha256": "90031ec41c0445fd06e4e24f6a4eea076560a3533ffe4d9ddf5ed54df4304dd4",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "P05",
          "sha256": "8e1247e70512c3298fdeaa36aaeb72d1bdafd8b309bf5f40b12cc55a085f5d6b",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "P12",
          "sha256": "1405fbeb672355f126c84c8ec2b17fef50779609a7e64e52efb662ade1718f9d",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            {
              "item": "final Version of Record main fulltext",
              "status": "publisher subscription restricted; legitimate accepted paper recovered and named original main-text/method passages read",
              "url": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09954-4",
              "resolution_source_id": "P12-S4",
              "remaining_boundary": "Accepted preview is not final VoR. The final published Extended Data Fig.10 caption agrees with the narrow 96 K onset/no-zero-resistivity statement; no complete accepted-to-VoR comparison claimed.",
              "blocks_current_scoped_claims": false
            },
            {
              "item": "arXiv 2501.14584v3 content mismatch",
              "status": "metadata says 96 K; web parser and direct download both delivered 17-page older 91 K title/content",
              "impact": "That mismatched PDF remains excluded from 96 K support. P12-S4 supplies a distinct, title/DOI-matched accepted paper; the arXiv mismatch itself is unresolved.",
              "blocks_current_scoped_claims": false
            }
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "P13",
          "sha256": "6e2d11d064583cc0f0e609a3335b68b3454c1671731204f1364dbdbb45c9e468",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "P14",
          "sha256": "dd98faa9b3063be3c6f037115e08400c156d8de2fe56d983dffeb15e99d9c2c1",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            {
              "source": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09675-8",
              "gap": "原研究正文订阅受限；PDF链接仍为付费页面，公开补充材料点击工具错误；未找到可合法取得的作者全文。",
              "impact": "不新增该原研究定量性能命题；只引用已读更正实质正文。"
            }
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "P15",
          "sha256": "7efd597fa3dc9a862991121ce67cb09d69d646b11cb10e3b958a27d62e518965",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "P16",
          "sha256": "000e681480405584fd84385ccd86469f6021c641ebc90bdbe654518fb3952d6d",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            {
              "source": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-026-02067-w",
              "gap": "正文订阅受限；合法Oxford作者稿仓储403，未读新增Note10。",
              "impact": "只使用正式更新事实，不声称验证原研究性能。"
            },
            {
              "source": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-026-01916-6",
              "gap": "正文订阅受限，未取得作者稿。",
              "impact": "制造主张不新增为已核验结论。"
            },
            {
              "source": "https://zenodo.org/records/20841591",
              "gap": "只读记录摘要；文件名为abstract eupvsec.pdf。",
              "impact": "未将户外结果作为已读全文证据。"
            }
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "LS01",
          "sha256": "f9d700ffcb1384b9f171fc0ab4c2c7dd9b98c71aea25f3b74d70f084990c02d8",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            {
              "source": "https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.08.750172v1.full",
              "gap": "2026-09-11因果变异低估预印本已发现；全文web错误、urllib429、PDF错误。",
              "impact": "只列候选，未把摘要扩成证据命题；外部新反证核验待办。"
            },
            {
              "source": "https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.16.26363192v1.full",
              "gap": "AlphaGenome Atlas9月预印本全文工具错误。",
              "impact": "未用数据库规模断言预测准确率或已解决疾病问题。"
            }
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "LS02",
          "sha256": "893d498f0cb7f3e5d2d8a22d516176abd65e9e3ae325a527644ac502850f8a0a",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "LS03",
          "sha256": "e98f796cfc437bb431e29a7432abe0b3847a0c5d5decbf75d7eb44e4d3bda555",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            {
              "source": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12080919/",
              "gap": "网页验证码，未处理验证码；通过EuropePMC合法开放XML读取作者稿。",
              "impact": "已解决全文读取；未复核全部补充材料。"
            },
            {
              "source": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08508-4",
              "gap": "网页/PDF工具错误、PMC网页验证码；EuropePMC公开XML成功。",
              "impact": "已解决全文相关段落读取。"
            }
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "LS04",
          "sha256": "99b4e429cea855f15d63447d7a9ef5e23a214639cf3b279219ef53bd57cf48c6",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            {
              "source": "https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2212948",
              "gap": "原文web工具错误，未新增lecanemab定量命题。",
              "impact": "原卡双试验证据尚非全部深入。"
            },
            {
              "source": "https://neurologyopen.bmj.com/content/bmjno/8/2/e001649.full.pdf",
              "gap": "2026延长研究重分析PDF403。",
              "impact": "已发现潜在更新，暂不作全文已读反证。"
            }
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "LS05",
          "sha256": "a6a054c3800d618e115d2ff20efb28f55494f948af1caaa72ee6f028c8f82f1d",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            {
              "source": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7618777/",
              "gap": "PMC网页验证码；EuropePMC网页工具错误，公开REST全文成功。",
              "impact": "已取得合法作者稿相关全文，不处理验证码。"
            },
            {
              "source": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10945747/",
              "gap": "PMC网页验证码；EuropePMC公开REST全文成功。",
              "impact": "已取得合法原始全文相关段落。"
            }
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "NS01",
          "sha256": "679c0763cbe865aa1fbbfe95673d1445cf966acedd38c7072dce0b8fe0f7633f",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            {
              "source": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08888-1",
              "gap": "出版社HTML/PDF工具错误；EuropePMC合法全文XML成功。",
              "impact": "已完成相关原文读取；补充材料和原始神经数据未独立重跑。"
            }
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "NS02",
          "sha256": "2075a184170615639003fe0aec1ef130227932a38ef69d6d47d05ed196cb8c6e",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            {
              "source": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2026.08.015",
              "gap": "发现2026-09-03雄性果蝇完整中枢神经系统（CNS）原研究，DOI不可读、Cell和ScienceDirect403；已读出版索引但未完整原文。",
              "impact": "列更新待核，不引用正式166700等新数值作为本图谱已读证据。"
            },
            {
              "source": "https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.21.745055v1.full",
              "gap": "定向搜索发现自发活动连接约束模型预印本，只读检索段落。",
              "impact": "不作为已核验反证；待原文审查。"
            }
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "ES01",
          "sha256": "a55369d34d818d8c01dd309f70829f96da40dee7750d913669319c2a1cd13570",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            {
              "item": "official IPCC host",
              "status": "HTML/PDF fetch failures and direct HTTP403",
              "resolution": "legitimate ICIMOD deposited final typeset chapter read with pdftotext; checksum recorded in log"
            },
            {
              "item": "regional precipitation/extremes and ocean mechanisms",
              "status": "not_in_this_scoped_chain",
              "impact": "No claim of comprehensive coverage of original broad question."
            }
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "ES02",
          "sha256": "75f20758fef587352a7759a9d87d7bc2f755968fdb860ccd2cb8f04bb76313cc",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            {
              "source": "Science Advances2024-02-23 amendment",
              "gap": "原卡提到2月23日更正，本轮读当前PMC全文但定向更正搜索未取得独立更正正文。",
              "impact": "不声称逐项审计该更正；需补版本差异核查。"
            },
            {
              "source": "IPCC AR6 Chapter9",
              "gap": "本轮未重新读完整正式章；不新增IPCC命题。",
              "impact": "保持原快照，不把旧读范围升级为深审。"
            }
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "ES03",
          "sha256": "8fb42a9b1484d73e5f01f84ec89e7b9b59ba05d8692c0f53dfad6ce6dfe96948",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            "旧版全章web下载因超过10MB失败；V2全文通过公开URL正常下载成功。",
            "未逐篇重审章节引用的独立实验；未重新核验2019全球趋势，避免把旧简介提升为已读全文。"
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "AG01",
          "sha256": "28a89c7873c4c9a687aeb5fb886cd1079cbb56dea82ad33ed040bf60879d4907",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            "Science直开失败，EfD PDF返回502，UBC有浏览器验证，VU PDF为403；未绕过。原始正文经公开ResearchGate全文可读。",
            "2024补充材料未读；SOFI2025原卡概述不升级为全文证据；消费者链仍待独立资料。"
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "VH01",
          "sha256": "36cef247341a3ae570145b50e3b38f008cdff5bfa5bfd10bce88d2a24a5de0e5",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            "PMC路由遇浏览器验证；合法作者机构发表版PDF可读。",
            "补充方程及代码未重跑；WHO联合行动计划不作为效果证据。"
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "SS01",
          "sha256": "583f2373b38d22bebe91d8812c520d237bc767f5e59d60b2535a29b31ad4e17e",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            "初始最终评论访问受阻已解决：协调者发现作者现网站公开发表版，本轮另行实读指定段落并更新；2006稿不再作为图中依据。",
            "未重算双方全部数据代码、原始历史档案或之后每篇研究；2025–2026候选不当作论争解决。"
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "SS02",
          "sha256": "8d99e1c31f068de12f0c0951bb4f8cfb89a8ff4ace0dfbbd145f9f7757057b10",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            "学会PDF路由读取失败，出版社HTML全文成功。",
            "2025–2026狭窄更新检索有其他国家政策及在研项目，但未发现并核验同研究全国扩展的结果；未将跨项目摘要当直接反证。"
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "SS03",
          "sha256": "578944661a3706d2cf62e5efc64d6555d8f524e6fcd005eb7010a276beef9ca5",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            "PMC两篇均触发浏览器验证；合法机构或CC BY发表版PDF替代成功。",
            "更正版SI全套及新访谈原始资料未独立复算；2026数据发布说明只视作可用资料更新，不视作预测效果改善。"
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "SS04",
          "sha256": "3eab8524631f3863a81f26a44399fbf55c7b9e8a5d54c7e1efe26cda7e291534",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            "Nature全文与PDF经web访问失败；合法Essex接受稿全文成功，命题精确定位采用接受稿页码。",
            "未逐个复核独立重复报告；狭窄2026更正查询未取得改变此限定解读的新纠正。"
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "LW01",
          "sha256": "be7795f9a8baea83a4ed87f3b900859d735fcd89aca6a8f608c58e232230d48f",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            "本轮深化Bostock与Carpentier原文；Greenberg2004和Plunkett2012旧卡来源未升级为已全文复审。",
            "狭窄更新检索发现其他文本主义论述但未全审；没有裁决学术争论或汇总2026现行法。"
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "HU01",
          "sha256": "4685836a7c25a483f36e59ce8b325f9c9b50aef3fe46e8c6c252d50d4e1f945b",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            "Nature/PMC直开受工具/验证限制，Nature PDF请求实际回摘要及订阅HTML；未绕过，改读合法作者全文。",
            "2023作者稿版本精确修订日未知；避免引用与正式摘要不同的110–135ka细值，最终排版及完整SI仍待逐项对照。",
            "2025主张仅对实际已读Cambridge稿定位；没有将现代群体排成演化高低。"
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "HU02",
          "sha256": "01c5fbca9c96fc7290eb4409a4375d67744f14fef275a2a35a3a77c29b38c3c8",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            "2023 Science全文的官方免费链接返回工具错误，UJI合法作者稿端点实际返回验证HTML而非PDF；未绕过，故本轮不深核该文树龄及具体混合起源结果。",
            "2025语言学批评独立作者但复用IE-CoR输入，未逐词裁决；2025古DNA仅核所列正文页，未重跑数据或全读SI。",
            "面向更新/反证的窄检索找到2025批评与2025基因结果；未声称穷尽截至2026-10-04的所有语言或考古研究。"
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "HU03",
          "sha256": "2929d6cee4ad1d398f79e733861b831a60cb5fdb7302548abd38ef33d4966a66",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            "已读正式全文指定正文和方法；未独立校勘口述传统/编年史，也未复算遗传结果。",
            "针对2025–2026更正、回应与批评的窄检索未找到本轮可核实的替代原始研究；这不是不存在反例或学界已经一致的证明。"
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "AR01",
          "sha256": "b62f8ad70bed14953efbacae4568fd56d5edc48d44238717e976f81a14e6fd01",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            "Moretti原刊网页只显示部分文字，合法大学托管原刊PDF提供全文；本轮没有重新深核Arac与Elkins全文，其旧卡观点未悄然升级为深核结论。",
            "已找到并读2026正式TLDM会议版，替换旧卡仅核预印本的状态；同一工作的预印本和会议版不能计作两次独立研究。",
            "本卡仍是文学方法入口，不代表音乐、视觉艺术或所有语言文学；没有声称人文学界已接受统一读法。"
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        },
        {
          "card_id": "HU04",
          "sha256": "fcda078cb9e1fc9314296a15dc719fbe29e3cb15acc2d449bb3dbddd6132e13c",
          "audit_status": "pass",
          "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
          "access_gaps": [
            "已实际读Sen指定页及IPBES完整章节中的限定节，未把整部报告或所有哲学传统标成已读。",
            "Sen全文在网页工具可读，独立shell下载返回403后未绕过；IPBES官方PDF通过公开直链取得。",
            "较新能力论窄检索没有提供本轮已读的决定性规范反驳；本卡不据此声称共识或哲学问题已解决。"
          ],
          "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
          "expert_review": "pending"
        }
      ],
      "source_snapshot_sha256": "0ca3d093f6d09fd654d2eede9ca7165e30649f7fbb8420d4293bcd5df742e985",
      "public_export_note": "Substantive graph content is unchanged. Public export removes internal file references and annotates per-card text-review status; the original three cases retain their 2026-10-03 assessment dates."
    },
    "v05_assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
    "expert_review": "pending",
    "public_primary_sources_only": true,
    "credentials_or_paid_access_used": false,
    "source_counts_are_not_independent_study_counts": true,
    "case_patches": [
      {
        "card_id": "AG01",
        "patch_file": "AG01.patch.json",
        "patch_sha256": "75b233d4f11e9bb06dea061acf95815be1dc31133b7dc360fbe4176c01cbde35",
        "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
        "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
      },
      {
        "card_id": "AR01",
        "patch_file": "AR01.json",
        "patch_sha256": "0d624f1032a517dd0a03146900ae1bda69c62ef2f6c038409355b9ce917f5829",
        "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
      },
      {
        "card_id": "ED01",
        "patch_file": "ED01.json",
        "patch_sha256": "9905b1798d6f809aace9a99a69ed60642626817f1587dd75dc83d108fe9e8ebd",
        "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
      },
      {
        "card_id": "ES02",
        "patch_file": "ES02.json",
        "patch_sha256": "f023b00ddcda246bf19e545cfc76f92bdb1fc586ddd4d24a79d60ee873ab2713",
        "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
        "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
      },
      {
        "card_id": "ES03",
        "patch_file": "ES03.json",
        "patch_sha256": "c2fb446dedacbf1373e000da0e85e5a7f80499e9747e168380be364f5d4cabb3",
        "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
      },
      {
        "card_id": "HU01",
        "patch_file": "HU01.patch.json",
        "patch_sha256": "c846d135fa14cd45e96ac8818a23218a8efa8d48011e52b74682cbae5de1336b",
        "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
        "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
      },
      {
        "card_id": "HU02",
        "patch_file": "HU02.patch.json",
        "patch_sha256": "853a335f84cb69529bbd0fed21ee2455e3117aa3984df5c8a19474a842c3979f",
        "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
        "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
      },
      {
        "card_id": "IK01",
        "patch_file": "IK01.json",
        "patch_sha256": "37a4dce4d4ede83ea50ca3ee8e6215457a20869206334eb5d3d1dcd67d073e7c",
        "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
      },
      {
        "card_id": "LS01",
        "patch_file": "LS01.patch.json",
        "patch_sha256": "9392e02fef317dacf44f1c0c41e2c5c0b5223ebf0aae9e200719da1ba5b9535e",
        "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
        "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
      },
      {
        "card_id": "LS04",
        "patch_file": "LS04.patch.json",
        "patch_sha256": "4418c9a97286ccc3af910dda6515a1ee436dd9cd13fd661a8876e9d7d07f7596",
        "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
        "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
      },
      {
        "card_id": "LW01",
        "patch_file": "LW01.json",
        "patch_sha256": "5600205e1848d4b2f6368c77f41951852931c1636ec9932bea0896ccee65bc3d",
        "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
      },
      {
        "card_id": "NS02",
        "patch_file": "NS02.patch.json",
        "patch_sha256": "61f378193ada9b78b2e982749765b796ccad6fbe7896eca9170d3cf8f73f8cab",
        "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
        "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
      },
      {
        "card_id": "P02",
        "patch_file": "P02.json",
        "patch_sha256": "575d02a2ef1e985dd418a1c76920cfb0a56942cce4621f098e2439751e507d37",
        "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
        "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
      },
      {
        "card_id": "P03",
        "patch_file": "P03.json",
        "patch_sha256": "355a2a5de83f649d3ebf0023511cfc6d9572e0dc67c9549ff9dba82ff04246f1",
        "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
        "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
      },
      {
        "card_id": "P12",
        "patch_file": "P12.json",
        "patch_sha256": "4e9a9b1686e7d9f087045d7a8d97c07ae05c629ec1a50bc04b7a203d42d40e43",
        "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
        "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
      },
      {
        "card_id": "P13",
        "patch_file": "P13.json",
        "patch_sha256": "6d246207d058996dcd3c0185e23e269325fda63679f62eb3497d7c0492c648dd",
        "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
        "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
      },
      {
        "card_id": "P14",
        "patch_file": "P14.json",
        "patch_sha256": "ce6bbb2edc5ae692b9c5c87a5faf94ccbe720dcd795a32ba72db086bbdf6b6df",
        "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
        "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
      },
      {
        "card_id": "P16",
        "patch_file": "P16.json",
        "patch_sha256": "efe72aacae03bed9785b901df45f0efea89b94684d415ca3598ff80adb8fc4e4",
        "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
        "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
      },
      {
        "card_id": "SS03",
        "patch_file": "SS03.json",
        "patch_sha256": "ee3924086a308d6debfd9271d3c60c51f1c1e45ab543d39428a03e9af824dc65",
        "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
      },
      {
        "card_id": "SS04",
        "patch_file": "SS04.json",
        "patch_sha256": "07d664acdf01adedc59860307ce9426b8d21ab0ae4a7ba5c684e1d41e386a7ed",
        "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending_for_exact_patch",
        "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
      },
      {
        "card_id": "VH01",
        "patch_file": "VH01.patch.json",
        "patch_sha256": "5c7799a9af04122f0373896b2bc4ac35959776e7077893c4db628af302440277",
        "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
        "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
      }
    ]
  },
  "counts": {
    "cases": 40,
    "nodes": 1103,
    "edges": 1274,
    "node_types": {
      "source": 127,
      "evidence": 241,
      "premise": 227,
      "limitation": 238,
      "claim": 230,
      "question": 40
    }
  },
  "source_identity_index": [
    {
      "identity": "arxiv:1707.06036",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P04-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "arxiv:2004.09765",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P07-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "arxiv:2406.13516",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "arxiv:2412.16622",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P12-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "arxiv:2502.17831",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P12-S3"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "arxiv:2503.14738",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P02-V05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "arxiv:2510.23823",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P03-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "arxiv:2511.07348",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P04-S3"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "arxiv:2512.08065",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P01-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "arxiv:2601.10904",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P09-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "arxiv:2602.03117",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P10-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "arxiv:2602.17997",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "NS02-S3"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "arxiv:2602.23240",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P12-V05-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "arxiv:2602.23842",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P12-V05-S3"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "arxiv:2604.16276",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P04-S4"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "arxiv:2607.18063",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P10-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "arxiv:2607.27410",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P02-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "arxiv:2609.37895",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P05-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://aclanthology.org/2026.latechclfl-1.28",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "AR01-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2026GL124158",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "ES01-S3"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://annual.llnl.gov/fy-2025/national-ignition-facility-2025",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P15-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/api/core/bitstreams/3880cec9-bccf-43af-b761-1ba299afe5f1/content",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "SS03-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://arcprize.org/blog/astra",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P09-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://arcprize.org/results/openai-gpt-6-astra",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P09-S3"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0608407",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P01-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/32d9f210-8b73-45e0-91bc-82a30aef8a9a/navier-stokes.pdf",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P08-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://cpi.stanford.edu/_media/pdf/Reference%20Media/Acemoglu,%20Johnson,%20and%20Robinson_2001_Development%20Economics.pdf",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "SS01-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://datascience.codata.org/articles/10.5334/dsj-2020-043",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "IK01-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://davidalbouy.com/research/2c8b9hmaes954fuqu6qnvgiesvvlfq",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "SS01-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-012-0086-8",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "IK01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2026.08.015",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "NS02-V05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.128178",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "VH01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325204040212",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325212000079",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "LW01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22335",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-S4"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22336",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "HU01-V05-S3"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69506-w",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P13-V05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06055-y",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "HU01-S1",
        "HU01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08531-5",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "HU02-S3",
        "HU02-V05-S3"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08789-3",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "HU02-V05-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09954-4",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P12-S4"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-10078-y",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "SS04-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-025-02117-1",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "HU01-S2",
        "HU01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2212948",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "LS04-V05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1915006117",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "SS03-V05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2322973121",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "SS03-S3"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422633122",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "ED01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adj1914",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "AG01-S1",
        "AG01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2026-001649",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "LS04-V05-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.20506/9789295121430",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "VH01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.143671",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "AR01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.4060/cd6008en",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "AG01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8147476",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "HU02-V05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.21.745055",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "NS02-V05-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.08.750172",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "LS01-V05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.16.26363192",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "LS01-V05-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/publications/The%20Colonial%20Origins%20of%20Compatayive%20Development%20-%20.pdf",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "SS01-S3"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/375932/1/375932.pdf",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "VH01-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/240623/1/aa57993-25.pdf",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P03-V05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://hamsabastani.github.io/education_llm.pdf",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "ED01-S03"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://lz.lbl.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2026/08/LZ_Preprint_260901_Dark_Matter_EFT_Nuclear_Recoil_Search_at_Higher_Energies.pdf",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P01-S3"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41560-026-02067-w/MediaObjects/41560_2026_2067_MOESM1_ESM.pdf",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P16-V05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-025-09675-8/MediaObjects/41586_2025_9675_MOESM1_ESM.pdf",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P14-V05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-025-09954-4/MediaObjects/41586_2025_9954_MOESM1_ESM.pdf",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P12-V05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii1/articles/franco-moretti-conjectures-on-world-literature",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "AR01-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.70086",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "IK01-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.3982/ECTA17945",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "SS02-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://paulheggarty.info/ieutest",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "HU02-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10352931",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "LS04-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12869028",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "LS04-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://tannerlectures.org/lectures/equality-of-what",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "HU04-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/95c246936988e43127bc6b2ceb7077c1dad2d68e.pdf",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P07-S3"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-law-and-jurisprudence/article/against-legal-facts/DF9402D8DC897258103C788ADEFD5047",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "LW01-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/F61263910A16BD9FDE86921E85E1E4D5/9781009157889c9_1211-1362.pdf/ocean-cryosphere-and-sea-level-change.pdf",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "ES02-V05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.claymath.org/millennium/navier-stokes-equation",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P08-S4"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.claymath.org/millennium/p-vs-np",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P06-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.claymath.org/millennium/riemann-hypothesis",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P07-S4"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.claymath.org/news/navier-stokes-announcement",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P08-S3"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/riemann.pdf",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P07-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/navierstokes.pdf",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P08-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/pvsnp.pdf",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P06-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC10857529/fullTextXML",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "ES02-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC10945747/fullTextXML",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "LS05-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11446831/fullTextXML",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "NS02-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11864975/fullTextXML",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "ES02-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11946889/fullTextXML",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "LS03-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC11981939/fullTextXML",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "NS02-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12080919/fullTextXML",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "LS03-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC12137136/fullTextXML",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "NS01-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC7618777/fullTextXML",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "LS05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.energy.gov/documents/fusion-science-and-technology-roadmap",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P15-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00013/full",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "VH01-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/chapter/chapter-7",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "ES01-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-66480-7",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P16-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-67757-7",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "AG01-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-69506-w",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P13-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-73012-4",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P14-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-026-02730-w",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "ES02-S3"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-026-02067-w",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P16-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05754-w",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "HU03-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08449-y",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P11-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08977-1",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "ES02-S4"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09595-7",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P04-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09954-4",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P12-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-10014-0",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "LS01-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-10078-y",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "SS04-V05-S1",
        "SS04-V05-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10559-8",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P11-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10759-2",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P11-S3"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10945-2",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P14-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-025-02777-8",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "LS01-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-025-04986-7",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "HU02-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-026-03461-8",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "ES01-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-022-00357-y",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "LS02-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2118703118",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "SS03-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2422633122",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "ED01-S01"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2518204122",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "ED01-S02"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/590us2r44_6kgn.pdf",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "LW01-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://zenodo.org/records/13850322",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "ES03-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://zenodo.org/records/18245895",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P12-V05-S4"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://zenodo.org/records/20841591/files/abstract%20eupvsec.pdf",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "P16-V05-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://zenodo.org/records/3553579",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "ES03-V05-S1"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    },
    {
      "identity": "https://zenodo.org/records/7701874",
      "source_node_ids": [
        "HU04-S2"
      ],
      "interpretation": "Same work/version family where recognized; not independent study counts."
    }
  ],
  "case_audit_index": [
    {
      "card_id": "P02",
      "preserved_from_v03": true,
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-03",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "ED01",
      "preserved_from_v03": true,
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-03",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "IK01",
      "preserved_from_v03": true,
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-03",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "P06",
      "sha256": "e98a293d34441c4656df5a30d3e51a9c99bb49151cd08e400209f46000efc560",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "P07",
      "sha256": "6451db133484157b1cf32e7b5936c5b8d48912148d2876ab2486f86f7a2d3924",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "P08",
      "sha256": "67ed4a852832e2da3cc7c12c5bcd93267ae6830b535362fc4484f628dc9134a7",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        {
          "item": "complete proof and Lean dependency audit",
          "status": "not_performed_not_access_denial",
          "impact": "不得把本次原文范围核对称为独立证明验证。"
        }
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "P09",
      "sha256": "403a3207150b0b1b055eb4e2278809856ab29b6ac8fb8dd383370bd9fde9b414",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "P10",
      "sha256": "b19cae2dc2b73d116d0b3b527b5a3e391c6bec64c68254cc2f678832c70dcd12",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "P11",
      "sha256": "3377b30c3a0626f8fc22bfe8f1b530285f2f4b2220fcc6cb1d9fb86d32053752",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "P01",
      "sha256": "234beba6d5dc01dd6165973c5c112c42b85be82e2f0f017fee5291be7ca7ce18",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "P03",
      "sha256": "c505421abe4b822c26024f41f71b1660f8a1d85903c1265980aedacdfe2db2b5",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        {
          "item": "A&A final publisher fulltext",
          "url": "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361%2F202557993",
          "status": "403 on web fetch; legal arXiv v1 read instead",
          "impact": "精确数值和取舍仅锚定v1，不声称逐段比较正式版。"
        }
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "P04",
      "sha256": "90031ec41c0445fd06e4e24f6a4eea076560a3533ffe4d9ddf5ed54df4304dd4",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "P05",
      "sha256": "8e1247e70512c3298fdeaa36aaeb72d1bdafd8b309bf5f40b12cc55a085f5d6b",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "P12",
      "sha256": "1405fbeb672355f126c84c8ec2b17fef50779609a7e64e52efb662ade1718f9d",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        {
          "item": "final Version of Record main fulltext",
          "status": "publisher subscription restricted; legitimate accepted paper recovered and named original main-text/method passages read",
          "url": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09954-4",
          "resolution_source_id": "P12-S4",
          "remaining_boundary": "Accepted preview is not final VoR. The final published Extended Data Fig.10 caption agrees with the narrow 96 K onset/no-zero-resistivity statement; no complete accepted-to-VoR comparison claimed.",
          "blocks_current_scoped_claims": false
        },
        {
          "item": "arXiv 2501.14584v3 content mismatch",
          "status": "metadata says 96 K; web parser and direct download both delivered 17-page older 91 K title/content",
          "impact": "That mismatched PDF remains excluded from 96 K support. P12-S4 supplies a distinct, title/DOI-matched accepted paper; the arXiv mismatch itself is unresolved.",
          "blocks_current_scoped_claims": false
        }
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "P13",
      "sha256": "6e2d11d064583cc0f0e609a3335b68b3454c1671731204f1364dbdbb45c9e468",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "P14",
      "sha256": "dd98faa9b3063be3c6f037115e08400c156d8de2fe56d983dffeb15e99d9c2c1",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        {
          "source": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09675-8",
          "gap": "原研究正文订阅受限；PDF链接仍为付费页面，公开补充材料点击工具错误；未找到可合法取得的作者全文。",
          "impact": "不新增该原研究定量性能命题；只引用已读更正实质正文。"
        }
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "P15",
      "sha256": "7efd597fa3dc9a862991121ce67cb09d69d646b11cb10e3b958a27d62e518965",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "P16",
      "sha256": "000e681480405584fd84385ccd86469f6021c641ebc90bdbe654518fb3952d6d",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        {
          "source": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-026-02067-w",
          "gap": "正文订阅受限；合法Oxford作者稿仓储403，未读新增Note10。",
          "impact": "只使用正式更新事实，不声称验证原研究性能。"
        },
        {
          "source": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-026-01916-6",
          "gap": "正文订阅受限，未取得作者稿。",
          "impact": "制造主张不新增为已核验结论。"
        },
        {
          "source": "https://zenodo.org/records/20841591",
          "gap": "只读记录摘要；文件名为abstract eupvsec.pdf。",
          "impact": "未将户外结果作为已读全文证据。"
        }
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "LS01",
      "sha256": "f9d700ffcb1384b9f171fc0ab4c2c7dd9b98c71aea25f3b74d70f084990c02d8",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        {
          "source": "https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.08.750172v1.full",
          "gap": "2026-09-11因果变异低估预印本已发现；全文web错误、urllib429、PDF错误。",
          "impact": "只列候选，未把摘要扩成证据命题；外部新反证核验待办。"
        },
        {
          "source": "https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.16.26363192v1.full",
          "gap": "AlphaGenome Atlas9月预印本全文工具错误。",
          "impact": "未用数据库规模断言预测准确率或已解决疾病问题。"
        }
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "LS02",
      "sha256": "893d498f0cb7f3e5d2d8a22d516176abd65e9e3ae325a527644ac502850f8a0a",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "LS03",
      "sha256": "e98f796cfc437bb431e29a7432abe0b3847a0c5d5decbf75d7eb44e4d3bda555",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        {
          "source": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12080919/",
          "gap": "网页验证码，未处理验证码；通过EuropePMC合法开放XML读取作者稿。",
          "impact": "已解决全文读取；未复核全部补充材料。"
        },
        {
          "source": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08508-4",
          "gap": "网页/PDF工具错误、PMC网页验证码；EuropePMC公开XML成功。",
          "impact": "已解决全文相关段落读取。"
        }
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "LS04",
      "sha256": "99b4e429cea855f15d63447d7a9ef5e23a214639cf3b279219ef53bd57cf48c6",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        {
          "source": "https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2212948",
          "gap": "原文web工具错误，未新增lecanemab定量命题。",
          "impact": "原卡双试验证据尚非全部深入。"
        },
        {
          "source": "https://neurologyopen.bmj.com/content/bmjno/8/2/e001649.full.pdf",
          "gap": "2026延长研究重分析PDF403。",
          "impact": "已发现潜在更新，暂不作全文已读反证。"
        }
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "LS05",
      "sha256": "a6a054c3800d618e115d2ff20efb28f55494f948af1caaa72ee6f028c8f82f1d",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        {
          "source": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7618777/",
          "gap": "PMC网页验证码；EuropePMC网页工具错误，公开REST全文成功。",
          "impact": "已取得合法作者稿相关全文，不处理验证码。"
        },
        {
          "source": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10945747/",
          "gap": "PMC网页验证码；EuropePMC公开REST全文成功。",
          "impact": "已取得合法原始全文相关段落。"
        }
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "NS01",
      "sha256": "679c0763cbe865aa1fbbfe95673d1445cf966acedd38c7072dce0b8fe0f7633f",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        {
          "source": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08888-1",
          "gap": "出版社HTML/PDF工具错误；EuropePMC合法全文XML成功。",
          "impact": "已完成相关原文读取；补充材料和原始神经数据未独立重跑。"
        }
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "NS02",
      "sha256": "2075a184170615639003fe0aec1ef130227932a38ef69d6d47d05ed196cb8c6e",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        {
          "source": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2026.08.015",
          "gap": "发现2026-09-03雄性果蝇完整中枢神经系统（CNS）原研究，DOI不可读、Cell和ScienceDirect403；已读出版索引但未完整原文。",
          "impact": "列更新待核，不引用正式166700等新数值作为本图谱已读证据。"
        },
        {
          "source": "https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.21.745055v1.full",
          "gap": "定向搜索发现自发活动连接约束模型预印本，只读检索段落。",
          "impact": "不作为已核验反证；待原文审查。"
        }
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "ES01",
      "sha256": "a55369d34d818d8c01dd309f70829f96da40dee7750d913669319c2a1cd13570",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        {
          "item": "official IPCC host",
          "status": "HTML/PDF fetch failures and direct HTTP403",
          "resolution": "legitimate ICIMOD deposited final typeset chapter read with pdftotext; checksum recorded in log"
        },
        {
          "item": "regional precipitation/extremes and ocean mechanisms",
          "status": "not_in_this_scoped_chain",
          "impact": "No claim of comprehensive coverage of original broad question."
        }
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "ES02",
      "sha256": "75f20758fef587352a7759a9d87d7bc2f755968fdb860ccd2cb8f04bb76313cc",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        {
          "source": "Science Advances2024-02-23 amendment",
          "gap": "原卡提到2月23日更正，本轮读当前PMC全文但定向更正搜索未取得独立更正正文。",
          "impact": "不声称逐项审计该更正；需补版本差异核查。"
        },
        {
          "source": "IPCC AR6 Chapter9",
          "gap": "本轮未重新读完整正式章；不新增IPCC命题。",
          "impact": "保持原快照，不把旧读范围升级为深审。"
        }
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "ES03",
      "sha256": "8fb42a9b1484d73e5f01f84ec89e7b9b59ba05d8692c0f53dfad6ce6dfe96948",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        "旧版全章web下载因超过10MB失败；V2全文通过公开URL正常下载成功。",
        "未逐篇重审章节引用的独立实验；未重新核验2019全球趋势，避免把旧简介提升为已读全文。"
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "AG01",
      "sha256": "28a89c7873c4c9a687aeb5fb886cd1079cbb56dea82ad33ed040bf60879d4907",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        "Science直开失败，EfD PDF返回502，UBC有浏览器验证，VU PDF为403；未绕过。原始正文经公开ResearchGate全文可读。",
        "2024补充材料未读；SOFI2025原卡概述不升级为全文证据；消费者链仍待独立资料。"
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "VH01",
      "sha256": "36cef247341a3ae570145b50e3b38f008cdff5bfa5bfd10bce88d2a24a5de0e5",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        "PMC路由遇浏览器验证；合法作者机构发表版PDF可读。",
        "补充方程及代码未重跑；WHO联合行动计划不作为效果证据。"
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "SS01",
      "sha256": "583f2373b38d22bebe91d8812c520d237bc767f5e59d60b2535a29b31ad4e17e",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        "初始最终评论访问受阻已解决：协调者发现作者现网站公开发表版，本轮另行实读指定段落并更新；2006稿不再作为图中依据。",
        "未重算双方全部数据代码、原始历史档案或之后每篇研究；2025–2026候选不当作论争解决。"
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "SS02",
      "sha256": "8d99e1c31f068de12f0c0951bb4f8cfb89a8ff4ace0dfbbd145f9f7757057b10",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        "学会PDF路由读取失败，出版社HTML全文成功。",
        "2025–2026狭窄更新检索有其他国家政策及在研项目，但未发现并核验同研究全国扩展的结果；未将跨项目摘要当直接反证。"
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "SS03",
      "sha256": "578944661a3706d2cf62e5efc64d6555d8f524e6fcd005eb7010a276beef9ca5",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        "PMC两篇均触发浏览器验证；合法机构或CC BY发表版PDF替代成功。",
        "更正版SI全套及新访谈原始资料未独立复算；2026数据发布说明只视作可用资料更新，不视作预测效果改善。"
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "SS04",
      "sha256": "3eab8524631f3863a81f26a44399fbf55c7b9e8a5d54c7e1efe26cda7e291534",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        "Nature全文与PDF经web访问失败；合法Essex接受稿全文成功，命题精确定位采用接受稿页码。",
        "未逐个复核独立重复报告；狭窄2026更正查询未取得改变此限定解读的新纠正。"
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "LW01",
      "sha256": "be7795f9a8baea83a4ed87f3b900859d735fcd89aca6a8f608c58e232230d48f",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        "本轮深化Bostock与Carpentier原文；Greenberg2004和Plunkett2012旧卡来源未升级为已全文复审。",
        "狭窄更新检索发现其他文本主义论述但未全审；没有裁决学术争论或汇总2026现行法。"
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "HU01",
      "sha256": "4685836a7c25a483f36e59ce8b325f9c9b50aef3fe46e8c6c252d50d4e1f945b",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        "Nature/PMC直开受工具/验证限制，Nature PDF请求实际回摘要及订阅HTML；未绕过，改读合法作者全文。",
        "2023作者稿版本精确修订日未知；避免引用与正式摘要不同的110–135ka细值，最终排版及完整SI仍待逐项对照。",
        "2025主张仅对实际已读Cambridge稿定位；没有将现代群体排成演化高低。"
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "HU02",
      "sha256": "01c5fbca9c96fc7290eb4409a4375d67744f14fef275a2a35a3a77c29b38c3c8",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        "2023 Science全文的官方免费链接返回工具错误，UJI合法作者稿端点实际返回验证HTML而非PDF；未绕过，故本轮不深核该文树龄及具体混合起源结果。",
        "2025语言学批评独立作者但复用IE-CoR输入，未逐词裁决；2025古DNA仅核所列正文页，未重跑数据或全读SI。",
        "面向更新/反证的窄检索找到2025批评与2025基因结果；未声称穷尽截至2026-10-04的所有语言或考古研究。"
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "HU03",
      "sha256": "2929d6cee4ad1d398f79e733861b831a60cb5fdb7302548abd38ef33d4966a66",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        "已读正式全文指定正文和方法；未独立校勘口述传统/编年史，也未复算遗传结果。",
        "针对2025–2026更正、回应与批评的窄检索未找到本轮可核实的替代原始研究；这不是不存在反例或学界已经一致的证明。"
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "AR01",
      "sha256": "b62f8ad70bed14953efbacae4568fd56d5edc48d44238717e976f81a14e6fd01",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        "Moretti原刊网页只显示部分文字，合法大学托管原刊PDF提供全文；本轮没有重新深核Arac与Elkins全文，其旧卡观点未悄然升级为深核结论。",
        "已找到并读2026正式TLDM会议版，替换旧卡仅核预印本的状态；同一工作的预印本和会议版不能计作两次独立研究。",
        "本卡仍是文学方法入口，不代表音乐、视觉艺术或所有语言文学；没有声称人文学界已接受统一读法。"
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    },
    {
      "card_id": "HU04",
      "sha256": "fcda078cb9e1fc9314296a15dc719fbe29e3cb15acc2d449bb3dbddd6132e13c",
      "audit_status": "pass",
      "artifact_status": "ready_for_independent_audit",
      "access_gaps": [
        "已实际读Sen指定页及IPBES完整章节中的限定节，未把整部报告或所有哲学传统标成已读。",
        "Sen全文在网页工具可读，独立shell下载返回403后未绕过；IPBES官方PDF通过公开直链取得。",
        "较新能力论窄检索没有提供本轮已读的决定性规范反驳；本卡不据此声称共识或哲学问题已解决。"
      ],
      "assessment_date": "2026-10-04",
      "expert_review": "pending"
    }
  ],
  "artifact_status": "immutable_v05_graph_candidate_external_audit_record_authoritative",
  "v05_case_audit_index": [
    {
      "card_id": "AG01",
      "patch_file": "AG01.patch.json",
      "patch_sha256": "75b233d4f11e9bb06dea061acf95815be1dc31133b7dc360fbe4176c01cbde35",
      "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
      "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
    },
    {
      "card_id": "AR01",
      "patch_file": "AR01.json",
      "patch_sha256": "0d624f1032a517dd0a03146900ae1bda69c62ef2f6c038409355b9ce917f5829",
      "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending_for_exact_patch",
      "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
    },
    {
      "card_id": "ED01",
      "patch_file": "ED01.json",
      "patch_sha256": "9905b1798d6f809aace9a99a69ed60642626817f1587dd75dc83d108fe9e8ebd",
      "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending_for_exact_patch",
      "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
    },
    {
      "card_id": "ES02",
      "patch_file": "ES02.json",
      "patch_sha256": "f023b00ddcda246bf19e545cfc76f92bdb1fc586ddd4d24a79d60ee873ab2713",
      "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
      "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
    },
    {
      "card_id": "ES03",
      "patch_file": "ES03.json",
      "patch_sha256": "c2fb446dedacbf1373e000da0e85e5a7f80499e9747e168380be364f5d4cabb3",
      "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending_for_exact_patch",
      "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
    },
    {
      "card_id": "HU01",
      "patch_file": "HU01.patch.json",
      "patch_sha256": "c846d135fa14cd45e96ac8818a23218a8efa8d48011e52b74682cbae5de1336b",
      "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
      "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
    },
    {
      "card_id": "HU02",
      "patch_file": "HU02.patch.json",
      "patch_sha256": "853a335f84cb69529bbd0fed21ee2455e3117aa3984df5c8a19474a842c3979f",
      "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
      "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
    },
    {
      "card_id": "IK01",
      "patch_file": "IK01.json",
      "patch_sha256": "37a4dce4d4ede83ea50ca3ee8e6215457a20869206334eb5d3d1dcd67d073e7c",
      "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending_for_exact_patch",
      "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
    },
    {
      "card_id": "LS01",
      "patch_file": "LS01.patch.json",
      "patch_sha256": "9392e02fef317dacf44f1c0c41e2c5c0b5223ebf0aae9e200719da1ba5b9535e",
      "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
      "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
    },
    {
      "card_id": "LS04",
      "patch_file": "LS04.patch.json",
      "patch_sha256": "4418c9a97286ccc3af910dda6515a1ee436dd9cd13fd661a8876e9d7d07f7596",
      "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
      "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
    },
    {
      "card_id": "LW01",
      "patch_file": "LW01.json",
      "patch_sha256": "5600205e1848d4b2f6368c77f41951852931c1636ec9932bea0896ccee65bc3d",
      "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending_for_exact_patch",
      "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
    },
    {
      "card_id": "NS02",
      "patch_file": "NS02.patch.json",
      "patch_sha256": "61f378193ada9b78b2e982749765b796ccad6fbe7896eca9170d3cf8f73f8cab",
      "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
      "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
    },
    {
      "card_id": "P02",
      "patch_file": "P02.json",
      "patch_sha256": "575d02a2ef1e985dd418a1c76920cfb0a56942cce4621f098e2439751e507d37",
      "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
      "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
    },
    {
      "card_id": "P03",
      "patch_file": "P03.json",
      "patch_sha256": "355a2a5de83f649d3ebf0023511cfc6d9572e0dc67c9549ff9dba82ff04246f1",
      "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
      "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
    },
    {
      "card_id": "P12",
      "patch_file": "P12.json",
      "patch_sha256": "4e9a9b1686e7d9f087045d7a8d97c07ae05c629ec1a50bc04b7a203d42d40e43",
      "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
      "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
    },
    {
      "card_id": "P13",
      "patch_file": "P13.json",
      "patch_sha256": "6d246207d058996dcd3c0185e23e269325fda63679f62eb3497d7c0492c648dd",
      "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
      "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
    },
    {
      "card_id": "P14",
      "patch_file": "P14.json",
      "patch_sha256": "ce6bbb2edc5ae692b9c5c87a5faf94ccbe720dcd795a32ba72db086bbdf6b6df",
      "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
      "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
    },
    {
      "card_id": "P16",
      "patch_file": "P16.json",
      "patch_sha256": "efe72aacae03bed9785b901df45f0efea89b94684d415ca3598ff80adb8fc4e4",
      "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
      "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
    },
    {
      "card_id": "SS03",
      "patch_file": "SS03.json",
      "patch_sha256": "ee3924086a308d6debfd9271d3c60c51f1c1e45ab543d39428a03e9af824dc65",
      "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending_for_exact_patch",
      "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
    },
    {
      "card_id": "SS04",
      "patch_file": "SS04.json",
      "patch_sha256": "07d664acdf01adedc59860307ce9426b8d21ab0ae4a7ba5c684e1d41e386a7ed",
      "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending_for_exact_patch",
      "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
    },
    {
      "card_id": "VH01",
      "patch_file": "VH01.patch.json",
      "patch_sha256": "5c7799a9af04122f0373896b2bc4ac35959776e7077893c4db628af302440277",
      "audit_status_at_patch_creation": "pending",
      "authoritative_audit": "See external exact-hash v0.5 audit record."
    }
  ]
}
